While individuals exhibit heightened attentional bias toward social media information, it remains debated whether this reflects a content-specific priority or a broader cognitive adaptation. Using visual search tasks, self-report scales, and the Embedded Figures Test, this study investigated attentional capture by digital icons and the role of cognitive style. Results showed that icons, particularly for field-independent individuals, elicited greater capture, suggesting a generalized digital attentional bias, and cognitive style play a key role in the process.
ChoiJ, ChoH, ChoiJS, et al.The neural basis underlying impaired attentional control in problematic smartphone users. Transl Psychiatry, 2021; 11(1):129; doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01246-5
3.
SkowronekJ, SeifertA, LindbergS. The mere presence of a smartphone reduces basal attentional performance. Sci Rep, 2023; 13(1):9363; doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36256-4
4.
PosnerMI, PetersenSE. The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci, 1990; 13(1):25–42; doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325
5.
LavieN. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 1995; 21(3):451–468; doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.451
6.
LiebherrM, SchubertP, AntonsS, et al.Smartphones and attention, curse or blessing?-A review on the effects of smartphone usage on attention, inhibition, and working memory. Comput Hum Behav Rep, 2020; 1:100005; doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100005
7.
JiangZ, HanJ, QianC, et al.VADS: Visual attention detection with a smartphone. In IEEE INFOCOM 2016-The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, 2016; 1–9; doi: 10.1109/INFOCOM.2016.7524398
8.
AndersonBA. Value-driven attentional capture in the auditory domain. Atten Percept Psychophys, 2016; 78(1):242–250; doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1001-7
9.
ZhangX, DingX, MaL. The influences of information overload and social overload on intention to switch in social media. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2022; 41(2):228–241; doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1800820
10.
SchwaigerE, TahirR. The impact of nomophobia and smartphone presence on fluid intelligence and attention. Cyberpsychology, 2022; 16(1); doi: 10.5817/CP2022-1-5
11.
KoessmeierC, BüttnerOB. Why are we distracted by social media? Distraction situations and strategies, reasons for distraction, and individual differences. Front Psychol, 2021; 12:711416; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711416
12.
KoessmeierC, BüttnerOB. Social media distraction: How distracting are visual social media cues and what influences users’ distractibility? Comput Human Behav, 2024; 159:108306; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108306
13.
WeiZ, GuoY, TsangMHL, et al.Social media distractions alter behavioral and neural patterns to global-local attention: The moderation effect of fear of missing out. Comput Human Behav, 2024; 157:108258; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108258
14.
JeongSH, HwangY. Media multitasking effects on cognitive vs. attitudinal outcomes: A meta-analysis. Hum Commun Res, 2016; 42(4):599–618; doi: 10.1111/hcre.12089
15.
UncapherMR, WagnerAD. Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current findings and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018; 115(40):9889–9896; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611612115
16.
FabioRA, StracuzziA, Lo FaroR. Problematic smartphone use leads to behavioral and cognitive self-control deficits. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022; 19(12):7445; doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127445
17.
WilmerHH, ShermanLE, CheinJM. Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Front Psychol, 2017; 8:605; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605
18.
WiradhanyW, PócsA, BaumgartnerSE. Are social media notifications distracting? Experimental Psychology, 2024; 71(4):189–201; doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000625
19.
NikolaidouM, FraserDS, HinvestN. Attentional bias in Internet users with problematic use of social networking sites. J Behav Addict, 2019; 8(4):733–742; doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.60
20.
MontagC, BeckerB. Neuroimaging the effects of smartphone (over-)use on brain function and structure-a review on the current state of MRI-based findings and a roadmap for future research. Psychoradiology, 2023; 3(1):kkad001; doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkad001
21.
MontagC, MarcianoL, SchulzPJ, et al.Unlocking the brain secrets of social media through neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci, 2023; 27(12):1102–1104; doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.09.005
22.
ChenL, NathR, TangZ. Understanding the determinants of digital distraction: An automatic thinking behavior perspective. Comput Human Behav, 2020; 104:106195; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106195
23.
WardAF, DukeK, GneezyA, et al.Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. J Assoc Consum Res, 2017; 2(2):140–154; doi: 10.1086/691462
24.
ItoM, KawaharaJI. Effect of the presence of a mobile phone during a spatial visual search. Jpn Psychol Res, 2017; 59(2):188–198; doi: 10.1111/jpr.12143
25.
ThorntonB, FairesA, RobbinsM, et al.The mere presence of a cell phone may be distracting. Soc Psychol, 2014; 45(6):479–488; doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000216
26.
ChenQ, YanZ. Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Comput Human Behav, 2016; 54(54):34–42; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047
27.
MontagC, ElhaiJD, DagumP. Show me your smartphone… and then I will show you your brain structure and brain function. Human Behav and Emerg Tech, 2021; 3(5):891–897; doi: 10.1002/hbe2.272
28.
FieldM, CoxWM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend, 2008; 97,(1-2):1–20; doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030
29.
WangY, ElhaiJD, MontagC, et al.Attentional bias to social media stimuli is moderated by fear of missing out among problematic social media users. J Behav Addict, 2024; 13(3):807–822; doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00039
30.
ElhaiJD, LevineJC, AlghraibehAM, et al.Fear of missing out: Testing relationships with negative affectivity, online social engagement, and problematic smartphone use. Comput Human Behav, 2018; 89:289–298; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.020
31.
BrandM, YoungKS, LaierC, et al.Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2016; 71(71):252–266; doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033
32.
MyruskiS, de RutteJ, FindleyA, et al.Preference for digital media use, biobehavioral attention bias, and anxiety symptoms in adolescents. Comput Hum Behav Rep, 2024; 15:100439; doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100439
33.
RittschofKA. Field dependence–independence as visuospatial and executive functioning in working memory: Implications for instructional systems design and research. Education Tech Research Dev, 2010; 58(1):99–114; doi: 10.1007/s11423-008-9093-6
34.
WitkinHA, MooreCA, GoodenoughDR, et al.Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Rev Educ Res, 1977; 47(1):1–64; doi: 10.3102/00346543047001001
35.
WapnerS, DemickJ., and Field Dependence-Independence: Bio-Psycho-Social Factors across the Life Span. Hoboken, Taylor and Francis, 2014.
36.
TeghilA, D’AntonioF, Di VitaA, et al.Temporal learning in the suprasecond range: Insights from cognitive style. Psychol Res, 2023; 87(2):568–582; doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01667-x
37.
WachtelP. L.Cognitive style, attention, and learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971; 32(1):315–318; doi: 10.2466/pms.1971.32.1.315
38.
GaspelinN, LeonardCJ, LuckSJ. Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons. Atten Percept Psychophys, 2017; 79(1):45–62; doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1209-1
39.
GaspelinN, LuckSJ. The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by Salient stimuli. Trends Cogn Sci, 2018; 22(1):79–92; doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001
40.
ZhangW, LuckSJ. Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 2008; 453(7192):233–235; doi: 10.1038/nature06860
41.
BradyTF, StörmerVS, AlvarezGA. Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016; 113(27):7459–7464; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520027113
42.
BradyTF, AlvarezGA. Contextual effects in visual working memory reveal hierarchically structured memory representations. J Vis, 2015; 15(15):6; doi: 10.1167/15.15.6
43.
MengQ, ChangJ. The revision of assessment method and partial normal about embedding figures test. Selected Papers on Cognitive Style (1988): 261–276.
44.
JiaS, ZhangQ, LiS. Field dependence-independence modulates the efficiency of filtering out irrelevant information in a visual working memory task. Neuroscience, 2014; 278:136–143; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.075
45.
WegmannE, OberstU, StodtB, et al.Online-specific fear of missing out and Internet-use expectancies contribute to symptoms of Internet- communication disorder. Addict Behav Rep, 2017; 5:33–42; doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2017.04.001
46.
WangY, LiuB, ZhangL, et al.Anxiety, depression, and stress are associated with internet gaming disorder during COVID-19: Fear of missing out as a mediator. Front Psychiatry, 2022; 13:827519; doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.827519
47.
LiD, ZhangW, LiX, et al.Stressful life events and problematic Internet use by adolescent females and males: A mediated moderation model. Comput Human Behav, 2010; 26(5):1199–1207; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.031
48.
KwonM, KimDJ, ChoH, et al.The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One, 2013; 8(12):e83558; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
CarrascoM. Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Res, 2011; 51(13):1484–1525.
51.
EysenckMW, DerakshanN, SantosR, et al.Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 2007; 7(2):336–353; doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
52.
EriksenBA, EriksenCW. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 1974; 16(1):143–149; doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
53.
TheeuwesJ. Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection. Acta Psychol (Amst), 2010; 135(2):77–99; doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
54.
LangenbergB, HelmJL, GüntherT, et al.Understanding, testing, and relaxing sphericity of repeated measures ANOVA with manifest and latent variables using SEM. Methodology, 2023; 19(1):60–95; doi: 10.5964/meth.8415
55.
RoystonP. Approximating the Shapiro-Wilk W-test for non-normality. Stat Comput, 1992; 2(3):117–119; doi: 10.1007/BF01891203
56.
ElhaiJD, LevineJC, DvorakRD, et al.Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Comput Human Behav, 2016; 63:509–516; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.079
57.
WitkinHA, DonaldR. Cognitive styles Essence and origins. International Universities, 1981.
58.
TreismanAM, GeladeG. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol, 1980; 12(1):97–136; doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
59.
BavelierD, BediouB, GreenCS. Expertise and generalization: Lessons from action video games. Curr Opin Behav Sci, 2018; 20:169–173; doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.012
60.
BediouB, AdamsDM, MayerRE, et al.Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychol Bull, 2018; 144(1):77–110; doi: 10.1037/bul0000130
61.
TwengeJM. More time on technology, less happiness? Associations between digital-media use and psychological well-being. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 2019; 28(4):372–379; doi: 10.1177/0963721419838244
62.
UhlsYT, MichikyanM, MorrisJ, et al.Five days at outdoor education camp without screens improves preteen skills with nonverbal emotion cues. Comput Human Behav, 2014; 39(39):387–392; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.036
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
