Juvenile correctional boot camps seek to transform youth labeled “at-risk” into productive members of society. While these military-style programs have been in decline since the early 2000s, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), one of the largest agencies in the country, continues to embrace them as a key disciplinary practice and vestige of the “get tough” era in U.S. juvenile justice reform. Contemporary transformative programs have been linked to Progressive Era juvenile social control, and scholars are beginning to show that, historically, racial exclusion has been a central function. The goals of this research are to interrogate the treatment of boot camp participants by police and demonstrate how racial exclusion remains central to juvenile social control. Drawing on collaborative ethnographic fieldwork, this study shows how police stigmatize Black and Latino parents, adopt the role of disciplinary authority in the family, and infuse formal control processes into domestic life. Youth face stigmatizing encounters through degradation and punitive physical training as part of the camp’s disciplinary regime. This research suggests that youth intervention programs built on liberal ideals are the most recent in a long line of racialized social control systems in the United States that seek to stigmatize and confine youth of color.
AlexanderM. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: The New Press.
2.
AosS.PhippsP.BarnoskiR.LiebR. (2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime (Version 4.0). Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
3.
BellD. A. (1991). Racism is here to stay: Now what?Howard Law Journal, 35, 79–93.
4.
BellD. A. (2004). Silent covenants: Brown v. Board of Education and the unfulfilled hopes for racial reform. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
BennettW. J.DilulioJ. J.Jr.WaltersJ. P. (1996). Body count: Moral poverty…and how to win America’s war against crime and drugs. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
6.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E. (1996). Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings of a statewide analysis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 392–414.
7.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E.HenrettaJ. C. (1989). Prosecutorial waiver: Case study of a questionable reform. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 179–201.
8.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E.Lanza-KaduceL.WinnerL. (1996). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Does it make a difference?Crime & Delinquency, 42, 171–191.
9.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2002). The linguistics of color blind racism: How to talk nasty about Blacks without sounding “racist.”Critical Sociology, 28, 41–64.
10.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2013). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
BurtonC. S. (2016). Schools and delinquency in the early 20th century: Rethinking the origins of school policing. British Journal of Criminology. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azw013
12.
ČehajićS.BrownR.GonzálezR. (2009). What do I care? Perceived ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 715–729.
13.
Chávez-GarcíaM. (2012). States of delinquency: Race and science in the making of California’s juvenile justice system. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
ChenC.-I.DulaniJ.Piepzna-SamarasinhaL. L. (Eds.). (2011). The revolution starts at home: Confronting intimate violence within activist communities. Brooklyn, NY: South End Press.
15.
ClaymanR. (1983). Once an adult, always an adult. Update on Law-Related Education, 7, 2–5.
16.
CorreiaM. E. (1997). Boot camps, exercise, and delinquency: An analytical critique of the use of physical exercise to facilitate decreases in delinquent behavior. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 13, 94–113.
17.
Costa VargasJ. H. (2006). Catching hell in the city of angels: Life and meanings of Blackness in south central Los Angeles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
CullenF. T.BlevinsK. R.TragerJ. S.GendreauP. (2005). The rise and fall of boot camps: A case study in common-sense corrections. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40, 53–70.
19.
DilulioJ. J.Jr. (1995). The coming of the super predators. The Weekly Standard, 1, 23–30.
20.
ElrodP.RyderR. S. (2013). Juvenile justice: A social, historical, and legal perspective (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
21.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
FeldB. C. (1999). Transformation of the juvenile court—Part II: Social structure, race, and the “crack down” on youth crime. Minnesota Law Review, 84, 327–395.
23.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (SheridanA., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
24.
GarfinkelH. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 420–424.
25.
GarlandD. (1990). Punishment in modern society: A study in social theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
GoffP. A.EberhardtJ. L.WilliamsM. J.JacksonM. (2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 292–306.
27.
Gonzalez Van CleveN. (2016). Crook County: Racism and injustice in America’s largest criminal court. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.
28.
GoodeE. (2012). Drugs in American society (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
29.
HaddenS. E. (2003). Slave patrols: Law and violence in Virginia and the Carolinas (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Haney LópezI. F. (2009). Racism on trial: The Chicano fight for justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
HartmanS. (1997). Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth century America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
HaslamN. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264.
34.
HippJ. R.TitaG. E.GascónL. D.RoussellA. (2010). Ethnically transforming neighborhoods and violent crime among and between African-Americans and Latinos: A study of south Los Angeles. Los Angeles, CA: The John and Dora Haynes Foundation of Los Angeles.
35.
KlenowskiP. M.BellK. J.DodsonK. D. (2010). An empirical evaluation of juvenile awareness programs in the United States: Can juveniles be “scared straight”?Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49, 254–272.
36.
KoballH.DionR.GothroA.BardosM.DworskyA.LansingJ.…ManningA. E. (2011). Synthesis of research and resources to support at-risk youth. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
37.
LareauA.HorvatE. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72, 37–53.
MackenzieD. L.WilsonD. B.KiderS. B. (2001). Effects of correctional boot camps on offending. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 126–143.
40.
MayR. A. B.Pattillo-McCoyM. (2000). Do you see what I see? Examining a collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 65–87.
41.
MennelR. M. (1973). Thorns & thistles: Juvenile delinquents in the United States, 1825–1940. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire.
42.
MirandeA. (1987). Gringo justice. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
43.
MuhammadK. G. (2010). The condemnation of Blackness: Race, crime, and the making of modern urban America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
NevilleH. A.GallardoM. E.SueD. W. (Eds.). (2016). The myth of racial color blindness: Manifestations, dynamics, and impact. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45.
NevilleH. A.LillyR. L.DuranG.LeeR. M.BrowneL. (2000). Construction and initial validation of the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 59–70.
46.
ParentD. G. (2003). Correctional boot camps: Lessons from a decade of research. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
47.
PlattA. M. (1977). The child savers: The invention of delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
PodkopaczM. R.FeldB. C. (2001). The back-door to prison: Waiver reform, “blended sentencing,” and the law of unintended consequences. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 91, 997–1072.
49.
PotterH. (2015). Intersectionality and criminology: Disrupting and revolutionizing studies of crime. New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
RamírezC. S. (2010). The woman in the zoot suit: Gender, nationalism, and the cultural politics of memory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
51.
RichieB. E. (2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America’s prison nation. New York: New York University Press.
52.
RiosV. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino boys. New York: New York University Press.
53.
RoussellA. (2015). Policing the anticommunity: Territory, race, exclusion, and regulation. Law & Society Review, 49, 813–846.
