School counselors increasingly are being asked to develop and implement data-based interventions for academic and social/emotional problems. The purpose of this article is to provide a demonstration of goal attainment scaling (GAS) as an intervention outcome assessment tool for school counselor’s work with students. The strengths and limitations of the GAS method are described and an application is provided on the use of the method with school counseling consultation cases. We conclude that GAS is a useful tool for school counselors to evaluate individual or group intervention outcomes.
American School Counselor Association. (2012). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs. Alexandria, VA: Author.
2.
BradyJ.BusseR. T.CarriereJ. A.HassM.KennedyK. S. (2013). Assessing intern impact factors for program evaluation and improvement. Trainer’s Forum, 31, 62–70.
3.
BusseR. T.ElliottS. N.KratochwillT. R. (2010). Convergent evidence scaling for multiple assessment indicators: Conceptual issues, applications, and technical challenges. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 26, 149–161. doi:10.1080/15377901003712728
4.
CardilloJ. E.SmithA. (1994). Reliability of goal attainment scores. In KiresukT. J.SmithA.CardilloJ. E. (Eds.), Goal attainment scaling: Application, theory, and measurement (pp. 213–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
DimmittC. (2009). Why evaluation matters: Determining effective school counseling practices, Professional School Counseling, 12, 395–399. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2010-12.395
7.
ElliottS. N.BusseR. T. (2004). Assessment and evaluation of students’ behavior and intervention outcomes: The utility of rating scales methods. In RutherfordR. (Ed.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 123–142). New York, NY: Guilford.
8.
GrumanD. H.HoelzenB. (2011). Determining responsiveness to school counseling interventions using behavioral observations. Professional School Counseling, 14, 183–190. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2011-14.183
9.
HatchT.Chen-HayesS. F. (2008). School counselor beliefs about ASCA national model school counseling program components using the SCPCS. Professional School Counseling, 12, 34–42. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2010-12.34
10.
HoagwoodK. E.OlinS. S.KerkerB. D.KratochwillT. R.CroweM.SakaN. (2007). Empirically based school interventions targeted at academic and mental health functioning. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 66–92. doi:10.1177/10634266070150020301
11.
KiresukT. J.ShermanR. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: General method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443–453. doi:10.1007/bf01530764
12.
KiresukT. J.SmithA.CardilloJ. (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
PoyntonT. A.CareyJ. C. (2006). An integrative model of data based decision making for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 10, 121–130. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2006-10.121
14.
RoachA. T.ElliottS. N. (2005). Goal attainment scaling: An efficient and effective approach to monitoring student progress. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37, 8–17. Retrieved fromhttp://sspw.dpi.wi.gov/files/sspw/pdf/mhgoalscaling.pdf
15.
YarbroughJ. L.ThompsonC. L. (2002). Using single-participant research to assess counseling approaches on children’s off-task behavior. Professional School Counseling, 5, 308–314. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2002-5.308
