Strategic stories: weaponized or worldmaking?

Abstract

The deployment of strategic stories, that is, stories designed to prevail over adversaries, is at work in domestic politics as well as in diplomacy. In both cases, the strategy has two aims: to create a division between ‘us’ and ‘them’, and at the same time to ascribe moral supremacy to ‘our side’ while posing ‘their side’ as an existential threat. Strategic storytelling specialises in discrimination and foe creation, but the nature of the actors involved has changed in the digital era. Now, ‘we’ and ‘they’ are organised into decentralised and mediated classes based on common identities, enabling collective action at planetary scale (e.g. climate activism, gender and ethnic justice, far-right extremism). At the same time, media platforms and news organisations are part of the apparatus by which strategic narratives are weaponised for warfare. Thus, I argue, digital media analysis needs to understand the ‘strategic turn’ in storytelling, and its deployment by states and ‘non-state actors’ alike, in this case, news media. Alternative models of worldmaking, in which popular culture acts as a pedagogic platform for class formation and activism, enter an ecology in which narrative is already a weapon of war – where it’s aircraft carriers, all the way down.

Keywords

strategic stories China Australia weaponised news aircraft carriers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2016). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Revised edition). Verso.

Arquilla

Ronfeldt

(1999). The emergence of noopolitik: Toward an American information strategy. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1033/RAND_MR1033.pdf

Baysha

(2021). Democracy, populism, and neoliberalism in Ukraine: On the fringes of the virtual and the real. Routledge.

Bier

, et al. (2020). In Bier

, et al., (Ed.) Hitler. Macht. Oper: Propaganda und Musiktheater in Nürnberg 1920-1950. Würzburg, Germany: Königshausen & Neumann.

Bingham

Souza

(2009). Death From a Distance and the Birth of a Humane Universe. Online: Booksurge.com.

Bowles

Gintis

(2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press.

Brecht

(1941). The resistible rise of Arturo Ui. Methuen Drama.

Bulwer-Lytton

(1835). Rienzi, Last of the Roman Tribunes. Online: Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1396/1396-h/1396-h.htm

Cable

(1994). Gunboat diplomacy. Political Applications of Limited Naval Forces, 3rd edn. London: Chatto & Windus.

10.

Campbell

(1949). The Hero with a Thousand Faces (3rd ed.). Novato CA.: New World Library.

11.

Carlsson

(2017). The Rise and Fall of NWICO. Nordicom Review, 24(2), 31–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0306

12.

da Silva

Tehrani

(2016). Comparative phylogenetic analyses uncover the ancient roots of Indo-European folktales. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1), 150645. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150645

13.

Deats

(2019). The Faust legend: From Marlowe and Goethe to contemporary film and drama. London: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Elton

(2006). The first casualty. Black Swan.

15.

Fiske

Hartley

(2003). Reading television (Second edn). London: Routledge.

16.

Gintis

van Schaik

Boehm

(2015). Zoon Politikon The Evolutionary Origins of Human Political Systems. Current Anthropology, 56(3), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1086/681217

17.

Gintis

van Schaik

Boehm

(2019). Zoon politikon: The evolutionary origins of human socio-political systems. Behavioural Processes, 161, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.007

18.

Greste

(2017). The first casualty: A memoir from the front lines of the global war on journalism. Viking.

19.

Hall

(1982). The rediscovery of “ideology”; return of the repressed in media studies. In Gurevitch

Bennett

Curran

Woollacott

(eds), Culture, Society and the Media (pp. 56–90). London: Routledge.

20.

Harnden

(2021) First Casualty. The Untold Story of the CIA Mission to Avenge (9/11). Little Brown & Co.

21.

Hartley

(1987). Regimes of Truth and the Politics of Reading: A Blivit. Cultural Studies, 1(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502388700490031

22.

Hartley

(1992a). Tele-ology: Studies in television. London: Routledge.

23.

Hartley

(1992b). The politics of pictures: The creation of the public in the age of popular media. London: Routledge.

24.

Hartley

(2020). How we use stories and Why that matters: Cultural science in action. Bloomsbury.

25.

Hartley

Ibrus

Ojamaa

(2021). On the digital semiosphere: Culture, media and science for the Anthropocene. Bloomsbury.

26.

Hartley

Potts

(2014). Cultural science: A natural history of stories, demes, knowledge and innovation. Bloomsbury.

27.

Ikeda

(2010). The First Experiments in Book Decoration at the Fust-Schöffer Press. In Wagner

Reed

(eds), Early Printed Books as Material Objects (pp. 39–50). De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255300.39

28.

Janaway

(2002). Schopenhauer: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

29.

Jiang

(2020). The “critical decade” in the sino-American relationship: The “new roman empire” and the “new great struggle”. China Institute, Fudan University. https://www.readingthechinadream.com/jiang-shigong-ten-crucial-years.html

30.

Jockers

(2013). Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Champaign IL.: University of Illinois Press.

31.

Knightley

(1975). The first casualty: The war correspondent as hero and myth maker (3rd edition). London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

32.

(2020). Global order in the shadow of the coronavirus: China, Russia and the West. Sydney: Lowy Institute. Publication ‘supported by the Department of Defence’s Strategic Policy Grants Program’: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/global-order-shadow-coronavirus-china-russia-and-west

33.

Nature (2022). Demographics of emissions. Editorial. Nature Climate Change, 12, 209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01325-5

34.

Ronfeldt

(1996). Tribes, institutions, markets, networks: A framework about social evolution. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2005/P7967.pdf

35.

Ronfeldt

Arquilla

(2020). Whose story wins? Rise of the noosphere, noopolitik, and information-age statecraft. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PEA200/PEA237-1/RAND_PEA237-1.pdfhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA237-1.html

36.

Ross

(2020). Wagnerism: Art and politics in the shadow of music. Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

37.

Rudd

(2022). The avoidable war: The dangers of a catastrophic conflict between the US and Xi Jinping's China. Hachette Australia.

38.

Unver

Ertan

(2022). The Strategic Logic of Digital Disinformation: Offense, Defence and Deterrence in Information Warfare. Information Warfare (SSRN Papers). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4098988

39.

Wijninga

Oosterveld

W. T.

Galdiga

J. H.

Marten

(2014). State and Non-State Actors: Beyond the Dichotomy. In Chivot

van Esc

. Strategic Monitor 2014: Four Strategic Challenges. Den Haag NL: Hague Centre for Strategic Studies, 139–162: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep12608

40.

Wirth

(2019). Whose “Freedom of Navigation”? Australia, China, the United States and the making of order in the “Indo-Pacific”. The Pacific Review, 32(4), 475–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2018.1515788

41.

Zhang

K. V.

(2019). Chinese non-military coercion—Tactics and rationale. Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinese-non-military-coercion-tactics-and-rationale/