Previous research on race and the death penalty has shown that victim race is a significant predictor of whether a jury imposes a death sentence. However, less attention has been given to the effects of victim gender and to the combined effects of victim race and gender. With a growing scholarly interest in intersectionality, it is crucial to consider the interaction effect of victim race and gender on death sentencing outcomes. Data from the Capital Jury Project were used to examine whether the intersection of victim race and gender is associated with an increased odds of defendants receiving a death sentence and whether a “White female victim effect” exists. This study instead reveals a significant “Black male victim” effect. Black male victim cases are the least likely to be perceived by jurors as involving brutality, heinousness, and victim suffering. Results indicate that a defendant’s odds of receiving a death sentence in a White female victim case is 3.8 times greater and 3.6 times greater in a White male victim case than in a Black male victim case. Victim race rather than victim gender appears to be the factor most strongly influencing jury decision making in capital cases.
BaldusD. C.WoodworthG. (1998). Race discrimination and the death penalty: An empirical and legal overview. In AckerJ. R.BohmR. M.LanierC. S. (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment (pp. 385–416). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
4.
BaldusD. C.WoodworthG.PulaskiC. A.Jr. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
5.
BaldusD. C.WoodworthG.ZuckermanD.WeinerN. A.BroffittB. (1998). Racial discrimination and the death penalty in the post-Furman era: An empirical and legal overview with recent findings from Philadelphia. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1638–1770.
6.
BannerS. (2006). Traces of slavery: Race and the death penalty in historical perspective. In OgletreeC. J.SaratA. (Eds.), From Lynch Mobs to the killing state: Race and the death penalty in America. (pp. 96–113). New York: New York University Press.
7.
BowersW. J. (1995). The capital jury project: Rationale, design, and preview of early findings. Indiana Law Journal, 70, 1043–1102.
8.
BowersW. J.SandysM.BrewerT. W. (2004). Crossing racial boundaries: A closer look at the roots of racial bias in capital sentencing when the defendant is black and the victim is white. DePaul Law Review, 53, 1497–1538.
9.
BowersW. J.SteinerB. D.SandysM. (2001). Death sentencing in black and white: An empirical analysis of the role of jurors’ race and jury racial composition. Journal of Constitutional Law, 3, 171–274.
10.
BrewerT. W. (2004). Race and jurors’ receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: The effects of jurors’, defendants’, and victims’ race in combination. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 529–545.
11.
BrittC. L.WeisburdD. (2010). Logistic regression models for categorical outcome variables. In PiqueroA. R.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 649–682). New York, NY: Springer.
12.
BrowneI.MisraJ. (2003). The intersection of gender and race in the labor market. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 487–513.
Civil Liberties Union. (2011). The persistent problem of racial disparities in the federal death penalty. In BairdR. M.RosenbaumS. E. (Eds.), The death penalty: Debating the moral, legal, and political issues (pp. 325–332). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
15.
CollinsP. H. (2009). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge Classics.
16.
CoxD. R.SnellE. J. (1989) Analysis of Binary Data. Second Edition. Chapman & Hall.
17.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–168.
18.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
19.
CurryT. R. (2010). The conditional effects of victim and offender ethnicity and victim gender on sentences for non-capital cases. Punishment & Society, 12, 438–462.
20.
DalyK.TonryM. (1997). Gender, race, and sentencing. Crime and Justice, 22, 201–252.
21.
DavisK. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9, 67–85.
22.
GibsonR. A. (2014). The Negro holocaust: Lynching and race riots in the United States, 1880- 1951. Yale-New Haven Teacher Institute. Retrieved fromhttp://www.yale.edu
23.
GillespieL. K.LoughranT. A.SmithM. D.FogelS. J.BjerregaardB. (2014). Exploring the role of victim sex, victim conduct, and victim-defendant relationship in capital punishment sentencing. Homicide Studies, 18, 175–195.
24.
GirgentiA. A. (2014). The importance of examining intersectionality in capital cases. Criminal Law Bulletin, 50, 324–343.
25.
GrossS. (1985). Race and death: The judicial evaluation of evidence of discrimination in capital sentencing. U. C. Davis Law Review, 18, 1275–1325.
26.
GrossS.MauroR. (1989). Death & discrimination: Racial disparities in capital sentencing. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
27.
HolcombJ. E.WilliamsM. R.DemuthS. (2004). White female victims and death penalty disparity research. Justice Quarterly, 21, 877–902.
28.
KennedyR. L. (1988). McCleskey v. Kemp: Race, capital punishment, and the Supreme Court. Harvard Law Review, 101, 1388–1443.
29.
LynchM. J. (1996). Class, race, gender and criminology: Structured choices and the life course. In MilovanovicD.SchwartzM. D. (Eds.), Race, gender, and class in criminology: The intersections (pp. 3–28). New York, NY: Garland.
30.
McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).
31.
NagelkerkeN.J.D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika78: 691–692.
32.
OgletreeC. J. (2006). Making race matter in death matters. In OgletreeC. J.SaratA. (Eds.), From Lynch Mobs to the killing state: Race and the death penalty in America. (pp. 55–95). New York: New York University Press.
33.
PierceG. L.RadeletM. L. (2002). Race, region, and death sentencing in Illinois, 1988-1997. Oregon Law Review, 81, 39–96.
34.
PierceG. L.RadeletM. L. (2005). The impact of legally inappropriate factors on death sentencing for California homicides, 1990-1999. Santa Clara Law Review, 46, 1–47.
35.
PierceG. L.RadeletM. L. (2011). Death sentencing in East Baton Rouge Parish, 1990-2008. Louisiana Law Review, 71, 647–673.
36.
PotterH. (2013). Intersectional criminology: Interrogating identity and power in criminological research and theory. Critical Criminology, 21, 305–318.
37.
RadeletM. L.PierceG. L. (1991). Choosing those who will die: Race and the death penalty in Florida. Florida Law Review, 43, 1–34.
38.
RadeletM. L.PierceG. L. (2011). Race and death sentencing in North Carolina, 1980-2007. North Carolina Law Review, 89, 2119–2160.
39.
RoyerC. E.HritzA. C.HansV. P.EisenbergT.WellsM. T.BlumeJ. H.JohnsonS. L. (2014). Victim gender and the death penalty. UMKC Law Review, 82, 429–467.
40.
SchwartzM. D.MilovanovicD. (Eds.) (1996). Race, gender, and class in criminology: The intersection. New York, NY: Garland Publishing, Inc.
41.
ShieldsS. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311.
42.
SommersS. R.EllsworthP. C. (2003). How much do we really know about race and juries? A review of social science theory and research. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 78, 977–1031.
43.
StaufferA. R.SmithM. D.CochranJ. K.FogelS. J.BjerregaardB. (2006). The interaction between victim race and gender on sentencing outcomes in capital murder trials: A further exploration. Homicide Studies, 10, 98–117. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010) Retrieved fromhttps://www.census.gov/topics/population/race.html
44.
WilliamsM. R.DemuthS.HolcombJ. E. (2007). Understanding the influence of victim gender in death penalty cases: The importance of victim race, sex-related victimization, and jury decision-making. Criminology, 45, 865–892.
45.
WilliamsM. R.HolcombJ. E. (2004). The interactive effects of victim race and gender on death sentence disparity findings. Homicide Studies, 8, 350–376.
