Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines the production and negotiation of ‘authenticity’ in reality television through a case study of a popular Chinese dating show If You Are the One. The study reconstructed the various stages of the show and collected perspectives from participating bachelors and production people. The ethnographic approach has enabled a relatively thick description of what happened on-screen and off-screen. Primarily, it details how four ordinary male participants entered the show and made sense of their experiences. It describes and discusses how they maintained a strong sense of authenticity while delivering anticipated performance on television. It uncovers the dynamics and interaction between the participants, producers and audiences and highlights the invisible scripts underlining the show. The recurring debates about authenticity, scripting and ordinariness in reality television are addressed with a renewed understanding of how the seemingly paradoxical ‘authentic performance’ and ‘extraordinary ordinariness’ work in the process.

Keywords

Authenticity China construction of reality dating shows FCWR gender participation reality television

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrejevic

(2004). Reality TV: The work of being watched. Rowman & Littlefield.

Aslama

Pantti

(2006). Talking alone reality TV, emotions and authenticity. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(2), 167–184.

Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Authenticity. Retrieved February 4, 2019, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/authenticity?q=Authenticity

Chen

(2017). Discipling desiring subjects through the remodeling of masculinity: A case study of a Chinese reality dating show. Modern China, 43(1), 95–120.

Cheung

C. K. F

. (2017). Trans-border televisual musicscape: Regionalizing reality TV I am a Singer in China and Hong Kong. Global Media and China, 2(1), 90–108.

Cloud

(2010). The irony bribe and reality television: Investment and detachment in the bachelor. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 27(5), 413–437.

Couldry

(2000). The place of media power: Pilgrims and witnesses of the media age. Routledge.

Couldry

(2002). Playing for celebrity: Big brother as ritual event. Television & New Media, 3(3), 283–293.

Cui

. (2017). Stardom from the perspective of media power: Reproducing media power in the reception of Li Yuchun’s stardom. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(5), 509–525.

10.

Cui

Lee

F. L.

(2010). Becoming extraordinary: Negotiation of media power in the case of Super Girls’ Voice in China. Popular Communication, 8(4), 256–272.

11.

DeRose

Fürsich

Haskins

E. V.

(2003). Pop (up) goes the blind date: Supertextual constraints on ‘reality’ television. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 27(2), 171–189.

12.

Dubrofsky

R. E.

(2007). Therapeutics of the self: Surveillance in the service of the therapeutic. Television & New Media, 8(4), 263–284.

13.

Dubrofsky

R. E.

(2009). Fallen women in reality TV: A pornography of emotion. Feminist Media Studies, 9(3), 353–368.

14.

Ferris

A. L.

Smith

S. W.

Greenberg

B. S.

Smith

S. L.

(2007). The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of Communication, 57(3), 490–510.

15.

Fox

(2013). ‘You are not allowed to talk about production’: Narratization on (and off) the set of CBS’s big brother. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 30(3), 189–208.

16.

Gilardi

Lam

Tan

K. C.

White

Cheng

Zhao

. (2018). International TV series distribution on Chinese digital platforms: Marketing strategies and audience engagement. Global Media and China, 3(3), 213–230.

17.

Goffman

(1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. The University of Edinburgh.

18.

Guo

(2017). When dating shows encounter state censors: A case study of if you are the one. Media, Culture & Society, 39(4), 487–503.

19.

Hall

(2009). Perceptions of the authenticity of reality programs and their relationships to audience involvement, enjoyment, and perceived learning. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 515–531.

20.

Holmes

Jermyn

(Eds.). (2004). Understanding reality television. Routledge.

21.

Kavka

(2012). Reality TV. Edinburgh University Press.

22.

Keane

Zhang

J. D

. (2017). Where are we going? Parent–child television reality programmes in China. Media, Culture & Society, 39(5), 630–643.

23.

Keane

(2015). The Chinese television industry. British Film Institute.

24.

Kilborn

(1994). How real can you get? Recent developments in reality television. European Journal of Communication, 9(4), 421–439.

25.

Liang

Shen

. (2016). Fan economy in the Chinese media and entertainment industry: How feedback from super fans can propel creative industries’ revenue. Global Media and China, 1(4), 331–349.

26.

Luo

(2017). Television’s ‘leftover’ bachelors and hegemonic masculinity in postsocialist China. Women’s Studies in Communication, 40(2), 190–211.

27.

Luo

Sun

(2014). Are you the one? China’s TV dating shows and the Sheng Nü’s predicament. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 239–256.

28.

Mast

(2016). Negotiating the ‘real’ in ‘reality shows’: Production side discourses between deconstruction and reconstruction. Media, Culture & Society, 38(6), 901–917.

29.

Riegert

(2007). Politicotainment: Television’s take on the real. Peter Lang.

30.

Rose

R. L.

Wood

S. L.

(2005). Paradox and the consumption of authenticity through reality television. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 284–296.

31.

Scannell

(2002). Big brother as a television event. Television & New Media, 3(3), 271–282.

32.

Sears

C. A.

Godderis

(2011). Roar like a tiger on TV? Constructions of women and childbirth in reality TV. Feminist Media Studies, 11(2), 181–195.

33.

Shedd

(2013). ‘This whole quest for love’: The role of narrative in the bachelor. Conversations: A Graduate Student Journal of the Humanities, Social Sciences, and Theology, 1(1), 1–14.

34.

Shei

(2013). How ‘real’ is reality television in China? On the success of a Chinese dating programme. In Lorenzo-Dus

Blitvich

P. G.-C.

(Eds.), Real talk: Reality television and discourse analysis in action (pp. 43–65). Palgrave Macmillan.

35.

Song

Hird

(2014). Men and masculinities in contemporary China. Brill.

36.

Sun

(2014, October). If you are the one: Dating shows, reality TV, and the politics of the personal in urban China. Australian Review of Public Affairs. http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2014/10/sun.html

37.

Syvertsen

(2001). Ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances: A study of participants in television dating games. Media, Culture & Society, 23(3), 319–337.

38.

Teurlings

(2001). Producing the ordinary: Institutions, discourses and practices in love game shows. Continuum, 15(2), 249–263.

39.

Tincknell

Raghuram

(2002). Big brother: Reconfiguring the ‘active’ audience of cultural studies? European Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(2), 199–215.

40.

Wilkinson

(2015, October 12). Love in the age of reality television. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/10/love-in-the-age-of-reality-tv/406663/

41.

(2012). Post-socialist articulation of gender positions: Contested public sphere of reality dating shows. In Kim

(Ed.), Women and the media in Asia: The precarious self (pp. 220–236). Palgrave Macmillan.

42.

Yang

(2017). Television and dating in contemporary China: Identities, love and intimacy. Palgrave Macmillan.

43.

Zhang

. (2019). Narrated oppressive mechanisms: Chinese audiences’ receptions of effeminate masculinity. Global Media and China, 4(2), 254–271.

44.

Zhang

(2011). Narrative analysis of gender in TV show ‘if you are the one’. Xinwen Aihaozhe, 21, 76–77. (in Chinese)

An (un)romantic journey: Authentic performance in a Chinese dating show

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References