With its growing appeal, an increasing number of counseling-related research studies have embraced moderated mediation as a method of inquiry. The purpose of this article is to provide an introduction to some and a refresher to others the concept of moderated mediation and how it can be applied in career development research. We also provide a specific example of how moderated mediation can be tested using the Mplus software program.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
3.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
4.
BernesK. B.BardickA. D.OrrD. T. (2007). Career guidance and counseling efficacy studies: An international research agenda. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7, 81–96. doi:10.1007/s10775-007-9114-8
5.
BikosL. H.DykhouseE. C.BoutinS. K.GowenM. J.RodneyH. E. (2013). Practice and research in career counseling and development-2012. Career Development Quarterly, 61, 290–329. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2013.00058.x
6.
BluesteinD. (2006). The psychology of working: A new perspective for career development, counseling, and public policy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
BollenK. A.StineR. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115–140. doi:10.2307/271084
8.
BrownS. D.LentR. W. (2005). Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
9.
BrowneM. A.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
DawsonJ. F.RichterA. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917
12.
EdwardsJ. R.LambertL. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
13.
EfronB.TibshiraniR. (1993). The bootstrap method for assessing statistical accuracy. Behaviormetrika, 17, 1–35. doi:10.2333/bhmk.12.17_1
14.
FrazierP. A.TixA. P.BarronK. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. The Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115
15.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
16.
HeppnerP. P.WampoldB.KivlighanD. M. (2008). Research design in counseling. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Brook/Cole.
17.
HollandJ. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
19.
JamesL. R.BrettJ. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307–321. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.307
20.
JoseP. E. (2008). ModGraph-I: A programme to compute cell means for the graphical display of moderational analyses: The internet version, Version 2.0. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved fromhttp://www.victoria.ac.nz/psyc/paul-jose-files/modgraph/
21.
JuddC. M.KennyD. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619. doi:10.1177/0193841X8100500502
22.
KraemerH. C.WilsonG. T.FairburnC. G.AgrasW. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877–883. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877
23.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
24.
MacKinnonD. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test the significance of mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
26.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
27.
MacKinnonD. P.WarsiG.DwyerJ. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41–62. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_3
28.
MallinckrodtB.AbrahamW.WeiM.RussellD. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372–378. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372
29.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
30.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user's guide. Version 7. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
31.
NilesS. G.Harris-BowlsbeyJ. (2009). Career development interventions in the 21st century (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson.
32.
NilesS. G.Harris-BowlsbeyJ. (2013). Career development interventions in the 21st century (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
33.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
34.
PreacherK. J.KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93–115. doi:10.1037/a0022658
35.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
36.
RoseB. M.HolmbeckG. N.CoakleyR. M.FranksE. A. (2004). Mediator and moderator effects in developmental and behavioral pediatric research. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 58–67. doi:10.1097/00004703-200402000-00013
37.
RosenthalR.RubinD. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166–169. doi:10.1037/0022-0663
38.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5/6, 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
39.
SharpeD. (2013). Why the resistance to statistical innovations? Bridging the communication gap. Psychological Methods, 18, 572–582. doi:10.1037/a0034177
40.
SherryA. (2006). Discriminant analysis in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 661–683. doi:10.1177/0011000006287103
41.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 12, 290–312. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/270723
42.
SteigerJ. H.LindJ. C. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City, IA.
43.
TraceyT. J. G. (2010). The 2009 Leona Tyler award address: Moderators I have known. The Counseling Psychologist, 38, 600–617. doi:10.1177/0011000009352689
44.
UllmanJ. B. (1996). Structural equation modeling. In TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed., pp. 709–811). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
45.
UrdanT. C. (2005). Statistics in plain English. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Van LieshoutR. J.CleverleyK.JenkinsJ. M.GeorgiadesK. (2011). Assessing the measurement invariance of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale across immigrant and non-immigrant women in the postpartum period. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 14, 413–423. doi:10.1007/s00737-011-0236-0
