This initial editorial of the premiere issue of Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) serves as a foundational description of the journal. Specifically, the editor provides a rationale for promoting a scientist-practitioner framework and encouraging counseling scholarship related to outcome research and evaluation. The editor also discusses the development of CORE in relation to current professional standards and guidelines; describes the Association for Assessment in Counseling and Education’s needs based on its vision and mission; and outlines pertinent manuscript and submission evaluation components.
American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
ArgyrisC.SchonD. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Association for Assessment in Counseling and Education. (n.d.). AACE statements of purpose. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://theaaceonline.com/about.htm
ErfordB. T.MillerE. M.DuncanK.ErfordB. M. (2010). Submission patterns: Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development author and article characteristics from 1990 to 2009. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42, 296–307.
7.
GelsoC. J. (2006). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, S(1):3–16.
8.
ShapiroJ. P. (2009). Integrating outcome research and clinical reasoning in psychotherapy planning. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 46–53.
9.
StrickerG. (2002). What is a scientist-practitioner anyway?Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1277–1283.
10.
WesterK. L. (2007). Teaching research integrity in the field of counseling. Counselor Education and Supervision, 46, 199–211.
