This study investigates the ideological implications of Real Men, a Korean reality show that portrays the experiences of celebrities who join the military as new conscripts. We situate the popularity of Real Men in the context of the changing gender geography of Korea. Through an analysis of the official Real Men online bulletin board, we explore how the male audience’s discourses regarding the authentic military experience and ideal soldiers are related to their desire to restore hegemonic masculinity. Our findings suggest that Real Men became a vehicle that was used to demand women’s appreciation of the difficult work of men in the military. A desire to be symbolically remunerated for military service involved the positioning of women as primary caregivers who fulfill traditional female roles. By calling for the restoration of traditional gender roles, the male viewers attempted to recover the hegemonic masculinity that they perceived to be under threat from changing gender relations.
AhnSKimILeeJ. (2015) A Study of Men’s Life Part II: Male Adolescents’ Value Conflicts on Gender Equality. Seoul, South Korea: Korean Women’s Development Institute.
2.
BaeSY (2014) Real man in the past 1 year and half: is the criticism legitimate?Tenasia, 17October. Available at: http://tenasia.hankyung.com/archives/344956 (in Korean) (accessed 21 April 2016).
3.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3: 77–101.
4.
ChoH (2016) Young people’s unemployment rate 11.8%: The highest since 1999. Joongang Daily, 16April. Available at: http://news.joins.com/article/19897110 (in Korean).
Chungnam Institute for National Defense (2011) How to make the military service proud. Report for the Korean government, Report no. 11-1300000-000116-01. Cheonan, South Korea: Government Printing Office (in Korean).
9.
ConnellR (1995) Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
DouglasS (2010) Enlightened Sexism: The Seductive Message That Feminism’s Work Is Done. New York: Times Books.
FlickerSHaansDSkinnerH (2004) Ethical dilemmas in research on Internet communities. Qualitative Health Research14(1): 124–134.
15.
HalberstamJ (1998) Female Masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16.
HesslerRDowningLBeltzC. (2003) Qualitative research on adolescent risk using e-mail: a methodological assessment. Qualitative Sociology26(1): 111–124.
17.
HillA (2002) Big Brother: the real audience. Television & New Media3(3): 323–341.
18.
HookwayN (2008) ‘Entering the blogosphere’: some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qualitative Research8(1): 91–113.
19.
IkunagaANathSSkinnerK (2013) Internet suicide in Japan: a qualitative content analysis of a suicide bulletin board. Transcultural Psychiatry50(2): 280–302.
20.
KimJS (2014) Misogyny for male solidarity? A case study of South Korean cyberspace. In: The 2014 console-ing passions conference. Columbia, MO, 10–13 April.
21.
KimS (2015) Misogynic cyber hate speech in Korea. Issues in Feminism15(2): 279–317 (in Korean).
22.
KimSKimK (2011) Gender mainstreaming and the institutionalization of the women’s movement in South Korea. Women’s Studies International Forum34: 390–400.
23.
KwakS (2016) 54% of Korean men sympathize with the notion of misogynic expressions such as kimchi woman. The Huffington Post Korea, 14March. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.kr/2016/03/14/story_n_9455904.html (in Korean) (accessed 21 April 2016).
24.
KwonI (2001) A feminist exploration of military conscription: the gendering of the connections between nationalism, militarism and citizenship in South Korea. International Feminist Journal of Politics3(1): 26–54.
LeeCHParkJH (2012) ‘We need a committee for men’s rights’: reactions of male and female viewers to reverse gender discrimination in Korean comedy. Asian Journal of Communication22(4): 353–371.
27.
MalikSCoulsonN (2008) The male experience of infertility: a thematic analysis of an online infertility support group bulletin board. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology26(1): 18–30.
28.
McKennaKYABarghJA (2000) Plan 9 from cyberspace: the implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review4(1): 57–75.
MoonS (2002) The production and subversion of hegemonic masculinity: reconfiguring gender hierarchy in contemporary South Korea. In: KendallL (ed.) Under Construction: The Gendering of Modernity, Class, and Consumption in the Republic of Korea. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 79–113.
31.
MoonS (2005) Trouble with conscription, entertaining soldiers: popular culture and the politics of militarized masculinity in South Korea. Men and Masculinities8(1): 64–92.
32.
OckH (2015) Korean men do least housework in OECD. The Korean Herald, 7December.
33.
PascoeCJ (2007) Dude, You’re a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
SedgwickE (1985) Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
SuzukiLCalzoJ (2004) The search for peer advice in cyberspace: an examination of online teen bulletin boards about health and sexuality. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology25: 685–698.
36.
TaftJK (2004) Girl power politics: pop-culture barriers and organizational resistance. In:HarrisA (ed.) All about the Girl: Culture, Power, and Identity. New York: Routledge, pp. 69–78.
37.
UmKH (2011) After neoliberalism: (im)possibility of new masculinity. In: KwonkimH (ed.) Masculinity and Gender. Seoul, South Korea: Jaeumgwa Moeum, pp. 147–166 (in Korean).
38.
YoonBR (2015) Kimchi-nyeo and naked kings. In: YoonBR (ed.) What Did Misogyny Do? The World of Naked Words. Seoul, South Korea: Reality Culture Research Press, pp. 9–46 (in Korean).
