Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction:

Depression is a prevalent, debilitating, and potentially life-threatening disorder that affects millions of people worldwide and is influenced by multiple factors.

Objective:

To examine the influence of sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and health-related factors on depression in the Peruvian adult population using data from a nationally representative survey conducted between 2020 and 2022.

Methods:

A descriptive analysis of the variables was conducted, followed by a bivariate analysis using the Chi-square test with the Rao-Scott correction. Subsequently, a multivariate analysis was performed using a Poisson multiple regression model with robust variance to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

Results:

The study included 72 334 participants aged 18 to 97 and identified an increased likelihood of depression among older adults (≥60 years; aPR = 1.18 [1.08, 1.29]); single individuals (aPR = 1.33 [1.22, 1.45]); separated individuals (aPR = 1.32 [1.18, 1.47]); divorced or widowed individuals (aPR = 1.44 [1.34, 1.56]); residents of the Sierra region (aPR = 1.41 [1.30, 1.53]); economically inactive individuals (aPR = 1.08 [1.01, 1.16]); individuals with disabilities (aPR = 1.50 [1.28, 1.77]); those diagnosed with hypertension (aPR = 1.45 [1.33, 1.58]) or diabetes (aPR = 1.42 [1.27, 1.59]); and those who smoke monthly (aPR = 1.32 [1.19, 1.48]). Conversely, being male (aPR = 0.50 [0.46, 0.54]), having a higher level of education (secondary or above; aPR = 0.69 [0.62, 0.76]), residing on the coast (aPR = 0.83 [0.76, 0.91]) or in the jungle region (aPR = 0.87 [0.79, 0.96]), living in a rural area (aPR = 0.85 [0.78, 0.93]), and having a higher wealth index (aPR = 0.81 [0.71, 0.94]) were associated with a lower likelihood of depression.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, depression is significantly associated with various sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and health factors.

Keywords

depression demography epidemiological surveys socioeconomic factor

Introduction

Depression is a common mental disorder that negatively affects the way individuals feel, think, and act.¹ It is generally characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in usual activities, fatigue, and cognitive impairment, which together can severely interfere with daily functioning and quality of life.² According to the World Health Organization (WHO),³ an estimated 3.8% of the global population suffers from depression, including 5% of adults (4% of men and 6% of women) and 5.7% of adults aged 60 and over. In the Americas, the Pan American Health Organization estimates that approximately 5% of the population experiences depressive symptoms, with a greater burden observed among women.³ Within South America, countries have reported some of the highest rates in the region, with increasing trends over the last decade.⁴ In Peru, the Ministry of Health (MINSA) reported 247 171 diagnosed cases of depression in 2022. Among these, 75.24% were women and 17.27% were minors, showing an unequal burden by sex and age.⁵ The National Institute of Mental Health (INSM) also recognizes depression as a public health priority, estimating a prevalence ranging from 6% to 10% in the population.⁶

The prevalence of depression is influenced by various sociodemographic factors, with notable differences by sex: women tend to experience higher rates of depressive symptoms, often attributed to hormonal and psychosocial factors, whereas in men, depression is more commonly linked to socioeconomic conditions.^7
-10 Age is also a predisposing factor, as older adults are more likely to develop depression due to social isolation, chronic illnesses, and the loss of loved ones.^11,12 Similarly, a low level of education is associated with a higher risk of developing depressive symptoms.^8,12,13 The natural region of origin and ethnicity may increase the risk of discrimination, cultural barriers, and limited access to mental health services, all of which can contribute to the onset of depressive symptoms.¹⁴ In rural areas, restricted access to healthcare and education, along with low income and social isolation, can also contribute to the development of these symptoms.¹²

Other studies have shown that individuals from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to experience chronic stress, financial instability, debt, and limited access to mental health resources, all of which contribute to the development of depression.^8,13,15 This finding has also been reported in studies involving older adults, such as the one conducted in China by Zhou et al,¹⁶ which found that low socioeconomic status is significantly associated with a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms. Similarly, individuals with chronic physical conditions—such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and multimorbidity—are also at increased risk.^17
-19

Multiple studies indicate that low income, low educational attainment, and unemployment are associated with higher rates of depressive symptoms, making individuals with a disadvantaged socioeconomic status particularly vulnerable to this condition.^20
-22 These findings highlight the need to reduce socioeconomic inequalities through policy reforms, enhance mental health services, and combat stigma surrounding mental health. These actions are essential to strengthening mental well-being and mitigating the impact of depression on individuals and communities.

On the other hand, studies analyzing factors associated with depression in national surveys, such as the study by Daray et al²³ in an adult population from three Latin American countries (Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay),²³ found that higher depression levels were associated with sociodemographic factors (being a woman and aged between 35 and 44 years) and health factors (current smoking and a history of chronic diseases). Conversely, lower depression levels were associated with higher education and being cohabiting or married. In Peru, Hernández-Vásquez et al²⁴ analyzed the 2018 Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES) and found that sociodemographic factors associated with a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms included being a woman and older age. Health-related factors included having diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, and a history of disability. Conversely, sociodemographic factors associated with lower depression levels included being married or cohabiting and having at least a secondary education. The only socioeconomic factor linked to lower depression was economic well-being (quintiles 3-5).

Although a decrease in depressive symptoms might have been expected following the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalence of depression has remained high—or even increased—in many populations, including in Peru. This persistence can be attributed to multiple ongoing and cumulative factors, such as prolonged economic instability, rising unemployment, weakened social support networks, and chronic stress resulting from food insecurity, domestic violence, and limited access to mental health services.²⁵ Furthermore, the psychological after-effects of confinement, unresolved grief, and information overload may have had long-term consequences on the mental health of the population.²⁶ Therefore, it is essential to consider these structural and social factors when analyzing the sustained increase in depression following the pandemic.

Although some studies have explored the factors associated with depression in Peru, there is still limited research that comprehensively examines the interplay between sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and health-related variables. For instance, Rautio et al²⁷ evaluated this association in a sample of older adults but focused solely on wealth level as a socioeconomic factor. Other studies have investigated these relationships using national survey data; however, they often analyzed the variables separately or within isolated years.^23,24 These limitations restrict the generalizability and integrative understanding of depression’s social determinants. Therefore, the present study is relevant because it simultaneously assesses multiple sociodemographic (sex, age, education, marital status, region, and area of residence), socioeconomic (wealth index and economic assets), and health-related factors (insurance status, disability, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and alcohol use) in a nationally representative sample of Peruvian adults, using data collected across 3 consecutive years (2020-2022). This approach allows for a more robust and comprehensive analysis of the determinants of depression in the Peruvian context.

Methods

Design

This study employed a cross-sectional and analytical design based on secondary data. The analysis was conducted using data previously collected by the Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES), a national survey carried out annually by the National Institute of Statistics and Informatics (INEI). As this is a secondary data analysis, no direct data collection or surveying was performed by the authors. The study is also retrospective in nature, as the events analyzed occurred before the initiation of the present investigation.^28,29

Participants

The study population consisted of Peruvian adults aged 18 years and older, selected from ENDES data collected between 2020 and 2022. ENDES is a nationally representative survey that covers all 25 regions of Peru and includes private households and their members. Its sampling design includes women aged 15 to 49, children under 5, and at least 1 household member aged 15 or older.

For this study, a total of 72 334 adults who completed the health questionnaire in the 2020, 2021, or 2022 survey waves were included in the final analysis (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Flowchart of the sample selection process.

Variables of the study

The dependent variable, depression, was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), located between questions QS700A and QS700I of the health questionnaire (CSSALUD01) in the Spanish National Health Survey (ENDESA).³⁰ It consists of 9 items with a Likert-type response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (almost every day), with total scores ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptomatology. The scale demonstrates adequate psychometric properties for the Peruvian population.³¹ A cutoff score of ≥7 was used to define clinically significant depressive symptomatology.³² For the present study, internal consistency reliability was calculated using the full sample across all years included, yielding a satisfactory McDonald’s omega coefficient (ω = .882).

The independent (exposure) variables were categorized into 3 groups:

(a) Sociodemographic factors: Sex (female, male), age group (young, adult, elderly), educational level (primary or lower, secondary, higher), marital status (single, married or cohabiting, separated or divorced, widowed), natural region (Metropolitan Lima, rest of the coast, highlands, jungle), and area of residence (urban, rural).

(b) Socioeconomic factors: Economic activity (yes, no) and wealth status (very poor, poor, average, rich, richest). These categories are based on the classification developed by the National Institute of Statistics and Informatics (INEI), the central and governing body of the National Statistical System in Peru. INEI is responsible for regulating, planning, directing, coordinating, and supervising official statistical activities in the country, including the classification of socioeconomic levels through methodologies based on national surveys.

(c) Health factors: Health insurance (no, yes), disability (no, yes), diagnosis of high blood pressure (no, yes), diagnosis of diabetes (no, yes), monthly smoking (no, yes), and monthly alcohol consumption (no, yes).

Additionally, the year of the survey was recorded (2020, 2021, 2022).

Data analysis

This study conducted a secondary analysis of ENDES data from 2020 to 2022. For this analysis, the databases for the required years were first downloaded from the ENDES web portal (https://proyectos.inei.gob.pe/microdatos/) and imported into the open-source statistical software RStudio (v. 4.0.3). They were then merged with the databases for the health survey (CSALUD01), household (RECH23), and housing (RECH0, RECH1, and RECH4). This was performed using the survey package (v. 4.0) and the svydesign function, which enabled data linkage at both the household and individual levels using the variables HHID and QNUMBER, respectively. To ensure greater representativeness of the results, the Primary Sampling Unit (HV001), stratum (HV022), and sample weight (PESO15_AMAS) were included as design variables.

The descriptive analysis of the categorical variables was calculated with the values of absolute frequency and the weighted proportions, while for the numerical variables the mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) were used. For the bivariate analysis of factors associated with depression, the Chi-square test (χ²) with a Rao-Scott correction was used. This correction accounts for standard error and confidence interval adjustments when analyzing complex survey data. Finally, a multivariate analysis of the factors influencing depression was conducted using a Poisson multiple regression model with robust variance, yielding adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) with 95% confidence intervals. To ensure acceptable multicollinearity, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) must be less than 2.

Ethical Considerations

This research did not require ethics committee approval, as the data is publicly available on the INEI website. This institution obtains the consent of each participant during the evaluation process, ensuring that all information is collected confidentially and that the anonymity of the individuals involved is respected.

Results

Characteristics of the Population

The study included 72 334 Peruvian participants of legal age, ranging from 18 to 97 years (M = 42.3, SD = 16.9). There were more women (52.6%), adults aged 30 to 59 (54.5%), and individuals with secondary education (42.9%). Additionally, 14.4% (13.9-14.8) experienced depressive symptoms. For a more detailed analysis, see Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Participants.

Variable	n	Weighted (95% CI)
Sex
Female	41 504	52.6 (52.0-53.2)
Male	30 830	47.4 (46.7-48.0)
Age (years) (M = 42.3, SD = 16.9)
Young (18-29)	20 968	27.7 (27.2-28.2)
Adult (30-59)	41 289	54.5 (53.9-55.1)
Older adult (60 or more)	10 077	17.8 (17.3-18.3)
Education
Primary school or lower	19 348	22.5 (21.9-23.0)
Secondary school	31 096	42.9 (42.2-43.6)
Superior	21 890	34.6 (33.9-35.3)
Marital status
Single	9771	16.7 (16.3-17.2)
Married or cohabiting	49 576	64.2 (63.6-64.8)
Separated or divorced	9313	13.0 (12.6-13.4)
Widower	3674	6.1 (5.8-6.4)
Region
Metropolitan Lima	8653	37.2 (35.9-38.4)
Coast	20 485	26.4 (25.4-27.5)
Sierra	25 510	23.8 (22.9-24.7)
Jungle	17 686	12.6 (11.9-13.2)
Area of residence
Urban	47 24	81.7 (81.0-82.3)
Rural	25 210	18.3 (17.7-19.0)
Wealth
The poorest	22 775	17.9 (17.3-18.5)
Poor	18 363	20.0 (19.4-20.6)
Medium	13 557	21.2 (20.6-21.8)
Rich	10 128	20.3 (19.7-21.0)
Richer	7511	20.6 (19.8-21.4)
Economically active
Yes	52 785	70.8 (70.2-71.3)
No	19 549	29.2 (28.7-29.8)
Health insurance
No	13 245	21.2 (20.7-21.8)
Yes	59 089	78.8 (78.2-79.3)
Disability
No	70 902	97.5 (97.2-97.8)
Yes	1432	2.5 (2.2-2.7)
Diagnosis of HTA
No	66 172	89.3 (88.9-89.7)
Yes	6162	10.7 (10.2-11.1)
Diagnosis of diabetes
No	69 733	95.0 (94.7-95.3)
Yes	2601	5.0 (4.7-5.3)
Smokes monthly
No	65 840	90.4 (90.1-90.8)
Yes	6494	9.6 (9.2-9.9)
Monthly alcohol consumption
No	49 470	64.9 (64.3-65.6)
Yes	22 864	35.1 (34.4-35.7)
Depression (PHQ > 7)
No	62 359	85.6 (85.2-86.1)
Yes	9975	14.4 (13.9-14.8)
Year
2020	14 745	20.2 (19.1-21.3)
2021	27 765	37.7 (36.7-38.7)
2022	29 824	42.1 (41.0-43.1)

Abbreviation: CI, confidence intervals; n, number of people evaluated.

Bivariate associations

The bivariate analysis revealed significant associations between depression and sociodemographic factors such as sex, age, educational level, marital status, region, and area of residence (P < .05). Similarly, significant associations were found for socioeconomic factors such as wealth and economic activity, as well as health factors including health insurance, disability, HTA diagnosis, diabetes diagnosis, and monthly smoking (see Table 2).

Table 2.

Bivariate Associations Between the Exposure Variables and Depression.

Variable	Depression (%)		P
Variable	No	Yes	P
Sex
Female	34 253 (80.7)	7251 (19.3)	<.001
Male	28 106 (91.1)	2724 (0.9)	<.001
Age (years) (M = 42.3, SD = 16.9)
Young (18-29)	18 576 (87.7)	2392 (12.3)	<.001
Adult (30-59)	35 997 (86.9)	5292 (13.1)
Older adult (60 or more)	7786 (78.6)	2291 (21.4)
Education
Primary school or lower	15 710 (79.7)	3638 (20.3)	<.001
Secondary school	27 120 (85.8)	3976 (14.2)
Superior	19 529 (89.3)	2361 (10.7)
Marital status
Single	8498 (86.3)	1273 (13.7)	<.001
Married or cohabiting	43 819 (88.0)	5757 (12.0)
Separated or divorced	7409 (79.2)	1904 (20.8)
Widower	2633 (72.8)	1041 (27.2)
Region
Metropolitan Lima	7483 (86.1)	1170 (13.9)	<.001
Coast	18 249 (88.3)	2236 (11.7)
Sierra	21 003 (80.7)	4507 (19.3)
Jungle	15 624 (88.0)	2062 (12.0)
Area of residence
Urban	40 881 (85.9)	6243 (14.1)	.002
Rural	21 478 (84.5)	3732 (15.5)	.002
Wealth
The poorest	19 297 (83.8)	3478 (16.2)	<.001
Poor	15 822 (85.1)	2541 (14.9)
Medium	11 696 (84.8)	1861 (15.2)
Rich	8876 (86.1)	1252 (13.9)
Richer	6668 (88.1)	843 (11.9)
Economically active
Yes	46 098 (87.5)	6687 (12.5)	<.001
No	16 261 (81.2)	3288 (18.8)	<.001
Health insurance
No	11 617 (87.0)	1628 (13.0)	<.001
Yes	50 742 (85.3)	8347 (14.7)	<.001
Disability
No	61 338 (86.0)	9564 (14.0)	<.001
Yes	1021 (72.1)	411 (27.9)	<.001
Diagnosis of HTA
No	57 760 (86.9)	8412 (13.1)	<.001
Yes	4599 (75.1)	1563 (24.9)	<.001
Diagnosis of diabetes
No	60 401 (86.2)	9332 (13.8)	<.001
Yes	1958 (75.0)	643 (25.0)	<.001
Smokes monthly
No	56 682 (85.5)	9158 (14.5)	.084
Yes	5677 (86.8)	817 (13.2)	.084
Monthly alcohol consumption
No	42 401 (84.7)	7069 (15.3)	<.001
Yes	19 958 (87.4)	2906 (12.6)	<.001

Abbreviation: P, level of significance.

Multivariate analysis

The Poisson regression model with robust variance revealed that the following characteristics were associated with a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms: being an older adult (60 years or older), being single, separated/divorced, or widowed, residing in the sierra region, not being economically active, having a disability, being diagnosed with hypertension, having diabetes, and smoking monthly. Conversely, being male, having a higher level of education (secondary or above), residing in the coastal or jungle regions of Peru, living in rural areas, and having a higher wealth status were all associated with a lower prevalence of depression. It is important to note that no multicollinearity issues were identified, as the VIF was below 2 in all cases (Table 3).

Table 3.

Adjusted Prevalence Ratios of Factors Associated With Depression.

Variable	aPR	IC 95%	P
Sex
Female	Ref.
Male	0.50	(0.46-0.54)	<.001
Age
Adult (30-59)	Ref.
Young (18-29)	0.94	(0.88-1.02)	.142
Older adult (60 or more)	1.18	(1.08-1.29)	<.001
Education
Primary school or lower	Ref.
Secondary school	0.89	(0.83-0.97)	.004
Superior	0.69	(0.62-0.76)	<.001
Marital status
Married or cohabiting	Ref.
Single	1.33	(1.22-1.45)	<.001
Separated or divorced	1.44	(1.34-1.56)	<.001
Widower	1.32	(1.18-1.47)	<.001
Region
Metropolitan Lima	Ref.
Coast	0.83	(0.76-0.91)	<.001
Sierra	1.41	(1.30-1.53)	.004
Jungle	0.87	(0.79-0.96)	<.001
Area of residence
Urban	Ref.
Rural	0.85	(0.78-0.93)	<.001
Wealth
The poorest	Ref.
Poor	0.99	(0.90-1.08)	.787
Medium	1.01	(0.92-1.12)	.793
Rich	0.95	(0.85-1.07)	.427
Richer	0.81	(0.71-0.94)	.005
Economically active
Yes	Ref.
No	1.08	(1.01-1.16)	.034
Health insurance
Yes	Ref.
No	1.00	(0.93-1.08)	.930
Disability
No	Ref.
Yes	1.50	(1.28-1.77)	<.001
Diagnosis of HTA
No	Ref.
Yes	1.45	(1.33-1.58)	<.001
Diagnosis of diabetes
No	Ref.
Yes	1.42	(1.27-1.59)	<.001
Smokes monthly
No	Ref.
Yes	1.32	(1.19-1.48)	<.001
Monthly alcohol consumption
No	Ref.
Yes	1.05	(0.98-1.12)	.197

Abbreviations: aPR, adjusted prevalence ratio; CI, confidence intervals; P, level of significance; Ref. group, reference group.

Discussion

Depression has become a significant global public health issue, driven by a range of complex and multifaceted factors.³³ Despite advances in understanding this issue, there remains a critical need to identify and examine the factors that contribute to depression, as these may vary depending on sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and health-related contexts. This study aimed to explore the influence of such factors on depression using data from a nationally representative survey conducted between 2020 and 2022.

One of the most significant findings of this study is that depressive symptoms are influenced by a range of sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and health-related factors. Specifically, among sociodemographic factors, being an older adult (60 years or older), being single, separated/divorced, or widowed, and being from the sierra region were identified as factors that increase the likelihood of depression. These results align with other studies that have reported that aging, social isolation due to marital status, and the unique geographical and cultural conditions of the sierra region contribute to a higher risk of developing depressive disorders.^{34, 35} Living conditions in the sierra region, often marked by geographical isolation, limited economic opportunities, and restricted access to healthcare services, tend to exacerbate vulnerability and increase the risk of depression.³⁶ According to the WHO,³⁷ older adults may be more vulnerable to depression due to a reduced social support network and the presence of chronic illnesses. Additionally, factors such as marital status, particularly being widowed, were found to be associated with feelings of loneliness and loss, which increase the likelihood of depressive symptoms.³⁸

Regarding socioeconomic factors, individuals who were not economically active exhibited a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms. This finding aligns with other research, which confirms that depressive symptoms are more common in individuals who have lost their jobs or have been unemployed for extended periods, compared to those with any form of employment, including informal or temporary jobs.³⁹ However, the relationship between economic problems and depression is bidirectional, as depression can exacerbate financial difficulties, creating a harmful cycle in which economic issues and mental disorders reinforce one another.⁴⁰

In the third analytical group, health-related factors such as a diagnosis of hypertension, the presence of diabetes, and monthly smoking were associated with a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms. These chronic conditions not only impose a significant physical burden but may also contribute to or exacerbate mental health issues. Hypertension and diabetes, both complex diseases with potentially serious complications, can increase levels of stress and anxiety, contributing to the development of depressive symptoms.⁴¹ Similarly, smoking, particularly when persistent, has been associated with a higher incidence of depression, possibly due to the neurochemical effects of nicotine and the lifestyle factors linked to smoking.⁴²

On the other hand, certain variables were identified as being associated with a lower prevalence of depressive symptoms. In particular, being male was linked to a reduced risk, which is consistent with previous research indicating that women are at significantly higher risk due to biological, hormonal, and psychosocial factors.^23,24,27 Another protective factor identified was a higher level of education (secondary or higher), as education not only provides cognitive and social resources but also grants access to better job opportunities and support networks, which are considered protective against depression.^43,44 Furthermore, residing in regions of the Peruvian Coast and Rainforest was associated with a lower prevalence of depression compared to other areas. Although these regions are often less economically developed, they may offer a lifestyle more connected to nature and less stressful.⁴⁵ Similarly, living in rural areas was associated with a lower prevalence of depression, likely due to reduced exposure to stress and stronger community support networks.⁴⁶ Finally, a higher level of wealth was associated with a lower prevalence of depression, as it provides economic stability and facilitates access to better health services, housing, and an overall higher quality of life.²²

Depression clearly increased from 2020 to 2022 among participants, with prevalence rates of 20.2% in 2020, 37.7% in 2021, and 42.1% in 2022. This indicates that the prevalence of depressive symptoms has doubled in just 2 years. One primary reason may be the prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which brought adverse factors such as mandatory confinement, social isolation, and increasing economic and health uncertainty—each of which has had lasting effects on mental health and contributed to sustained levels of depression.^36,47

Limitations

It is important to acknowledge the limitations of this study. First, it focuses on the general population and does not include a significant number of economically active individuals or those with specific characteristics. Secondly, our research does not account for changes in participants’ depression over time, as an observational approach was used and the participants varied each year. Consequently, it was not possible to assess longitudinal changes in the analyzed sample. Finally, in our study, the PHQ-9 was the sole measure used to assess depressive symptoms. It is possible that using other depression scales, such as the Reynolds Depression Scale or the Beck Depression Inventory, which cover a broader range of depressive symptoms, could have yielded different results. However, we believe that the PHQ-9 captures the core indicators of depressive symptoms as outlined in the DSM-5. Therefore, using other scales would have provided additional information on symptoms not specific to depression.^30,32

Additionally, it is important to recognize the limitations associated with the use of secondary data from national surveys. First, we had no control over how the data were collected, and some variables may be affected by measurement errors or reporting bias, especially self-reported data on depressive symptoms and health status. Second, certain relevant variables—such as history of mental illness, social support, or access to mental health services—were not available in the dataset, which may have influenced the results and limited the scope of our analysis. Lastly, secondary databases are susceptible to recall bias and social desirability bias, particularly in mental health assessments, which may underestimate or distort the true prevalence and associations observed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study highlights the sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and health-related factors that influence depression among Peruvian adults. The findings indicate that being an older adult, being single, residing in the highlands, having hypertension or diabetes, and smoking are associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing depressive symptoms. In contrast, higher educational attainment, rural residence, and greater wealth are linked to a lower prevalence of depression. The significant increase in depression levels from 2020 to 2022, partly due to the prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, underscores the need for comprehensive interventions.

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Jacksaint Saintila

Ethical Considerations

This research did not require ethics committee approval, as the data is publicly available on the INEI website.

Consent to Participate

The INEI obtains consent from each participant during the evaluation process, ensuring that all information is collected confidentially and the anonymity of individuals is respected.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Author Contributions

MB-D conducted the statistical analysis, designed the methodology, and drafted the initial manuscript. MB-D and J-AM-G collaborated on data analysis, interpreted the results, and revised the manuscript. JS contributed to the statistical analysis and played a key role in drafting and refining multiple manuscript versions. All authors reviewed and approved the final version.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Universidad Señor de Sipán has provided institutional support for the article processing charge (APC) related to the publication of this manuscript.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets generated to support the findings of this study are not publicly available, but can be requested from the corresponding author.

References

Depression - National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Accessed April 8, 2025. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/depression

Stringaris

Editorial: What is depression?

J Child Psychol Psychiatr 2017;58:1287–1289.

Depressive disorder (depression). Accessed April 8, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression

Bajo su superficie alegre, Latinoamérica también sufre de depresión. Accessed April 8, 2025. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/news/feature/2017/04/07/latinoamerica-tambien-sufre-depresion-dia-mundial-salud-2017

Instituto Nacional de Salud Mental. La depresión y el suicidio: Mitos y creencias. Lima, Perú: INSM. 2006. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://www.insm.gob.pe/oficinas/comunicaciones/notasdeprensa/2012/006.html

Ministerio de Salud. La depresión: un trastorno de salud mental que también afecta a niñas, niños y adolescentes, y requiere la participación de la familia. Lima. 2023. Accessed February 15, 2024. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/minsa/noticias/690010-la-depresion-un-trastorno-de-salud-mental-que-tambien-afecta-a-ninas-ninos-y-adolescentes-y-requiere-la-participacion-de-la-familia

Polak

Nowicki

Naylor

, et al The prevalence of depression symptoms and their socioeconomic and health predictors in a local community with a high deprivation: A cross-sectional studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:11797.

Yang

Liu

, et al Socioeconomic inequalities, genetic susceptibility, and risks of depression and anxiety: A large-observational study. J Affect Disord 2024;367:174–183.

Zhou

Shuai

, et al Social determinants of health and gender differences in depression among adults: A cohort study. Psychiatry Res 2023;329:115548. doi:10.1016/J.PSYCHRES.2023.115548

10.

Posel

Oyenubi

Heterogeneous gender gaps in mental wellbeing: Do women with low economic status face the biggest gender gaps?

Soc Sci Med 2023;332:116133.

11.

Khanal

Selvamani

Association of perceived childhood socio-economic status and health with depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older adults in India: Using data from LASI Wave I, 2017-2018. BMC Geriatr 2024;24:226. doi:10.1186/S12877-024-04800-0

12.

Zeng

Family socioeconomic status and adolescent depression in urban and rural China: A trajectory analysis. SSM Popul Health 2024;25:101627. doi:10.1016/J.SSMPH.2024.101627

13.

Zeng

The impact of family socioeconomic status on depression in Chinese adolescents: A comparison of life course models. J Affect Disord 2024;356:97–104.

14.

Fletcher-Slater

Peters

Garg

, et al Trends in risk factors for peripartum depression in socio-economically disadvantaged childbearing community. Open Public Health J 2024; 16. doi:10.2174/0118749445273463231205101934

15.

Alfaqeeh

Alfian

Abdulah

Sociodemographic factors, health-risk behaviors, and chronic conditions are associated with a high prevalence of depressive symptoms: findings from the indonesian family life survey-5. Behav Med 2024;1-11. doi:10.1080/08964289.2024.2375205

16.

Zhou

Gao

Liu

, et al Socioeconomic status and depressive symptoms in older people with the mediation role of social support: A population-based longitudinal study. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2021;30. doi:10.1002/mpr.1894

17.

Jang

Temporal and bidirectional association of depression and physical illnesses: Analyzing the pooled data from independently conducted cross-sectional national surveys at three distinct time points. J Psychosom Res 2024;179:111614. doi:10.1016/J.JPSYCHORES.2024.111614

18.

Pedrosa

Neto

Namorado

, et al Depression and multimorbidity - Results from a nationwide study. European J Psychiatr 2023;37:92–99.

19.

Berk

Köhler-Forsberg

Turner

, et al Comorbidity between major depressive disorder and physical diseases: A comprehensive review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management. World Psychiatr 2023;22:366–387.

20.

Ishimwe

Irechukwu

EN.

Socio-economic factors and patient’s depression at gisenyi district hospital in rubavu district, western province – Rwanda. J Sociol, Psychol Relig Stud 2023;5. doi:10.53819/81018102t2241

21.

Reiss

Brown

Sisitsky

, et al The influence of socio-economic factors on community mental health. Jurnal Sosial, Sains, Terapan dan Riset (Sosateris) 2021;10:79–90.

22.

Mills

Suresh

Chang

, et al Socioeconomic predictors of treatment outcomes among adults with major depressive disorder. Psychiatr Serv 2022;73:965–969.

23.

Daray

Rubinstein

Gutierrez

, et al Determinants and geographical variation in the distribution of depression in the Southern cone of Latin America: A population-based survey in four cities in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay. J Affect Disord 2017;220:15–23.

24.

Hernández-Vásquez

Vargas-Fernández

Bendezu-Quispe

, et al Depression in the Peruvian population and its associated factors: analysis of a national health survey. J Affect Disord 2020;273:291–297.

25.

Mental health of older adults. Accessed April 8, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-of-older-adults

26.

Webb

Chen

CY.

The COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on older adults’ mental health: Contributing factors, coping strategies, and opportunities for improvement. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021;37:10-1002.

27.

Martina Chávez

Amemiya Hoshi

Suguimoto Watanabe

, et al Depresión en adultos mayores en el Perú: distribución geoespacial y factores asociados según ENDES 2018 - 2020. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina 2022;83:180–187.

28.

Corona

Fonseca

Acerca del carácter retrospectivo o prospectivo en la investigación científica. MediSur 2021;19:338–341.

29.

Rodríguez

Mendivelso

Diseño de investigación de corte transversal . Revista Médica Sanitas 2018;21:141–147.

30.

Kroenke

Spitzer

Williams

JBW

. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–613.

31.

Villarreal-Zegarra

Copez-Lonzoy

Bernabé-Ortiz

, et al Valid group comparisons can be made with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): A measurement invariance study across groups by demographic characteristics. PLoS One 2019;14:e0221717.

32.

Villarreal-Zegarra

Barrera-Begazo

Otazú-Alfaro

, et al Sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9, PHQ-8, PHQ-2) and General Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7, GAD-2) for depression and anxiety diagnosis: a cross-sectional study in a Peruvian hospital population. BMJ Open 2023;13:e076193.

33.

Samji

Ladak

, et al Review: Mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on children and youth – a systematic review. Child Adolesc Ment Health 2022;27:173–189.

34.

Kuklová

Lustigová

Vliv socioekonomického statusu na výskyt depresivních symptomů v populaci Česka – výsledky EHIS 2019. Demografie 2023;65:84–93.

35.

Villarreal-Zegarra

Otazú-Alfaro

Segovia-Bacilio

, et al Profiles of depressive symptoms in Peru: An 8-year analysis in population-based surveys. J Affect Disord 2023;333:384–391.

36.

Antiporta

Cutipé

Mendoza

, et al Depressive symptoms among Peruvian adult residents amidst a National Lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatr 2021;21:111.

37.

World Health Organization. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders. Ginebra, Suiza: WHO. 2017. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/depression-global-health-estimates

38.

Santini

Koyanagi

Tyrovolas

, et al The association between social relationships and depression: A systematic review. J Affect Disord 2015;175:53–65.

39.

García-Prieto

Jiménez-Gómez

MI.

Estudio ecológico sobre la relación entre desempleo y depresión en Europa en 2014. Revista Enfermería CyL 2020;12:43–51.

40.

Guan

Guariglia

Moore

, et al Financial stress and depression in adults: A systematic review. PLoS One 2022;17:e0264041.

41.

Nie

The association between school climate and aggression: A moderated mediation model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:8709.

42.

Fluharty

Taylor

Grabski

, et al The association of cigarette smoking with depression and anxiety: A systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res 2017;19:3–13.

43.

Bjelland

Krokstad

Mykletun

, et al Does a higher educational level protect against anxiety and depression? The HUNT study. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:1334–1345.

44.

Lorant

Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: A meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:98–112.

45.

Rautio

Filatova

Lehtiniemi

, et al Living environment and its relationship to depressive mood: A systematic review. Int J Soc Psychiatr 2018;64:92–103.

46.

Gao

Sun

, et al The role of community factors in predicting depressive symptoms among Chinese workforce: A longitudinal study in rural and urban settings. BMC Public Health 2022;22:1429.

47.

Ramos-Vera

García O’Diana

Basauri

, et al Psychological impact of COVID-19: A cross-lagged network analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging COVID-19 database. Front Psychiatr 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1124257

Influence of Sociodemographic,Socioeconomic,and Health Factors on Depression in the Peruvian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

Introduction:

Objective:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Design

Participants

Variables of the study

Data analysis

Ethical Considerations

Results

Characteristics of the Population

Bivariate associations

Multivariate analysis

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Ethical Considerations

Consent to Participate

Consent for Publication

Author Contributions

Funding

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Data Availability Statement

References