The phrase “the personal is political” is commonly associated with 1970s feminists, for whom it denoted the relationship between personal experiences and broad systems of inequality. However, considering bell hooks’ argument that feminists have lost the power analysis fundamental to the relationship between the personal and the political, we assess the relevance of the notion the ‘personal is political,’ to our work as feminist criminologists. Building on hooks’ insight, we argue there is a need to take up an intersectional and anti-racist feminist praxis that centers multiple forms of oppression in scholarship and seeks greater accountability for sexism, racism, and transphobia both within and beyond academic spaces. We elaborate our ideas by, first, outlining the intellectual history and evolution of feminist criminology. Second, we examine how the relationship between the personal and political figures in the work of minoritized scholars. Third, we discuss the necessary discomforts associated with working towards an intersectional and antiracist feminist criminology.
AjilA.Blount-HillK. L. (2020). “Writing the Other as Other”: Exploring the othered lens in academia using collaborative autoethnography. Decolonization of Criminology and Justice, 2(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.24135/dcj.v2i1.19
ApplebaumB. (2017). Comforting discomfort as complicity: White fragility and the pursuit of invulnerability. Hypatia, 32(4), 862–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12352
7.
BalfourG. (2006). Re-imagining a feminist criminology. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 48(5), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.48.5.735
BeemanA. (2021). If only we are brave enough to be it”: Demanding more from diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts to support women faculty of color. Critical Sociology, 47(7–8), 1099–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205211003316
10.
BelknapJ. (2015). Activist criminology: Criminologists’ responsibility to advocate for social and legal justice. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 53(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12063
11.
Blount-HillK.St. JohnV.MotonL.AjilA. (2022). In their experience: A review of racial and sexual minority experiences in academe and proposals for building an inclusive criminology. Race and Justice, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687221087352
BrownR. A. (2021). There can be more than one: A Black man’s journey through the academy. Race and Justice, 11(3), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687211001917
14.
Burgess-ProctorA. (2006). Intersections of race, class, gender, and crime: Future directions for feminist criminology. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085105282899
15.
CameronJ. J.StinsonD. A. (2019). Gender (mis) measurement: Guidelines for respecting gender diversity in psychological research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(11), e12506. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12506
16.
CarterT. J.CraigM. O. (2022). It could be us: Black faculty as “threats” on the path to tenure. Race and Justice, 21533687221087366.
ChavezV.DuranB.BakerQ. E.AvilaM. M.WallersteinN. (2003). The dance of race and privilege in community-based participatory research. In MinklerM.WallersteinN. (Eds.), Community-Based participatory research for health (pp. 81–97). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Chesney-LindM. (2006). Patriarchy, crime, and justice: Feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085105282893
20.
Chesney-LindM. (2020). Feminist criminology in an era of misogyny. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 58(3), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12247
21.
Chesney-LindM.ChagnonN. (2016). Criminology, gender, and race: A case study of privilege in the academy. Feminist Criminology, 11(4), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/155708511663374
22.
Chesney-LindM.MorashM. (2013). Transformative feminist criminology: A critical re-thinking of a discipline. Critical Criminology, 21(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-013-9187-2
23.
CollinsP. H. (2013). Truth-telling and intellectual activism. Contexts, 12(1), 36–41.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.
28.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
DwyerA. E.PanfilV. R. (2017). “We need to lead the charge”--“talking only to each other is not enough”: The pulse Orlando mass shooting and the futures of queer criminologies. The Criminologist, 42(3), 1–7. https://repository.globethics.net/handle/20.500.12424/1378573
35.
EarleR. (2018). Convict criminology in England: Developments and dilemmas. British Journal of Criminology, 58(6), 1499–1516. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy016
GardnerS. K.HartJ.NgJ.Ropers-HuilmanR.WardK.Wolf-WendelL. (2017). Me-search. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 8(2), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-d-17-00014
38.
GarzaA. (2021). Situating institutional responses to Latina intimate partner violence victims: An argument for a LatCrit Lens. Crime & Delinquency, 67(8), 1221–1240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128721989061
GloverK. S. (2019). Identifying racialized knowledge through a critical race studies lens: Theory and principles for the criminology textbook realm. Contemporary Justice Review, 22(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2019.1672542
41.
GoJ. (2020). Race, empire, and epistemic exclusion: Or the structures of sociological thought. Sociological Theory, 38(2), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120926213
42.
GokarikselB.HawkinsM.NeubertC.SmithS.NeubertC.HawkinsM. (2021). Introduction. In SmithS.NeubertC.HawkinsM.GokarikselB. (Eds.), Feminist geography unbound: Discomfort, bodies, and prefigured futures (pp. 1–24). West Virginia University Press.
43.
GrzankaP. R. (2014). Intersectionality: A foundations and frontiers reader (1st ed.). Westview Press.
44.
GurungL. (2020). Feminist standpoint theory: Conceptualization and utility. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 14, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v14i0.27357
45.
HamerJ. F.LangC. (2015). Race, structural violence, and the neoliberal university: The challenges of inhabitation. Critical Sociology, 41(6), 897–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920515594765
46.
HardingS. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: “What is strong objectivity?”. In AlcoffL.PotterE. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). Routledge.
47.
HarrisJ. L. (2021). Black on Black: The vilification of “me-search,” tenure, and the economic position of Black sociologists. Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy, 4(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41996-020-00066-x
HeberleR. (2016). The personal is political. In DischL. J.HawkesworthM. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford University Press.
50.
HeidensohnF. (1968). The deviance of women: A critique and an enquiry. The British Journal of Sociology, 19(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.2307/588692
51.
HemmingsC. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112442643
52.
HessB. B.FerreeM. M. (1987). Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research. Sage Publications.
53.
Hesse-BiberS. (2012). Feminist aapproaches to triangulation: Uncovering subjugated knowledge and fostering social change in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437184
54.
Hill CollinsP. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), s14–s32. https://doi.org/10.2307/800672
55.
Hill CollinsP. (2000). Gender, Black feminism, and Black political economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620056800105
56.
hooksb. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center (2nd ed.). South End Press.
57.
hooksb. (1984; 2015). Feminist theory: From margin to center (1st and 3rd ed.). Routledge.
58.
JamesA. (2008). Making sense of race and racial classification. In ZuberiT.Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.), White logic, White methods: Racism and methodology (pp. 31–46). Rowman & Littlefield.
59.
KahleL. (2018). Feminist and queer criminology: A vital place for theorizing LGBTQ youth. Sociology Compass, 12(3), e12564. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12564
60.
LafranceM. N.WiggintonB. (2019). Doing critical feminist research: A Feminism & psychology reader. Feminism and Psychology, 29(4), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353519863075
LeónK. S. (2021). Critical criminology and race: Re-examining the Whiteness of US criminological thought. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 60(3), 388–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12441
63.
LloydS.Few-DemoA.AllenK. (2009). Handbook of feminist family studies. Sage.
64.
LópezV.PaskoL. (2021). Latinas in the criminal justice system: Victims, targets, and offenders. New York University Press.
65.
LordeA. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches by Audre Lorde. Crossing Press.
66.
LutzeF. E. (2021). ACJS 2019 Presidential address. Taking responsibility for justice: Transforming criminal justice at the intersection of human rights and activism. Justice Quarterly, 38(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1849361
MasonG.StubbsJ. (2010). Feminist approaches to criminological research. In GaddD.KarstedtS.MessnerS. (Eds.), Sage handbook of criminological rsearch methods. Sage.
69.
McClintockM. (1990). How to interrupt oppressive behavior. Camping Magazine, 63(2), 32–34.
70.
McCoyH. (2021). What do you call a Black woman with a PhD? A n*****: How race trumps education no matter what. Race and Justice, 11(3), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368720988892
71.
MedinaC.LunaG. (2000). Narratives from Latina professors in higher education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 31(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2000.31.1.47
72.
MelakuT. M. (2022). Black women in White institutional spaces: The invisible labor clause and the inclusion tax. American Behavioral Scientist, 000276422110660. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211066037
MurreyA. (2019). Constant questioning on-and-off the page: Race, decolonial ethics and women researching in Africa. In JacksonR.KellyM. (Eds.), Women researching in Africa: The impact of gender (pp. 171–192). Springer International Publishing.
75.
NaffineN. (1996). Feminism and criminology. Temple University Press.
76.
NaplesN. A. (2003). Feminism and method: Ethnography, discourse analysis, and activist research. Routledge.
77.
NaplesN. A. (2007). Feminist standpoint theory. In The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons.
78.
NelundA. (2014). Troubling publics: A feminist analysis of public criminology. Radical Criminology, (4), 67–84.
79.
NencelL. (2014). Situating reflexivity: Voices, positionalities and representations in feminist ethnographic texts. Women’s Studies International Forum, 43, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.018
80.
OhS. (2019). Canonical versus “me” studies: A shakespearean moonlights as an Asian Americanist. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 20(4), 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2019.1681079
81.
PalmerJ.MorganJ. W.HinojosaS.OlomiJ. M.AyalaL.RosayA. (2022). Anti-racist and intersectional approaches in social science and community-based research. In ThroneR. (Ed.) Social justice research methods for doctoral research (Chapter 11, pp. 222–243). IGI Global.
82.
PalmerJ.RajahV.WilsonS. (2022). Anti-racism & criminology: An oxymoron?Race and Justice, 12(3).
83.
PanfilV. R.PetersenA. M.WalkerA.WoddaA. (2022). Similar past, different future? How feminist and queer criminological pedagogy and qualitative methods intersect and diverge. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2022.2027478
84.
PhillipsC.BowlingB. (2003). Racism, ethnicity and criminology: Developing minority perspectives. The British Journal of Criminology, 43(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/43.2.269
85.
PhippsA. (2016). Whose personal is more political? Experience in contemporary feminist politics. Feminist Theory, 17(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700116663831
PotterH. (2006). An argument for Black feminist criminology: Understanding African American women’s experiences with intimate partner abuse using an integrated approach. Feminist Criminology, 1(2), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085106286547
88.
PotterH. (2013). Intersectional criminology: Interrogating identity and power in criminological research and theory. Critical Criminology, 21(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-013-9203-6
89.
PotterH. (2015). Intersectionality and criminology: Disrupting and revolutionizing studies of crime. Routledge.
90.
QiZ.TerryA.LynnT. J. (2022). Navigating empowerment and activism in the ivory tower: A co-autoethnography gives voice to feminist identity in a criminal justice program. In HeathM.DarkwahA.Beoku-BettsJ.PurkayasthaB. (Eds.), Global feminist autoethnographies during COVID-19: Displacements and disruptions (pp. 76–87). Routledge.
91.
RaphaelJ.RennisonC. M.JonesN. (2019). Twenty-five years of research and advocacy on violence against women: What have we accomplished, and where do we go from here? A conversation. Violence Against Women, 25(16), 2024–2046. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219875822
92.
RayR.FuentesG. (2021). Formulating a theory in anti-racism activism. In SolomosJ. (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of contemporary racisms. Routledge.
RichieB. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered Black women. Psychology Press.
97.
RoganF.BudgeonS. (2018). The personal is political: Assessing feminist fundamentals in the digital age. Social Sciences, 7(8), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7080132
Shokooh ValleF. (2021). How will you give back?”: On becoming a compañera as a feminist methodology from the cracks. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 50(6), 835–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416211021631
100.
SimonR. J. (1975). Women and crime. Lexington Books.
101.
SpelmanE. V. (1988). Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Beacon Press.
102.
StregaS. (2005). Research as resistance: Revisiting critical, indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches. Canadian Scholars’ Press.
SweetP. L. (2020). Who knows? Reflexivity in feminist standpoint theory and bourdieu. Gender and Society, 34(6), 922–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220966600
105.
TaylorK. (2017). How we get free: Black feminism and the combahee river collective. Haymarket.
106.
TietjenG. (2019). Convict criminology: Learning from the past, confronting the present, expanding for the future. Critical Criminology, 27(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09436-w
107.
ValcoreJ.FradellaH.Guadalupe-DiazX.BallM.DwyerA.DeJongC.WalkerA.WoddaA.WorthenM. (2021). Building an intersectional and trans-inclusive criminology: Responding to the emergence of “gender critical” perspectives in feminist criminology. Critical Criminology, 29(4), 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-021-09590-0
108.
WakemanS. (2014). Fieldwork, biography and emotion: Doing criminological autoethnography. The British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 705–721. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu039
109.
WellmanM. L. (2022). Black squares for Black lives? Performative allyship as credibility maintenance for social media influencers on Instagram. Social Media+Society, 8(1), 205630512210804. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221080473
110.
WhittierN. (2017). Identity politics, consciousness-raising, and visibility politics. The Oxford Handbook of US Women’s Social Movement Activism, 376–397.
111.
WiggintonB.LafranceM. N. (2019). Learning critical feminist research: A brief introduction to feminist epistemologies and methodologies. Feminism & Psychology, 095935351986605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353519866058
