Multidisciplinary team meetings (MTM) about a patient are a way to coordinate fragmented care. The Minimal Data Set/Resident Assessment Instrument (MDS/RAI) is a tool to prepare and support these meetings. Methods: An exploratory, qualitative study was used to examine the factors that influence the need for an MTM and to determine the value of MDS/RAI supporting the MTM. Results: Key elements are awareness of the health care professionals that “something is wrong” and the presence of sufficient family caregivers with enough capacity. The MDS/RAI is an aid because registration provides all health care professionals with the same type of preparation, allows possible blind spots to be discovered, and provides structure to the multidisciplinary meeting. Multidisciplinary meetings were found to contribute to sharing of information, knowledge, goals, and mutual respect. Conclusion: The evaluation of the patient’s care needs by MDS/RAI registration, performed by health care professionals involved in the care, and discussion of the results leads to more efficient MTMs.
BodenheimerT. Coordinating care—a perilous journey through the health care system. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1064-1071.
2.
KodnerDLSpreeuwenbergC. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications—a discussion paper. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e12.
3.
McDonaldKMSundaramVBravataDM. Care Coordination. In: ShojanaKGMcDonaldKMWachterRMOwensDK, eds. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies. Technical Review 9. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007.
4.
PowellDGWilliamsAMLarsenKPerkinsDRolandMHarrisMF. Coordinating primary health care: an analysis of the outcomes of a systematic review. Med J Aust. 2008;188:S65-S68.
5.
De LepeleireJVan HoudtSAertgeertsBBuntinxF. Het effect van een multidisciplinair zorgplan in de thuiszorg. Leuven: Academisch Centrum voor Huisartsgeneeskunde KULeuven; 2007.
6.
NoelkerLS. Case management for caregivers. Care Manag J. 2002;3:199-204.
7.
ZuberRF. Back to the basics: the clinical record. Home Healthcare Nurse. 2004;22:327-332.
8.
De LepeleireJFalezFSwineCYlieffMPepersackTBuntinxF. Interface: rapport 2005. Leuven-Bruxelles: Interface; 2005.
9.
MorrisJNHawesCFriesBE. Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes. Gerontologist. 1990;30:293-307.
10.
MorrisJNFriesBESteelK. Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: applicability of the MDS-HC. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:1017-1024.
11.
LandiFTuaEOnderG. Minimum data set for home care: a valid instrument to assess frail older people living in the community. Med Care. 2000;38:1184-1190.
12.
MorrisJNFriesBESteelK. Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: applicability of the MDS-HC. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:1017-1024.
13.
Van HoudtSDe CorteEBuntinxF. RAI-project: bevordering van de communicatie tussen zorgverleners betrokken bij de zorg voor oudere afhankelijke personen. Leuven, Academisch Centrum Huisartsgeneeskunde KULeuven; 2007.
14.
DeclercqAGossetCPaepenB. Actieproject BelRAI II: haalbaarheid van de RAI-methode in Belgi. Leuven: LUCAS, 2008.
15.
LandiFTuaEOnderG. Minimum data set for home care: a valid instrument to assess frail older people living in the community. Med Care. 2000;38:1184-1190.
16.
BrymanA. Social Research Methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2004.
17.
PopeCZieblandSMaysN. Qualitative research in health care. Analyzing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320:114-116.
18.
GittellJH. Organizing work to support relational co-ordination. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2000;11:517-539.
19.
AchterbergWPvan CampenCPotAMKerkstraARibbeMW. Effects of the resident assessment instrument on the care process and health outcomes in nursing homes. A review of the literature. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1999;31:131-137.
20.
DuyverCVanHSDeLJDoryVDegryseJM. The perception of the clinical relevance of the MDS-Home Care(C) tool by trainers in general practice in Belgium. Fam Pract. 2010;27:638-643.
21.
CrawfordMJPrinceMMenezesPMannAH. The recognition and treatment of depression in older people in primary care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1998;13:172-176.
22.
Van den BruelAAertgeertsBBruyninckxRAertsMBuntinxF. Signs and symptoms for diagnosis of serious infections in children: a prospective study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:538-546.
23.
ColerickEJGeorgeLK. Predictors of institutionalization among caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34:493-498.
24.
LiebermanMAKramerJH. Factors affecting decisions to institutionalize demented elderly. Gerontologist. 1991;31:371-374.
25.
RobinsonJHCallisterLCBerryJADearingKA. Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20:600-607.
