Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that has multiple molecular and morphological subtypes. Nonetheless, the relation between various molecular subtypes and functional characteristics of a tumor in terms of cytokine secretion remains unknown.

Methods

We studied spontaneous and mitogen-induced cytokine secretion by invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC NST; cultured tumors and cultured peripheral blood cells), depending on a molecular tumor subtype (where “mitogens” means “polyclonal activators” (PA): phytohemagglutinin p, phytohemagglutinin M, concanavalin A, and Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to determine concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IL-18, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF, VEGF, and MCP-1 in culture supernatants of the tumors and peripheral blood cells.

Results

The luminal B HER2-positive molecular subtype of IBC NST was found to feature the highest spontaneous secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 and the highest mitogen-induced secretion of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1Ra, and TNF-α by tumors; the highest mitogen-induced secretion of IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and G-CSF by peripheral blood cells; and the highest cytokine-producing potential (the ratio of mitogen-induced to spontaneous secretion) of peripheral blood cells for the secretion of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1Ra as compared to other molecular subtypes. The triple-negative subtype of IBC NST was characterized by the lowest cytokine-producing potential of tumors for the secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 as compared to other molecular subtypes as well as a lower “stimulation index of polyclonal activators” (calculated as (cytokine secretion after incubation with PA)/(spontaneous cytokine secretion)) for IL-18 secretion as compared to luminal subtypes. The XYZ correlated with a suppressive effect of PA on cytokine secretion by tumors of the triple-negative molecular subtype.

Conclusion

Therefore, our findings indicate that in IBC NST of luminal B HER2-positive and triple-negative molecular subtypes, the cytokine network has distinctive functional features.

Keywords

cytokines mitogens invasive carcinoma of no special type molecular subtypes

Introduction

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that has multiple molecular and morphological subtypes.¹ The most common morphological type is invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC NST), whose molecular subtypes are characterized by three main phenotypes: luminal (estrogen receptor– and/or progesterone receptor–positive), HER2-overexpressing, and triple-negative.² The molecular subtype is associated with the metastatic potential of breast cancer cells: the luminal tumor subtypes have a lower malignant progression rate and a better response to pharmacotherapy compared to those of the HER2-overexpressing subtype and triple-negative subtype of breast cancer.³ According to recent studies, the progression of a luminal subtype to a more malignant subtype occurs in 30% of cases and is associated with metastatic progression of breast cancer and development of multidrug resistance.^4,5 Nonetheless, the relation between various molecular subtypes and functional characteristics of a tumor in terms of cytokine secretion remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate in vitro spontaneous and mitogen-induced cytokine secretion by IBC NST tumors and peripheral blood cells, depending on the molecular tumor subtype. In this article, the term “mitogens” means “polyclonal activators” (PA): phytohemagglutinin P, phytohemagglutinin M, concanavalin A, and Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. The choice of cytokines for study was due to their functional characteristics, in particular, their substantial role in malignant progression. The main processes taken into account in the choice of cytokines were immunosenescence (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, G-CSF, and GM-CSF), chronic inflammation (IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, TNF-α, VEGF, and MCP-1), and immune evasion (IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-17, and IFN-γ).^6–8

Methods

Patients

The current study was of a retrospective nature. We studied biopsy samples of tumors and their microenvironment and peripheral blood cells from patients with grade II or III IBC NST (108 and 9 patients, respectively; 117 patients in total). Biopsies were performed from September 2018 to August 2020 and were obtained from the archives of the City Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russia). Within 30 days of the examination, all patients underwent surgical treatment, and the final diagnosis was made on the basis of a histopathological examination. The patients were included in the study according to the following criteria: newly diagnosed with IBC NST and did not undergo neoadjuvant (preoperative) therapy. Signs of hematogenous metastasis to distant organs or concurrent endocrine, chronic, inflammatory, or infectious diseases were the exclusion criteria. According to the TNM classification of malignant tumors—which includes assessment of the primary tumor (T), regional lymph nodes (N), and distant metastases (M)—the stage of cancer was determined. Stage IA was diagnosed in 45 patients, stage IB in 31 patients, stage IIA in 16, stage IIB in 15, and stages IIIA and IIIC were diagnosed in 7 and 3 patients, respectively. The molecular tumor subtype in these patients was determined by immunohistochemical analysis of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and proliferation marker Ki-67.⁹ The luminal A subtype was identified in 39 patients with a mean age of 56 (36–76) years; the luminal B HER2-negative subtype was identified in 19 patients with a mean age of 54 (23–74) years; the luminal B HER2-positive subtype was identified in 32 patients with mean age of 58 (39–77) years; the HER2-overexpressing subtype was identified in 10 patients with a mean age of 53 (40–69) years; and the triple-negative subtype was identified in 17 patients with mean age of 59 (38–75) years. At the time of the study, metastases in regional lymph nodes were present in 9 patients with the luminal A subtype, 10 patients with the luminal B HER2-negative subtype, 13 patients with the luminal B HER2-positive subtype, 3 patients with the HER2-overexpressing subtype, and 5 patients with the triple-negative subtype.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Biopsy samples of IBC NST were fixed in neutral formalin, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections of IBC NST were dewaxed and rehydrated with xylene and ethanol according to the standard technique. Expression levels of HER2, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Ki-67 in the IBC NST samples were evaluated in accordance with the procedures and evaluation criteria⁹ recommended for the identification of molecular subtypes of breast cancer (Gallen International Expert Consensus, 2011), using monoclonal antibodies (Ventana Med. System Inc., USA): anti-HER2 (4B5; 790-2991), anti-ER (SP1; 790-4325), anti-PR (1 × 10²; 790-4296), and Ki-67 (790-4286). The tumor tissue sections were additionally stained with hematoxylin and eosin and embedded in balsam.

Evaluation of spontaneous and mitogen-induced cytokine secretion

Spontaneous and mitogen-induced secretion of cytokines by cultured tumors and cultured peripheral blood cells from IBC NST patients was analyzed using the Cytokine-Stimul-Best Kit (AO Vector-Best, Russia). For each tumor, 8 mm³ biopsy samples¹⁰ were placed in two vials (one sample per vial), one of which contained 1 mL of the DMEM-F12 culture medium, and the other contained PA (2 μg/mL phytohemagglutinin P, 2 μg/mL phytohemagglutinin M, 4 μg/mL concanavalin A, and 2 μg/mL lipopolysaccharide from E. coli) in the same volume of the medium. The vials were incubated at 37°C for 72 h. The tumor sample was removed from each vial, and the remaining cells were precipitated by centrifugation at 900 × g for 15 min to obtain a supernatant, which was analyzed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

After vein sampling, 1 mL of whole blood was placed into vial no. 1 containing 4 mL of the DMEM-F12 medium, 2.5 U/ml heparin, 100 μg/mL gentamicin, and 0.6 mg/mL l-glutamine. After incubation, the culture supernatant from this vial was tested for spontaneous cytokine secretion. To study mitogen-induced cytokine secretion, 1 mL of the suspension from vial no. 1 was transferred into vial no. 2 with PA: 2 μg/mL phytohemagglutinin P, 2 μg/mL phytohemagglutinin M, 4 μg/mL concanavalin A, and 2 μg/mL lipopolysaccharide from E. coli.¹¹ Vial no. 1 and no. 2 were placed in a thermostat at 37°C for 24 h incubation, and then blood cells were precipitated by centrifugation at 900 × g for 15 min, and the supernatant was collected. The supernatants were frozen and stored at −80°C until cytokine assays. The obtained supernatants were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays by means of kits from AO Vector-Best, to determine concentrations of the following cytokines (the limit of detection of the kit is indicated in parentheses): IL-2 (2.0 pg/mL), IL-6 (0.5 pg/mL), IL-8 (2.0 pg/mL), IL-1β (1.0 pg/mL), IL-1Ra (10.0 pg/mL), IL-10 (1.0 pg/mL), IL-17 (1.0 pg/mL), IL-18 (2.0 pg/mL), TNF-α (1.0 pg/mL), IFN-γ (2.0 pg/mL), G-CSF (2.0 pg/mL), GM-CSF (2.0 pg/mL), VEGF (10.0 pg/mL), and MCP-1 (15.0 pg/mL).

The cytokine-producing potential of IBC NST tumors and peripheral blood cells were assessed based on the stimulation index of polyclonal activators (SIPA), which was calculated using the formula A/B, where A is cytokine secretion after incubation with PA and B is spontaneous cytokine secretion. Stimulation index of polyclonal activators is expressed in arbitrary units (a.u.). Stimulation index of polyclonal activators ≤ 1.0 a.u. was interpreted as a suppressive effect of PA on cytokine secretion, and SIPA ≥ 1.1 was interpreted as a stimulatory effect.

Statistical analysis

This analysis of the results was performed in the SPSS Statistics software, v22.0 for Windows. Independent groups were compared by the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by intergroup comparison via the Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical significance of differences between data expressed as a percentage was determined by Fisher’s exact test. To evaluate the measured cytokine data, we performed principal component analysis (PCA) by means of the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett’s test of sphericity. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient (R) and its statistical significance (p) were calculated for some variables. The differences between groups were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. A heatmap was constructed using the Morpheus platform (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus/). The data are presented as a median and interquartile range.

Results

After the measurement of spontaneous cytokine secretion by cultured IBC NST tumors, features specific for luminal molecular subtypes were identified (Table 1). The luminal B HER2-positive subtype showed the highest spontaneous secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 as compared to the other molecular subtypes. IL-6 and IL-8 are known to synergistically modulate each other’s biological activity and to affect the activity of enzymes involved in the synthesis of estrogen and progesterone, for example, 17β-HSD and 3β-HSD.^5,12–14 IL-6 is reported to cause increased transcription of the CYP19 gene encoding aromatase: an enzyme that transforms androgens into estrogens in adipose tissue.¹³ Overexpression of HER2 initiates the HER2–IL-6–STAT3 signaling cascade, which promotes the development of resistance to anti-HER2 therapy through self-renewal of breast cancer stem cells.^15,16

Table 1.

Spontaneous cytokine secretion by cultured IBC NST tumors, depending on the molecular tumor subtype. Q: an interquartile range, where 50 denotes a median.

Q	Cytokine	Spontaneous cytokine secretion (pg/ml)
		1	2	3	4	5	P
		Luminal A	Luminal B HER2-negative	Luminal B HER2-positive	HER2-enriched	Triple-negative	P
25	IL-2	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
50		2.00	3.06	2.05	4.50	2.20
75		2.70	5.15	5.03	6.28	5.45
25	IL-6	83.55	147.13	16130.00	279.03	298.95	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻³
50		310.60	383.30	36490.00	603.30	600.85
75		17870.00	35250.00	53235.00	41760.00	20589.53
25	IL-8	159.15	276.33	7085.00	84.55	330.88	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻³
50		400.00	376.40	15980.00	1384.35	1350.10
75		18350.00	11250.00	28610.00	24120.00	11210.00
25	IL-10	1.00	1.00	4.20	8.95	4.68	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻²
50		7.60	3.35	9.25	12.65	8.80
75		19.95	7.23	14.45	15.78	14.28
25	IL-17	1.00	1.00	2.00	1.10	1.78
50		2.00	2.00	2.95	2.00	3.05
75		3.90	6.18	5.40	6.18	11.18
25	IL-18	5.55	28.93	41.35	46.13	75.60	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻⁴
50		29.10	52.75	90.95	97.90	188.25
75		62.15	91.30	239.80	221.48	870.53
25	IL-1β	11.35	18.15	14.75	18.48	42.70	P_1–5 = 8 × 10⁻³
50		25.10	25.35	31.70	43.95	94.50
75		62.25	57.40	63.08	71.15	169.70
25	IL-1Ra	1927.50	1498.83	1936.33	2568.80	2809.40	P_2,3 = 3 × 10⁻²
50		3725.40	3098.60	5950.00	4151.05	3945.00
75		7115.00	6903.03	15498.00	21716.25	10190.00
25	TNF-α	1.45	1.65	3.70	3.83	3.10	P_1–5 = 2 × 10⁻³
50		2.40	6.45	10.15	6.60	4.80
75		7.25	11.95	14.50	8.75	8.30
25	IFN-γ	4.85	6.18	7.73	5.50	11.20	P_4,5 = 3 × 10⁻²
50		9.20	10.90	11.45	7.65	16.20
75		28.70	21.53	20.48	13.20	40.70
25	G-CSF	8.00	50.50	552.25	120.60	28.40	P_1,3 = 2 × 10⁻²P_2,3 = 3 × 10⁻²
50		336.50	366.40	630.40	527.55	440.80
75		781.45	655.90	2337.25	2935.13	1921.00
25	GM-CSF	2.00	4.35	8.88	7.40	13.40	P_1–5 = 8 × 10⁻³
50		5.10	8.80	25.95	12.50	27.60
75		22.10	28.90	48.93	29.28	79.50
25	VEGF	183.65	149.55	1585.05	540.90	1895.10	P_1–5 = 5 × 10⁻³
50		1346.60	2060.00	2465.45	2037.10	2207.50
75		2204.10	3225.63	3876.40	3942.13	2989.80
25	MCP-1	202.80	181.53	1057.33	320.85	1258.90	P_1–5 = 4 × 10⁻²
50		410.00	581.00	1971.05	962.40	1717.80
75		2890.15	2757.38	5057.83	4913.73	2732.90

IBC NST: invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.

As for the other molecular subtypes, cultured IBC NST tumors of the luminal B HER2-negative subtype showed the lowest spontaneous IL-10 secretion, and the luminal A subtype manifested the lowest spontaneous secretion of IL-18, TNF-α, GM-CSF, VEGF, and MCP-1 as compared to the other subtypes. It is known that (i) VEGF is a key mediator of angiogenesis in both nominally healthy people and patients with malignant tumors¹⁷; (ii) IL-18 creates an immunosuppressive environment for the tumor¹⁸; and (iii) TNF-α, GM-CSF, and MCP-1 induce the synthesis of matrix metalloproteinases and activation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition.¹¹ Therefore, their low spontaneous secretion by the luminal A subtype may be one of the reasons for the relatively slow malignant progression typical for this molecular subtype.^3,4 The cultured tumors of the triple-negative molecular subtype featured the highest spontaneous secretion of IL-1β in our study.

The results on mitogen-induced cytokine secretion by cultured IBC NST tumors of various molecular subtypes are presented in Table 2. The luminal B HER2-positive subtype showed not only the highest mitogen-induced secretion of IL-6 and IL-8, as in the assays of spontaneous secretion, but also the highest mitogen-induced secretion of IL-1Ra and TNF-α by the cultured tumors as compared to the other molecular subtypes. Furthermore, for the luminal B HER2-positive subtype of IBC NST, (i) mitogen-induced secretion of G-CSF by the cultured tumors was higher than that for luminal B HER2-negative and triple-negative subtypes; (ii) mitogen-induced secretion of GM-CSF by the cultured tumors was higher compared to that for the luminal B HER2-negative subtype, HER2-overexpressing subtype, and triple-negative subtype; and (iii) mitogen-induced secretion of MCP-1 by the cultured tumors was higher as compared to luminal A, luminal B HER2-negative, and triple-negative subtypes. Therefore, the luminal B HER2-positive molecular subtype differs significantly from the other subtypes not only by high spontaneous but also by high mitogen-induced cytokine secretion by the cultured tumors.

Table 2.

Mitogen-induced cytokine secretion by IBC NST, depending on the molecular tumor subtype. Q: an interquartile range, where 50 denotes a median.

Q	Cytokine	Mitogen-induced cytokine secretion (pg/ml)
		1	2	3	4	5	P
		Luminal A	Luminal B HER2-negative	Luminal B HER2-positive	HER2-enriched	Triple-negative	P
25	IL-2	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.68	2.03
50		5.05	5.25	4.15	5.00	4.20
75		12.00	7.58	9.05	19.28	26.65
25	IL-6	292.10	295.70	7937.50	430.23	251.75	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻³
50		678.35	516.05	68300.00	599.35	544.20
75		65300.00	67275.00	137525.0	124912.5	9287.03
25	IL-8	390.83	303.68	4600.00	584.08	333.25	P_1–5 = 2 × 10⁻³
50		2029.20	1297.00	35250.00	2025.80	1092.05
75		37210.00	18240.00	56325.00	43312.50	9825.00
25	IL-10	3.90	1.00	3.70	2.05	8.28
50		10.70	5.40	10.20	17.50	13.45
75		57.85	13.50	27.28	45.63	50.50
25	IL-17	1.00	1.00	2.25	1.00	2.25
50		3.45	2.65	4.90	3.20	5.70
75		24.28	8.63	10.18	70.23	30.15
25	IL-18	9.30	38.28	82.80	20.93	30.30	P_1,3 = 4 × 10⁻³
50		56.65	97.90	159.05	101.30	143.85
75		251.53	234.03	420.95	366.83	468.25
25	IL-1β	22.35	58.75	157.00	28.18	42.00
50		220.00	194.20	312.50	261.70	221.10
75		383.50	530.00	653.75	830.00	320.30
25	IL-1Ra	1513.38	2167.28	6745.23	1801.75	1343.20	P_1–5 = 2 × 10⁻³
50		4730.70	4489.20	14075.90	2504.25	4810.00
75		12083.38	11261.08	26455.00	37341.25	15240.00
25	TNF-α	1.20	1.00	9.53	1.00	1.90	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻²
50		5.10	7.55	18.90	8.35	7.70
75		50.20	19.00	49.90	47.00	33.60
25	IFN-γ	5.15	4.08	8.35	6.80	9.00
50		13.75	11.90	16.65	10.15	27.00
75		42.03	29.38	48.13	34.70	112.20
25	G-CSF	199.93	66.95	961.25	126.93	41.20	P_2,3 = 2 × 10⁻²P_3,5 = 6 × 10⁻³
50		864.55	673.25	1538.05	894.65	616.00
75		2597.73	1488.80	2841.75	2973.50	1333.00
25	GM-CSF	7.43	4.20	38.55	5.33	16.90	P_2,3 = 2 × 10⁻²P_3,4 = 2 × 10⁻²P_3,5 = 2 × 10⁻²
50		64.35	29.70	122.05	24.95	27.30
75		152.43	153.83	201.03	240.08	346.00
25	VEGF	423.60	159.43	864.80	216.23	862.00
50		1458.60	1545.95	1693.90	1402.65	1721.50
75		1758.25	1826.60	3369.30	3403.93	2752.70
25	MCP-1	541.50	140.10	1062.43	366.63	725.80	P_1,3 = 2 × 10⁻²P_2,3 = 3 × 10⁻²P_3,4 = 2 × 10⁻²
50		1209.90	1393.15	2423.75	1201.15	1787.10
75		3026.53	2674.50	6125.25	7610.25	2429.30

IBC NST: invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.

Evaluation of the cytokine-producing potential (i.e., SIPA) of IBC NST allowed us to identify the features specific for the triple-negative molecular subtype and for the HER2-overexpressing subtype (Figure 1). The triple-negative subtype of IBC NST manifested lower SIPA for the secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 by the cultured tumors as compared to the other molecular subtypes. The triple-negative subtype and HER2-overexpressing subtype had lower SIPA for the secretion of IL-18 by the cultured tumors as compared to luminal subtypes. The obtained differences indicate a suppressive effect of the tested set of mitogens (PA) on cytokine secretion by cultured IBC NST tumors of these molecular subtypes. IL-18 is known to have immunosuppressive activity in breast cancer by regulating natural killer (NK) cell subsets and inducing PD-1 expression on mature NK cells; IL-18 promotes drug resistance to chemotherapeutic agents.¹⁸ IL-6 and IL-8 are pleiotropic cytokines that can exert an immunosuppressive effect via recruitment and regulation of biological activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment.^19,20 It is possible that IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18 together form an immunosuppressive network in IBC NST of the triple-negative molecular subtype.

Figure 1.

SIPA for cytokine secretion by cultured IBC NST tumors, depending on the molecular tumor subtype. Bars correspond to median ± interquartile range. ^∗P = 2 × 10⁻², ^∗∗P = 1 × 10⁻² as compared to the other molecular subtypes, ^#P = 1 × 10⁻², ^##P = 1 × 10⁻² as compared to the luminal molecular subtypes. SIPA: stimulation index of polyclonal activators; IBC NST: invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.

The spontaneous cytokine secretion by cultured peripheral blood cells, depending on the molecular IBC NST subtype, is presented in Table 3. It turned out that the HER2-overexpressing subtype is characterized by (i) higher spontaneous secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 by the cultured peripheral blood cells in comparison with luminal A and luminal B HER2-negative subtypes and (ii) higher spontaneous secretion of IL-10 and G-CSF relative to the other molecular subtypes.

Table 3.

Spontaneous cytokine secretion by cultured peripheral blood cells, depending on the molecular tumor subtype of the patients. Q: an interquartile range, where 50 denotes a median.

Q	Cytokine	Spontaneous cytokine secretion (pg/ml)
		1	2	3	4	5	P
		Luminal A	Luminal B HER2-negative	Luminal B HER2-positive	HER2-enriched	Triple-negative	P
25	IL-2	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
50		2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
75		2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
25	IL-6	22.70	20.83	39.08	90.68	30.25	P_1,4 = 3 × 10⁻²P_2,4 = 2 × 10⁻²
50		78.70	62.95	154.20	299.60	105.55
75		142.55	200.30	408.80	602.20	212.75
25	IL-8	296.20	213.70	266.25	369.75	237.88	P_1,4 = 4 × 10⁻²P_2,4 = 4 × 10⁻²
50		368.40	384.75	687.50	1210.00	694.60
75		548.15	1000.30	1542.50	2697.53	943.13
25	IL-10	1.30	1.00	1.10	4.65	1.70	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻²
50		3.50	2.95	2.55	9.05	6.30
75		7.26	8.80	5.00	32.33	8.83
25	IL-17	1.00	1.00	2.00	1.00	1.00
50		1.00	1.00	2.00	1.00	1.00
75		1.50	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
25	IL-18	22.00	25.05	17.90	23.75	27.03
50		27.40	31.45	24.55	29.60	31.80
75		36.75	46.88	34.00	34.05	40.05
25	IL-1β	8.15	14.83	13.00	32.25	9.70
50		23.50	28.40	32.85	40.85	28.65
75		49.05	86.73	104.70	152.30	55.18
25	IL-1Ra	478.80	521.45	498.63	620.80	500.60
50		781.80	988.10	726.85	980.90	1145.00
75		1210.00	1281.03	942.40	1613.95	2098.40
25	TNF-α	1.00	1.00	2.90	1.00	1.00
50		7.30	6.25	9.15	11.10	6.60
75		16.80	10.40	21.38	42.78	11.70
25	IFN-γ	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
50		2.00	2.00	2.00	2.85	2.50
75		5.00	5.00	2.00	5.00	5.00
25	G-CSF	2.00	2.00	2.00	6.68	2.00	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻²
50		5.80	3.60	11.45	28.55	2.85
75		16.10	13.85	31.75	68.70	18.43
25	GM-CSF	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
50		2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.25
75		2.85	3.98	7.08	10.13	6.68
25	VEGF	33.05	40.33	20.58	48.05	33.83
50		61.30	62.05	44.20	67.60	48.05
75		86.85	94.88	72.13	88.43	72.33
25	MCP-1	750.55	860.83	1087.30	1153.35	718.20
50		1302.60	1413.00	1756.50	1455.65	1814.65
75		2639.25	2537.78	6179.73	10010.78	3312.78

After the measurement of mitogen-induced cytokine secretion by the cultured peripheral blood cells from patients with IBC NST, some features of the luminal B HER2-positive molecular subtype were determined: this subtype was found to be associated with higher levels of mitogen-induced secretion of IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and G-CSF by the cultured peripheral blood cells as compared to the other molecular subtypes and higher levels of mitogen-induced secretion of MCP-1 only in comparison with the luminal A subtype, luminal B HER2-negative subtype, and HER2-overexpressing subtype (Table 4). These findings were suggestive of high cytokine-producing activity of tumor cells and peripheral blood cells in IBC NST of the luminal B HER2-positive subtype. Given the biological effects of IL-6 and IL-8, namely, their modulation of the synthesis of enzymes involved in estrogen and progesterone metabolism as well as the interaction of these cytokines with estrogen and progesterone receptors and receptor HER2 in breast cancer,^5,12–16 it can be assumed that the high cytokine-producing activity of the cultured tumors and peripheral blood cells is associated with the luminal B HER2-positive subtype of IBC NST.

Table 4.

Mitogen-induced cytokine secretion by cultured peripheral blood cells, depending on the molecular tumor subtype of IBC NST. Q: an interquartile range, where 50 denotes a median.

Q	Cytokine	Mitogen-induced cytokine secretion (pg/ml)
		1	2	3	4	5	P
		Luminal A	Luminal B HER2-negative	Luminal B HER2-positive	HER2-enriched	Triple-negative	P
25	IL-2	6.05	8.15	10.48	3.43	8.05	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻²
50		12.80	13.75	21.45	7.85	13.40
75		19.60	29.75	32.23	14.73	29.65
25	IL-6	528.95	512.05	7000.00	467.45	529.35	P_1–5 = 3 × 10⁻³
50		755.80	539.50	10300.00	553.75	664.30
75		8075.00	10887.50	16375.00	13775.00	7416.43
25	IL-8	398.20	381.65	10612.50	640.98	398.83	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻³
50		3800.00	2147.85	13550.00	2084.30	1432.50
75		15575.00	15125.00	20850.00	14062.50	15925.00
25	IL-10	68.90	55.40	57.08	74.58	65.00
50		95.40	83.85	79.50	84.70	100.80
75		146.80	164.10	122.85	105.60	137.75
25	IL-17	22.10	22.58	26.00	18.08	37.35
50		47.80	36.75	67.10	32.90	64.60
75		158.05	114.45	119.03	70.93	83.90
25	IL-18	30.85	33.08	25.30	34.18	33.05
50		38.00	41.00	31.55	38.85	45.75
75		48.80	54.20	41.15	49.23	52.20
25	IL-1β	392.50	371.08	693.75	311.30	368.15	P_1–5 = 2 × 10⁻²
50		452.00	410.25	1070.00	433.95	407.50
75		1799.50	1078.75	1795.00	1518.75	1290.75
25	IL-1Ra	3282.45	2910.00	3970.08	2765.30	1630.90	P_2,3 = 3 × 10⁻²
50		6952.00	4768.80	7531.05	5932.10	5839.30
75		8357.50	6801.20	10751.75	9730.38	9256.00
25	TNF-α	321.25	297.60	522.50	242.43	335.90	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻²
50		527.40	519.70	778.55	409.45	413.95
75		865.00	799.00	1344.50	968.50	765.00
25	IFN-γ	256.40	318.68	397.80	65.73	177.43	P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻²
50		450.10	569.95	892.25	373.10	534.85
75		813.45	1092.05	1401.65	849.75	729.20
25	G-CSF	252.95	318.40	515.35	176.45	237.15	P_1–5 = 4 × 10⁻³
50		446.60	536.85	734.30	357.35	269.20
75		820.70	772.15	1006.50	906.70	561.75
25	GM-CSF	22.50	19.63	33.88	11.85	25.63
50		42.20	36.10	60.80	22.82	39.20
75		66.10	73.33	109.13	62.05	67.05
25	VEGF	74.80	58.08	62.73	82.10	98.25
50		120.20	118.55	100.40	123.45	121.40
75		191.85	206.83	137.25	189.48	142.28
25	MCP-1	1920.50	1668.53	2564.75	1347.78	1904.88	P_1,3 = 3 × 10⁻²P_2,3 = 7 × 10⁻³P_3,4 = 1 × 10⁻²
50		3056.00	2125.00	4253.50	2086.20	3708.55
75		3776.00	3435.75	5757.28	3361.50	3984.75

IBC NST: invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.

As for the cytokine-producing potential of the cultured peripheral blood cells from patients with IBC NST, specific features were noted in the luminal B HER2-positive subtype and HER2-overexpressing subtype (Figure 2). We found that the luminal B HER2-positive molecular subtype is characterized by higher SIPAs for the secretion of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1Ra by the cultured peripheral blood cells as compared to the other subtypes. The HER2-overexpressing subtype proved to have lower SIPA for IL-10, TNF-α, and G-CSF secretion relative to the other subtypes.

Figure 2.

SIPA for cytokine secretion by cultured peripheral blood cells, depending on the molecular tumor subtype of IBC NST. Bars correspond to median ± interquartile range. ^∗P_1–5 = 8 × 10⁻³, ^∗∗P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻³, ^∗∗∗P_1–5 = 3 × 10⁻³, ^#P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻², ^##P_1–5 = 1 × 10⁻², ^###P_1–5 = 2 × 10⁻² as compared to the other molecular subtypes. SIPA: stimulation index of polyclonal activators; IBC NST: invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.

On the basis of our findings and the fact that IL-6 and IL-8 potentiate each other’s biological effects,^21,22 we tested an index consisting of the mathematical product of IL-6 SIPA and IL-8 SIPA for the cultured peripheral blood cells. We found that 75.00% of cases of IL-6 SIPA × IL-8 SIPA ≥ 251.00 a.u. correspond to the luminal B HER2-positive molecular subtype, and 74.35% of cases with ≤ 250.00 a.u. correspond to the other molecular subtypes (p = 0.006 according to Fisher’s exact test).

Results of our PCA of spontaneous cytokine secretion by the cultured tumors and cultured peripheral blood cells isolated from IBC NST patients are presented in Tables 5 and 6, respectively. In the PCA, the cytokines that were most closely related to each other (the highest correlation coefficient) were found to be grouped together. The optimal number of groups of cytokines secreted by both the cultured tumors and cultured peripheral blood cells was 5.

Table 5.

PCA of cytokine secretion by cultured IBC NST tumors. KMO = 0.667, p > 10⁻¹⁰.

Correlations between cytokine secretion and estimated principal components
1		2		3		4		5
IL-6	0.872	TNF-α	0.741	IFN-γ	0.612	IL-2	0.887	IL-1β	0.571
IL-8	0.787	VEGF	0.620	IL-18	0.852			IL-17	0.637
IL-10	0.565
IL-1Ra	0.507
G-CSF	0.866
GM-CSF	0.474
MCP-1	0.801

PCA: principal component analysis; KMO: Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin; IBC NST: invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.

Table 6.

PCA of cytokine secretion by cultured peripheral blood cells from IBC NST patients. KMO = 0.723, p > 10⁻¹⁰.

Correlations between cytokine secretion and estimated principal components
1		2		3		4		5
IL-6	0.939	IL-1β	0.549	IL-1Ra	0.686	VEGF	0.937	IL-18	0.938
IL-8	0.919	TNF-α	0.794	IFN-γ	0.831
G-CSF	0.763	IL-17	0.913	IL-10	0.533
GM-CSF	0.660			IL-2	0.538
MCP-1	0.930

PCA: principal component analysis; KMO: Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin; IBC NST: invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.

Next, we evaluated the correlations between PCA groups of secreted cytokines and markers of molecular subtypes (Figure 3). Secretion of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-1Ra, G-CSF, GM-CSF, and MCP-1 by the cultured tumors correlated with the expression of HER2, which is characteristic of the luminal B HER2-positive and HER2-enriched molecular subtypes. Similarly, secretion of IL-6, IL-8, G-CSF, GM-CSF, and MCP-1 by the cultured peripheral blood cells correlated with the expression of HER2. These results indicated that there were specific patterns of cytokine secretion in patients with luminal B HER2-positive and HER2-enriched molecular subtypes. Probably, these groups of cytokines form a cytokine network that maintains HER2 expression in the IBC NST tumor.

Figure 3.

Correlations between markers of molecular subtypes and the groups of cytokines secreted by a cultured tumor (A) or by cultured peripheral blood cells (B) from invasive breast carcinoma of no special type patients.

Furthermore, we identified correlations that imply the formation of a tumor–blood cytokine network in various molecular subtypes of breast cancer (Table 7). In the luminal A molecular subtype, the tumor–blood cytokine network seems to maintain TNF-α secretion by the cultured peripheral blood cells. In turn, the cytokine network in the luminal B HER2-positive molecular subtype may maintain high secretion of IL-6 and VEGF by the cultured tumors.

Table 7.

Correlations between spontaneous cytokine secretion by cultured tumors and by cultured peripheral blood cells, depending on the molecular tumor subtype of IBC NST.

Molecular subtype		Pairs of parameters	R (p value)
1	Luminal A	IL-6 tumor–TNF-α blood	0.602 (0.00008)
		IL-8 tumor–TNF-α blood	0.574 (0.0002)
		MCP-1 tumor–TNF-α blood	0.706 (0.000006)
2	Luminal B HER2-negative	IL-6 tumor–TNF-α blood	0.687 (0.002)
3	Luminal B HER2-positive	IL-6 tumor–TNF-α blood	0.455 (0.009)
		IL-6 tumor–GM-CSF blood	0.457 (0.009)
		IL-6 tumor–MCP-1 blood	0.586 (0.001)
		VEGF tumor–IL-6 blood	0.546 (0.001)
		VEGF tumor–IL-8 blood	0.560 (0.001)
		VEGF tumor–IL-1β blood	0.477 (0.006)
4	HER2-enriched	IL-8 tumor–IFN-γ blood	−0.849 (0.002)
5	Triple-negative	IL-8 tumor–IL-10 blood	−0.715 (0.002)

IBC NST: invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.

Discussion

Cytokines play the most important role in malignant transformation of cells and tumor progression.⁶ Depending on an immunobiological environment, cytokines can have either a stimulatory or suppressive effect on malignant cells.⁷ The antitumor immune response is known to be determined by a combination of intracellular and extracellular interactions between tumor cells and the cells of the tumor microenvironment, resulting in a complex cytokine network.^6,7 Furthermore, it is peripheral blood leukocytes that constitute a functional reserve for tumor microenvironment cells.⁸ Heterogeneity of malignant tumors is known to be based on marked intratumoral diversity of XYZ that ensures various levels of cytokine secretion; these levels are specific to each particular tumor.²³ Although the currently known molecular subtypes of breast cancer determine the treatment strategy, they do not allow interpretation of a tumor’s immunobiological environment, whose functional characteristics include cytokines.^9,24

The present study revealed that the luminal B HER2-positive molecular subtype of IBC NST differs significantly from the other subtypes not only by high spontaneous but also by high mitogen-induced secretion of cytokines by the cultured tumor as well as by high mitogen-induced secretion by cultured peripheral blood cells and a high cytokine-producing potential of peripheral blood cells. Cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 are most specific for the luminal B HER2-positive molecular subtype. IL-6 and IL-8 can directly or indirectly affect the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors and of receptor HER2 by tumor cells in IBC NST of the luminal B HER2-positive subtype because these cytokines potentiate each other’s biological effects and affect the activity of steroidogenesis enzymes.^5,12–14 IL-6 is reported to increase transcription of the CYP19 gene encoding aromatase: an enzyme that transforms androgens into estrogens in adipose tissue.¹³ Overexpression of HER2 initiates the HER2–IL-6–STAT3 signaling cascade, which promotes the development of resistance to anti-HER2 therapy through self-renewal of breast cancer stem cells.^15,16 Based on the published data and our results, it can be assumed that the high spontaneous secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 by cultured tumors of the luminal B HER2-positive subtype is caused by the activity of cells comprising the tumor, including its microenvironment; it is also possible that these cytokines can contribute to high expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors and receptor HER2, which defines the luminal B HER2-positive subtype (Figure 4(a)). The evaluation of the cytokine-producing potential of IBC NST allowed us to identify specific features of the triple-negative molecular subtype, for example, lowest SIPAs for the secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 as well as lower SIPA for IL-18 secretion relative to luminal subtypes. The observed differences point to a suppressive effect of PA on the secretion of cytokines by IBC NST of this molecular subtype. It is possible that IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18 together form an immunosuppressive network in IBC NST of the triple-negative molecular subtype (Figure 4(b)) because IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18 are known to exert immunosuppressive action on cells constituting the tumor microenvironment and to enable the development of multidrug resistance.^18–20

Figure 4.

The cytokine network in luminal B HER2-positive (A) and triple-negative (B) molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

From the results of this study, it can be deduced that for patients with the luminal B HER2-positive molecular subtype of breast cancer, an anticytokine therapy based on inhibitors of IL-6 and IL-8 receptors may be effective. According to the literature, IL-6 receptor inhibitors suppress bone metastases in a breast cancer model.²⁵ Concerning the triple-negative molecular subtype of breast cancer, it is probable that an anticytokine treatment with inhibitors of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18 receptors will suppress the intratumoral immunosuppressive network through, among other mechanisms, nonspecific suppression of PD-L1 expression.¹⁸

There are some limitations to this study. First, power calculation for estimation of the sample size needed for this study was not done because this study was limited by the number of patients who signed the agreement to participate and by the terms of this agreement itself. Second, due to high variation within the study population, the results close to the p = 0.05 cutoff should be interpreted with caution. On the other hand, the strength of this study on IBC NST is not only the analysis of spontaneous and mitogen-induced secretion of cytokines but also the SIPA calculation, which eliminates the error associated with differences in the number of cytokine-producing cells. Additionally, this study comprehensively covers the secretion of cytokines, both in cultured tumors and cultured peripheral blood cells, thereby making it possible to elucidate specific features of the cytokine network functioning in various molecular subtypes of IBC NST.

Conclusion

Spontaneous and mitogen-induced secretion of cytokines by cultured tumors and cultured peripheral blood cells from IBC NST patients is associated with molecular subtypes of breast cancer. The luminal B HER2-positive molecular subtype shows (i) the highest spontaneous secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 and the highest mitogen-induced secretion of IL-6, IL-8, IL-1Ra, and TNF-α by the cultured tumors; (ii) the highest mitogen-induced secretion of IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and G-CSF by the cultured peripheral blood cells; and (iii) the highest cytokine-producing potential (mitogen-induced to spontaneous secretion ratio) of the cultured peripheral blood cells for the secretion of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1Ra as compared to other molecular subtypes. It is possible that these features are associated with the modulatory activity of these cytokines toward the synthesis of enzymes involved in estrogen and progesterone metabolism and are based on the interaction of these cytokines with estrogen and progesterone receptors and with receptor HER2. The triple-negative subtype of IBC NST has the lowest cytokine-producing potential of the cultured tumors for the secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 as compared to the other molecular subtypes as well as lower SIPA values for IL-18 secretion as compared to luminal subtypes. XYZ is associated with a suppressive effect of the tested set of mitogens (PA) on cytokine secretion by the cultured tumors of the triple-negative molecular subtype. Probably, the cytokines produced by the cultured tumors, namely, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18, together form an intratumoral immunosuppressive network in IBC NST of the triple-negative molecular subtype. Therefore, our findings indicate that the cytokine network has distinctive functional features in IBC NST of luminal B HER2-positive and triple-negative molecular subtypes.

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association. All recommendations of ICMJE were followed. All participants of the study gave their voluntary informed consent to participate in the study. The study protocol was approved (Protocol No. 2016-3) by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, a subdivision of the Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine (Novosibirsk, Russia).

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was financed as part of a state assignment (No. АААА-А18-118030790008-7) by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, a subdivision of the Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine (Protocol No. 2016-3).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.

Trial registration

Molecular markers of breast cancer and the influence of Human Leukemia Differentiation Factor on the metastatic potential: No. АААА-А18-118030790008-7.

ORCID iD

Kristina Davletova

References

Bertucci

Finetti

Goncalves

, et al. (2020) The therapeutic response of ER+/HER2− breast cancers differs according to the molecular Basal or Luminal subtype. NPJ Breast Cancer 6: 8.

Fragomeni

Sciallis

Jeruss

(2018) Molecular subtypes and local-regional control of breast cancer. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America 27(1): 95–120.

Negro

Aschenbrenner

Brezar

, et al. (2020) Molecular heterogeneity in breast carcinoma cells with increased invasive capacities. Radiology and Oncology 54(1): 103–118.

Chen

Goodison

Sun

(2020) Molecular profiles of matched primary and metastatic tumor samples support a linear evolutionary model of breast cancer. Cancer Research 80(2): 170–174.

Lee

O-Y

Park

, et al. (2016) IL-1β induces IL-6 production and increases invasiveness and estrogen-independent growth in a TG2-dependent manner in human breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 16(1): 724.

Lippitz

(2013) Cytokine patterns in patients with cancer: a systematic review. The Lancet. Oncology 14(6): e218–e228.

Edwardson

Parissenti

Kovala

(2019) Chemotherapy and inflammatory cytokine signalling in cancer cells and the tumour microenvironment. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 1152: 173–215.

Kaur

Vasudeva

Singla

, et al. (2018) Analysis of pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokine gene variants and serum cytokine levels as prognostic markers in breast cancer. Journal of Cellular Physiology 233(12): 9716–9723.

Rakha

Pareja

(2020) New advances in molecular breast cancer pathology. Seminars in Cancer Biology S1044-579X(20): 30080–30088.

10.

Freeman

Hoffman

(1986) In vivo-like growth of human tumors in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 83: 2694–2698.

11.

Autenshlyus

Davletova

Studenikina

, et al. (2019) Cytokine production by blood immune cells, tumor and its microenvironment, characteristic of extracellular matrix in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type. Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series B: Biomedical Chemistry 65(5): 424–431.

12.

Rose-John

(2018) Interleukin-6 family cytokines. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 10(2): a028415.

13.

Uciechowski

Dempke

WCM

(2020) Interleukin-6: a masterplayer in the cytokine network. Oncology 98(3): 131–137.

14.

Hilborn

Stål

Jansson

(2017) Estrogen and androgen-converting enzymes 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and their involvement in cancer: with a special focus on 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1, 2, and breast cancer. Oncotarget 8(18): 30552–30562.

15.

Hartman

Yang

X-Y

Glass

, et al. (2011) HER2 overexpression elicits a proinflammatory IL-6 autocrine signaling loop that is critical for tumorigenesis. Cancer Research 71(13): 4380–4391.

16.

Korkaya

Kim

G-i

Davis

, et al. (2012) Activation of an IL6 inflammatory loop mediates trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer by expanding the cancer stem cell population. Molecular Cell 47(4): 570–584.

17.

Apte

Chen

Ferrara

(2019) VEGF in signaling and disease: beyond discovery and development. Cell 176(6): 1248–1264.

18.

Park

Yang

Lee

, et al. (2017) Tumor-derived IL-18 induces PD-1 expression on immunosuppressive NK cells in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncotarget 8(20): 32722–32730.

19.

Jiang

Chen

Zhang

, et al. (2017) Interleukin-6 trans-signaling pathway promotes immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells via suppression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 in breast cancer. Frontiers in Immunology 8: 1840.

20.

Liu

Tian

, et al. (2016) The CXCL8-CXCR1/2 pathways in cancer. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 31: 61–71.

21.

Piotrowski

Kulcenty

Suchorska

(2020) Interplay between inflammation and cancer. Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy 25(3): 422–427.

22.

Alfaro

Sanmamed

Rodríguez-Ruiz

, et al. (2017) Interleukin-8 in cancer pathogenesis, treatment and follow-up. Cancer Treatment Reviews 60: 24–31.

23.

Testa

Castelli

Pelosi

(2020) Breast cancer: a molecularly heterogenous disease needing subtype-specific treatments. Medical Sciences 8(1): 18.

24.

Meehan

Gray

Martínez-Pérez

, et al. (2020) Precision medicine and the role of biomarkers of radiotherapy response in breast cancer. Frontiers in Oncology 10: 628.

25.

Wakabayashi

Hamaguchi

Nagao

, et al. (2018) Interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor suppresses bone metastases in a breast cancer cell line. Breast Cancer 25(5): 566–574.

Cytokines in various molecular subtypes of breast cancer

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Patients

Immunohistochemical analysis

Evaluation of spontaneous and mitogen-induced cytokine secretion

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Compliance with ethical standards

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Ethics approval

Informed consent

Trial registration

ORCID iD

References