This research explores the variations between Chinese party and non-party newspapers in the framing of trans-edited international news. Existing studies on the framing of Chinese domestic news show that the variations depend on the sensitivity of news, which invokes government control. However, it is not clear how strictly the government would control international news and whether party and non-party news organizations would show similarities or variations in the framing of it. To address these issues, we conducted a comparative quantitative content analysis of 806 pieces of trans-edited international news from one party newspaper and one non-party newspaper. The findings show that the party and non-party newspapers show similarity on the use of three frames but small variations on the other four. This implies a strong control of the Chinese government on the reporting of international news. By comparison, the government control has stronger effects on the party newspaper than on its non-party counterpart.
Akhavan-MajidR. (2004). Mass media reform in china: Toward a new analytical framework. Gazette, 66(6), 553–565.
2.
BennettW. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–125.
3.
BennettW. L. (2003). News: The politics of illusion. Longman.
4.
BennettW. L.LivingstonS. (2003). Editors’ introduction: A semi-independent press: Government control and journalistic autonomy in the political construction of news. Political Communication, 20, 359–362.
5.
BolsenT. (2010). The construction of news: Energy crises, advocacy messages, and frames toward conservation. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(2), 143–162.
6.
BradyA. (2008). Marketing dictatorship: Propaganda and thought work in contemporary China. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
CheesmanT.NohlA.-M.BBCWSUS Elections Study Group. (2011). Many voices, one BBC World service? The 2008 US elections, gatekeeping and trans-editing. Journalism: Theory, Practice, and Criticism, 12(2), 217–233.
9.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. N. (2007). A Theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118.
10.
CookT. E. (2005). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
11.
CookT. E. (2006). The news media as a political institution: Looking backward and looking forward. Political Communication, 23(2), 159–171.
12.
De VreeseC. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–62.
13.
DimitrovaD. V.KostadinovaP. (2013). Identifying antecedents of the strategic game frame: A longitudinal analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 75–88.
14.
EntmanR. (1993). Framing toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 10(2), 155–173.
15.
FengM.BrewerP. R.LeyB. L. (2012). Framing the Chinese baby formula scandal: A comparative analysis of US and Chinese news coverage. Asian Journal of Communication, 22(3), 253–269.
16.
FerreeM. M.StrömbäckW. A.GerhardsJ.RuchtD. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge University Press.
17.
GangQ.BandurskiD. (2011). China’s emerging public sphere: The impact of media commercialization, professionalism, and the internet in an era of transition. In ShirkS. L. (Ed.), Changing media, changing China (pp. 39–76). Oxford University Press.
18.
GansH. J. (1980). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. Vintage.
19.
GitlinT. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. University of California Press.
20.
GoffmanE. (1974). Framing analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.
21.
HadlandA.ZhangS. I. (2012). The “paradox of commercialization” and its impact on media-state relations in China and South Africa. Chinese Journal of Communication, 5(3), 316–335.
22.
HanJ.SunS.LuY. (2017). Framing climate change: A content analysis of Chinese mainstream newspapers from 2005 to 2015. International Journal of Communication, 11, 2889–2911.
23.
HänggliR. (2012). Key factors in frame building: How strategic political actors shape news media coverage. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 300–317.
24.
HänggliR.KriesiH. (2012). Frame construction and frame promotion (Strategic framing choices). American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 260–278.
25.
HarcupT. (2009). Journalism: Principles and practice. SAGE.
26.
HuangC. (2001). China’s state-run tabloids: The rise of “city newspapers.”International Communication Gazette, 63(435), 435–452.
27.
HuangC. (2007). From control to negotiation: Chinese media in the 2000s. International Communication Gazette, 69(5), 402–412.
28.
JiaW. (2002). Chinese mediation and its cultural foundation. In ChenG.MaR. (Eds.), Chinese conflict management and resolution (pp. 289–297). Ablex Publishing.
29.
KeeC. P.IbrahimF.AhmadF.KhiangC. C. (2012). Frame contention between news sources and news media: Framing the dispute of teaching mathematics and science in English. Asian Social Science, 8(5), 16–28.
30.
KnightM. G. (1999). Getting past the impasse: Framing as a tool for public relations. Public Relations Review, 17(2), 27–36.
31.
KuangX. (2014). How effective is political control over the news media? Political censorship and news production in authoritarian China. University Press of Southern Denmark.
32.
KuangX. (2017). Negotiating the boundaries of news reporting: Journalists’ strategies to access and report political information in China. Mediekultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 62, 35–51.
33.
KuangX. (2018). Central state vs. local levels of government: Understanding news media censorship in China. Chinese Political Science Review, 3(2), 154–171.
34.
KuangX.WeiR. (2018). How framing of nationally and locally sensitive issues varies? A content analysis of news from party and nonparty newspapers in China. Journalism, 19(9–10), 1435–1451.
35.
LaiS. (2015). Dushibao de guoji xinwen kunjing: Yi Nanfang Dushibao weili [The predicament of metropolis newspapers in international news reporting: A case study of Southern Metropolis Daily]. Business, 20, 214–215.
36.
LangG. E.LangK. (1983). The battle for public opinion: The president, the press and the polls during Watergate. Columbia University Press.
37.
LengauerG.HöllerI. (2013). Generic frame building in the 2008 Austrian elections. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 303–314.
38.
LiL. (2013). Chinese television between the state and the market: An analysis of the business reality show win in China. Media, Culture & Society, 35(7), 906–917.
39.
LiJ.BrewerP. R.LeyB. L. (2017). Chinese news coverage of diseases with domestic versus foreign origins: An analysis of Xinhua Framing of SARS and Ebola. China Media Research, 13(2), 75–85.
40.
LiebmanB. L. (2011). The media and the courts: Towards competitive super-vision?The China Quarterly, 208, 833–850.
41.
LiuN. X. (2017). Same perspective, different effect: Framing the economy through financial news translation. Perspectives, 25(3), 452–463.
42.
LiuS. (2011). Structuration of information control in China. Cultural Sociology, 5(3), 323–339.
43.
LorentzenP. (2014). China’s strategic censorship. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 402–414.
44.
LutherC.ZhouX. (2005). Within the boundaries of politics: News framing of SARS in China and the United States. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 857–872.
45.
MaR. (2005). Media, crisis, and SARS: An introduction. Asian Journal of Communication, 15(3), 241–246.
46.
McMenaminI.FlynnR.O’MalleyE.RafterK. (2013). Commercialism and election framing: A content analysis of twelve newspapers in the 2011 Irish general election. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 167–187.
47.
NeumanW. R.JustM. R.CriglerA. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. University of Chicago Press.
48.
NisbetM. C.LewensteinB. V. (2002). Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970–1999. Science Communication, 23(4), 359–391.
49.
OstiniJ.FungA. Y. H. (2002). Beyond the four theories of the press: A new model of national media systems. Mass Communication & Society, 5(1), 41–56.
50.
PanZ.ChanJ. M. (2003). Shifting journalistic paradigms: How China’s journalists assess “Media Exemplars.”Communication Research, 30(6), 649–682.
51.
QianG.BandurskD. (2011). China’s emerging public sphere: The impact of media commercialization, professionalism, and the Internet in an era of transition. In ShirkS. L. (Ed.), Changing media, changing China (pp. 38–76). Oxford University Press.
52.
RodeloF. V.MuñizC. (2019). Government frames and their influence on news framing: An analysis of cross-lagged correlations in the Mexican context. Global Media and Communication, 15(1), 103–119.
53.
SalwenM. (1988). Effect of accumulation of coverage on issues salience in agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 65(3), 100–106.
54.
SchudsonM. (2002). The news media as political institution. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 249–269.
55.
SemetkoH. A.ValkenburgP. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.
56.
ShaoZ. (2002). Guanyu Dangbao Chengwei Zhuliu Meijie de Tantao [A discussion on party newspapers becoming mainstream media]. Xinwen Jizhe, 3, 15–18.
57.
ShirkS. L. (Ed.). (2011). Changing media, changing China. Oxford University Press.
58.
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. Longman.
59.
SigalL. V. (1973). Reporters and officials: The organization and politics of newsmaking. D.C. Heath.
60.
SnowD. A.VliegenthartR.Corrigall-BrownC. (2007). Framing the French riots: A comparative study of frame variation. Social Forces, 86(2), 385–415.
61.
StockmannD. (2011). Race to the bottom: Media marketization and increasing negativity toward the United States in China. Political Communication, 28(3), 268–290.
62.
StockmannD. (2013). Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. Cambridge University Press.
63.
StrömbäckJ.van AelstP. (2010). Exploring some antecedents of the media’s framing of election news: A comparison of Swedish and Belgian election news. The International Journal of Press/politics, 15(1), 41–59.
64.
ValkenburgP. M.SemetkoH. A.de VreeseC. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26(5), 550–569.
65.
WeiY. (1999). Lun Dangbao he Dushibao de yicun guanxi [A discussion on the dependent relations between party newspaper and metropolitan newspapers]. Xinwen Yu Chuanbo Yanjiu, 4, 14–22.
66.
WinfieldB. H.PengZ. (2005). Market or party controls? Chinese media in transition. Gazette, 67(3), 255–270.
67.
WuG. G. (2000). One head, many mouths: Diversifying press structures in reform china. In LeeC. (Ed.), Power, money, and media: Communication patterns and bureaucratic control in cultural China (pp. 45–67). Northwestern University Press.
68.
WuM. (2006). Framing AIDS in China: A comparative analysis of US and Chinese wire news coverage of HIV/AIDS in China. Asian Journal of Communication, 16(3), 251–272.
69.
WuX. (2010). Red net over China: China’s new online media order and its implications. Asian Journal of Communication, 15(2), 215–227.
70.
ZhangE.FlemingK. (2005). Examination of characteristics of news media under censorship: A content analysis of selected Chinese newspapers’ SARS coverage. Asian Journal of Communication, 15(3), 319–339.
71.
ZhangX.BoukesM. (2019). How China’s flagship news program frames “the West”: Foreign news coverage of CCTV’s Xinwen Lianbo before and during Xi Jinping’s presidency. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(4), 414–430.
72.
ZhaoY. (2000). From commercialization to conglomeration: The transformation of the Chinese press within the orbit of the party state. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 3–26.
73.
ZhouX. (2008). Cultural dimensions and framing the Internet in China: A cross-cultural study of newspapers’ coverage in Hong Kong, Singapore, the US and the UK. International Communication Gazette, 70(2), 117–136.
74.
ZhouY.MoyP. (2007). Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 79–98.
75.
ZillmannD.ChenL.KnoblochS.CallisonC. (2004). Effects of lead framing on selective exposure to Internet news reports. Communication Research, 31(1), 58–81.
