Enabling change: An assessment tool for adult offenders that operationalises risk needs responsivity and desistance principles

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which the risk needs responsivity (RNR) model and desistance principles have been integrated and operationalised in the development of the Enablers of Change assessment and sentence planning tool developed by a Community Rehabilitation Company provider in England. We consider the constructs that underpin the tool, identifying points of departure and similarity between RNR principles (Andrews and Bonta, 2007), the ‘good lives’ model (Ward and Maruna, 2007) and desistance principles (McNeil and Weaver, 2010) and their integration. We examine how these constructs have been operationalised in the tool, which aims to assess needs, strengths, protective factors and contribute to risk assessment. Given the tool’s innovation, this article is of international significance and will make an original contribution to the evidence base on operationalising desistance in the management of people with convictions in England and Wales and other jurisdictions.

Keywords

Enablers of change assessment and sentence planning tool desistance integration offender assessment operationalise risk needs responsivity model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbiati

Azzola

Palix

, et al. (2017) Validity and predictive accuracy of the Structured Assessment Of Protective Factors For Violence Risk in criminal forensic evaluations: A Swiss cross-validation retrospective study. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 44(4): 493–510.

Andrews

Bonta

(2007) The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model of assessment and human service in prevention and corrections: Crime-prevention jurisprudence. The Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 49(4): 439–464.

Andrews

Bonta

(2010) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender.

Andrews

Bonta

Wormith

(2011) The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model: Does adding the Good Lives Model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behaviour 38(7): 735–755.

Baker

(2012) AssetPlus rationale. London. Youth Justice Board.

Bonta

Andrews

(2017) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (6th ed.). Routledge: New York, NY.

Canton

(2014) The European probation rules, assessment and risk. EuroVista, 3(2): 68–80.

College of Policing (2018) Major investigation and public protection: Identifying, assessing and managing risk. Available at: https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/major-investigation-and-public-protection/managing-sexual-offenders-and-violent-offenders/identifying-assessing-and-managing-risk/#active-risk-management-system-arms (accessed 12 November 2018).

Council of Europe (2010) Recommendation CM / Rec (2010)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the Council of Europe Probation Rules, (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 January 2010 at the 1075th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

10.

Craig

Dixon

Gannon

(2013) Overview and structure of the book. In: Craig

Dixon

Gannon

(eds) What Works in Offender Rehabilitation: An Evidence-Based Approach to Assessment and Treatment. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

11.

Cullen

Myer

Latessa

(2009)Eight lessons from moneyball: The high cost of ignoring evidence-based corrections. Victims & Offenders 4(2): 197–213.

12.

Debidin

(ed) (2009) A compendium of research and analysis on the Offender Assessment System (OASys) 2006–2009. In: Ministry of Justice Research Series 16/09. London: Ministry of Justice.

13.

De Vries Robbé

De Vogel

(2012) SAPROF 2nd Edition manual updated Research chapter. Available at: http://www.saprof.com/_files/Research%20chapter%20SAPROF%202nd%20Edition.%20De%20Vries%20Robbe%20and%20De%20Vogel.%202012.pdf (accessed 12 November 2018).

14.

Erikson

(1968) Identity, Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.

15.

Farrall

(2004) Social capital and offender reintegration: making probation desistance focused. In: Maruna

Immarigeon

(eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

16.

Hanson

Bourgon

Helmus

Hodgson

(2009) The Principles of Effective Correctional Treatment Also Apply to Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis. Available at: https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/2009-01-trt/2009-01-trt-eng.pdf (accessed 12 November 2018).

17.

Horan

(2015) Restorative justice: The relevance of desistance and psychology. Safer Communities, 14(3): 147–155.

18.

Jones

Brown

Robinson

, et al. (2015) Incorporating strengths into quantitative assessments of criminal risk for adult offenders: the service planning instrument. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 42(3): 321–338.

19.

Kewley

Blandford

(2017) The development of the active risk management system. Journal of Criminal Psychology 7(3): 155-167.

20.

Laub

Nagin

Sampson

(1998) Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review 63(2): 225–238.

21.

Looman

Abracen

(2013) The risk need responsivity model of offender rehabilitation: Is there really a need for a paradigm shift? International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy 8(3–4): 30–36.

22.

McNeill

(2006) A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6(1): 39-62.

23.

McNeill

(2009) Towards Effective Practice in Offender Supervision. Glasgow: The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.

24.

McNeill

(2014) Punishment as rehabilitation. In: Bruinsma

Weisburd

(eds) Encyclopaedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, pp. 4195–4206.

25.

McNeill

(2016) What (good) is punishment? In: Farrall

Goldson

Loader

Dockley

(eds) Justice and Penal Reform: Reshaping the Penal Landscape. London: Routledge, pp. 81–98.

26.

McNeill

Weaver

(2007) Giving up crime: Directions for policy. SCCCJ Online.

27.

McNeill

Weaver

(2010) Changing lives? Desistance Research and Offender Management. SCCJR Project Report; No.03/2010.

28.

Mair

Burke

Taylor

(2006) The worst tax form you’ve ever seen’? Probation officers’ views about OASys. Probation Journal 53(1): 7–23.

29.

Maruna

(2010) Mixed method research in criminology: Why not go both ways? In Piquero

Weisburd

(eds) Handbook of Quantitative Criminology. New York: Springer, pp. 123–138.

30.

Maruna

(2017) Desistance as a Social Movement. Irish Probation Journal 14(1): 5–20.

31.

Merrington

(2004) Assessment tools in probation. In: Burnett

Roberts

(eds) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

32.

Ministry of Justice (2013) Transforming Rehabilitation: A revolution in the way we manage offenders. London: Ministry of Justice. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/transforming-rehabilitation-a-revolution-in-the-way-we-manage-offenders (accessed 12 November 2018)

33.

Moore

(2015) A compendium of research and analysis on the Offender Assessment System (OASys) 2009–2013. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/449357/research-analysis-offender-assessment-system.pdf (accessed 12 November 2018)

34.

Morton

(2009) Findings from OASys Completion Rates. Research Summary 4/09. London: Ministry of Justice.

35.

Nicholls

Webster

(2014) Sex offender management and dynamic risk: Pilot evaluation of the Active Risk Management System (ARMS). Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. London: Ministry of Justice.

36.

NOMS (2014) Evidence and Segmentation. Companion document to NOMS Commissioning Intentions from 2014. London: Ministry of Justice. National Offender Management Service.

37.

NOMS (2015a) Risk Assessment Tool Approval Criteria and Guidance. Criteria and Guidance document _ V 1.0. London: Ministry of Justice. National Offender Management Service.

38.

NOMS (2015b) Implementation of the Active Risk Management System (ARMS). Available at: https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/offenders/psipso/psi-2015/pi-15-2015-ai-16-2015-arms.pdf (accessed 12 November 2018).

39.

Nugent

Schinkel

(2016) The pains of desistance. Criminology and Criminal Justice 16(5).

40.

Paternoster

Bushway

(2009) Desistance and the feared self: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 99(4): 1103–1156.

41.

Polaschek

DLL

(2012) An appraisal of the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment. Legal and Criminological Psychology 17(1): 1–17.

42.

Porporino

(2010) Bringing sense and sensitivity to corrections: From programmes to ‘fix’ offenders to services to support desistance. In: Brayford

Cowe

Deering

(eds), What Else Works? Creative work with Offenders. London: Willan Publishing, pp. 61–85.

43.

Policy Evaluation and Research Unit (2017) Evaluation of Accord Programme: Whole system approach to sex offender management. Available at: http://www.mmuperu.co.uk/projects/evaluation-of-accord-programme-whole-system-approach-to-sex-offender-manage (accessed 12 November 2018).

44.

Public Safety Canada (2011) Strengths and human needs in offender assessment. Research summary. Available at: https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/strgnths-rhb/strgnths-rhb-eng.pdf (accessed 8 October 2019).

45.

Savolainen

(2009) Work, family and criminal desistance. Adult social bonds in a Nordic welfare state. British Journal of Criminology 49(3): 285–304.

46.

Skardhamar

Savolinen

(2014) Changes in Criminal Offending around the time of job entry: A study of employment and desistance. Criminology 52(2): 263–291.

47.

Van Essen

Van Alphen

Van Tuinen

(2016) Risk assessment the Dutch way: A scalable, easy to use tool for probation reports. Available at: https://www.cep-probation.org/risk-assessment-dutch-way-scalable-easy-use-tool-probation-reports/ (accessed 12 November 2018).

48.

Ward

Maruna

(2007) Rehabilitation: Beyond the Risk Assessment Paradigm.London:Routledge.

49.

Ward

Yates

Willis

(2012) The Good Lives Model and the Risk Need Responsivity Model: A critical response to Andrews, Bonta, and Wormith (2011). Criminal Justice and Behaviour 39: 94–110.

50.

Waterman

(1993) Developmental perspectives on identity formation: From adolescence to adulthood. In: Waterman

MJE

Matteson

Archer

, et al. (eds) Ego Identity: A Handbook for Psycho-social Research. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 42–68.

51.

Willis

Ward

(2014) Risk management versus the Good Lives Model: The construction of better lives and the reduction of harm. Available at: http://herzog-evans.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/willis-ward.pdf (accessed 12 November 2018).

52.

Wong

Horan

(2019) Early testing and formative evaluation of the Enablers of Change assessment and sentence planning tool for adults with convictions. European Journal of Probation 11(1): 30–48.