Race and ethnic difference in delinquency are examined using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. We argue that crime theories that attempt to explain race and ethnic differences imply consistent effects for different offenses and common mediating processes. Analyses suggest some degree of group consistency in delinquent behaviors for Mexican Americans, Puerto Ricans, Native Americans, and some Asian groups, but not for African Americans. Black youth have higher rates of violent offenses than White youth, lower rates of substance use, and similar rates of property offending. Some variables are consistent mediators while others are not. Crime theories can account for the low rates of delinquency among Asian Americans while theories of violence and substance use are needed to understand differences between Black and White youth. The findings are inconsistent with the idea that group differences among youth are due to the socioeconomic status of their families or neighborhoods. The race patterns are also inconsistent with the stereotype of high crime rates in Black communities.
AgnewR. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AkersR. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
3.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
4.
BaglivioM. T.JackowskiK.GreenwaldM. A.HowellJ. C. (2014). Serious, violent, and chronic Juvenile offenders: A statewide analysis of prevalence and prediction of subsequent recidivism using risk and protective factors. Criminology and Public Policy, 13, 83–116.
5.
BeaverK. M.DeLisiM.WrightJ. P.BoutwellB. B.BarnesJ. C.VaughnM. G. (2013). No evidence of racial discrimination in criminal justice processing: Results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 29–34.
6.
BerkowitzL. (1989). The frustration-aggression hypothesis: An examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 59–73.
ClowardR. A.OhlinL. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe.
10.
CohenA. (1955). Delinquent boys. New York, NY: Free Press.
11.
ConradK. J.RileyB. B.ConradK. M.ChanY.DennisM. L. (2010). Validation of the Crime and Violence Scale (CVS) against the Rasch Measurement Model including differences by gender, race, and age. Evaluation Review, 34, 83–115.
12.
DeLisiM. (2011). Where is the evidence for racial profiling?Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 461–462.
13.
FaganJ.WilkinsonD. L.DaviesG. (2007). Social contagion of violence. In FlanneryD.VazsonyiA.WaldmenI. (Eds.), Cambridge: The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior. Cambridge University Press, Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 06-126. Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=935104
14.
FarringtonD. P.LoeberR.Stouthamer-LoeberM. (2003). How can the relationship between race and violence be explained? In HawkinsD. F. (Ed.), Violent crime: Assessing race and ethnic differences (pp. 213–237). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FelsonM.BobaR. (2010). Crime and everyday life (4nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
FelsonR. B. (2008). Barking up the right tree. The Criminologist, September/October, 1–6.
17.
FelsonR. B.DeaneG.ArmstrongD. P. (2008). Do theories of crime or violence explain race differences in delinquency?Social Science Research, 37, 624–641.
18.
GottfredsonM.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
GreenbergD. F. (2008). Age, sex, and racial distributions of crime. In GoodeE. (Ed.), Out of control: Assessing the general theory of crime (pp. 61–76). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
GreenmanE.XieY. (2008). Is assimilation theory dead? The effect of assimilation on adolescent well-being. Social Science Research, 37, 109–137.
21.
HaoL.Bonstead-BrunsM. (1998). Parent-child differences in educational expectations and the academic achievement of immigrant and native students. Sociology of Education, 71, 175–198.
22.
HawkinsD. F.LaubJ. H.LauritsenJ. L.CotghernL. (2000). Race, ethnicity and serious and violent juvenile offending, Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept of Justice.
23.
HaynieD. L.PayneD. C. (2006). Race, friendship networks, and violent delinquency. Criminology, 44, 775–806.
24.
HempelC. G.OppenheimP. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175.
25.
HindelangM.HirschiT.WeisJ. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
KaoG. (1995). Asian-Americans as model minorities? A look at their academic performance. American Journal of Education, 103, 121–59.
28.
KaoG.TiendaM.SchneiderB. (1996). Racial and ethnic variation in academic performance. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 11, 263–297.
29.
KaufmanJ. M. (2005). Explaining the race/ethnicity-violence relationship: Neighborhood context and social psychological processes. Justice Quarterly, 22, 224–251.
30.
KitanoH. L.SueS. (1973). The model minorities. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 1–9.
31.
KlingJ. R.LudwigJ.KatzL. F. (2005). Neighborhood effects on crime for female and male youth: Evidence from a randomized housing voucher experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 87–129.
32.
McNultyT. L.BellairP. E. (2003). Explaining racial and ethnic differences in serious adolescent violent behavior. Criminology, 41, 709–748.
33.
MeierA. (2007). Adolescent first sex and subsequent mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1811–1847.
34.
MertonR. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
35.
MorenoffJ. D.AstorA. (2007). Immigrant assimilation and crime: Generational differences in youth violence in Chicago. In MartínezR.ValenzuelaA. (Eds.), Immigration and crime: Race, ethnicity and violence (pp. 36–63). New York: New York University Press.
36.
MorrisG. D.WoodP. B.DunawayR. G. (2007). Testing the cultural invariance of parenting and self-control as predictors of American Indian delinquency. Western Criminology Review, 8, 32–47.
37.
O’MalleyP. M.JohnstonL. D.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E.KumarR. (2006). How substance use differs among American secondary schools. Prevention Science, 7, 409–420.
38.
OsgoodD. W.McMorrisB. J.PotenzaM. T. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance I: Item response theory scaling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 267–296.
39.
PongS.HaoL.GardnerE. (2005). The roles of parenting styles and social capital in the school performance of immigrant Asian and Hispanic adolescents. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 928–50.
40.
RaudenbushS. W.JohnsonC.SampsonR. J. (2003). A multivariate, multilevel Rasch Model with application to self-reported criminal behavior. Sociological Methodology, 33, 169–211.
41.
SakamotoA.GoyetteK. A.KimC. H. (2009). Socioeconomic attainments of Asian Americans. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 255–276.
42.
SampsonR. J.LauritsenJ. L. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. In Crime and Justice, Ethnicity, crime and immigration: Comparative and cross-national perspectives, 21, 311–374.
43.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.RaudenbushS. (2005). Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 224–232.
44.
SampsonR. J.WilsonW. J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In HaganJ.PetersonR. D. (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37–56). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
SnedkerK. A.HertingJ. R.WaltonE. (2009). Contextual effects and adolescent substance use: Exploring the role of neighborhoods. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 1272–1297.
47.
SteinbergL.DornbuschS. M.BrownB. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723–729.
48.
StinchcombeA. L. (1968). Constructing social theories. ChicagoIL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
TittleC. R.VillemezW. J.SmithD. A. (1978). The myth of social class and criminality: An empirical assessment of the empirical evidence. American Sociological Review, 43, 643–656.
50.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDonaldCynthia Pfaff WrightRonald CzajaKirkMiller. (2006). Self-reports of police speeding stops by race: Results from the North Carolina Reverse Record Check Survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 279–297.
51.
TurnerC. F.KuL.RogersS. M.LindbergL. D.PleckJ. H.SonensteinF. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867–873.
52.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T.MathersS. A.McClureT. E.AllisonM. C. (2009). Racial discrimination and Hirschi's criminological classic: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. Justice Quarterly, 26, 377–409.
VaughnM. G.Salas-WrightC. P.DeLisiM.MaynardB. R. (2014). The immigrant paradox: Immigrants are less antisocial than native-born Americans. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49, 1129–1137.
55.
WrightB. R. E.YountsC. W. (2009). Reconsidering the relationship between race and crime positive and negative predictors of crime among African American youth. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 327–352.
56.
ZimringF. E.HawkinsG. (1997). Crime is not the problem. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
