Do Race and Ethnicity Matter? An Examination of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Perceptions of Procedural Justice and Recidivism Among Problem-Solving Court Clients
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2019
Do Race and Ethnicity Matter? An Examination of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Perceptions of Procedural Justice and Recidivism Among Problem-Solving Court Clients
Over the years, a distinct body of research has emerged that examines procedural justice in problem-solving courts. However, there is virtually no research to date on racial and ethnic differences in perceptions of procedural justice among problem-solving court clients. The present study seeks to understand the complexities of judicial procedural justice and race/ethnicity within problem-solving courts. Using a convenience sample of 132 clients from two problem-solving courts in a southern state, this study addresses a void in the literature by examining the influence of race/ethnicity on perceptions of procedural justice as well as the impact of race/ethnicity and procedural justice on clients’ likelihood of recidivism. Results suggest that Black problem-solving court clients’ have significantly lower perceptions of procedural justice, while also having a lower likelihood of recidivism. Perceptions of procedural justice did not influence recidivism outcomes. Policy implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Atkin-PlunkC. A.ArmstrongG. S. (2016). An examination of the impact of drug court clients’ perceptions of procedural justice on graduation rates and recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55, 525–547.
2.
BakerT.PelfreyW. V.BedardL. E.DhunganaK.GertzM.GoldenK. (2013). Female inmates’ procedural justice perceptions of the police and courts: Is there a spill-over of police effects?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 144–162.
3.
BakerT.PickettJ. T.AminD. M.GoldenK.DhunganaK.GertzM.…BedardL. (2015). Shared race/ethnicity, court procedural justice, and self–regulating beliefs: A study of female offenders. Law & Society Review, 49, 433–466.
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
5.
Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2004). Defining drug courts: The key components (NCJ 205621). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs.
6.
CaldeiraG. A.GibsonJ. L. (1992). The etiology of public support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 635–664.
7.
CanadaK. E.WatsonA. C. (2013). “Cause everybody likes to be treated good”: Perceptions of procedural justice among mental health court participants. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 209–230.
8.
CasperJ. D.TylerT.FisherB. (1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law & Society Review, 22, 483–508.
9.
CastellanoU. (2011). Problem-solving courts: Theory and practice. Sociology Compass, 5, 957–967.
10.
Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2007). Improving responses to people with mental illnesses: The essential elements of a mental health court. New York, NY: Council of State Governments Justice Center.
11.
EngelR. S. (2005). Citizens’ perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 445–481.
12.
GibsonJ. L.CaldeiraG. A. (1992). Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of diffuse support. Journal of Politics, 54, 1120–1145.
13.
GottfredsonD. C.KearleyB. W.NajakaS. S.RochaC. M. (2007). How drug treatment courts work: An analysis of mediators. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 3–35.
14.
GoverA. R.BrankE. M.MacDonaldJ. M. (2007). A specialized domestic violence court in South Carolina: An example of procedural justice for victims and defendants. Violence Against Women, 13, 603–626.
15.
HaganJ.AlbonettiC. (1982). Race, class, and the perception of criminal injustice in America. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 329–355.
16.
HartleyR. E.PhillipsR. C. (2001). Who graduates from drug courts? Correlates of client success. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 107–119.
17.
HeinzA. M. (1985). Procedure versus consequences: Experimental evidence of preferences for procedural and distributive justice. In TalaricoS. M. (Ed.), Courts and criminal justice: Emerging issues (pp. 13–34). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
HendersonM.CullenF.CaoL.BrowningS.KopacheR. (1997). Impact of race on perceptions of criminal injustice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 447–462.
19.
HendersonH.WellsW.MaguireE. R.GrayJ. (2010). Evaluating the measurement properties of procedural justice in a correctional setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 384–399.
20.
HenryK. (2011). The role of drug court participant attitudes and perceptions. In RossmanS. B.ZweigJ. M.KralsteinD.HenryK.DowneyP. M.LindquistC. H. (Eds.), The multi-site adult drug court evaluation: The drug court experience (Vol. 3, pp. 84–100). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
21.
HigginsG.WolfeS.MahoneyM.WaltersN. (2009). Race, ethnicity, and experience: Modeling the public’s perceptions of justice, satisfaction, and attitude toward the court. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 7, 293–310.
22.
HigginsG. E.JordanK. L. (2005). Race and gender: An examination of the models that explain evaluations of the court system for differences. Criminal Justice Studies, 18, 81–97.
23.
HuddlestonW.MarloweD. B. (2011). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Drug Court Institute.
24.
KaiserK. A.HoltfreterK. (2016). An integrated theory of specialized court programs. Using procedural justice and therapeutic jurisprudence to promote offender compliance and rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 45–62.
25.
KirkD. S.MatsudaM. (2011). Legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and the ecology of arrest. Criminology, 49, 443–472.
26.
KopelovichS.YanosP.PrattC.KoernerJ. (2013). Procedural justice in mental health courts: Judicial practices, participant perceptions, and outcomes related to mental health recovery. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36, 113–120.
27.
LandisJ. M.GoodsteinL. (1986). When is justice fair? An integrated approach to the outcome versus procedure debate. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 11, 675–707.
28.
LeventhalG. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In GergenK. J.GreenbergM. S.WillisR. H. (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
29.
LongazelJ. G.ParkerL. S.SunI. Y. (2011). Experiencing court, experiencing race: Perceived procedural injustice among court users. Race and Justice, 1, 202–227.
30.
MacKenzieD. L. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MazerolleL.BennettS.AntrobusE.EgginsE. (2012). Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: Main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 343–367.
32.
McIvorG. (2009). Therapeutic jurisprudence and procedural justice in Scottish Drug Courts. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 9, 29–49.
33.
MitchellO.WilsonD. B.EggersA.MacKenzieD. L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60–71.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859–866.
36.
PeckJ. H. (2015). Minority perceptions of the police: A state-of-the-art review. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38, 173–203.
37.
PortilloS.RudesD. S.ViglioneJ.NelsonM. (2013). Front-stage stars and backstage producers: The role of judges in problem-solving courts. Victims and Offenders, 8, 1–22.
38.
PoythressN. G.PetrilaJ.McGahaA.BoothroydR. (2002). Perceived coercion and procedural justice in the Broward mental health court. Law and Psychiatry, 25, 517–533.
39.
ReisigM. D.ParksR. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 17, 607–630.
40.
RottmanDHansenR.MottN.GrimesL. (2003). Perceptions of the courts in your community: The influence of experience, race and ethnicity (final report). Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
41.
RottmanD. B. (2000). Does effective therapeutic jurisprudence require specialized courts (and do specialized courts imply specialist judges)?Court Review, 37, 22–54.
42.
RottmanD. B. (2005). Trust and confidence in the California courts: A survey of the public and attorneys. California: Judicial Council of California/Administrative Office of the Courts. Retrieved fromhttp://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/4_37pubtrust1.pdf
43.
SampsonR. J.BartuschD. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review, 32, 777–804.
44.
ShafferD. K. (2011). Looking inside the back box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28, 493–521.
45.
SenjoS. R.LeipL. A. (2001). Testing and developing theory in drug court: A four-part logit model to predict program completion. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12, 66–87.
46.
SunI. Y.WuY. (2006). Citizens’ perceptions of the courts: The impact of race, gender, and recent experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 457–467.
47.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513–547.
48.
TankebeJ. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103–135.
49.
TaxmanF. S.BouffardJ. A. (2005). Treatment as part of drug court: The impact on graduation rates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42, 23–50.
50.
ThibautJ.WalkerL. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51.
TylerT. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants’ evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law & Society Review, 18, 51–74.
52.
TylerT. R. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal authorities?Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 215–235.
53.
TylerT. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
TylerT. R. (2007). Procedural justice and the courts. Court Review, 44, 26–31.
55.
TylerT. R.FolgerR. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 281–292.
56.
TylerT. R.HuoY. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
57.
TylerT. R.ShermanL.StrangH.BarnesG. C.WoodsD. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders’ psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law & Society Review, 41, 553–585.
58.
TylerT. R.WakslakC. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42, 253–281.
59.
WalesH. W.HidayV. A.RayB. (2010). Procedural justice and the mental health court judge’s role in reducing recidivism. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 265–271.
60.
WalkerL.LindE. A.ThibautJ. (1979). The relation between procedural and distributive justice. Virginia Law Review, 65, 1401–1420.
61.
WalkerL. E.PannJ. M.ShapiroD. L.Van HasseltV. B. (2016). Best practices for the mentally ill in the criminal justice system. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
62.
WexlerD. B. (1990). Inducing therapeutic compliance through the criminal law. Law & Psychology Review, 14, 43–57.
63.
WienerR. L.WinickB. J.GeorgesL. S.CastroA. (2010). A testable theory of problem-solving courts: Avoiding past empirical and legal failures. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 417–427.
64.
WinickB. J.WexlerD. B. (2002). Drug treatment court: Therapeutic jurisprudence applied. Touro Law Review, 18, 479–485.
65.
WilsonD. B.MitchellO.MacKenzieD. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487.
66.
WoolardJ.HarvellS.GrahamS. (2008). Anticipatory injustice among adolescents: Age and racial/ethnic differences in perceived unfairness of the justice system. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 26, 207–226.
67.
WuY.SunI. Y.TriplettR. A. (2009). Race, class or neighborhood context: Which matters more in measuring satisfaction with police?Justice Quarterly, 26, 125–156.
