The rise of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has expanded the landscape of cyberbullying, necessitating an examination of the psychological and demographic factors underlying these behaviors. This two-wave longitudinal study (N = 1,019) investigated the associations between Dark Tetrad, gender, age, and GAI-involved cyberbullying (GAICB) over a 6-month interval. Hierarchical linear regressions indicated that psychopathy and male gender were longitudinal predictors of GAICB at Time 2, even after controlling for baseline behaviors at Time 1. While sadism was significant in the baseline model, its effect became nonsignificant after accounting for prior GAICB. Machiavellianism, narcissism, and age showed no significant effects. These results suggest that psychopathy and gender may be associated with AI-driven aggression, warranting further research into targeted prevention strategies.
BaumanS, CrossD, WalkerJ. Principles of cyberbullying research: Definitions, measures, and methodology. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2013. xxviii, 358–xxviii, 358 p.
2.
OlweusD. Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? Eur J Dev Psychol2012;9(5):520–538; doi: 10.1080/17405629.2012.682358
3.
SchoffstallCL, CohenR. Cyber aggression: The relation between online offenders and offline social competence. Social Development2011;20(3):587–604; doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00609.x
4.
SmithPK. Cyberbullying and cyber aggression. In: Handbook of school violence and school safety: International research and practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2012. pp. 93–103.
5.
BarlettCP, KowalskiRM, WilsonAM. Meta-analyses of the predictors and outcomes of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization while controlling for traditional bullying perpetration and victimization. Aggress Violent Behav2024;74:101886; doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2023.101886
6.
KowalskiRM, GiumettiGW, SchroederAN, et al.Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol Bull2014;140(4):1073–1137; doi: 10.1037/a0035618
7.
FerraraE. GenAI against humanity: Nefarious applications of generative artificial intelligence and large language models. J Comput Soc Sc2024;7(1):549–569; doi: 10.1007/s42001-024-00250-1
8.
FerraraE. The generative AI paradox: GenAI and the erosion of trust, the corrosion of information verification, and the demise of truth. Future Internet2026;18(2):73; doi: 10.3390/fi18020073
9.
KelleyPG, Rousso-SchindlerS, ShelbyR, et al.How generative AI empowers attackers and defenders across the trust & safety landscape. In:Proceedings of the 2026 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems [Internet]. 2026. pp. 1–21. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06033 [cited 2026 Apr 28]; doi: 10.1145/3772318.3791363
10.
DioufMA, DiaoMT, OlatunjiIE, et al.From Rookie to Expert: Manipulating LLMs for Automated Vulnerability Exploitation in Enterprise Software [Internet]. ArXiv2025. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22753; doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.22753 [cited 2026 Apr 28].
11.
PaulhusDL, BuckelsEE, TrapnellPD, et al.Screening for dark personalities: The Short Dark Tetrad (SD4). European Journal of Psychological Assessment2021;37(3):208–222; doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
12.
GoodboyAK, MartinMM. The personality profile of a cyberbully: Examining the Dark Triad. Comput Human Behav2015;49:1–4; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.052
13.
KircaburunK, JonasonP, GriffithsMD, et al.Childhood emotional abuse and cyberbullying perpetration: The role of dark personality traits. J Interpers Violence2021;36(21–22):NP11877–NP11893; doi: 10.1177/0886260519889930
14.
MoorL, AndersonJR. A systematic literature review of the relationship between dark personality traits and antisocial online behaviours. Pers Individ Dif2019;144:40–55; doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.027
15.
WangCY, LiuYL, ChangCY. Investigating the effects of dark triad and anonymity on exclusionary cyber aggression: A social media experiment. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw2025;28(8):566–573; doi: 10.1089/cyber.2024.0577
16.
WangCY, BiK. Exploring the Influence of the Dark Triad on Indirect Cyber Aggression: A Longitudinal Study of a Taiwanese Sample. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw2025;28(2):105–111; doi: 10.1089/cyber.2024.0303
17.
BaughmanHM, DearingS, GiammarcoE, et al.Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults. Pers Individ Dif2012;52(5):571–575; doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.020
BuckelsEE, TrapnellPD, PaulhusDL. Trolls just want to have fun. Pers Individ Dif2014;67:97–102; doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
20.
van GeelM, GoemansA, ToprakF, et al.Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the Big Five, Dark Triad and sadism. Pers Individ Dif2017;106:231–235; doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.063
21.
OlweusD, LimberSP. Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the olweus bullying prevention program. Am J Orthopsychiatry2010;80(1):124–134; doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01015.x
22.
DilmacB. Psychological Needs as a predictor of cyber bullying: A preliminary report on college students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice2009;9(3):1307–1325.
23.
KowalskiRM, LimberSP. Electronic bullying among middle school students. J Adolesc Health2007;41(6 (Suppl 1)):S22–S30; doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
24.
SmithPK, MahdaviJ, CarvalhoM, et al.Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatry2008;49(4):376–385; doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
25.
HindujaS, PatchinJW. Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behav2008;29(2):129–156; doi: 10.1080/01639620701457816
26.
SlonjeR, SmithPK. Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scand J Psychol2008;49(2):147–154; doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x
27.
VarjasK, HenrichCC, MeyersJ. Urban middle school students’ perceptions of bullying, cyberbullying, and school safety. J Sch Violence2009;8(2):159–176; doi: 10.1080/15388220802074165
28.
KowalskiRM, MorganCA, LimberSP. Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. Sch Psychol Int2012;33(5):505–519; doi: 10.1177/0143034312445244
29.
BabbieER. Survey Research Methods. Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1990. p. 428.
30.
AbdullahN, KamaruddinMA, GohY-X, et al.Participants Attrition in a Longitudinal Study: The Malaysian Cohort Study Experience. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021;18(14):7216; doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147216
31.
StekhovenDJ, BühlmannP. MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics2012;28(1):112–118; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597
32.
HairJF, BlackWC, BabinBJ, et al.Multivariate Data Analysis7th ed. London: Pearson; 2009. p. 816.
33.
MengX, LiC, LiuD, et al.The super-short dark tetrad: Development and validation within the Chinese context. Pers Individ Dif2022;188:111459; doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111459
34.
HindujaSK, PatchinJW. Bullying Beyond the Schoolyard: Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying. Third edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin; 2023. p. 248.
