Issues in policy development for allergy and anaphylaxis have been gaining more attention among both policy makers and the general public. The media can play an important role both in framing allergy issues for the general public and in the policy-making process. As such, an exploration of media representations can provide valuable insight that can inform policy and communication strategies. The authors conducted a content analysis of Canadian newspaper articles to elicit information about the portrayal of laws and policies to address food allergy and anaphylaxis. The authors gathered information on types of policies, support or evidence provided for policies, and whether the overall theme of an article was in support or opposition to a policy. Results indicated that, in general, the media portrayed laws and/or policy proposals to address food allergy-related issues in a supportive manner, but policies that limit individual choice, such as allergy-related food bans, drew more criticism and debate.
RiesNMvon TigerstromB. Roadblocks to laws for healthy eating and activity. CMAJ. 2010;182:687-692.
5.
GostinLOGostinKG. A broader liberty: J.S. Mill, paternalism and the public’s health. Public Health. 2009;123:214-221.
6.
HoekJ. Public health, regulation and the nanny state fallacy [Paper 2]. In: Partnerships, Proof and Practice—International Nonprofit and Social Marketing Conference 2008—Proceedings. http://ro.uow.edu.au/insm08/2. Accessed March 9, 2011.
7.
BuchananDR. Autonomy, paternalism, and justice: ethical priorities in public health. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:15-21.
8.
Van PraetN. Air Canada ordered to create a nut “buffer zone” on flights; deadly allergy a “disability,” tribunal says. The National Post. January8, 2010;A1.
9.
CherryT. Sabrina’s mom agitates so other kids won’t die; Ontario legislation created in her name is now spreading across the country and around world. The Toronto Star. May3, 2007;H05.
10.
PearsonP. It’s just NUTS. Chatelaine. December2009;82(12):129.
YoungMENormanGRHumphreysKR. Medicine in the popular press: the influence of the media on perceptions of disease. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3552.
14.
CallaghanKSchnellF. Assessing the democratic debate: how the news media frame elite policy discourse. Political Commun. 2001;18:183-213.
15.
CaulfieldTBubelaTMurdochCJ. Myriad and the mass media: the covering of a gene patent controversy. Genet Med. 2008;9:850-855.
16.
Ten EyckTA. The media and the public opinion on genetics and biotechnology: mirrors, windows, or walls?Public Underst Sci. 2005;14:305-316.
17.
Research Canada. Highlights of media science forum poll results on Canadians views of health research information in the media. http://www.rc-rc.ca/content.php?sec=1. Updated December2007. Accessed August 30, 2010.
BarryCLBrescollVLBrownellKDSchlesingerM. Obesity metaphors: how beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. Milbank Q. 2009;87:7-47.
20.
BarryCLBrescollVLGollustS. Framing public support for childhood obesity policies: the effects of individualizing the problem. Paper presented at: The ISPP 33rd Annual Scientific Meeting; July 7, 2010; San Francisco, CA.
21.
HarringtonDWElliottSJClarkeAE. Frames, claims and audiences: construction of food allergies in the Canadian media [published online ahead of print March 1, 2011]. Public Underst Sci. doi:10.1177/096366251039308310.1177/0963662510393083
22.
GuptaRSKimJSBarnathanJAAmsdenLBTummalaLSHollJL. Food allergy knowledge, attitudes and beliefs: focus groups of parents, physicians and the general public. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8:36.
LandisJRKochGG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
25.
RiesNMRachulCCaulfieldT. Newspaper reporting on legislative and policy interventions to address obesity: United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. J Public Health Policy. 2011;32:73-90.
26.
SuggsLSMcIntyreC. European Union public opinion on policy measures to address childhood overweight and obesity. J Public Health Policy. 2011;32:91-106.
27.
LawrenceRG. Framing obesity. Harvard Int J Press Politics. 2004;9:56-75.
28.
MajorLH. Break it to me harshly: the effects of intersecting news frames in lung cancer and obesity coverage. J Health Commun. 2009;14:174-188.
29.
SchwarzingerMFlicoteauxRCortarenodaSObadiaYMoattiJP. Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?PLoS One. 2010;5:e10199.
30.
Schneider ChafenJJNewberrySJRiedlMA. Diagnosing and managing common food allergies. JAMA. 2010;303: 1848-1856.
31.
YoungMCMunoz-FurlongASichererSH. Management of food allergies in schools: a perspective for allergists. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124:175-182.
32.
MillsENMackieARBurneyP. The prevalence, cost and basis of food allergy across Europe. Allergy. 2007;62:717-722.
33.
Munoz-FurlongA. Food allergy in schools: concerns for allergists, pediatricians, parents and school staff. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009;93(5suppl 3):S47-S50.
34.
ChristakisNA. This allergies hysteria is just nuts. BMJ. 2008;337:a2880.
35.
GreenbergL. Queen’s Park unanimously passes Sabrina’s Law: legislation named after Pembroke teen who had fatal allergic reaction at school. The Ottawa Citizen. May17, 2005;D1.
