In 2021, the FBI sought to retire the Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Summary Reporting System (SRS) and fully transition to the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). However, it is unclear how this transition to a “NIBRS-only” system might impact statistics on race/ethnicity and crime in the United States. To date, research offers few comparisons of race/ethnicity and crime patterns in NIBRS versus traditional UCR reporting systems. In addition, studies that provide these comparisons were conducted years ago (1) before the full transition to NIBRS when the program had limited coverage (less than 30% U.S. population coverage) and (2) before the rapid growth in U.S. minority groups and especially Hispanic populations seen throughout the twenty-first century. The current study addresses this gap in research by comparing racial/ethnic portraits of crime (cross-sectionally and over time) across four of the FBI's “public facing” official crime data systems—(1) Crime in the United States (CIUS) reports, (2) NIBRS Offender data, (3) NIBRS Arrestee data, and (4) NIBRS Arrestee National Estimates. Findings suggest that Black offending and arrest patterns are generally consistent across data sources, but depictions of Hispanic crime involvement differ sharply depending on which data source is used.
AddingtonL. A. (2006). Using national incident-based reporting system murder data to evaluate clearance predictors: A research note. Homicide Studies, 10(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767905285439
2.
AddingtonL. A. (2008). Assessing the extent of nonresponse bias on NIBRS estimates of violent crime. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986207312936
ChamblissW. J.NagasawaR. H. (1969). On the validity of official statistics: A comparative study of white, black, and Japanese high-school boys. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 6(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242786900600108
6.
ChamblissW.SeidmanR. (1971). Law, order, and power. Addison-Wesley.
7.
ChapmanD. (1968). Sociology and the stereotype of the criminal. Tavistock.
8.
ChiltonR.JarvisJ. (1999). Using the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) to test estimates of arrestee and offender characteristics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(2), 207–224. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23366696 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007578906408
9.
D’AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL. (2003). Race and the probability of arrest. Social Forces, 81(4), 1381–1397. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3598118
10.
EitleD.D’AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL. (2002). Racial threat and social control: A test of the political, economic, and threat of black crime hypotheses. Social Forces, 81(2), 557–576. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3086482
11.
ElliottD. S.AgetonS. S. (1980). Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 45(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095245
12.
Federal Bureau of Investigations. (2000). National incident-based reporting system, volume 1: Data collection guidelines. Government Printing Office.
FogliatoR.KuchibholtaA. K.LiptonZ.NaginD.XiangA.ChouldechovaA. (2024). Estimating the likelihood of arrest from police records in presence of unreported crimes. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 18(2), 1253–1274. https://doi.org/10.1214/23-AOAS1833
18.
FogliatoR.XiangA.LiptonZ.NaginD.ChouldechovaA. (2021). On the validity of arrest as a proxy for offense: Race and the likelihood of arrest for violent crimes. Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, and society (pp. 100–111).
19.
HindelangM. J. (1978). Race and involvement in common law personal crimes. American Sociological Review, 43(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094764
20.
HindelangM. J.HirschiT.WeisJ. G. (1979). Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures. American Sociological Review, 44(6), 995–1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094722
21.
HindelangM. J.HirschiT.WeisJ. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Sage.
22.
KaplanJ. (2024). Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program data: An opinionated guide to FBI data. https://ucrbook.com/
23.
KirkD. S.MatsudaM. (2011). Legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and the ecology of arrest. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 49(2), 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00226.x
24.
LaFreeG.BaumerE. P.O’BrienR. (2008). Still separate and unequal? A city-level analysis of the Black-White gap in homicide arrests since 1960. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122409357045
25.
McCormackP. D.ClarkeK.WalfieldS.SpinaF. (2023). The (mis)measure of race and ethnicity in crime data. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 21(3), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2023.2241404
26.
McCormackP. D.PattavinaA.TracyP. E. (2017). Assessing the coverage and representativeness of the national incident-based reporting system. Crime & Delinquency, 63(4), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717694595
27.
PattavinaA.CarkinD. M.TracyP. E. (2017). Assessing the representativeness of NIBRS arrest data. Crime & Delinquency, 63(12), 1626–1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717724298
RantalaR. R.EdwardsT. J. (2000). Effects of NIBRS on Crime Statistics (NCJ 178890). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
31.
RobertsA. (2009). Contributions of the national incident-based reporting system to substantive knowledge of criminology: A review of research. Sociology Compass, 3(3), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00209.x
32.
SEARCH. (1997). Implementing the national incident-based reporting system: A project status report (NCJ 165581). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
33.
SteffensmeierD.FeldmeyerB.HarrisC. T.UlmerJ. T. (2011). Reassessing trends in black violent crime, 1980–2008: Sorting out the “Hispanic effect” in uniform crime reports arrests, national crime victimization survey offender estimates, and U.S. prisoner counts. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 49(1), 197–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00222.x
34.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ. T.FeldmeyerB.HarrisC. T. (2010). Scope and conceptual issues in testing the race–crime invariance thesis: Black, White, and Hispanic comparisons. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 48(4), 1133–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00214.x
