The conference in Poona that led to the foundation of Indian National Congress in 1885 aimed to serve as the germ of a native parliament to provide a reply to the assertion that India was still unfit for any form of representative institution. It spearheaded the Indian independence movement and post 1947 ushered in a ‘Congress system’ of one-party dominance that represented a historical consensus with few parallels in any political party system in the world. Dialectical contradiction has been a historic recurrence in the Congress as ‘personality cults’ of Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi in the early years and a ‘high command culture’ later on decimated its hegemonic power in competitive party politics. The Congress declined due to a deficit of political vision, lack of forward-thinking ideas, engagement in competitive pseudo-secularism and diminishing electoral returns of dynastic (Nehru-Gandhi) politics. The institutionalization of BJP as a dominant party in 2014 coincided with the deinstitutionalization of the Congress party system. The grand old party needs to relegitimize itself by revamping its ideology, formulating a populist model of governance, creating son-of-the-soil leadership, revitalizing the party system, re-engaging with citizens, altering its politics to meritocracy and embracing new age electoral grammar.
BalmasMRahatGSheaferT, et al. (2014) Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics20(1): 37–51.
2.
Bismarck O (1895) Fürst Bismarck: Neue Tischgespräche Und Interviews. Unspecified publisher Volume 1. https://www.worldcat.org/title/958753476 (accessed on 11 January 2023).
3.
ChandraB (1964) Lord Dufferin and the character of the Indian nationalist leadership. Proceedings of the Indian history congress. Indian History Congress26(Part II): 199–208.
4.
ChhibberPVermaR (2018) Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
5.
ChhibberPVermaR (2019) The rise of the second dominant party system in India: BJP’s new social coalition in 2019. Studies in Indian Politics7(2): 131–148.
6.
ConaghanCM (2000) The irrelevant right: Alberto Fujimori and the new politics of pragmatic Peru. In: MiddlebrookKJ (ed.) Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
DaltonJRWattenbergPM (2000) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
9.
DuvergerM (1951) Le système politique français. Rome: Librairie Armand Colin.
10.
HardgraveRLKochanek SA (1993) India: Government and Politics in a Developing Nation. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
11.
HuntingtonS (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
JandaK (1993) Comparative political parties: Research and theory. In: FinifterAW (ed.) Political Science: State of the Discipline II. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, pp. 163–191.
13.
KirchhmeirO (1966) The transformation of the Western European party sytems. In: WeinerM (eds) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton University Press, 177–200.
14.
Kitschelt H, Mansfeldova Z, Markowski R, et al. (1999) Post-communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
KothariR (1964) The congress ‘system’ in India. Asian Survey4(12): 1161–1173.
16.
KothariR (1970) Continuity and change in India’s party system. Asian Survey10(11): 937–948.
17.
LevitskyS (2003) Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
18.
MainwaringSScullyT (1995) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford University Press.
19.
MainwaringSTorcalM (2006) Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratisation. In: KatzRCrottyW (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage Publications, pp. 1–34.
20.
ManorJ (1981) Party decay and political crisis in India. The Washington Quarterly4: 25–40.
21.
MényY (1990) Government and Politics in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
MuirheadRRosenblumNL (2020) The political theory of parties and partisanship: Catching up. Annual Review of Political Science23: 95–110.
23.
OstiguyP (1998) Peronism and anti-Peronism: Class-cultural cleavages and political identity in Argentina. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, USA. Available at: http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/lasa97/ostiguy4.pdf (accessed 22 December 2022).
24.
PalshikarS (2014) The defeat of the Congress. Economic and Political Weekly49(39): 57–63.
25.
PanebiancoA (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge University Press.
26.
PedersenMN (1983) Changing patterns of electoral volatility in European party systems: Explorations in explanation. In: DaalderHMairP (eds) Western European Party Systems:Continuity and Change. Beverly Hills, CA and London: Sage, 29–66.
27.
PrzeworskiA (1975) Institutionalization of voting patters, or is mobilization the source of decay?American Political Science Review69(1): 49–67.
28.
RahatGSheaferT (2007) The personalization(s) of politics: Israel 1949–2003. Political Communication24(1): 65–80.
29.
RaiP (2021) Psephological fallacies of public opinion polling. Economic and Political WeeklyLVI(28): 51–57.
RandallVSvåsandL (2002) Party institutionalization in new democracies. Party Politics8(1): 5–29.
32.
RobertsKMWibbelsE (1999) Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: A test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. American Political Science Review575–590.
33.
RoseRMunroN (2003) Elections and Parties in New European Democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
34.
RosenstoneSJHansenJM (1993) Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
35.
RudolphLRudolphS (1981) Transformation of Congress party: Why 1980 was not a restoration?Economic and Political Weekly16(18): 811–818.
36.
SanchezO (2008) Transformation and decay: The de-institutionalisation of party systems in South America. Third World Quarterly29(2): 315–337.
37.
SartoriG (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
38.
SatyanarayanaD (1997) Coalitions in India. The Indian Journal of Political Science58(1/4): 68–78.
39.
SilveiraF (1998) A Decisão do voto no Brasil. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs.
