This study was performed to clarify the relationship between smartphone usage and depression risk among older adults. We also examined smartphone use variations, population heterogeneity, and the mechanisms behind smartphone-related depression symptoms. A total of 10,997 older adults (mean age = 84.31 years) from a national cohort (Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity and Happy Family Study) in China were included. Smartphone use was measured by use status (yes/no) and contents. Among eight dichotomous questions about contents of smartphones, chatting, shopping, traveling, and entertainment were classified as routine-oriented activities. In contrast, health management, financial management, and learning were classified as functional/cognitive-oriented activities. Thus, participants were categorized into four groups, including not using a smartphone, using smartphones both for routine-oriented and functional/cognitive-oriented activities, only for routine-oriented activities, and others. Smartphone users had lower 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale scores (β = −0.62; p < 0.001) and a reduced depression risk (odds ratio = 0.77; p < 0.001) compared with nonusers. Furthermore, those using smartphones for routine-oriented and functional/cognitive-oriented activities had even lower risks than those using them only for routine-oriented activities. Second, using smartphones was more sensitive to alleviating depression among older adults aged <80 years or living in rural areas. Third, mediation analyses suggested that using smartphones may be associated with depressive symptoms through communicating with children regularly. Our findings suggest that smartphone use may have a positive effect on mental health, particularly among those who engage in diverse routine-oriented and functional/cognitive-oriented activities. Smartphone benefits are more evident in younger seniors and rural residents, indicating a need for targeted interventions for these groups.
PirkisJ, PfaffJ, WilliamsonM, et al.The community prevalence of depression in older Australians. J Affect Disord, 2009; 115(1–2):54–61; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.08.014
2.
SubramaniamM, AbdinE, SambasivamR, et al.Prevalence of depression among older adults—results from the well-being of the Singapore elderly study. Ann Acad Med Singap, 2016; 45(4):123–133.
3.
XuZ, ZhangQ, LiW, et al.Individualized prediction of depressive disorder in the elderly: A multitask deep learning approach. Int J Med Inform, 2019; 132:103973; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103973
4.
ChoiS, LeeS, MatejkowskiJ, et al.The relationships among depression, physical health conditions and healthcare expenditures for younger and older Americans. J Ment Health, 2014; 23(3):140–145; doi: 10.3109/09638237.2014.910643
5.
GuD, MorganRO, LiR, et al.Association between depression and healthcare expenditures among elderly cancer patients. BMC Psychiatry, 2020; 20(1):131; doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02527-x
6.
BrewsterGS, PetersonL, RokerR, et al.Depressive symptoms, cognition, and everyday function among community-residing older adults. J Aging Health, 2017; 29(3):367–388; doi: 10.1177/0898264316635587
7.
RosenbergPB, MielkeMM, XueQL, et al.Depressive symptoms predict incident cognitive impairment in cognitive healthy older women. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2010; 18(3):204–211; doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c53487
8.
DongX, ChangES, WongE, et al.The perceptions, social determinants, and negative health outcomes associated with depressive symptoms among U.S. Chinese older adults. Gerontologist, 2012; 52(5):650–663; doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr126
9.
ZivinK, LlewellynDJ, LangIA, et al.Depression among older adults in the United States and England. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2010; 18(11):1036–1044; doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181dba6d2
10.
KaraşH, Küçükparlakİ, ÖzbekMG, et al.Addictive smartphone use in the elderly: Relationship with depression, anxiety and sleep quality. Psychogeriatrics, 2023; 23(1):116–125; doi: 10.1111/psyg.12910
BertocchiFM, De OliveiraAC, LucchettiG, et al.Smartphone use, digital addiction and physical and mental health in community-dwelling older adults: A population-based survey. J Med Syst, 2022; 46(8):53; doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01839-7
13.
ZhuX, ChengX. Staying connected: Smartphone acceptance and use level differences of older adults in China. Univers Access Inf Soc, 2022:1–10; doi: 10.1007/s10209-022-00933-4
14.
SagongH, YoonJY. The effects of smartphone use on life satisfaction in older adults. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 2022; 40(8):523–530; doi: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000867
15.
XiangY, JinQ, WangX. Does smartphone use affect the elderly attitude toward aging?: Evidence from China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey (class). Southeast Academic Research, 2023; 01:160–161; doi: 10.13658/j.cnki.sar.2023.01.011
16.
TangD, JinY, ZhangK, et al.Internet use, social networks, and loneliness among the older population in China. Front Psychol, 2022; 13:895141; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895141
17.
TorousJ, PowellAC. Current research and trends in the use of smartphone applications for mood disorders. Internet Interv, 2015; 2(2):169–173; doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.03.002
18.
ChenY, FeeleyTH. Social support, social strain, loneliness, and well-being among older adults: An analysis of the Health and Retirement Study. J Soc Pers Relat, 2014; 31(2):141–161; doi: 10.1177/0265407513488728
19.
SilversteinM, BengtsonVL. Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families. Am J Sociol, 1997; 103(2):429–460.
20.
ChuL, JolyE, MoisanM-G. Child-to-parent intergenerational support and its association with subjective well-being among older adults: A cross-national comparison of American and Korean parents. Wellbeing Space Soc, 2023; 5:100177.
21.
Solis-LópezSE, Hernández-RuizV, AmievaH, et al.Social connections and depressive symptoms among older adults during the initial lockdown period for COVID-19. Salud Ment, 2023; 46(3):131–136; doi: 10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2023.017
22.
von ElmE, AltmanDG, EggerM, et al.; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med, 2007; 147(8):573–577; doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
23.
GuD, FengQ, ChenH, et al.Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). In: Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. (GuD, DupreME eds.) Springer Nature Switzerland AG: 2022; pp. 1–14.
24.
GuD, FengQ. Psychological resilience of Chinese centenarians and its associations with survival and health: A fuzzy set analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2018; 73(5):880–889; doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw071
25.
ZengY, PostonDLJr, VloskyDA, et al.Healthy Longevity in China: Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Psychological Dimensions. Springer Publisher: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2008.
26.
YangH, TngGYQ, KhooSS, et al.Smartphone-use profiles and cognitive and socioemotional outcomes in middle-aged and older adults: A latent profile analysis. Curr Psychol, 2024; 43(4):3197–3209.
27.
AndresenEM, MalmgrenJA, CarterWB, et al.Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med, 1994; 10(2):77–84; doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30622-6
28.
BoeyKW. Cross-validation of a short form of the CES-D in Chinese elderly. Int J Geriat Psychiatry, 1999; 14(8):608–617.
29.
ChenH, MuiAC. Factorial validity of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale short form in older population in China. Int Psychogeriatr, 2014; 26(1):49–57; doi: 10.1017/s1041610213001701
30.
RongH, LaiX, JingR, et al.Association of sensory impairments with cognitive decline and depression among older adults in China. JAMA Netw Open, 2020; 3(9):e2014186; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14186
31.
SongH, SunH. Association of unmet long-term care needs with depression and anxiety among older adults in urban and Rural China. Geriatr Nurs, 2023; 49:115–121; doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.11.017
32.
RadloffLS. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas, 1977; 1(3):385–401; doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306
33.
ZhangP, WangL, ZhouQ, et al.A network analysis of anxiety and depression symptoms in Chinese Disabled Elderly. J Affect Disord, 2023; 333:535–542; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.065
34.
ChengST, ChanAC. The center for epidemiologic studies depression scale in older Chinese: Thresholds for long and short forms. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2005; 20(5):465–470; doi: 10.1002/gps.1314
35.
WangM, SuW, ChenH, et al.Depressive symptoms and risk of incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity in community-dwelling older adults: The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. J Affect Disord, 2023; 335:75–82; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.048
36.
BaronRM, KennyDA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1986; 51(6):1173–1182.
37.
SobelME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: Sociological Methodology. (LeinhardtS. ed.) American Sociological Association: Washington, DC; 1982; pp. 290–312.
38.
WenZ, YeB. Analyses of mediating effects: The development of methods and models. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014; 22(5):731; doi: 10.3724/sp.J.1042.2014.00731
PreacherKJ, HayesAF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods, 2008; 40(3):879–891; doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
41.
KouvonenA, KemppainenL, KetonenE-L, et al.Digital information technology use, self-rated health, and depression: Population-based analysis of a survey study on older migrants. J Med Internet Res, 2021; 23(6):e20988; doi: 10.2196/20988
42.
MinagawaY, SaitoY. An analysis of the impact of cell phone use on depressive symptoms among Japanese elders. Gerontology, 2014; 60(6):539–547; doi: 10.1159/000363059
43.
ChopikWJ. The benefits of social technology use among older adults are mediated by reduced loneliness. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2016; 19(9):551–556; doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0151
44.
MonteiroJM, GonçalvesR, BastosA, et al.Social engagement and wellbeing in late life: A systematic review. Ageing Soc, 2025; 45(7):1327–1354; doi: 10.1017/s0144686x24000011
45.
CottenSR, SchusterAM, SeifertA. Social media use and well-being among older adults. Curr Opin Psychol, 2022; 45:101293; doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.005
46.
DelelloJA, McWhorterRR. Reducing the digital divide: Connecting older adults to iPad technology. J Appl Gerontol, 2017; 36(1):3–28; doi: 10.1177/0733464815589985
47.
ZhangA, WroblewskiKE, ImberyTE, et al.Can digital communication protect against depression for older adults with hearing and vision impairment during COVID-19? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2023; 78(4):629–638; doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac193
48.
BellevilleS, CordièreA, Ducharme-LalibertéG, et al.Early-life and late-life cognitive lifestyle as a way to promote cognitive reserve in older adults. Innovation in Aging, 2017; 1(Suppl_1):60.
49.
AndrewsJA, BrownLJE, HawleyMS, et al.Older adults’ perspectives on using digital technology to maintain good mental health: Interactive Group Study. J Med Internet Res, 2019; 21(2):e11694; doi: 10.2196/11694
50.
FriemelTN. The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 2016; 18(2):313–331; doi: 10.1177/1461444814538648
51.
BurholtV, ScharfT. Poor health and loneliness in later life: The role of depressive symptoms, social resources, and rural environments. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2014; 69(2):311–324; doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt121
52.
ValkenburgPM, SchoutenAP, PeterJ. Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media and Society, 2005; 7(3):383–402; doi: 10.1177/1461444805052282
53.
MalikN. Family Systems Theory. In: Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. (GellmanMD. ed.) Springer: Cham; 2020.
54.
PetrovčičA, FortunatiL, VehovarV, et al.Mobile phone communication in social support networks of older adults in Slovenia. Telemat Inform, 2015; 32(4):642–655; doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.005
55.
DodgeHH, ZhuJ, MattekNC, et al.Web‐enabled conversational interactions as a method to improve cognitive functions: Results of a 6‐week randomized controlled trial. Alzheimers Dement (N Y), 2015; 1(1):1–12; doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2015.01.001
56.
ZengY, FengQ, HeskethT, et al.Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: A Cohort Study. Lancet, 2017; 389(10079):1619–1629; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30548-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
