The present study examines racial and ethnic variation in the intervening effects of deviant peers on the relationship between receiving a formal label and subsequent deviance. We build on earlier research by distinguishing between violent and nonviolent deviance, drawing on peer network data to directly measure peer deviant behavior, and stratifying analyses for White, Black, and Hispanic adolescents. Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), we find that overall, receiving a formal label, in the form of school sanctions, is associated only with later violent deviance but not associated with nonviolent deviance and there was no evidence of mediation by peer deviance or peer violent deviance. Results from stratified analyses for White, Black, and Hispanic adolescents are mixed. Among both White and Hispanic adolescents receiving a formal label was significantly associated with engaging in violent deviance, but this relationship was only partially mediated by peer nonviolent deviance among White adolescents. However, neither peer nonviolent deviance nor peer violence were related to violent deviance among Hispanic adolescents. In further contrast, among Black adolescents receiving a formal label was not significantly associated with engaging in violent deviance, but peer violent deviance did show a positive and significant main effect on violent deviance. Implications for theory and future research are discussed.
AdamsM. S.EvansT. D. (1996). Teacher disapproval, delinquent peers, and self-reported delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. The Urban Review, 28, 199–211.
2.
AdamsM. S.JohnsonJ. D.EvansT. D. (1998). Racial differences in informal labeling effects. Deviant Behavior, 19, 157–171.
3.
AdamsM. S.RobertsonC. T.Gray-RayP.RayM. C. (2003). Labeling and delinquency. Adolescence, 38, 171–186.
4.
AgnewR. (1991). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29, 47–72.
5.
AseltineR.Jr. (1995). A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 103–121.
6.
BarrickK. (2014). A review of prior tests of labeling theory. In FarringtonD. P.MurrayJ. (Eds.), Labeling theory: Empirical tests (pp. 89–112). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
7.
BeckerH. S. (1963). Outsiders. New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe.
8.
BernburgJ. G.KrohnM. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 41, 1287–1318.
9.
BernburgJ. G.KrohnM. D.RiveraC. J. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 67–88.
10.
BontragerS.BalesW.ChiricosT. (2005). Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology, 43, 589–622.
11.
BowditchC. (1993). Getting rid of troublemakers: High school disciplinary procedures and the production of dropouts. Social Problems, 40, 493–509.
12.
BridgesG. S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554–570.
13.
BurgessR. L.AkersR. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14, 128–147.
ChiricosT.BarrickK.BalesW.BontragerS. (2007). The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology, 45, 547–581.
16.
CooleyC. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Scribner’s.
17.
CullenF. T.CullenJ. B. (1978). Toward a paradigm of labeling theory. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska.
18.
DaviesS.TannerJ. (2003). The long arm of the law: Effects of labeling on employment. The Sociological Quarterly, 44, 385–404.
19.
De LiS. (1999). Legal sanctions and youths’ status attainment: A longitudinal study. Justice Quarterly, 16, 377–401.
20.
DemuthS. (2003). Racial profiling and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White Felony arrestees. Criminology, 41, 873–907.
21.
FordC. A.BearmanP. S.MoodyJ. (1999). Foregone health care among adolescents. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 2227–2234.
22.
GordonR. A. (1975). Examining labeling theory: The case of mental retardation. In GoveW. R. (Ed.) The labeling of deviance: Evaluating a perspective (pp. 83–146). New York, NY: Wiley.
23.
GoveW. R. (1975). Labelling and mental illness: A critique. In GoveW. R. (Ed.) The Labeling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective (pp. 35–81). New York, NY: Wiley.
24.
HaynieD. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 99–134.
25.
HaganJ. (1993). The social embeddedness of crime and unemployment. Criminology, 31, 465–491.
26.
HaganJ. & McCarthyB. (1998). Mean streets: Youth crime and homelessness. Cambridge (England): Cambridge University Press.
27.
HirschfieldP. J. (2008). The declining significance of delinquent labels in disadvantaged urban communities. Sociological Forum, 23, 575–601.
28.
HirschiT. (1975). Labelling theory and juvenile delinquency: An assessment of the evidence. In GoveW. R. (Ed.) The Labeling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective (pp. 181–203). New York, NY: Wiley.
29.
HuebnerB. M. & BynumT. S. (2008). The role of race and ethnicity in parole decisions. Criminology, 46, 907–938.
30.
HuizingaD.HenryK. L. (2008). The effect of arrest and justice system sanctions on subsequent behavior: Findings from longitudinal and other studies. In LibermanA. M. (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 220–254). New York, NY: Springer.
31.
JohnsonB. D. (2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology, 41, 449–490.
32.
JohnsonL. M.SimonsR. L.CongerR. D. (2004). Criminal justice system involvement and continuity of youth crime: A longitudinal analysis. Youth & Society, 36, 3–29.
33.
JussimL.OsgoodD. W. (1989). Influence and similarity among friends: An integrated model applied to incarcerated adolescents. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 98–112.
34.
KitsuseJ. I. (1975). The 'new conception of deviance' and its critics. In GoveW. R. (Ed.) The Labeling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective (pp. 273–284). New York, NY: Wiley.
35.
LeBelT. P. (2012). Invisible stripes? Formerly incarcerated persons' perceptions of stigma. Deviant Behavior, 33, 89–107.
36.
LemertE. M. (1972). Human deviance, social problems, and social control (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37.
MatsuedaR. L. (1992). Reflected appraisals, parental labeling, and delinquency: Specifying a symbolic interactionist theory. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1577–1611.
38.
McAraL.McVieS. (2005). The usual suspects? Street-life, young people and the police. Criminal Justice, 5, 5–36.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
MitchellO. (2016). The effect of drug arrest on subsequent drug offending and social bonding. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39, 174–188.
42.
OsgoodD. W.WilsonJ. K.O'malleyP. M.BachmanJ. G. & JohnstonL. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 635–655.
43.
PagerD. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937–975.
44.
PagerD.WesternB.SugieN. (2009). Sequencing disadvantage: Barriers to employment facing young black and white men with criminal records. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623, 195–213.
45.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP. & PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859–866.
46.
PaternosterR.IovanniL. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6, 359–394.
47.
PayneD. C.CornwellB. (2007). Reconsidering peer influences on delinquency: Do less proximate contacts matter?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 127–149.
48.
PegueroA. A. & ShekarkharZ. (2011). Latino/a student misbehavior and school punishment. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 33, 54–70.
49.
PetrunikM. (1980). The rise and fall of" labelling theory": the construction and destruction of a sociological strawman. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 5, 213–233.
50.
PettitB. & WesternB. (2004). Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in US incarceration. American Sociological Review, 69, 151–169.
51.
RocheleauG.ChavezJ. M. (2015). Guilt by association: The relationship between delinquent peers and delinquent labels. Deviant Behavior, 36, 167–186.
52.
RocqueM. (2010). Office discipline and student behavior: Does race matter?American Journal of Education, 116, 557–581.
53.
RocqueM. & PaternosterR. (2011). Understanding the antecedents of the" school-to-jail" link: The relationship between race and school discipline. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 633–665.
54.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage. In ThornberryT. (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 133–162). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
55.
SchurE. M. (1975). Comments. In GoveW. R. (Ed.) The Labeling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective (pp. 285–294). New York, NY: Wiley.
56.
SteffensmeierD. & DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?. American Sociological Review, 705–729.
57.
SteffensmeierD. & DemuthS. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race–ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241–261.
58.
SutherlandE. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
59.
SweetenG. (2006). Who will graduate?Disruption of high school education by arrest and court involvement. Justice Quarterly, 23, 462–480.
TannenbaumF. (1938). Crime and the community. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
62.
TannerJ.DaviesS.O’GradyB. (1999). Whatever happened to yesterday’s rebels? Longitudinal effects of youth delinquency on education and employment. Social Problems, 46, 250–274.
63.
TittleC. R. (1975). Labeling and crime: An empirical evaluation. In GoveW. (Ed.), The labeling of deviance: Evaluating a perspective (pp. 157–179). New York, NY: Wiley.
64.
WarrM. (1993). Parents/peers, and delinquency. Social Forces, 72, 247–264.
65.
WarrM.StaffordM. (1991). The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do?Criminology, 29, 851–866.
66.
WeermanF. M.SmeenkW. H. (2005). Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: A comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology, 43, 499–524.
67.
WellfordC. F. (1975). Labeling theory and criminology: An assessment. Social Problems, 22, 332–345.
68.
WesternB. (2002). The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. American Sociological Review, 67, 526–546.
69.
WileyS. A.SlocumL. A.EsbensenF. (2013). The unintended consequences of being stopped or arrested: An exploration of the labeling mechanisms through which police contact leads to subsequent delinquency. Criminology, 41, 927–966.
