Gender Effects Across Place: A Multilevel Investigation of Gender,Race/Ethnicity,and Region in Sentencing

Abstract

Previous empirical research has indicated that women receive less punitive sentencing outcomes, compared to their male counterparts, while controlling for legally relevant case characteristics. This advantage persists at the federal level, despite the implementation of sentencing guidelines. However, drawing from the “intersectionalities” literature, it does not appear as though all women are equal beneficiaries of this courtroom leniency. Specifically, women of color are less inclined to receive sentencing benefits in response to the differential stereotyping of this demographic. Furthermore, due to differing sociohistorical contexts and gender ideologies, the influence of gender on sentencing outcomes will likely vary across place. This study contributes to the existing sentencing literature by examining whether, and to what extent, gender leniency is moderated by race/ethnicity and geographic region. Using data from the 2015 Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, this study finds that women receive shorter sentence lengths than men. However, contrary to expectation, women of color receive shorter sentences than White women. Additionally, women who are adjudicated in the southern and border districts receive significantly longer sentences. These findings demonstrate the importance of contextualizing and disaggregating female criminal justice outcomes as well as the need to limit research and discourse that imply a singular shared experience among all women.

Keywords

feminist theory criminological theories race and sentencing race and courts sentencing guidelines stereotypes presumptive sentencing Latino/Hispanic Americans race/ethnicity African/Black Americans

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albonetti

C. A.

(1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247–266.

Albonetti

C. A.

(2002). The joint conditioning effect of defendant’s gender and ethnicity on length of imprisonment under the federal sentencing guidelines for drug trafficking/manufacturing offenders. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 6, 39.

Albonetti

C. A.

(2017). Theoretical perspectives and empirical assessments of race/ethnicity disparities in federal sentencing. Sociology of Crime, Law & Deviance, 22, 95–114.

Albonetti

C. A.

Baller

R. D.

(2010). Sentencing in federal drug trafficking/manufacturing cases: A multilevel analysis of extra-legal defendant characteristics, guidelines departures, and continuity of culture. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 14, 41–71.

Alexander

(2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: The New Press.

Becker

J. C.

Wright

S. C.

(2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62.

Beckett

Sasson

(2003). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bontrager

Barrick

Stupi

(2013). Gender and sentencing: A meta-analysis of contemporary research. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 16, 349–372.

Burgess-Proctor

(2006). Intersections of race, class, gender, and crime. Feminist Criminology, 1, 27–47.

10.

Carpenter

T. R.

(2012). Construction of the crack mother icon. Western Journal of Black Studies, 36, 264–275.

11.

Carson

Anderson

(2016). Prisoners in 2015. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved January 11, 2018, from the U.S. Department of Justice website: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p15.pdf

12.

Carter

Borch

(2005). Assessing the effects of urbanism and regionalism on gender-role attitudes, 1974-1998. Sociological Inquiry, 75, 548–563.

13.

Chesney-Lind

Pasko

(2013). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

14.

Chiao

(2017). Mass incarceration and the theory of punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 11, 431–452.

15.

Curry

T. R.

Corral-Camacho

(2008). Sentencing young minority males for drug offenses testing for conditional effects between race/ethnicity, gender and age during the US war on drugs. Punishment and Society, 10, 253–276.

16.

Davis

Shaylor

(2001). Race, gender, and the prison industrial complex: California and beyond. In James

Guy-Sheftall

Foster

(Eds.), Still brave: The evolution of Black women’s studies (pp. 192–215). New York, NY: Feminist Press.

17.

Doerner

J. K.

(2012). Gender disparities in sentencing departures: An examination of US federal courts. Women & Criminal Justice, 22, 176–205.

18.

Doerner

J. K.

Demuth

(2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in US federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 1–27.

19.

Doerner

J. K.

Demuth

(2014). Gender and sentencing in the federal courts: Are women treated more leniently? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 242–269.

20.

Doyle

(2013). Federal mandatory minimum sentencing statutes. Congressional Research Service Report. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32040.pdf

21.

Engen

R. L.

Gainey

R. R.

(2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207–1230.

22.

Farnworth

Teske

R. H.

Jr (1995). Gender differences in felony court processing: Three hypotheses of disparity. Women & Criminal Justice, 6, 23–44.

23.

Farrell

Ward

Rousseau

(2010). Intersections of gender and race in federal sentencing: Examining court contexts and the effects of representative court authorities. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 14, 85–125.

24.

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2015). 2015 Crime in the United States. Retrieved September 20, 2015, from Criminal Justice Information Services Division website: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/crime-in-the-u.s.-2015/persons-arrested/persons-arrested

25.

Forman

Jr (2012). Racial critiques of mass incarceration: Beyond the new Jim Crow. NYUL Review, 87, 21.

26.

Franklin

Fearne

(2008). Gender, race, and formal court decision-making outcomes: Chivalry, paternalism, conflict theory, or gender conflict? Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 279–290.

27.

Franklin

T. W.

(2015). Race and ethnicity effects in federal sentencing: A propensity score analysis. Justice Quarterly, 32, 653–679.

28.

Freiburger

T. L.

Hilinski

C. M.

(2013). An examination of the interactions of race and gender on sentencing decisions using a trichotomous dependent variable. Crime and Delinquency, 59, 59–86.

29.

Harm

Phillips

(2001). You can’t go home again: Women and criminal recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 32, 3–21.

30.

Harmon

M. G.

O’brien

R. M.

(2011). Gendered arrests or gendered sentencing: Explaining the narrowing of the gender gap in imprisonment over time: 1970–2008. Sociological Perspectives, 54, 641–664.

31.

Hartley

R. D.

(2008). Sentencing reforms and the war on drugs: An analysis of sentence outcomes for narcotics offenders adjudicated in US district courts on the southwest border. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 437–461.

32.

Hartley

R. D.

Maddan

Spohn

C. C.

(2007). Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, 24, 382–407.

33.

Hayes

Lee

(2005). The Southern culture of honor and violent attitudes. Sociological Spectrum, 25, 593–617.

34.

Herzog

Oreg

(2008). Chivalry and the moderating effect of ambivalent sexism: Individual differences in crime seriousness judgments. Law and Society Review, 42, 45–74.

35.

Hessick

C. B.

(2010). Race and gender as explicit sentencing factors. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 14, 127–142.

36.

Holmquist

K. L.

(1997). Cultural defense or false stereotype-what happens when Latina defendants collide with the federal sentencing guidelines. Berkeley Women’s LJ, 12, 45.

37.

Johnson

(1999). Nonmetropolitan sex-role ideologies: A longitudinal study. Rural Sociology, 64, 44–65.

38.

Kautt

(2009). Heuristic influences over offense seriousness calculations: A multilevel investigation of racial disparity under sentencing guidelines. Punishment and Society, 11, 191–218.

39.

Koons-Witt

B. A.

(2002). The effect of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 297–328.

40.

Kreft

I. G.

de Leeuw

(1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

41.

Moore

Vanneman

(2003). Context matters: Effects of the proportion of fundamentalists on gender attitudes. Social Forces, 82, 115–139.

42.

Mustard

D. B.

(2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the US federal courts. The Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 285–314.

43.

Nowacki

J. S.

(2017). An intersectional approach to race/ethnicity, sex, and age disparity in federal sentencing outcomes: An examination of policy across time periods. Criminology & Criminal Justice: An International Journal, 17, 97–116.

44.

Pasko

(2002). Villain or victim: Regional variation and ethnic disparity in federal drug offense sentencing. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 307–328.

45.

Paternoster

(2011). Racial disparity under the federal sentencing guidelines pre- and post-booker. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 1063–1072.

46.

Raudenbush

Bryk

Cheong

Y. F.

Congdon

Du Toit

(2004). HLM 6. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

47.

Rice

Coates

(1995). Gender role attitudes in the Southern United States. Gender and Society, 9, 744–756.

48.

Rodriguez

Curry

Lee

(2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87, 318–339.

49.

Schanzenbach

(2005). Racial and sex disparities in prison sentences: The effect of district-level judicial demographics. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34, 57–92.

50.

Sharkey

(2010). Does overcrowding in prisons exacerbate the risk of suicide among women prisoners? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 49, 111–124.

51.

Spohn

(2013). The effects of the offender’s race, ethnicity, and sex on federal sentencing outcomes in the guidelines era. Law & Contemporary Problems, 76, 75–104.

52.

Spohn

Brennan

P. K.

(2011). The joint effects of offender race/ethnicity and gender on substantial assistance departures in federal courts. Race and Justice, 1, 49–78.

53.

Starr

S. B.

(2014). Estimating gender disparities in federal criminal cases. American Law and Economics Review, 17, 127–159.

54.

Steffensmeier

Kramer

Streifel

(1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411–446.

55.

Steffensmeier

Painter-Davis

Ulmer

(2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Sociological Perspectives, 60, 810–833.

56.

Sudbury

(2005). Celling Black bodies: Black women in the global prison industrial complex. Feminist Review, 70, 57–74.

57.

The Sentencing Project. (2015). Incarcerated women and girls. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org/doc/publications/cc_incarcerated_women_factsheet_sep24sp.pdf

58.

Tillyer

Hartley

R. D.

Ward

J. T.

(2015). Differential treatment of female defendants: Does criminal history moderate the effect of gender on sentence length in federal narcotics cases? Criminal Justice & Behavior, 42, 703–721.

59.

Umamaheswar

(2013). Gendered representations of parents behind bars: An analysis of newspaper reports. Punishment and Society, 15, 274–303.

60.

Unseem

Piehl

A. M.

(2008). Prison State: The challenge of mass incarceration. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB