Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-12
Work Hard,Use Harder? The Longitudinal Association Between Work Addiction and Social Media Addiction in Full-Time Workers by a Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis
Social media addiction (SMA) has become a global public issue in recent decades. Considering the increasing use of social media in the workplace as a communication and productivity tool, workers may suffer a higher risk of SMA. Workers are also a notable population susceptible to work addiction (WA) due to the fierce competition in the labor market. By analyzing temporal associations between WA and SMA as well as their symptoms (e.g., salience), our study advances knowledge regarding comorbidity between these behavioral addictions and relationships among their specific symptoms. In a sample of 1,100 workers (Mage = 32.69, standard deviation [SDage] = 7.76, female = 60.5 percent), we conducted a two-wave, longitudinal survey to examine the relationship(s) between WA and SMA (i.e., construct level) and the association(s) between their specific symptoms (i.e., symptom level) by modeling a cross-lagged panel model and a cross-lagged panel network (CLPN). Both a high prevalence of SMA (7.3 percent) and WA (16.9 percent), as well as their co-occurrence, were found. Results of the cross-lagged panel model and CLPN consistently showed the reciprocal predictions between SMA and WA. Results of CLPN analysis also identified the stronger positive prospective effects of WA on SMA and highlighted the most influential roles of WA-tolerance in predicting SMA, especially SMA-relapse. Besides, mutual but negative predictions between their salience and relapse symptoms were noted in CLPN. Our findings extend the knowledge of the bidirectionality of behavioral addictions and provide practical implications regarding cost-effective interventions for workers’ co-occurring behavioral addictions.
AndreassenCS. Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Curr Addict Rep, 2015; 2(2):175–184.
2.
AndreassenC, PallesenS. Social network site addiction—An overview. Curr Pharm Des, 2014; 20(25):4053–4061.
3.
ChengC, LauY, ChanL, et al.Prevalence of social media addiction across 32 nations: Meta-analysis with subgroup analysis of classification schemes and cultural values. Addict Behav, 2021; 117:106845.
4.
AppelM, MarkerC, GnambsT. Are social media ruining our lives? A review of meta-analytic evidence. Rev Gen Psychol, 2020; 24(1):60–74.
5.
QuinonesC, GriffithsMD, KakabadseNK. Compulsive internet use and workaholism: An exploratory two-wave longitudinal study. Comput Human Behav, 2016; 60:492–499.
6.
HorváthZ, PaksiB, ArandaFF, et al.The predictive role of tolerance and health problems in problem gambling: A cross-sectional and cross-lagged network analyses. J Gambl Stud, 2023; 39(4):1781–1798.
7.
AndreassenCS, GriffithsMD, HetlandJ, et al.Development of a work addiction scale. Scand J Psychol, 2012; 53(3):265–272.
8.
GrantJE, PotenzaMN, WeinsteinA, et al.Introduction to behavioral addictions. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse, 2010; 36(5):233–241.
9.
GriffithsM. A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. J Subst Use, 2005; 10(4):191–197.
10.
MolinoM, KovalchukLS, GhislieriC, et al.Work addiction among employees and self-employed workers: An investigation based on the Italian version of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale. Eur J Psychol, 2022; 18(3):279–292.
11.
AtroszkoPA. Nondrug addiction: Addiction to work. In: Handbook of substance misuse and addictions: from biology to public health. (PatelVB, PreedyVR., eds.) Springer International Publishing; Cham; 2022; pp. 2981–3012.
12.
DutheilF, CharkhabiM, RavouxH, et al.Exploring the link between work addiction risk and health-related outcomes using job-demand-control model. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020; 17(20):7594.
13.
GriffithsMD, DemetrovicsZ, AtroszkoPA. Ten myths about work addiction. J Behav Addict, 2018; 7(4):845–857.
14.
GoldenL. A brief history of long work time and the contemporary sources of overwork. J Bus Ethics, 2009; 84(S2):217–227.
15.
JacobsJA, GersonK. Overworked individuals or overworked families? Work Occup, 2001; 28(1):40–63.
16.
NgTWH, SorensenKL, FeldmanDC. Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: A conceptual integration and extension. J Organ Behavior, 2007; 28(1):111–136.
17.
WhitingA, WilliamsD. Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Res, 2013; 16(4):362–369.
18.
SyrekCJ, KühnelJ, HinzTV, et al.Share, like, twitter, and connect: Ecological momentary assessment to examine the relationship between non-work social media use at work and work engagement. Work Stress, 2018; 32(3):209–227.
19.
BakkerAB, DemeroutiE, OerlemansW, et al.Workaholism and daily recovery: A day reconstruction study of leisure activities. J Organ Behavior, 2013; 34(1):87–107.
20.
RobertsonBW, KeeKF. Social media at work: The roles of job satisfaction, employment status, and Facebook use with co-workers. Comput Human Behav, 2017; 70(70):191–196.
21.
PeluchetteJ, KarlK, CoustasseA, et al.Professionalism and social networking: Can patients, physicians, nurses, and supervisors all be “friends”? Health Care Manag (Frederick), 2012; 31(4):285–294.
22.
LeftheriotisI, GiannakosMN. Using social media for work: Losing your time or improving your work? Comput Human Behav, 2014; 31:134–142.
23.
CheungYL, LunMC, WangH. Smartphone use after work mediates the link between organizational norm of connectivity and emotional exhaustion: Will workaholism make a difference? Stress Health, 2022; 38(1):130–139.
24.
SpagnoliP, BalducciC, FabbriM, et al.Workaholism, intensive smartphone use, and the sleep-wake cycle: A multiple mediation analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019; 16(19):3517.
25.
ChanSM, Au-YeungTC, WongH, et al.Long working hours, precarious employment and anxiety symptoms among working Chinese population in Hong Kong. Psychiatr Q, 2021; 92(4):1745–1757.
26.
SunY, DingZ, ZhangZ. Enterprise social media in workplace: Innovative use cases in China. IEEE Trans Eng Manag, 2020; 70(7):1–16.
27.
SunR, LamRLW, WuAMS. Work addiction in Chinese white-collar workers: The psychometric properties of its measure and its comorbidity with general anxiety in network analysis. BMC Psychol, 2023; 11(1):214.
28.
BeardC, MillnerAJ, ForgeardMJC, et al.Network analysis of depression and anxiety symptom relationships in a psychiatric sample. Psychol Med, 2016; 46(16):3359–3369.
29.
BorsboomD, CramerAOJ. Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 2013; 9(1):91–121.
30.
FriedEI, van BorkuloCD, CramerAOJ, et al.Mental disorders as networks of problems: A review of recent insights. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 2017; 52(1):1–10.
31.
JonesPJ, MaR, McNallyRJ. Bridge centrality: A network approach to understanding comorbidity. Multivariate Behav Res, 2021; 56(2):353–367.
32.
LazarovA, Suarez-JimenezB, LeviO, et al.Symptom structure of PTSD and co-morbid depressive symptoms—A network analysis of combat veteran patients. Psychol Med, 2020; 50(13):2154–2170.
33.
RobinaughDJ, HoekstraRHA, TonerER, et al.The network approach to psychopathology: A review of the literature 2008–2018 and an agenda for future research. Psychol Med, 2020; 50(3):353–366.
34.
HeveyD. Network analysis: A brief overview and tutorial. Health Psychol Behav Med, 2018; 6(1):301–328.
35.
McNallyRJ. Can network analysis transform psychopathology? Behav Res Ther, 2016; 86:95–104.
36.
PengP, LiaoY. Six addiction components of problematic social media use in relation to depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms: A latent profile analysis and network analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 2023; 23(1):321.
37.
HuntBR, ZarateD, GillP, et al.Mapping the links between sexual addiction and gambling disorder: A Bayesian network approach. Psychiatry Res, 2023; 327:115366.
JiaJ, TongW, WangX, et al.The comorbidity mechanism of problematic internet use and depression among Chinese college students: A cross-lagged panel network analysis. Addict Behav, 2024; 156:108057.
40.
AlimoradiZ, LinCY, ImaniV, et al.Social media addiction and sexual dysfunction among Iranian women: The mediating role of intimacy and social support. J Behav Addict, 2019; 8(2):318–325.
41.
KumarP, PatelV, ChaudharyP, et al.A study of correlates of social networking site addiction among the undergraduate health professionals. Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior, 2021; 4(1):30–35.
42.
DangL, YangHM, SpadaMM, et al.A three-wave longitudinal study on the underlying metacognitive mechanism between depression and internet gaming disorder. J Behav Addict, 2024; 13(1):215–225.
43.
LeungH, PakpourAH, StrongC, et al.Measurement invariance across young adults from Hong Kong and Taiwan among three internet-related addiction scales: Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS), and Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form (IGDS-SF9) (study part A). Addict Behav, 2020; 101:105969.
44.
AndreassenCS, TorsheimT, BrunborgGS, et al.Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychol Rep, 2012; 110(2):501–517.
45.
Tullett-PradoD, DoleyJR, ZarateD, et al.Conceptualising social media addiction: A longitudinal network analysis of social media addiction symptoms and their relationships with psychological distress in a community sample of adults. BMC Psychiatry, 2023; 23(1):509.
46.
LuoT, QinL, ChengL, et al.Determination the cut-off point for the Bergen Social Media Addiction (BSMAS): Diagnostic contribution of the six criteria of the components model of addiction for social media disorder. J Behav Addict, 2021; 10(2):281–290.
47.
EndersC, BandalosD. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct Equation Modeling Multidisciplinary J, 2001; 8(3):430–457.
48.
LiuY, SriutaisukS. A comparison of FIML- versus multiple-imputation-based methods to test measurement invariance with incomplete ordinal variables. Struct Equation Modeling Multidisciplinary J, 2021; 28(4):590–608.
RosseelY. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Soft, 2012; 48(2):1–36.
51.
SchreiberJB, NoraA, StageFK, et al.Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. J Educ Res, 2006; 99(6):323–338.
52.
FriedmanJ, HastieT, TibshiraniR. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw, 2010; 33(1):1–22.
53.
EpskampS, CramerAOJ, WaldorpLJ, et al.qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J Stat Soft, 2012; 48(4):1–18.
54.
LerougeL, Trujillo PonsF. Contribution to the Study on the “Right to Disconnect” from work. Are France and Spain examples for other countries and EU law? Eur Labour Law J, 2022; 13(3):450–465.
55.
ChamberlainSR, ReddenSA, LeppinkE, et al.Problematic internet use in gamblers: Impact on clinical and cognitive measures. CNS Spectr, 2017; 22(6):495–503.
56.
CritselisE, JanikianM, PaleomilitouN, et al.Internet gambling is a predictive factor of Internet addictive behavior among Cypriot adolescents. J Behav Addict, 2013; 2(4):224–230.
57.
ShafferHJ, LaPlanteDA, LaBrieRA, et al.Toward a syndrome model of addiction: Multiple expressions, common etiology. Harv Rev Psychiatry, 2004; 12(6):367–374.
58.
HaylettSA, StephensonGM, LefeverRMH. Covariation in addictive behaviours: A study of addictive orientations using the Shorter PROMIS Questionnaire. Addict Behav, 2004; 29(1):61–71.
59.
MartinRJ, UsdanS, CremeensJ, et al.Disordered gambling and co-morbidity of psychiatric disorders among college students: An examination of problem drinking, anxiety and depression. J Gambl Stud, 2014; 30(2):321–333.
60.
BurleighTL, GriffithsMD, SumichA, et al.A systematic review of the co-occurrence of gaming disorder and other potentially addictive behaviors. Curr Addict Rep, 2019; 6(4):383–401.
61.
QuD, LiuB, JiaL, et al.The longitudinal relationships between short video addiction and depressive symptoms: A cross-lagged panel network analysis. Comput Human Behav, 2024; 152:108059.
62.
JiangX, WuY, ZhangK, et al.Symptoms of problematic pornography use among help-seeking male adolescents: Latent profile and network analysis. J Behav Addict, 2022; 11(3):912–927.
63.
TurelO, VaghefiI. Social media detox: Relapse predictors. Psychiatry Res, 2020; 284:112488.
64.
HobfollSE, HalbeslebenJ, NeveuJP, et al.Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav, 2018; 5(1):103–128.
65.
AdamsS. Psychopharmacology of tobacco and alcohol comorbidity: A review of current evidence. Curr Addict Rep, 2017; 4(1):25–34.
66.
FunkD, MarinelliP, LêA. Biological processes underlying co-use of alcohol and nicotine: Neuronal mechanisms, cross-tolerance, and genetic factors. Alcohol Res Health, 2006; 29(3):186–192.
67.
HobfollSE. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol, 1989; 44(3):513–524.
68.
MackintoshV, KnightT. The notion of self in the journey back from addiction. Qual Health Res, 2012; 22(8):1094–1101.
69.
TheodorakisY, HassandraM, PanagiotounisF. Enhancing substance use disorder recovery through integrated physical activity and behavioral interventions: A comprehensive approach to treatment and prevention. Brain Sci, 2024; 14(6):534.
70.
LeH, NewmanA, MenziesJ, et al.Work–life balance in Asia: A systematic review. Human Resource Management Review, 2020; 30(4):100766.
71.
SussmanS, LishaN, GriffithsM. Prevalence of the addictions: A problem of the majority or the minority? Eval Health Prof, 2011; 34(1):3–56.
72.
MulderJD, HamakerEL. Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Struct Equation Modeling Multidisciplinary J, 2020; 28(4):1–11.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
