Race and racial stereotypes have long been recognized as influencing the formal social control of youth. Recent analyses have moved beyond identifying disproportionate minority contact (DMC) and toward assessing the contingencies under which race has a lesser or greater impact on juvenile court outcomes. While often confounded, the racial threat and symbolic threat perspectives offer conceptually distinct explanations for DMC. The racial threat perspective proposes that racial disparities in sanctioning are at least partly the result of perceptions among Whites that the minority group threatens their economic and political hegemony. Alternatively, the symbolic threat perspective proposes that intergroup inequality fosters perceptions that minorities are a threat to middle class norms, values, and standards motivating Whites to discriminate. The current study employs hierarchical generalized linear modeling to discern the salience of these two perspectives to understanding racial bias in preadjudication detention. To do this, we merge county-level Census data with data on nearly a decade’s worth of delinquency cases in one Southeastern state. Our results offer limited support for the racial threat perspective but strongly support the symbolic threat perspective in indicating that the impact of race on detention is contingent upon interracial socioeconomic inequality in the community at large.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). The integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247–266.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
3.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the streets. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
4.
ArmstrongG. S.RodriguezN. (2005). Effects of individual and contextual characteristics on pre-adjudication detention of juvenile delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 22, 521–539.
5.
AustinJ.JohnsonK. D.WeitzerR. (2005). Alternatives to the secure detention and confinement of juvenile offenders. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
AuthorP.RocheT. (2008). Juvenile justice reform in arkansas: Building a better future for youth, their families, and the community. A report in collaboration with the Arkansas Division of Youth Services.
7.
BishopD. (2005). The role of race and ethnicity in juvenile justice processing. In HawkinsD.Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Race, development, and juvenile justice, MacArthur foundation research network on adolescent development and juvenile justice, The John T. and Catherine MacArthur Foundation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E. (1988).The influence of race in juvenile justice processing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 242–263.
9.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E. (1996). Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings of a statewide analysis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 392–414.
10.
BlalockH. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
11.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press.
12.
BlauJ. R.BlauP. M. (1982). The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review, 47, 114–129.
13.
BlauP. M.GoldenR. M. (1986). Metropolitan structure and criminal violence. Sociological Quarterly, 27, 15–26.
14.
BortnerM. A. (1982). Inside a juvenile court. New York: New York University Press.
15.
BortnerM. A.ReedW. L. (1985). The preeminence of process: An example of refocused justice research. Social Science Quarterly, 25, 413–425.
16.
BridgesG. S.CrutchfieldR. D. (1988). Law, social standing, and racial disparities in imprisonment. Social Forces, 66, 699–724.
17.
BridgesG. S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554–570.
18.
BridgesG. S.ConleyD.BerettaG.EngenR. (1993). Racial disproportionality in the juvenile justice system. Olympia, WA: Department of Social and Health Services, State of Washington.
19.
ChamlinM. B. (1989). Conflict theory and police killings. Deviant Behavior, 104, 353–368.
20.
ChamlinM. B.LiskaA. E. (1992). Social structure and crime control revisited: The declining significance if intergroup threat. In LiskaA. E. (Ed.), Social threat and social control (pp. 103–112). Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
EitleD.D’AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL. (2002). Racial threat and social control: A test of the political, economic and threat of black crime hypotheses. Social Forces, 81, 557–576.
22.
EllisonC. G.PowersD. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis and racial attitudes among black Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 385–400.
23.
FeldB. C. (1991). Justice by geography: Urban, suburban, and rural variations in juvenile justice administration. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 156–210.
24.
FeldB. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
FeldmeyerB.UlmerJ. T. (2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 238–270.
26.
FrazierC. E.CochranJ. C. (1986). Detention of juveniles: Its effects on subsequent juvenile court processing decisions. Youth and Society, 17, 286–305.
27.
FreiburgerT. L.JordanK. L. (2011). A multilevel analysis of race on the decision to petition a case in the juvenile court. Race and Justice, 1, 185–201.
28.
GuevaraL.HerzD.SpohnC. (2006). Gender and juvenile justice decision making: What role does race play?Feminist Criminology, 1, 258–282.
29.
HarerM. D.SteffensmeierD. (1992). The differing effects of economic inequality on black and white rates of violence. Social Forces, 70, 1035–1054.
30.
HarmsP. (2003). Detention in delinquency cases, 1990–1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
31.
HorowitzD. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
JacobsD.CarmichaelJ. T. (2004). Ideology, social threat, and death sentences: Capital sentencing across time and space. Social Forces, 83, 249–278.
33.
JacobsD.CarmichaelJ. T.KentS. L. (2005). Vigilantism, current racial threat, and death sentences. American Sociological Review, 70, 656–677.
34.
JacobsD.HelmsR. (1999). Collective outbursts, politics, and punitive resources: Toward a political sociology of spending on social control. Social Forces, 77, 1497–1523.
35.
JacobsD.WoodK. (1999). Interracial conflict and interracial homicide: Do political and economic rivalries explain white killings of black or black killings of whites?American Journal of Sociology, 105, 157–190.
36.
Justice Policy Institute. (2002). Reducing disproportionate minority confinement: The Multnomah county, Oregon success story and its implications. Washington DC: Justice Policy Institute.
37.
KentS. L.JacobsD. (2004). Social divisions and coercive control in advanced societies: Law enforcement strength in eleven nations from 1975 to 1994. Social Problems, 51, 343–361.
38.
KentS. L.JacobsD. (2005). Minority threat and police strength from 1980–2000: A fixed-effects analysis of nonlinear and interactive effects in large U.S. cities. Criminology, 43,731–760.
39.
KingR. D.WheelockD. (2007). Group threat and social control: Race, perceptions of minorities and the desire to punish. Social Forces, 85, 1255–1280.
40.
LandK. C.McCallP. L.CohenL. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space?American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922–963.
41.
LeiberM. (2013). Race, pre- and post-detention, and juvenile justice decision making. Crime and Delinquency, 59, 396–418.
42.
LeiberM. J.FoxK. C. (2005). Race and the impact of detention on juvenile justice decision making. Crime and Delinquency, 51, 470–497.
43.
LeiberM.JamiesonK. (1995). Race and decision-making within juvenile justice: The importance of context. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 363–388.
44.
LeiberM.JohnsonJ. D. (2008). Being young and black: What are the effects on juvenile justice decision making?Crime and Delinquency, 54, 560–581.
45.
LeiberM.MackK. (2003). Race, age, and juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Crime & Justice, 40, 34–70.
46.
LeiberM. J.RodriguezN. (2011). The implementation of the disproportionate minority confinement/contact (DMC) mandate: A failure or success?Race and Justice, 1, 103–124.
47.
LeiberM.StairsJ. (1999).Race, contexts, and the use of intake diversion. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 56–86.
48.
LiskaA. E. (1992). Social threat and social control. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
49.
LiskaA. E.ChamlinM. B. (1984). Social structure and crime control among macrosocial units. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 383–395.
50.
LiskaA. E.LawrenceJ. J.BensonM. (1981). Perspectives on the legal order: The capacity for social control. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 413–426.
51.
LukeD. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
MasseyD.DentonN. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the Underclass. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
53.
MessnerS. F.GoldenR. M. (1992). Racial inequality and racially disaggregated homicide rates: An assessment of alternative theoretical explanations. Criminology, 30, 421–447.
54.
MyersM.TalaricoS. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
55.
OliverE. J.WongJ. (2003). Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic settings. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 567–582.
56.
OuseyG. C.LeeM. R. (2008). Racial disparity in formal social control: An investigation of alternative explanations of arrest rate inequality. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 322–355.
57.
ParkerK. F.McCallP. L. (1999). Structural conditions and racial homicide patterns: A look at the multiple disadvantages in urban areas. Criminology, 37, 447–478.
58.
ParkerK. F.StultsB.RiceS. (2005). Racial threat, concentrated disadvantage and social control: Considering the macro-level sources of variation in arrests. Criminology, 43, 1111–1134.
59.
PetersonR.KrivoL. (1993). Racial segregation and black urban homicide. Social Forces, 71, 1001–1026.
60.
PiqueroA. R. (2008). Disproportionate minority contact. Future of Children, 18, 59–79.
61.
PopeC.LeiberM. (2005). Disproportionate minority confinement (DMC): The Federal Initiative. In HawkinsD.Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Race, development and juvenile justice, MacArthur foundation research network on adolescent development and juvenile justice, The John T. and Catherine MacArthur Foundation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62.
PuzzancheraC.AdamsB. (2012). National disproportionate minority contact databook. Developed by the National Center for Juvenile Justice for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved fromhttp://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/ojstatbb/dmcdb/
63.
QuinneyR. (1970). The social reality of crime. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
64.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
ReedJ. S. (1972). Percent black and lynching: A test of Blalock’s theory. Social Forces, 50, 356–360.
66.
RodriguezN. (2007). Juvenile court context and detention decisions: reconsidering the role of race, ethnicity, and community characteristics in juvenile court processes. Justice Quarterly, 24, 629–656.
67.
RodriguezN. (2010). The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why pre-adjudication detention matters. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 391–413.
68.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processing: Inequality, the underclass and social control. Law and Society Review, 27, 285–311.
69.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of ‘Broken Windows’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319–342.
70.
SecretP. E.JohnsonJ. B. (1997). The effect of race on juvenile justice decision making in Nebraska: Detention, adjudication and disposition, 1988–1993. Justice Quarterly, 14, 445–478.
71.
ShihadehE. S.FlynnN. (1996). Segregation and crime: The effect of black social isolation on the rates of black urban violence. Social Forces, 74, 1325–1352.
72.
SigelmanL.WelchS. (1993). The contact hypothesis revisited: Interracial contact and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces, 71, 781–795.
73.
StolzenbergL.D’AlessioS. J.EitleD. (2004). A multilevel test of racial threat theory. Criminology, 42, 673–698.
74.
StultsB. J.BaumerE. P. (2006). Racial context and police force size: Evaluating the empirical validity of the minority threat perspective(Unpublished manuscript).
75.
TittleC. R.CurranD. A. (1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67, 23–58.
76.
TomkinsA. (1990). Dispositional decision making in the juvenile justice system: An empirical study of the use of offense and of offender information. Nebraska Law Review, 69, 298–345.
77.
UlmerJ. T.JohnsonB. (2004) Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137–178.
78.
WangX.MearsD. P. (2010). A multilevel test of minority threat effects on sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 191–215.
79.
WeidnerR. R.FraseR. S.SchultzJ. S. (2005). The impact of contextual factors on the decision to imprison in large urban jurisdictions: A multilevel analysis. Crime and Delinquency, 51, 400–424.
