This article highlights the views and advice of offenders in Scotland about what helps and hinders young people generally in the process of desistance, why interventions may or may not encourage desistance and what criminal justice and other agencies can do to alleviate the problems which may result in offending. The findings suggest that probation-style supervisory relationships with workers are still the key means to promote desistance but given the fact that offenders perceive desistance to be ‘by design’ rather than ‘by default’, there still needs to be a greater emphasis placed by criminal justice and wider agencies on the structural constraints to a legal, conventional and integrated lifestyle.
BarryM. (2000) ‘The mentor/monitor debate in criminal justice: “what works” for offenders’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 30: 575–595.
2.
BarryM. (2006) Youth Offending in Transition: The search for social recognition, Abingdon: Routledge.
3.
BarryM. (2007) ‘Youth offending and youth transitions: The power of capital in influencing change’, Critical Criminology, 15: 185–198.
4.
BarryM. (2012) ‘Desisters on Desistance’, paper presented at the ESRC Desistance Seminar, September, Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
5.
BurnettR. (1992) The Dynamics of Recidivism, Oxford: Centre for Criminological Research.
6.
BurnettR. (2004) ‘To reoffend or not to reoffend? The ambivalence of convicted property offenders’, in MarunaS.ImmarigeonR. (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration, Cullompton: Willan.
7.
FarrallS. (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders, Cullompton: Willan.
8.
FarrallS.CalverleyA. (2006) Understanding Desistance from Crime, Crime and Justice Series, London: Open University Press.
9.
GelsthorpeL. (2007) ‘Sentencing and gender’ in SheehanR.McIvorG.TrotterC. (eds) What Works with Women Offenders, Cullompton: Willan.
10.
GiordanoPCernovichS.RudolphJ. (2002) ‘Gender, crime and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation’, American Journal of Sociology, 107: 990–1064.
11.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990) A General Theory of Crime, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
HealyD. (2010) The Dynamics of Desistance: Charting pathways through change, Cullompton: Willan.
13.
HirschiT. (1969) Causes of Delinquency, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
LaubJ.SampsonR.J. (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent boys to age 70, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
LeBelT.BurnettR.MarunaS.BushwayS. (2008) ‘The “Chicken and Egg” of Subjective and Social Factors in Desistance from Crime’, European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 5 (2), 131–159.
16.
LeonardsenD. (2003) ‘Crime in Japan — A lesson for criminological theory?’ Selected papers from the 2003 British Criminology Conference, Bangor, June, British Society of Criminology, Vol. 6.
17.
MacDonaldR.WebsterC.ShildrickT.SimpsonM. (2011) ‘Paths of exclusion, inclusion and desistance: Understanding marginalised young people's criminal careers’ in FarrallS.HoughM.MarunaS.SparksR. (eds) Escape Routes: Contemporary perspectives on life after punishment, Abingdon: Routledge.
18.
McNeillF. (2006) ‘A desistance paradigm for offender management’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6: 39–62.
19.
McNeillF.FarrallS.LightowlerC.MarunaS. (2012) How and why people stop offending: Discovering desistance, Insights No. 15, Glasgow: IRISS.
20.
MoloneyM.MacKenzieK.HuntG.Joe-LaidlerK. (2009) ‘The path and promise of fatherhood for gang members’, British Journal of Criminology, 49: 305–325.
21.
MunroM.McNeillF. (2010) ‘Fines, community sanctions and measures in Scotland’ in CroallH.MooneyG.MunroM. (eds) Criminal Justice in Scotland, Cullompton: Willan.
22.
National Records of Scotland (2011) Drug-related Deaths in Scotland in 2010, Edinburgh: National Records of Scotland.
23.
NellisM. (2013) ‘Electronic Monitoring and Surveillance-based Compliance’, in RaynorP.UgwudikeP. (eds) What Works in Offender Compliance?London: Routledge.
24.
PaternosterR.BushwayS. (2009) ‘Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory ofcriminal desistance, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 99, No. 4, 1103–1156.
25.
RexS. (1999) ‘Desistance from offending: Experiences of probation’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 38 (4): 366–383.
26.
SampsonR.J.LaubJ. (1993) Crime in the Making: Pathways and turning points through life, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Scottish Government (2011) What Works to Reduce Reoffending: A Summary of the Evidence, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
ShildrickT.MacDonaldR.WebsterC.GarthwaiteK (2012) Poverty and Insecurity: Life in low-pay, no-pay Britain, Bristol: Policy Press.
30.
ShoverN. (1996) Great Pretenders: Pursuits and Careers of Persistent Thieves, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
31.
UggenC. (2000) ‘Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment and recidivism’, American Sociological Review, 65: 529–46.
32.
WeaverB. (2011) Co-Producing Community Justice: The Transformative Potential of Personalisation for Penal Sanctions, British Journal of Social Work, 41 (6): 1038–1057.
33.
WeaverB. (2012) ‘The relational context of desistance: Some implications and opportunities for social policy’, Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 46, No. 4: 395–412.
34.
WeaverB.ArmstrongS. (2011) ‘User views of punishment — The dynamics of community-based punishment: Insider views from the Outside, Research report No. 03/2011, Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research, published online at www.sccjr.ac.uk.
