This study examines the third-person effects of COVID-19 news among Wuhan residents during the peak of the outbreaks in the city. Using data collected in a telephone survey of 1,071 Wuhan residents, results show that respondents believed others were more influenced by the COVID-19 news. However, the more the respondents systematically processed the news through elaboration and the more they were oriented toward collectivist values, the smaller the self-other perceptual gap. Finally, results suggest the moderating effect of collectivism on the relationship between perceived effects of COVID news and altruistic behavior—collectivism enhances the influence of perceived effects on others on adoption of altruistic behavior. The influence of culture in shaping risk perception and behavioral responses is discussed.
AliI. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Making sense of rumor and fear. Op-Ed Medical Anthropology, 39(5), 376-379.
2.
AndsagerJ.WhiteA. (2007). Self versus others: Media, messages, and the third-person effect. New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
ChangC. (2012). News coverage of health-related issues and its impacts on perceptions: Taiwan as an example. Health Communication, 27(2), 111-123.
4.
ChenC. C.ChenX. P.MeindlJ. R. (1998). How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism.Academy of management. review, 23(2), 285-304.
5.
ChoiD. H.YooW.NohG. Y.ParkK. (2017). The impact of social media on risk perceptions during the MERS outbreak in South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 422-431.
6.
ColemanC. L. (1993). The influence of mass media and interpersonal communication on societal and personal risk judgments. Communication Research, 20(4), 611-628.
7.
DavidP.LiuK.MyserM. (2004). Methodological artifact or persistent bias? Testing the robustness of the third-person and reverse third-person effects for alcohol messages. Communication Research, 31(2), 206-233.
8.
DavisonW. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion, 47(1), 1-15.
9.
DayA. G. (2008). Out of the living room and into the voting booth: An analysis of corporate public affairs advertising under the third-person effect. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(2), 243-260.
10.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt brace Jovanovich college publishers.
11.
EarleyP. C. (1989). Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(4), 565-581.
12.
EarleyP. C.GibsonC. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24(3), 265-304.
13.
ElsterJ. (2006). Altruistic behavior and altruistic motivations. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, 1, 183-206.
14.
EvelandW. P.ShahD. V. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24(1), 101-117.
15.
FincherC. L.ThornhillR.MurrayD. R.SchallerM. (2008). Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1640), 1279-1285.
16.
GolanG. J.DayA. G. (2008). The first-person effect and its behavioral consequences: A new trend in the twenty-five year history of third-person effect research. Mass Communication and Society, 11(4), 539-556.
17.
GuntherA. C.MundyP. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 58-67.
18.
GuntherA. C.StoreyJ. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 199-215.
19.
GuntherA. C.ThorsonE. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19(5), 574-596.
20.
HoggM. A.ReidS. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7-30.
21.
HongT. (2007). Information control in time of crisis: The framing of SARS in China-based newspapers and Internet sources. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(5), 696-699.
22.
HoS. S.ScheufeleD. A.CorleyE. A. (2013). Factors influencing public risk–benefit considerations of nanotechnology: Assessing the effects of mass media, interpersonal communication, and elaborative processing. Public Understanding of Science, 22(5), 606-623.
23.
HuangY. (2004). The SARS epidemic and its aftermath in China: A political perspective. In KnoblerS.MahmoudA.LemonS.MackA.SivitzL.OberholtzerK. (Eds.), Learning from SARS: Preparing for the next disease outbreak (pp. 116-136). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
24.
HuiC. H.TriandisH. C.YeeC. (1991). Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation?British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 145-157.
25.
KimH. J. (2013). “They will help, so i don’t need to?” behavioral hypothesis of the third-person effect in donation aid advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 34(1), 93-106.
26.
KimH. S.ShermanD. K.UpdegraffJ. A. (2016). Fear of Ebola: The influence of collectivism on xenophobic threat responses. Psychological Science, 27(7), 935-944.
27.
LampertM.BlanksmaA. (2020). China COVID-19 lockdown trend report. Corona virus–survey conducted online in China among 2,022 people between January 23 and March 13 amidst COVID-19 lockdown detects shifts in values and trust. Glocalities.https://glocalities.com/latest/reports/china-lockdown-trends.
28.
LeeH.ParkS. A. (2016). Third-person effect and pandemic flu: The role of severity, self-efficacy method mentions, and message source. Journal of Health Communication, 21(12), 1244-1250.
29.
LeeB.TamboriniR. (2005). Third-person effect and internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and Internet self-efficacy. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 292-310.
30.
LimJ. S.LeeJ.KimS.ChangJ. J. (2017). Effects of perceived sensationalism and susceptibility to the disease on cognitive and emotional third-person perceptions of the MERS news coverage. IJHMR, 1(1), 45-70.
31.
LinC. A.LagoeC. (2013). Effects of news media and interpersonal interactions on H1N1 risk perception and vaccination intent. Current Rheumatology Reports, 30(2), 127-136.
32.
LiuX.LoV. H. (2014). Media exposure, perceived personal impact, and third-person effect. Media Psychology, 17(4), 378-396.
33.
LoV.WeiR.LuH. Y.HouH. Y. (2015). Perceived issue importance, information processing, and third-person effect of news about the imported US beef controversy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(3), 341-360.
34.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.
35.
MurrayD. R.TrudeauR.SchallerM. (2011). On the origins of cultural differences in conformity: Four tests of the pathogen prevalence hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 318-329.
36.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3.
37.
PerloffR. M. (1999). The third person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1(4), 353-378.
ReyniersD.BhallaR. (2013). Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(1), 7-15.
40.
RyuY.KimS. (2015). Testing the heuristic/systematic information-processing model (HSM) on the perception of risk after the Fukushima nuclear accidents. Journal of Risk Research, 18(7), 840-859.
41.
SalwenM. B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25(3), 259-285.
42.
SmithR. D. (2006). Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks: Lessons from SARS on the role of risk perception, communication and management. Social Science and Medicine, 63(12), 3113-3123.
43.
TaiZ.SunT. (2007). Media dependencies in a changing media environment: The case of the 2003 SARS epidemic in China. New Media and Society, 9(6), 987-1009.
44.
Ting-ToomeyS.DorjeeT. (2018). Communicating across cultures. New York, USA: Guilford Publications.
45.
TriversR. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.
46.
WeiR.LoV.-H.LuH. Y. (2007). Reconsidering the relationship between the third-person perception and optimistic bias. Communication Research, 34(6), 665-684.
47.
WeiR.LoV.-H.LuH. Y. (2008). Third-person effects of health news: Exploring the relationships among media exposure, presumed media influence, and behavioral intentions. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(2), 261-277.
48.
WeiR.LoV. H.LuH. Y. (2010). The third-person effect of tainted food product recall news: Examining the role of credibility, attention, and elaboration for college students in Taiwan. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3–4), 598-614.
49.
WeiR.LoV. H.LuH. Y.HouH. Y. (2015). Examining multiple behavioral effects of third-person perception: Evidence from the news about Fukushima nuclear crisis in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8(1), 95-111.
50.
YooB.DonthuN.LenartowiczT. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of international consumer marketing, 23(3-4), 193-210.
51.
ZangC.GuidaJ.SunY.LiuH. (2014). Collectivism culture, HIV stigma and social network support in Anhui, China: A path analytic model. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 28(8), 452-458.
52.
ZhangL.LiH.ChenK. (2020). Effective risk communication for public health emergency: Reflection on the COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) outbreak in Wuhan, China. Healthcare, 8(1), 64.
