Psychometric instruments have been underutilized by counselor educators in performance assessment and program evaluation efforts. As such, we conducted a review of the literature that revealed 41 instruments fit for such efforts. We described and critiqued these instruments along four dimensions—Target Domain, Format, Psychometrics, and Frequency of Use.
ArredondoP.ToporekR.BrownS. P.JonesJ.LockeD.SanchezJ.StadlerH. (1996). Operationalization of the multicultural counseling competencies. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 24, 42–78.
6.
BaltimoreM. (1996). Portfolio assessment: A model for counselor education. Counselor Education & Supervision, 36, 113–121.
7.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
8.
BantaT. W. (2004). Hallmarks of effective outcomes assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
BetzN.E.HackettG. (2006). Career Self Efficacy Theory: Back to the Future. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 3-11.
10.
BhatC. (2005). Enhancing counseling gatekeeping with performance appraisal protocols. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 27, 399–411.
11.
BodenhornN.SkaggsG. (2005). Development of the school counselor self-efficacy scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 38, 14–29.
12.
ChoateL.SmithS.SpruillD. (2005). Professional development of counselor education students: An exploratory study of professional performance indicators for assessment. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 27, 383–397.
13.
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press.
14.
Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2009). 2009 standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
15.
CreswellJ. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
16.
DanielsJ.LarsonL. (2001). The impact of performance feedback on counseling self-efficacy and counselor anxiety. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 120–130.
17.
DrummondR. (2000). Appraisal procedures for counselors and helping professionals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
FongM. L.BordersL. D.EthingtonC.PittsJ. (1997). Becoming a counselor: A longitudinal study of student cognitive development. Counselor Education and Supervision, 37, 100–114.
19.
FosterV.McAdamsC. (2009). A framework for creating a climate of transparency for professional performance assessment: Fostering student investment in gatekeeping. Counselor Education and Supervision, 48, 271–284.
20.
GamstG.DanaR.Der-KarabetianA.AragonM.ArellanoL.MorrowG.MartensonL. (2004). Cultural competency revised: The California Brief Multicultural Competence Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 163–183.
21.
HayesR.PaisleyP. (2002). Transforming school counselor preparation programs. Theory into Practice, 41(3), 169–176.
22.
JohnsonE.BakerS.KopalaM.KiselicaM.ThompsonE. (1989). Counseling self-efficacy and counseling competence in prepracticum training. Counselor Education and Supervision, 28, 205–218.
23.
KlineR. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
LaFromboiseT.ColemanH.HernandezA. (1991). Development and factor structure of the Cross-Cultural Counseling Inventory–Revised. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 380–388.
MakiP. L.BorkowskiN. A.DeneckeD. (2006). The assessment of doctoral education: Emerging criteria and new models for improving outcomes. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
27.
ManeseJ.WuJ.NepomucenoC. (2001). The effect of training on multicultural counseling competencies: An exploratory study over a ten-year period. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 29(1), 31–40.
28.
MelchertT.HaysV.WiljanenL.KolocekA. (1996). Testing models of counselor development with a measure of counseling self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 640–644.
29.
MiddaughM. F. (2010). Planning and assessment in higher education: Demonstrating institutional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
MintonC.GibsonD. (2012). Evaluating student learning outcomes in counselor education: Recommendations and process considerations. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 73–91.
SodowskyG.TaffeR.GutkinT.WiseS. (1994). Development of the Multicultural Counseling Inventory: A self-report measure of multicultural competencies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 137–148.
35.
SpatzC. (2007). Basic statistics: Tales of distributions. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
36.
Spellings Commission. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education (Report of the Secretary’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
37.
StecherB. (2010). Performance assessment in an era of standard-based educational accountability. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Standard Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
38.
SternbergR. J.PennJ.HawkinsC. (2011). Assessing college student learning: Evaluating alternative models, using multiple methods. Washington DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
39.
SwankJ.LambieG. (2012). The assessment of CACREP core curricular areas and student learning outcomes using the Counseling Competencies Scale. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 3, 116–127.
40.
TateK.Torres RiveraE.ConwillW.MillerM.PuigA. (2013). Conceptualizing group dynamics from our clients’ perspective: Development of the Conceptualization of Group Dynamics Inventory. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 38, 146–168.
41.
TateK. A.Torres RiveraE.EdwardsL. M. (in press). Colonialism and multicultural counseling competence research: A liberatory analysis. In GoodmanR. D.GorskiP. (Eds.) Decolonizing “multicultural” counseling and psychology: Visions for social justice theory and practice. New York: Springer
42.
UrofskyR.BobbyC. (2012). The evolution of a student learning outcomes focus in the CACREP standards in relation to accountability in higher education. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 63–72.
43.
WalvoordB. E.BantaT. W. (2010). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
