The current study seeks to better understand the challenges faced by immigrant applicants and respondents as they enter the civil court system for the purpose of obtaining protection orders. Structured observations of protection order hearings in a civil court are analyzed and include cases in which immigration-related issues were discussed. Through qualitative data analysis, three themes emerged. These include (1) threats of parental kidnapping and child abduction across country borders; (2) concerns over legal immigration documents; and (3) worries and/or threats of deportation. Findings suggest that battered immigrant victims have an acute vulnerability to experiencing multiple types of abuse. Implications for future research directions, policy recommendations, and strategies for improving the experiences of battered immigrants within the civil court system are also discussed.
AcevedoM. J. (2000). Battered immigrant Mexican women’s perspectives regarding abuse and help-seeking. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 8(3-4), 243–282.
2.
AmmarN.Couture-CarronA.AlviS.AntonioJ. S. (2013). Experiences of Muslim and non-Muslim battered immigrant women with the police in the United States: A closer understanding of commonalities and differences. Violence Against Women, 19(12), 1449–1471.
3.
AmmarN.OrloffL. (2006). Battered immigrant women’s domestic violence dynamics and legal protections. In MuraskinR. (Ed.), It’s a Crime: Women and Justice (pp. 314–332). Prentice Hall.
4.
AmmarN. H.OrloffL. E.DuttonM. A.HassG. A. (2012). Battered immigrant women in the United States and protection orders: An exploratory research. Criminal Justice Review, 37(3), 337–359.
5.
BellM. E.GoodmanL. A. (2001). Supporting battered women involved with the court system: An evaluation of a law school-based advocacy intervention. Violence Against Women, 7(12), 1377–1404.
6.
BellM. E.PerezS.GoodmanL. A.DuttonM. A. (2011). Battered women’s perceptions of civil and criminal court helpfulness: The role of court outcome and process. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 71–88.
7.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BriedingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.ChenJ.StevensM. R. (2011). National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
8.
BuiH. N. (2003). Help-seeking behavior among abused immigrant women: A case of Vietnamese American women. Violence Against Women, 9(2), 207–239.
9.
Burgess-ProctorA. (2003). Evaluating the efficacy of protection orders for victims of domestic violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 15(1), 33–54.
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
11.
CresswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.
12.
DeJongC.Burgess-ProctorA. (2006). A summary of personal protection order statutes in the United States. Violence Against Women, 12(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205277720
13.
DuttonM. A.OrloffL. E.HassG. A. (2000). Characteristics of help-seeking behaviors, resources and service needs of battered immigrant Latinas: Legal and policy implications. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, 7, 245.
14.
EigenbergH.McGuffeeK.BerryP.HallW. H. (2003). Protective order legislation: Trends in state statutes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 411–422.
15.
EsterbergK. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. McGraw-Hill.
16.
FeldmanM. S. (1995). Strategies for interpreting qualitative data (Vol. 33). Sage.
17.
FischerK.RoseM. (1995). When “enough is enough”: Battered women’s decision making around court orders of protection. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 414–429.
18.
Fleury-SteinerR. E.MillerS. L.MaloneyS.PostelE. B. (2014). “No Contact, Except…” Visitation decisions in protection orders for intimate partner abuse. Feminist Criminology, 11(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085114554259
19.
GoldfarbS. F. (2007). Reconceiving civil protection orders for domestic violence: Can law help end the abuse without ending the relationship. Cardozo Law Review, 29, 1487.
20.
GoodmanL. A.ThomasK.CattaneoL. B.HeimelD.WoulfeJ.ChongS. K. (2016). Survivor-defined practice in domestic violence work measure development and preliminary evidence of link to empowerment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 163–185.
21.
HambyS. (2014). Battered women’s protective strategies: Stronger than you know. Oxford University Press.
22.
HardestyJ. L.GanongL. H. (2006). How women make custody decisions and manage co-parenting with abusive former husbands. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(4), 543–563.
23.
IngramM.McClellandD. J.MartinJ.CaballeroM. F.MayorgaM. T.GillespieK. (2010). Experiences of immigrant women who self-petition under the Violence Against Women Act. Violence Against Women, 16(8), 858–880.
24.
JordanC. E. (2004). Intimate partner violence and the justice system: An examination of the interface. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1412–1434.
25.
LoganT. K.ShannonL.WalkerR.FaragherT. M. (2006). Protective orders: Questions and conundrums. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 7(3), 175–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/152483006288930
26.
LoganT. K.WalkerR. (2009). Civil protective order outcomes: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(4), 675–692.
27.
LoganT. K.WalkerR.ShannonL.ColeJ. (2008). Factors associated with separation and ongoing violence among women with civil protective orders. Journal of Family Violence, 23(5), 377–385.
28.
MalechaA.McFarlaneJ.GistJ.WatsonK.BattenE.HallI.SmithS. (2003). Applying for and dropping a protection order: A study with 150 women. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14(4), 486–504.
29.
McFarlaneJ.MalechaA.GistJ.WatsonK.BattenE.HallI.SmithS. (2002). Intimate partner violence against immigrant women: Measuring the effectiveness of protection orders. American Journal of Family Law, 16(4), 244–252.
30.
MillerS. L.SmolterN. L. (2011). “Paper abuse”: When all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking. Violence Against Women, 17(5), 637–650.
31.
MorashM.BuiH. N.SantiagoA. M. (2000). Cultural-specific gender ideology and wife abuse in Mexican-descent families. International Review of Victimology, 7(1–3), 67–91.
32.
MountzA.RichardW.InesM.AdrianJ. B. (2002). Lives in limbo: Temporary protected status and immigrant identities. Global Networks, 2, 335–356.
33.
OrloffL. E.KaguyutanJ. V. (2002). Offering a helping hand: Legal protections for battered immigrant women: A history of legislative responses. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 10, 95.
34.
RajA.SilvermanJ. (2002). Violence against immigrant women: The roles of culture, context, and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 8(3), 367–398.
35.
SokoloffN. J.DupontI. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11(1), 38–64.
36.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
37.
ZeoliA. M.RiveraE. A.SullivanC. M.KubiakS. (2013). Post-separation abuse of women and their children: Boundary-setting and family court utilization among victimized mothers. Journal of Family Violence, 28(6), 547–560.
