While prior research has uncovered racial disparities in the administration of death sentences, little attention has been devoted to earlier stages in the capital punishment processes. To understand the locus of racial bias within death penalty institutions, this study examines the entry of homicide cases into Los Angeles County’s criminal justice system during a 5-year period. This two-part analysis seeks to answer the following research questions: (1) Does victim/defendant race influence homicide clearance and death penalty charging decisions? and (2) if so, does the likelihood of clearance mediate the effect of victim race on death penalty charges? Logistic regressions indicate that cases involving Latino victims are less likely to be cleared. Moreover, cases with Black and Latino victims are less likely to be prosecuted with a death penalty–eligible charge. Racial disparities accumulate across these stages, with clearance patterns influencing subsequent death penalty charging decisions. Results underscore the cumulative nature of racial within criminal justice institutions. By linking police and prosecution outcomes, these findings also highlight the interrelationship between criminal justice agencies.
AckerJ.LanierC. (1993). Aggravating circumstances and capital punishment law: Rhetoric or real reforms. Criminal Law Bulletin, 29, 467–501.
2.
AlaridL. F.SimsB. A.RuizJ. (2011). Juvenile probation and police partnerships as loosely coupled systems: A qualitative analysis. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9, 79–95.
3.
AlbonettiC. A. (1986). Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Toward a theory of discretionary decision making in felony case processings. Criminology, 24, 623–644.
4.
AlbonettiC. A. (1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21, 291.
5.
BaldusD. C.WoodworthG. (2003). Race discrimination and the death penalty: An empirical and legal overview. In BohmR. M.LanierC. S. (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 470–501). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
6.
BaldusD. C.WoodworthG.ZuckermanD.WeinerN.GrossoC. (2009). Empirical studies of race and geographic discrimination in the administration of the death penalty: A primer on the key methodological issues. In LanierC. S.AckerJ. R. (Eds.), The future of America’s death penalty: An agenda for the next generation of capital punishment research (pp. 153–197). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
7.
BaldusD. C.WoodworthG.PulaskiC. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Lebanon, NH: Upne.
8.
BaldusD. C.WoodworthG.WeinerN. (2009). Perspectives, approaches, and future directions in death penalty proportionality studies. In LanierC. S.BowersW. J.AckerJ. R. (Eds.), The future of America’s death penalty: An agenda for the next generation of capital punishment research (pp. 135–151). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
9.
BaumerE. P.MessnerS. F.FelsonR. B. (2000). The role of victim characteristics in the disposition of murder cases. Justice Quarterly, 17, 281–307.
10.
BeckettK.NyropK.PfingstL. (2006). Race, Drugs, and Policing: Understanding Disparities in Drug Delivery Arrests. Criminology, 44(1), 105–137.
11.
BerkR. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386–398.
12.
BerkR.BogerJ.WeissR. (1993). Chance and the death penalty. Law & Society Review, 27, 89.
13.
BishopD. M.LeiberM.JohnsonJ. (2010). Contexts of decision making in the juvenile justice system: An organizational approach to understanding minority overrepresentation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 213–233.
14.
BlackD. (1976). The behavior of law. New York, NY: Academic Press.
15.
BlumsteinA.WallmanJ. (2006). The crime drop in America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16.
BorgM. J.ParkerK. F. (2001). Mobilizing law in urban areas: The social structure of homicide clearance rates. Law and Society Review, 35, 435–466.
17.
BowersW. J. (1983). The pervasiveness of arbitrariness and discrimination under post-“Furman” capital statutes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 1067–1100.
18.
BowersW. J.PierceG. L. (1980). Arbitrariness and discrimination under post-Furman capital statutes. Crime & Delinquency, 26, 563–632.
19.
BrightS. B. (1994). Discrimination, death and denial: The tolerance of racial discrimination in infliction of the death penalty. Santa Clara Law Review, 35, 433.
BushwayS.JohnsonB. D.SlocumL. A. (2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 151–178.
CarterL. E.KreitzbergE.HoweS. (2012). Understanding capital punishment law. New York, NY: LexisNexis.
27.
ChavezL. (2013). The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
DemuthS. (2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White felony arrestees. Criminology, 41, 873–908.
FoxJ. A.SwattM. L. (2009). Multiple imputation of the supplementary homicide reports, 1976–2005. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 51–77.
31.
FrohmannL. (1991). Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38, 213–226.
32.
FrohmannL. (1997). Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decision making. Law & Society Review, 31, 531.
33.
GlassmanR. B. (1973). Persistence and loose coupling in living systems. Behavioral Science, 18, 83–98.
34.
GrossoC. M.O’BrienB.TaylorA.WoodworthG. (2014). Race discrimination and the death penalty: An empirical and legal overview. In AckerJ.BohmR.LanierC. (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 525–576). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
35.
HaganJ. (1973). Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing: An assessment of a sociological viewpoint. Law & Society Review, 8, 357.
36.
HaganJ. (1989). Why is there so little criminal justice theory? Neglected macro- and micro-level links between organization and power. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 116–135.
37.
HaganJ.HewittJ. D.AlwinD. F. (1979). Ceremonial justice: Crime and punishment in a loosely coupled system. Social Forces, 58, 506–527.
38.
HerbertS. (1996). The normative ordering of police territoriality: Making and marking space with the Los Angeles Police Department. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86, 567–582.
39.
JacksonM. A.WebsterC. D.HaganJ. L. (1982). Probation outcome: Is it necessary to fulfill the conditions. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 24, 267.
40.
JacobsD.WoodK. (1999). Interracial conflict and interracial homicide: Do political and economic rivalries explain white killings of blacks or black killings of whites?American Journal of Sociology, 105, 157–190.
41.
KaplanP.GanschowR.AngioliS.TabinL. (2009). Public but opaque: The problems of tracking homicide charging in a California county. Justice Policy Journal, 6, 1–29.
42.
KeilT. J.VitoG. F. (1990). Race and the death penalty in Kentucky murder trials: An analysis of post-Gregg outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 7, 189–207.
KutateladzeB.AndiloroN. R.JohnsonB. D.SpohnC. C. (2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52, 514–551.
LaFreeG.BaumerE. P.O’BrienR. (2010). Still separate and unequal? A city-level analysis of the black–white gap in homicide arrests since 1960. American Sociological Review, 75, 75–100.
48.
LandesW. M. (1971). An economic analysis of the courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 14, 61–107.
49.
LanganP. A.BrownJ. M. (1997). Felony sentences in state courts, 1994. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved fromhttp://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fssc94.pdf
50.
LeeC. (2005). The value of life in death: Multiple regression and event history analyses of homicide clearance in Los Angeles County. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 527–534.
51.
LeeC. (2007). Hispanics and the death penalty: Discriminatory charging practices in San Joaquin County, California. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 17–27.
52.
LeiberM. J.FoxK. C. (2005). Race and the impact of detention on juvenile justice decision making. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 470–497.
53.
LeiberM. J.JamiesonK. M. (1995). Race and decision making within juvenile justice: The importance of context. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 363–384.
54.
LeiberM. J.MackK. Y. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 34–70.
55.
LiebmanJ. S.ClarkeP. (2011). Minority practice, majority’s burden: The death penalty today. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 9, 255.
56.
LitwinK. J. (2004). A multilevel multivariate analysis of factors affecting homicide clearances. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 327–351.
57.
LitwinK. J.XuY. (2007). The dynamic nature of homicide clearances a multilevel model comparison of three time periods. Homicide Studies, 11, 94–114.
58.
MessnerS. F.SouthS. J. (1992). Interracial homicide: A macrostructural-opportunity perspective. Sociological Forum, 7, 517–536.
59.
OrtonJ. D.WeickK. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203–223.
60.
PaternosterR.BrameR.BaconS.DitchfieldA. (2004). Justice by geography and race: The administration of the death penalty in Maryland, 1978–1999. University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class, 4, 1.
61.
PetersenN. (2016). Neighborhood context and media constructions of murder: A multilevel analysis of homicide newspaper coverage in Los Angeles County. Homicide Studies, 20(1) 25–52.
62.
PetersenN. (forthcoming). Neighbourhood context and unsolved murders: The social ecology of homicide investigations. Policing and Society, 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2015.1063629.
63.
PetersenN.LynchM. (2013). Prosecutorial discretion, hidden costs, and the death penalty: The case of Los Angeles County. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102, 1233.
64.
PetersenN.WardG. (2015). The transmission of historical racial violence: Lynching, civil rights-era terror, and contemporary interracial homicide. Race and Justice: An International Journal, 5, 114–143.
65.
PetersonR. D.BaileyW. C. (1991). Felony murder and capital punishment: An examination of the deterrence question. Criminology, 29, 367.
66.
PhillipsS. (2009a). Legal disparities in the capital of capital punishment. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99, 717–756.
67.
PhillipsS. (2009b). Status disparities in the capital of capital punishment. Law & Society Review, 43, 807–838.
68.
PierceG.RadeletM. (2005). Impact of legally inappropriate factors on death sentencing for California homicides, 1990–1999. The Santa Clara Law Review, 46, 1.
69.
PuckettJ. L.LundmanR. J. (2003). Factors affecting homicide clearances: Multivariate analysis of a more complete conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 171–193.
70.
RadeletM. (1981). Racial characteristics and the imposition of the death penalty. American Sociological Review, 46, 918–927.
71.
RadeletM.PierceG. (1985). Race and prosecutorial discretion in homicide cases. Law and Society Review, 19, 587–621.
72.
RadeletM.PierceG. (2009). Racial and ethnic disparities in resolving. In LanierC. S.AckerJ. R. (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 113–134). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
73.
RasmusenE.RaghavM.RamseyerM. (2009). Convictions versus conviction rates: The prosecutor’s choice. American Law and Economics Review, 11, 47–78.
74.
RegoecziW. C.JarvisJ. P. (2013). Beyond the social production of homicide rates: Extending social disorganization theory to explain homicide case outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 30, 983–1014.
75.
ReissA. J. (1973). The police and the public (Vol. 39). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
76.
RiedelM. (2008). Homicide arrest clearances: A review of the literature. Sociology Compass, 2, 1145–1164.
77.
RodriguezN. (2010). The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 391–413.
78.
RuppA. (2002). Death penalty prosecutorial charging decisions and county budgetary restrictions: Is the death penalty arbitrarily applied based on county funding. Fordham Law Review, 71, 2735.
79.
Russell-BrownK. (1998). The color of crime: Racial hoaxes, white fear, black protectionism, police harassment, and other macroaggressions. New York, NY: NYU Press.
80.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processing: Inequality, the underclass, and social control. Law and Society Review, 27, 285–311.
81.
SchaferJ. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3–15.
82.
SchlesingerT. (2008). The cumulative effects of racial disparities in criminal processing. The Advocate, 13, 22–34.
83.
ShatzS. F. (2007). Eighth amendment, the death penalty, and ordinary robbery–burglary murderers: A California case study. The Florida Law Review, 59, 719.
84.
ShatzS. F.RivkindN. (1997). California death penalty scheme: Requiem for Furman. The New York University Law Review, 72, 1283.
85.
SongerM. J.UnahI. (2006). Effect of race, gender, and location on prosecutorial decisions to seek the death penalty in South Carolina. The South Carolina Law Review, 58, 161.
86.
SorensenJ.WallaceD. (1999). Prosecutorial discretion in seeking death: An analysis of racial disparity in the pretrial stages of case processing in a Midwestern county. Justice Quarterly, 16, 559–578.
87.
SpohnC. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice, 3, 427–501.
88.
SpohnC.SampleL. L. (2008). The dangerous drug offender in federal court: Intersections of race, ethnicity, and culpability. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 3–31.
89.
SteenS.EngenR. L.GaineyR. R. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435–468.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–798.
92.
StolzenbergL.D’AlessioS. J.EitleD. (2013). Race and cumulative discrimination in the prosecution of criminal defendants. Race and Justice, 3, 275–299.
93.
SuttonJ. R. (2013). Structural bias in the sentencing of felony defendants. Social Science Research, 42, 1207–1221.
94.
UlmerJ. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29, 1–40.
95.
UlmerJ. T.JohnsonB. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137–178.
96.
U.S. Census. (1990). Summary tape file 1, prepared by the Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC: Bureau of Census.
97.
U.S. General Accountability Office. (1990). Death penalty sentencing: Research indicates pattern of racial disparities. Government Accountability Office, Washington, D.C. Retrieved fromhttp://www.gao.gov/assets/220/212180.pdf
98.
WangX.MearsD. P. (2010a). A multilevel test of minority threat effects on sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 191–215.
99.
WangX.MearsD. P. (2010b). Examining the direct and interactive effects of changes in racial and ethnic threat on sentencing decisions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 522–557.
100.
WeickK. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
101.
WeickK. E. (1982). Administering education in loosely coupled schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 673–676.
102.
WeissR.BerkR.LeeC. (1996). Assessing the capriciousness of death penalty charging. Law and Society Review, 30, 607–626.
103.
WeissR.BerkR.LiW.Farrell-RossM. (1999). Death penalty charging in Los Angeles County: An illustrative data analysis using skeptical priors. Sociological Methods & Research, 28, 91–115.
104.
YarvisR. M. (2000). Homicide, psychopathology, prosecutorial and jury discretion and the death penalty. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 10, 256–268.
105.
ZatzM. S. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69–92.
106.
ZatzM. S. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. Criminal Justice, 3, 503–552.
107.
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S. Ct. 2726, 33 L. Ed. 2d 346 (1972).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
