Social media influencers are emerging as a new force in shaping public discourse and raising public awareness of socio-political agendas in the digital space. This paper explores the role of influencers as part of the citizens group in nation branding by looking into their interactions with followers through the lens of authenticity. It analyzes the networked narratives generated by the influencers and followers, using the mixed methods of blending content analysis with social network analysis. The findings identify the potential of influencers evolving as a crucial force in contributing to a representative national brand informed through imbuing authenticity with engagement, featuring valued-based content, interactivity, creativity and intrinsic motivations within an ethical communication mechanism. It advances influencer studies in nation branding by underpinning the two-way construct of authenticity in generating influence; and informs the development of strategies for engaging citizens in nation branding through influencers using authenticity. Considering the central role of China in international economics, politics and culture, this article has significant domestic and regional implications.
AudrezetA.de KervilerG.Guidry MoulardJ. (2020). Authenticity under threat: when social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008.
5.
CarterD. (2016). Hustle and brand: the sociotechnical shaping of influence. Social Media+ Society, 2(3), 2056305116666305. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116666305.
6.
ConnellJ. (2018). Globalisation, soft power, and the rise of football in China. Geographical Research, 56(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12249.
7.
CotterK. (2019). Playing the visibility game: how digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895-913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684.
8.
DesatovaP. (2018). Thailand 4.0 and the internal focus of nation branding. Archives of Suicide Research: Official Journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research, 42(4), 682-700. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2018.1512555.
EnkeN.BorchersN. S. (2019). Social media influencers in strategic communication: A conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1620234.
11.
Eugenio-VelaJ. d. S.GinestaX.KavaratzisM. (2020). The critical role of stakeholder engagement in a place branding strategy: a case study of the Empordà brand. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 28(7), 1393-1412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1701294.
12.
Femenia-SerraF.GretzelU. (2020). Influencer Marketing for Tourism Destinations: Lessons from a Mature Destination Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2020 (pp. 65-78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36737-4_6.
13.
FerchaudA.GrzesloJ.OrmeS.LaGroueJ. (2018). Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.041.
14.
General Office of the State Council (2015). The overall Chinese Soccer Reform and Development Program. Beijing.
15.
Goulart SztejnbergR.GiovanardiM. (2017). The ambiguity of place branding consultancy: working with stakeholders in Rio de Janeiro. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(5-6), 421-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2017.1319404.
16.
GoversR.GoF. (2009). Glocal, virtual and physical identities, constructed, imagined and experienced. Springer.
17.
GräveJ.-F. (2019). What KPIs are key? evaluating performance metrics for social media influencers. Social Media+ Society, 5(3), 2056305119865475.
18.
HereźniakM. (2017). Place branding and citizen involvement: participatory approach to building and managing city brands. International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, 19(1), 129-141.
19.
HongF.ManganJ. A. (2003). Will the ‘Iron Roses’ bloom forever? women's football in China: changes and challenges. Soccer & Society, 4(2-3), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970512331390825.
20.
HuddersL.De JansS.De VeirmanM. (2021). The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 327-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925.
JohnsonG. J.Bruner IIG. C.IIKumarA. (2006). Interactivity and its facets revisited: theory and empirical test. Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.2753/joa0091-3367350403.
23.
JohnstoneL.LindhC. (2018). The sustainability-age dilemma: a theory of (un) planned behaviour via influencers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(1), e127-e139. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1693.
24.
JunS.YiJ. (2020). What makes followers loyal? The role of influencer interactivity in building influencer brand equity. The Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(6), 803-814. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-02-2019-2280.
25.
KahramanE. (2016). A methodological approach to nation branding: Measurement and issues. In ChittyN.JiL.RawnsleyG. D.HaydenC.SimonsJ. (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Soft Power (pp. 93-103). New York: Routledge.
26.
Kania-LundholmM. (2016). Nation for sale? Citizen online debates and the ‘new patriotism’ in post-socialist Poland. In VolcicZ.AndrejevicM. (Eds), Commercial Nationalism (pp. 106-130). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137500991_7.
27.
KavaratzisM. (2012). From “necessary evil” to necessity: stakeholders’ involvement in place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development, 5(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538331211209013.
KhamisS.AngL.WellingR. (2017). Self-branding,‘micro-celebrity’and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292.
30.
KnottB.FyallA.JonesI. (2015). The nation branding opportunities provided by a sport mega-event: South Africa and the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 4(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2014.09.001.
31.
KnottB.JonesA.I.FyallAlan. (2017). Sport mega-events and nation branding: Unique characteristics of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, South Africa. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(3), 900-923. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-09-2015-0523.
32.
KostyginaG.FengM.CzaplickiL.TranH.TulsianiS.PerksS. N.SchilloB. (2021). Exploring the discursive function of hashtags: a semantic network analysis of JUUL-related Instagram messages. Social Media+ Society, 7(4), 20563051211055442. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211055442.
33.
LeeJ. A.EastinM. S. (2021). Perceived authenticity of social media influencers: scale development and validation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-12-2020-0253.
34.
LewisR. (2020). This is what the news Won’t Show You”: Youtube creators and the reactionary politics of micro-celebrity. Television & New Media, 21(2), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419879919.
35.
LiX. (2017). From Beijing to Rio: rebranding China via the modern Olympic games. The Journal of International Communication, 23(2), 252-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2017.1347101.
36.
LiX. (2020). Positive projection: soccer and Xi’s softpower strategy-branding, intention, ambition, and assertion. In ManganJ. A.HortonP.TagsoldC. (Eds), Softpower, Soccer, Supremacy: The Chinese Dream (pp. 97-114). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
37.
LiX.FengJ. (2021a). Empowerment or disempowerment: exploring stakeholder engagement in nation branding through a mixed method approach to social network analysis. Public Relations Review, 47(3), 102024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102024.
38.
LiX.FengJ. (2021b). Nation branding through the lens of soccer: Using a sports nation branding framework to explore the case of China. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211011179.
39.
Luoma-ahoV.PirttimäkiT.MaityD.MunnukkaJ.ReinikainenH. (2019). Primed authenticity: How priming impacts authenticity perception of social media influencers. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 352-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1617716.
MolinilloS.Anaya-SánchezR.MorrisonA. M.Coca-StefaniakJ. A. (2019). Smart city communication via social media: analysing residents’ and visitors’ engagement. Cities, 94(11), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.003.
42.
MorhartF.MalärL.GuèvremontA.GirardinF.GrohmannB. (2015). Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 200-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.006.
43.
National Development, & Reform Commission (2016). The medium and long-term Development Plan of Chinese Soccer (2016-2050). Beijing.
44.
NavarriaG. (2016). To censor or not to censor: roots, current trends and the long-term consequences of the Chinese communist party’s fear of the internet. Communication, Politics & Culture, 49(2), 82-110.
45.
PalazzoM.VolleroA.VitaleP.SianoA. (2021). Urban and rural destinations on Instagram: exploring the influencers’ role in# sustainabletourism. Land Use Policy, 100, 104915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104915.
46.
PentinaI.GuillouxV.MicuA. C. (2018). Exploring social media engagement behaviors in the context of luxury brands. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1405756.
47.
PoleseA.AmbrosioT.KerikmäeT. (2020). Estonian Identity construction between nation branding and building. Czech Journal of International Relations, 55(2), 22-46. https://doi.org/10.32422/mv.1690.
48.
PöyryE.PelkonenM.NaumanenE.LaaksonenS.-M. (2019). A Call for authenticity: audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 336-351.
49.
RecueroR.ZagoG.SoaresF. (2019). Using social network analysis and social capital to identify user roles on polarized political conversations on Twitter. Social Media+ Society, 5(2), 2056305119848745. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119848745.
50.
SchoutenA. P.JanssenL.VerspagetM. (2020). Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and Product-Endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898.
51.
ShanY.ChenK.-J.LinJ.-S. (2019). When social media influencers endorse brands: the effects of self-influencer congruence, parasocial identification, and perceived endorser motive. International Journal of Advertising, 39(5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1678322.
ShternJ.HillS.ChanD. (2019). Social media influence: Performative authenticity and the relational work of audience commodification in the Philippines. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1939-1958.
54.
SngK.AuT. Y.PangA. (2019). Social Media Influencers as a Crisis Risk in Strategic Communication: Impact of Indiscretions on Professional Endorsements. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1618305.
55.
StacksD. W.BowenS. A. (2013). Dictionary of public relations measurement and research3rd ed.Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
56.
StockmannD.LuoT. (2017). Which Social Media Facilitate Online Public Opinion in China?. Problems of Post-Communism, 64(3-4), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2017.1289818.
SunJ.LeungX. Y.BaiB. (2021). How social media influencer’s event endorsement changes attitudes of followers: the moderating effect of followers’ gender. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(7), 2337–2351.
59.
TafesseW.WoodB. P. (2021). Followers' engagement with Instagram influencers: The role of influencers’ content and engagement strategy. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102303.
60.
VolcicZ.AndrejevicM. (2011). Nation branding in the era of commercial nationalism. International Journal of Communication, 5(1), 598-618.
61.
WellmanM. L.StoldtR.TullyM.EkdaleB. (2020). Ethics of authenticity: social media influencers and the production of sponsored content. Journal of Media Ethics, 35(2), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2020.1736078.
XuM.ReijndersS.KimS. (2021). ‘Mingren are the respectable ones’: an analysis of everyday engagements with contemporary celebrity culture in China. Celebrity Studies, 12(1), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2019.1611461.
67.
XuJ.YangL. (2021). Governing entertainment celebrities in China: practices, policies and politics (2005–2020). Celebrity Studies, 12(2), 202-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2021.1912109.
68.
YangG. (2018). Un) civil Society in Digital China| Demobilizing the Emotions of Online Activism in China: A Civilizing Process. International Journal of Communication, 12, 21.
69.
YangG.JiangM. (2015). The networked practice of online political satire in China: Between ritual and resistance. International Communication Gazette, 77(3), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514568757.
70.
ZhangJ.LuoY. (2017). Degree Centrality, betweenness Centrality, and closeness Centrality in Social Network. 2nd International Conference on modelling, simulation and Applied mathematics (MSAM2017). Paper presented at the 2017.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
