This study investigates the persistence of news frames cross-nationally and over time by analyzing the international news agencies’ coverage of Kosovo’s status negotiations over a period of two years. The results suggest a congruency in international news agencies reporting, who mainly employ the ‘episodic frame’ and emphasize the ‘conflict’ nature of the issue. However, a major difference in frame choice emerged between western and non-western agencies, while news frames over the two-year period appeared to be static rather than dynamic. Overall, this study implies that event-oriented factors, such as professional norms, tend to drive the framing of international news. Yet these norms are embedded in the journalistic culture of the country where the news-people originate from, and this culture is becoming more homogeneous along with the process of globalization.
Alleyne MD and Wagner J. ( 1993) Stability and change at the ‘Big Five’ news agencies. Journalism Quarterly70(1): 40-50.
2.
Bardhan N. ( 2001) Transnational AIDS-HIV news narratives: A critical exploration of overarching frames. Mass Communication and Society4(3): 283-309.
3.
Bennett WL ( 1990) Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication40(2): 103-125.
4.
Blumler JG and Gurevitch M. ( 1995) The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
5.
Boyd-Barrett O. ( 1980) The International News Agencies. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
6.
Boyd-Barrett O. ( 1982) Western news agencies and the ‘media imperialism’ debate: What kind of data-base? Journal of International Affairs35(2): 247-260.
7.
Boyd-Barrett O. ( 2003) Globalizing the national news agency. Journalism Studies4(3): 371-385.
8.
Boyd-Barrett O. and Rantanen T. ( 1998) The Globalization of News. London: Sage.
9.
Cappella JN and Jamieson KH ( 1996) News frames, political cynicism, and media cynicism . Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546: 71-84.
10.
Cappella JN and Jamieson KH ( 1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good . New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Carragee M. and Roefs W. ( 2004) The neglect of power in recent framing research . Journal of Communication54(2): 214-233.
12.
Chang K. and Lee T. ( 2010) International news determinants in the US media . In: Golan G, Johnson TJ and Wanta W (eds) International Media Communication in a Global Age. New York and London: Routledge, 71-88.
13.
Chang K., Salmon CTD, Lee B., Choi J. and Zeldes GA ( 2010) The influence of contextual factors on the selection of news frames. In: Golan G, Johnson TJ and Wanta W (eds) International Media Communication in a Global Age . New York and London: Routledge, 177-199.
14.
Chang T., Shoemaker PJ and Brendlinger N. ( 1987) Determinants of international news coverage in the US media. Communication Research14(4): 396-414.
15.
Chyi HI and McCombs ME ( 2004) Media salience and the process of framing: Coverage of the Columbine school shootings. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly81(1): 22-35.
16.
Clausen L. ( 2003) Global news communication strategies - 9.11.2002 around the World. Nordicom Review24(2): 105-116.
17.
De Sola Pool I. ( 1952) The Prestige Papers: A Survey of Their Editorials . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
De Vreese CH, Peter J. and Semetko HA ( 2001) Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication18(2): 107-122.
19.
Dimitrova DV and Stromback J. ( 2005) Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq War in the elite newspapers in Sweden and the United States. The International Communication Gazette67(5): 399-417.
20.
Dimitrova DV, Kaid LL, Williams AP and Trammell KD ( 2005) War on the web: The immediate news framing of Gulf War II. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics10(1): 22-44.
21.
Entman RM ( 1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm . Journal of Communication43(4): 51-58.
22.
Entman RM ( 2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
23.
Esser F. and Pfetch B. ( 2004) Meeting the challenges of global communication and political integration. In: Esser F and Pfetch B (eds) Comparing Political Communication . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 384-410.
24.
Gamson WA and Lasch KE ( 1983) The political culture of social welfare policy . In: Spiro SE and Yuchtman-Yaar E (eds) Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives. New York: Academic Press, 397-415.
25.
Gamson WA and Modigliani A. ( 1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1-37.
26.
Giffard CA and Rivenburgh NK ( 2000) News agencies, national images, and global media events . Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly77(1): 8-21.
27.
Goffman E. ( 1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience . Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
28.
Graber DA ( 2002) Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
29.
Gurevitch M. and Blumler JG ( 2004) State of the art of comparative political communication research. In: Esser F and Pfetch B (eds) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 325-343.
30.
Hallin DC and Mancini P. ( 2004) Americanization, globalization, and secularization . In: Esser F and Pfetsch B (eds) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25-44.
31.
Horvit B. ( 2006) International news agencies and the war debate of 2003 . The International Communication Gazette68(5-6): 427-447.
32.
Iyengar S. ( 1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Kaid LL, Myrick R., Chanslor M., Roper C., Hovind M. and Trivoulidis M. ( 1994) CNN’s Americanization of the Gulf War: An analysis of media, technology, and storytelling. In: McCain T and Shyles L (eds) The 1,000 Hour War: Communication in the Gulf. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 147-160.
34.
Kamhawi R. ( 2002) Television news and the Palestinian Israeli conflict: An analysis of visual and verbal framing. Paper presented to the Visual Communication Division at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC), Miami Beach, FL.
35.
Li X. ( 2007) Stages of a crisis and media frames and functions: US television coverage of the 9/ 11 incident during the first 24 hours. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media51(4): 670-687.
36.
Musa M. ( 1990) News agencies, transnationalization and the new order. Media, Culture and Society12(3): 325-342.
37.
Muschert GW and Carr D. ( 2006) Media salience and frame changing across events: Coverage of nine school shootings. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly83(4): 747-766.
38.
Neuman WR, Just MR and Crigler AA ( 1992) Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Norris P. ( 1995) The restless searchlight: Network news framing of the post-Cold War world. Political Communication12(4): 357-370.
40.
Pan ZP and Kosicki GM ( 1993) Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse . Political Communication10(1): 55-75.
41.
Pfetsch B. and Esser F. ( 2004) Comparing political communication: reorientations in a changing world. In: Esser F and Pfetsch B (eds) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-22.
42.
Price V., Tewksbury D. and Powers E. ( 1997) Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research24(5): 481-506.
43.
Rampal KR ( 1995) The collection and flow of world news. In: Merrill J (ed.) Global Journalism , 3rd edn. New York: Longman, pp. 35-52.
44.
Rantanen T. and Vartanova E. ( 1995) News agencies in post-communist Russia: From state mono-poly to state dominance. European Journal of Communication10(2): 207-220.
45.
Rauch J. ( 2003) Rooted in nations, blossoming in globalization? A cultural perspective on the content of a ‘northern’ mainstream and a ‘southern’ alternative news agency. Journal of Communication Inquiry27(1): 87-103.
46.
Reese SD ( 2007) The framing project: A bridging model for media research revised. Journal of Communication57(1): 148-154.
47.
Reese SD, Gandy OH and Grant AE (eds) ( 2001) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
Ryan M. ( 2004) Framing the war against terrorism: US newspaper editorials and military action in Afghanistan. The International Communication Gazette66(5): 363-382.
49.
Scheufele D. ( 1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication49(1): 103-122.
50.
Semetko HA and Valkenburg PM ( 2000) Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication50(2): 93-109.
51.
Shoemaker PJ and Reese SD ( 1996) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content, 2nd edn. London : Longman.
52.
Sreberny A. and Paterson C. ( 2004) Introduction. In: Paterson C and Sreberny A (eds) International News in the Twenty-First Century. London : John Libbey, 3-31.
53.
Tankard JW Jr ( 2001) The empirical approach to the study of media framing . In: Reese S, Gandy O and Grant A (eds) Framing Public Life. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 95-106.
54.
Tunstall J. ( 1981) Worldwide news agencies: Private wholesalers of public information. In: Richstadt J and Anderson MH (eds) Crisis in International News: Policies and Prospects. New York: Columbia University Press, 258-267.
55.
Van Gorp B. ( 2005) Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication20(4): 485-508.
56.
Van Gorp B. ( 2007) The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing the culture back. Journal of Communication57(1): 60-78.
57.
Yang J. ( 2003) Framing the NATO air strikes on Kosovo across countries: Comparison of Chinese and US newspaper coverage. The International Communication Gazette65(3): 231-249.
