This article describes the work of the Illinois Disproportionate Justice Impact Study Commission, a nonpartisan, multidisciplinary group of policy makers, government leaders, and justice professionals that focused on understanding and alleviating the disproportionate incarceration of African Americans and Latinos in Illinois for drug law violations. The study data were obtained from arrest records statewide and court cases in Cook County (Chicago), which were both drawn from calendar year 2005. Results showed that racial disproportionality in arrests for drug crimes is found in urban, suburban, and rural counties of the state and is more pronounced among arrestees with arrest records than among first-time arrestees. Analyses of Cook County court data showed that controlling for other variables, including criminal history, African Americans were approximately 2.2 times more likely than Whites, and Latinos were approximately 1.6 times more likely than Whites, to be prosecuted for drug offenses. Unequal outcomes in court processing compound the disparities at arrest, perpetuating a vicious cycle. The article concludes with the Commission’s proposed remedies for racial disproportionality.
AlexanderM. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: The New Press.
2.
Amnesty International. (2004). Threat and humiliation: Racial profiling, domestic security, and human rights in the United States. Retrieved fromhttp://www.amnestyusa.org/pdfs/rp_report.pdf
3.
BeckettK.NyropK.PfingstL. (2006). Race, drugs and policing: Understanding disparities in drug delivery arrests. Criminology, 44, 105–137.
4.
FarrellA.GivelberD. (2010). Liberation reconsidered: Understanding why judges and juries disagree about guilt. Journal of Law and Criminology, 100, 1549–1586.
5.
GaleaS.AhernJ.TardiffK.LeonA.CoffinP. O.DerrK.VlahovD. (2003). Racial/ethnic disparities in overdose mortality trends in New York City, 1990–1998. Journal of Urban Health, 80, 201–211.
6.
GeerkenM. R. (1994). Rap sheets in criminological research: Considerations and caveats. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 3–21.
7.
GoodeE. (2002). Drug arrests at the millennium. Social Science and Public Policy, 39, 41–45.
8.
HaganJ. (1974). Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing: An assessment of sociological viewpoint. Law and Society, 8, 357–384.
9.
HarcourtB. (2008). A reader’s companion to “Against Prediction”: A reply to Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, and Yoav Sapir on economic modeling, selective incapacitation, governmentality, and race. Law & Social Inquiry, 33, 265–283.
10.
HeapsM. M.LurigioA. J.RodriguezP.LyonsT.BrookesL. (2009). Recovery-oriented care for drug abusing offenders. Addiction Science and Criminal Practice: Journal of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, 5, 31–36.
LizotteA. J. (1978). Extra-legal factors in Chicago’s criminal courts: Testing the conflict model of criminal justice. Social Problems, 25, 564–580.
14.
LurigioA. J.LyonsT.BrookesL.WhitneyT. (2010, December). Illinois disproportionate justice impact study commission: Final report(Submitted to the Illinois General Assembly, Springfield, Illinois). Chicago: Department of Criminal Justice, Loyola University Chicago and TASC.
15.
MauerM. (1999). Race to incarcerate. New York, NY: The New Press.
16.
MauerM.KingR. (2007). Uneven justice: State rates of incarceration by race and ethnicity. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
17.
MurakawaN.BeckettK. (2010). The penology of racial innocence: The erasure of racism in the study and practice of punishment. Law & Society Review, 44, 695–730.
18.
OlsonD. E. (2001). Racial disparities in drug sentencing. Testimony presented to the Illinois House Judiciary: Criminal Justice Committee. Chicago, IL: Olive-Harvey College.
19.
OlsonD. E. (2010). Unpublished analyses of State Fiscal Year 2009 Illinois Department of Corrections’ Court Admissions Data. Chicago, IL: Loyola University
20.
PagerD. (2007). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
PuhrmannA. (2009). Public support for racial profiling: Exploring urban and rural residence. Conference paper abstract, American Society for Criminology, 2009 Annual Meeting.
22.
RabinowitzM. (2010). Holding cells: Understanding the collateral consequences of pretrial detentions. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
23.
RamchandR.PaculaR. L.IguchiM. Y. (2006). Racial differences in marijuana-users’ risk of arrest in the United States. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 84, 264–272.
24.
RodriguezM.EmsellemM. (2011). 65 Million need not apply: The case for reforming criminal background checks for employment. The National Employment Law Project. Retrieved fromhttp://nelp.3cdn.net/c1696a4161be2c85dd_t0m62vj76.pdf
25.
RohS.RobinsonM. (2009). A geographic approach to racial profiling: The microanalysis and macroanalysis of racial disparity in traffic stops. Police Quarterly, 12, 137–169.
26.
RoncekD. W. (1991). Using logit coefficients to obtain the effects of independent variables on changes in probabilities. Social Forces, 70, 509–518.
27.
SampsonR. J.LauritsenJ. L. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. Crime and Justice, 21, 311–374.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 501–526.
31.
StemenD. (2010, June). Prosecution and racial justice: Using prosecution case management data to examine disparity. Conference abstract, National Institute of Justice Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
32.
WeitzerR.TuchS. A. (2002). Perceptions of racial profiling: Race, class, and personal experience. Criminology40, 435–456.
33.
WesternB. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
