A guide for researchers to calculate effect sizes for single-case research using three nonoverlap methods is provided. These methods are evaluated for their strengths and limitations, applied to a data set, and contrasted with one another. Criteria are presented to determine goodness of fit between nonoverlap procedures and data sets.
ChamblessD. L.BakerM.BaucomD. H.BeutlerL. E.CalhounK. S.. . . WoodyS. R. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. Clinical Psychologist. 51, 3–16.
2.
ChamblessD. L.SandersonW. C.ShohamV.JohnsonS. B.PopeK. S.Crits-ChristophP.. . . McCurryS. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. Clinical Psychologist, 49, 5–18.
3.
FosterL. (2010). A best kept secret: Single- subject research design in counseling. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 1, 30–39. doi:10.1177/2150137810387130
4.
HeppnerM. J.HendricksF. (1995). A process and outcome study evaluating career indecision and indecisiveness. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 426–437.
5.
LenzA. S.AguilarJ. V. (2012). Integrating relational cultural therapy concepts into supervision: Mediating effects on relational health and working alliance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
LenzA. S.PerepiczkaM.BalkinR. (2012). Evidence for the mediating effects of a support group for attitudes toward statistics. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8.
LenzA. S.SpecialeM.AguilarJ. V. (2012). Relational-cultural therapy intervention with incarcerated adolescents: A single-case effectiveness design. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 3, 17–29.
9.
LundervoldD. A.BelwoodM. F. (2000). The best kept secret in counseling: Single-case (N = 1) experimental designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 92–102.
10.
MaH. H. (2006). An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject researches: Percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behavior Modification, 30, 598–617.
11.
MaH. H. (2009). The effectiveness of intervention on the behavior of individuals with autism: A meta-analysis using percentage of data points exceeding the median of baseline phase (PEM). Behavior Modification, 33, 339–359. doi:10.1177/0145445509333173
12.
Martin-CauseyT.HinkleJ. S. (1995). Multimodal therapy with an aggressive preadolescent: A demonstration of effectiveness and accountability. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 305–310.
13.
MorganD. L.MorganR. K. (2009). Single-case research methods for the behavioral and health sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
O’NeillR. E.McDonnellJ. J.BillingsleyF. F.JensonW. R. (2011). Single case research designs in educational and community settings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
15.
ParkerR. I.Hagan-BurkeS. (2007). Useful effect size interpretations for single case research. Behavior Therapy, 38, 95–105.
16.
ParkerR. I.Hagan-BurkeS.VannestK. (2007). Percentage of all non-overlapping data (PAND): An alternative to PND. Journal of Special Education, 40, 194–204.
17.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40, 357–367.
18.
ParkerR. I.VannestK.DavisJ. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine overlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303–322. doi:10.1177/0145445511399147
19.
PowellM. L.NewgentR. A. (2010). Improving the empirical credibility of cinematherapy: A single-subject interrupted time series design. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 1, 40–49. doi:10.1177/2150137810373920
20.
PrestonD.CarterM. (2009). A review of the efficacy of the picture exchange communication system intervention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1147–1486.
21.
RayD. C.MintonC. A.SchottelkorbA. A.BrownA. G. (2010). Single-case design in child counseling research: Implications for counselor education. Counselor Education & Supervision, 49, 193–208.
22.
SandersonW. C. (2003). Why empirically supported treatments are important. Behavioral Modification, 27, 290–299. doi:10.1177/0145445503253828
23.
SchottelkorbA. A.RayD. C. (2009). ADHD symptom reduction in elementary students: A single subject case effectiveness design. Professional School Counseling, 13, 11–22. doi:10.5330/PSC.n.2010-13.11
24.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221–242.
25.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2001). How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications. Exceptionality, 9, 227–244. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX0904_5
26.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.CastoG. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.
27.
SharpleyC. F. (2007). So why aren’t counselors reporting n = 1 research designs?Journal of Counseling and Development, 85, 349–356.
28.
WoleryM.BusickM.ReichowB.BartonE. E. (2010). Comparison of overlap methods for quantitatively synthesizing single-subject data. Journal of Special Education, 44, 18–28. doi:10.1177/0022466908328009
