When press freedom meets national interest: How terrorist attacks are framed in the news in China and the US

Abstract

This cross-nation, multi-event study examined 142 news stories from CCTV and CNN on two major terrorist attacks in China and the United States. It aimed to unveil how press system and national interest come into play in influencing media coverage of terrorism. Framing analyses were conducted in terms of attitude toward local government and perpetrators, news origin and source, coverage theme, definition of the incident, and attribution of cause of the incident. Findings suggest that, in reporting these two significant terrorist attacks, media of the two countries employed varied framing strategies based on their ideological backgrounds and national interests. The framing strategies utilized by the two media outlets are interpreted and discussed.

Keywords

Boston Bombing CCTV Kunming Attack national interest press freedom terrorism terrorist attack

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akhavan

M. R.

Ramaprasad

(1998). Framing and ideology: A comparative analysis of U.S. and Chinese newspaper coverage of the Fourth United Nations Conference on Women and the NGO forum. Mass Communication & Society, 1, 131–152.

Altheide

D. L.

(1987). Format and symbols in TV coverage of terrorism in the United States and Great Britain. International Studies Quarterly, 31, 161–176.

Atwater

(1987). Network evening news coverage of the TWA hostage crisis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 64, 520–525.

Berkowitz

Eko

(2007). Blasphemy as sacred rite/right: “The Mohammed cartoons affair” and maintenance of journalistic ideology. Journalism Studies, 8, 779–797.

Billings

A. C.

Angelini

J. R.

(2011). Nationalistic notions of the superpowers: Comparative analyses of the American and Chinese telecasts in the 2008 Beijing Olympiad. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 251–266. doi:10.1080/08838151.2011.571325

Chang

Wang

Chen

(1998). The social construction of international imagery in the Post-Cold War Era: A comparative analysis of U.S. and Chinese national TV news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42, 277–296.

Chatterji

(2001). Politicking with terrorism coverage. The Economic Times of India.

Dastgeer

Gade

(2016). Visual framing of Muslim women in the Arab Spring: Prominent, active, and visible. International Communication Gazette, 78, 432–450.

Y. R.

Cheng

K. L.

(2013). Framing the 2011 Egyptian revolution within ideological boundaries: One incident, three stories. International Communication Research Journal, 48(3-4), 27–51.

10.

Entman

R. M.

(1991). Symposium framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–27.

11.

Entman

R. M.

(1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.

12.

Entman

R. M.

Rojecki

(1993). Freezing out the Public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti-nuclear movement. Political Communication, 10, 155–173.

13.

Feng

(2013). National voice: A discourse analysis of China Central Television’s news simulcast. Discourse & Communication, 7, 255–273.

14.

Goffman

(1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

15.

Hachten

W. A.

Scotton

J. F.

(2007). The world news prism: Global information in a satellite age (7th ed.). Ames: Iowa University Press.

16.

Handley

(2008). Israeli image repair: Recasting the deviant actor to retell the story. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 32, 140–154.

17.

Jang

(2006, June). A comparative content analysis of wartime news sources: CNN and Al-Jazeera. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden International Congress Centre, Dresden, Germany.

18.

Jürgen

Schäfer

M. S.

(2014). International terrorism, domestic coverage? How terrorist attacks are presented in the news of CNN, Al Jazeera, the BBC, and ARD. International Communication Gazette, 76, 3–26.

19.

Kim

K. H.

(2014). Examining US news media discourses about North Korea: A corpus-Based critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 25, 221–244.

20.

Lee

C. C.

Yang

(1995). Foreign news and national interest: Comparing US and Japanese coverage of a Chinese student movement. Gazette, 56, 1–18.

21.

Lee

Craig

(1992). News as an ideological framework: Comparing US newspapers’ coverage of labor strikes in South Korea and Poland. Discourse & Society, 3, 341–363.

22.

Izard

(2003). 9/11 attack coverage reveals similarities, differences. Newspaper Research Journal, 24, 204–219.

23.

(1999). An ideological/cultural analysis of political slogans in communist China. Discourse & Society, 10, 487–508.

24.

Lule

(2002). Myth and terror on the editorial page: The New York Times responds to September 11, 2001. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 275–293.

25.

McQuail

(1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

26.

Miladi

(2006). Satellite TV news and the Arab diaspora in Britain: Comparing Al-Jazeera, the BBC and CNN. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32, 947–960.

27.

Norris

Kern

Just

M. R.

(2003). Framing terrorism: The news media, the government, and the public. New York, NY: Routledge.

28.

Paek

Nelson

Vilela

(2011). Examination of gender-role portrayals in television advertising across seven countries. Sex Roles, 64, 192–207.

29.

Paletz

D. L.

Entman

(1981). Media, power and politics. New York, NY: The Free Press.

30.

Papacharissi

de Fatima Oliveira

(2008). News frames terrorism: A comparative analysis of frames employed in terrorism coverage in U.S. and U.K. newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 52–74.

31.

Scheufele

D. A.

(1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122.

32.

Semetko

H. A.

Valkenburg

P. M.

(2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.

33.

Severin

W. J.

Tankard

J. W.

(2001). Communication theories: Origin, methods, and uses in the mass media (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

34.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Han

Wang

(2006). International terrorism and news coverage: A comparative study between the U.S. and China. Paper presented at International & Development Communication Division, the 57th Annual Conference of ICA, San Francisco, CA.

35.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Reese

S. D.

(1991). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. New York, NY: Longman.

36.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Reese

S. D.

(1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

37.

Silke

(Ed.). (2003). Terrorists, victims and society: Psychological perspectives on terrorism and its consequences. Sussex, UK: Wiley.

38.

Townshend

(2011). Terrorism: A very short introduction (Vol. 78). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

39.

Tuchman

(1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.

40.

Tuman

J. S.

(2003). Communicating terror. The Rhetorical Dimensions of Terrorism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

41.

Van Dijk

. (1998). Ideology. London, England: SAGE.

42.

Watson

Hill

(2000). Dictionary of media & communication (5th ed.). London, England: Arnold Publishers.

43.

Weimann

Winn

(1994). The theater of terror: Mass media and international terrorism (pp. 17–50). New York: Longman.

44.

Zhu

(2012). Two billion eyes: The story of China central television. New York, NY: New Press.