We implemented a large series (N = 8) single-case research design to assess the effectiveness of a four-session peer support group intervention with students in a doctoral counselor education program completing statistics coursework. Analysis of wait-list group participants’ scores on the Attitude Toward Statistics scale yielded treatment effects indicating that a support group may be effective for promoting student attitudes; however, this intervention was not associated with ubiquitous efficacy between all participants associated with the support group. Considerations for implementing groups that promote positive attitudes are provided.
AndersonA.CheyneW.FootH.HoweC.LowJ.TolmieA. (2000). Computer support for peer-based methodology tutorials. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 41–53. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00114.x
2.
ArakiL. T.ShultzK. S. (1995, April). Students attitudes toward statistics and their retention of statistical concepts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
3.
BerkR. A.NandaJ. P. (1998). Effects of jocular instructional methods on attitudes, anxiety, and achievement in statistics courses. International Journal of Humor Research, 11, 383–409. doi:10.1515/humr.1998.11.4.383
4.
BoldC. (2008). Peer support groups: Fostering a deeper approach to learning through critical reflection on practice. Reflective Practice, 9, 257–267. doi:10.1080/14623940802207022
5.
CashinS. E.ElmoreP. B. (1997, March). Instruments used to assess attitudes toward statistics. A psychometric evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
6.
CashinS. E.ElmoreP. B. (2005). The survey of attitudes toward statistics scale: A construct validity study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 509–524. doi:10.1177/0013164404272488
7.
CasteleinS.BruggemanR.van BusschbachJ. T.van der GaagM.StantA. D.KnegteringH.WiersmaD. (2008). The effectiveness of peer support groups in psychosis: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 118, 64–72. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01216.x
8.
ChamblessD. L.BakerM. J.BaucomD. H.BeutlerL. E.CalhounK. S.Crits-ChristophP., …Woody S. R (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3–16.
9.
CookR.SackettD. L. (1995). The number needed to treat: A clinically useful measure of treatment effect. British Medical Journal, 310, 452–454. doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452
DevenishR.DyerS.JeffersonT.LordL.van LeeuwenS.FazakerleyV. (2009). Peer to peer support: The disappearing work in the doctoral student experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 59–70. doi:10.1080/07294360802444362
12.
FosterL. (2010). A best kept secret: Single-subject research design in counseling. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 1, 30–39. doi:10.1177/2150137810387130
KottkeJ. L. (2000). Mathematical proficiency, statistics knowledge, attitudes toward statistics, and measurement course performance. College Student Journal, 34, 334–347.
15.
LeflyH. P. (2010). A psychoeducational support group for serious mental illness. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 34, 369–381. doi:10.1080/01933920903219094
16.
LenzA. S. (2013). Calculating effect size in single-case research: A comparison of nonoverlap methods. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 46, 64–73. doi:10.1177/0748175612456401
17.
LundervoldD. A.BelwoodM. F. (2000). The best kept secret in counseling: Single-case (N=1) experimental designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 92–102.
18.
McGrailM. R.RickardC. M.JonesR. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 19–35. doi:10.1080/07294360500453053
19.
MoosR. H.MoosB. S. (2004). Long-term influence of duration and frequency of participationin alcoholics anonymous on individuals with alcohol use disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 81–90.
20.
MvududuN. (2003). A cross-cultural study of the connection between students’ attitudes toward statistics and the use of constructivist strategies in the course. Journal of Statistics Education, 11. Retrieved fromwww.amstat.org/publications/jse/v11n3/mvududu.html
21.
O’NeillR. E.McDonnellJ. J.BillingsleyF. F.JensonW. R. (2011). Single case research designs in educational and community settings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
22.
Page-AdamsD.ChengL. C.GogineniA.ShenC. Y. (1995). Establishing a group to encourage writing for publication among doctoral students. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 402–407.
23.
ParkerR. I.Hagan-BurkeS. (2007). Single case research results as clinical outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 637–653. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.004
24.
PercyC. A.GibbsT.PotterL.BoardmanS. (2008). Nurse-led peer support group: Experiences of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 2046–2055. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05061.x
25.
PerepiczkaM. (2009, October). Relationship between graduate counseling student success in statistics and statistics anxiety and social support. Poster session presented at the Biannual Conference for the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision, San Diego, CA.
26.
PerepiczkaM.ChandlerN.BecerraM. (2011). Relationship between graduate students' statistics self-efficacy, statistics anxiety, attitude toward statistics, and social support. The Professional Counselor, 1, 99–108.
27.
PowellT.PerronB. E. (2010). Self-help groups and mental health/substance use agencies: The benefits of organizational exchange. Substance Use & Misuse, 45, 315–329. doi:10.3109/10826080903443594
28.
RayD. C.MintonC. A.SchottelkorbA. A.BrownA. G. (2010). Single-case design in child counseling research: Implications for counselor education. Counselor Education & Supervision, 49, 193–208.
29.
RhoadsT. R.HubeleN. F. (2000). Student attitudes toward statistics before and after a computer-integrated introductory statistics course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43, 182–187. doi:10.1109/13.848071
30.
RobertsD. M.BilderbackE. W. (1980). Reliability and validity of a statistics attitude survey. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 235–238. doi:10.1177/001316448004000138
31.
RobertsD. M.SaxeJ. E. (1982). Validity of a statistics attitude survey. A follow-up study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 907–912.
32.
SchottelkorbA. A.RayD. C. (2009). ADHD symptom reduction in elementary students: A single subject case effectiveness design. Professional School Counseling, 13, 11–22. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2010-13.11
33.
SchultzK. S.KoshinoH. (1998). Evidence of reliability and validity for Wise’s attitude toward statistics scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82, 27–31. doi:10.2466/pr0.1998.82.1.27
34.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2001). How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications. Exceptionality, 9, 227–244. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX0904_5
35.
SharpleyC. F. (2007). So why aren’t counselors reporting n = 1 research designs?Journal of Counseling and Development, 85, 349–356.
36.
VanhoofS.KuppensS.Castro SotosA. E.VerschaffelL.OnghenaP. (2011). Measuring statistics attitude: Structure of the survey of attitudes towards statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 10, 35–51.
37.
WatersL. K.MartelliT. A.ZakrajsekT.PopovichP. M. (1998). Attitudes toward statistics: An evaluation of multiple measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 513–516. doi:10.1177/0013164488482026
38.
WiseS. L. (1985). The development and validation of a scale measuring attitudes toward statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 401–405.
