India is in the throes of a massive demographic turn. People born and brought up after 1986 constitute the bulk of the population. Studies elsewhere show that generational replacement transforms societies and can play a key role in changing the political attitudes and behaviour of the electorate. Over the last few general elections the Indian National Congress has witnessed a steady decline in support, while the Bharatiya Janata Party has seen a surge in support. This article examines whether the decline of the Congress party is linked to a demographic shift that is taking place. The study demonstrates that generations as socio-historical space helps us nuance party-choice explanations.
AbramsonP. R. (1976). Generational change and the decline of party identification in America: 1952–1974. American Political Science Review, 70(2), 469–478.
2.
AbramsonP. R. (1979). Developing party identification: A further examination of life-cycle, generational, and period effects. American Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 78–96.
3.
AbramsonP. R., & InglehartR. (1986). Generational replacement and value change in six West European societies. American Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 1–25.
4.
AlamM. S. (2009). Whither Muslim politics?Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 92–95.
5.
AlwinD. F., & KrosnickJ. A. (1991). Ageing, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 169–195.
6.
AndersenK. (1979). Generation, partisan shift, and realignment: A glance back to the New Deal. The changing American voter (pp. 74–95). Harvard University Press.
7.
BlaisA., GidengilE., & NevitteN. (2004). Where does the turnout decline come from?European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 221–236.
8.
BraungartR. G., & BraungartM. M. (1986). Life-course and generational politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 12(1), 205–231.
9.
ButlerD., & StokeD. (1974). Political change in Britain: Basis of electoral choice. Springer.
10.
ChhibberP. (2009). Are national elections any more than aggregations of state-level verdicts?Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 58–63.
11.
ChhibberP., & OstermannS. L. (2014). The BJP’s fragile mandate: Modi and vote mobilisers in the 2014 general elections. Studies in Indian Politics, 2(2), 137–151.
12.
ChhibberP., JenseniusF. R., & SuryanarayanP. (2014). Party organisation and party proliferation in India. Party Politics, 20(4), 489–505.
13.
ConverseP. (1976). Dynamics of party identification. Sage Publications.
14.
DaltonR. J. (1987). Generational change in elite political beliefs: The growth of ideological polarisation. The Journal of Politics, 49(4), 976–997.
15.
DeshpandeR. (2004). How gendered was women’s participation in the 2004 election?Economic & Political Weekly, 39(51), 5431–5436.
16.
DeshpandeR. (2009). How did women vote in the Lok Sabha elections in 2009?Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 83–87.
17.
FalcaoV. L. (2009). Urban patterns of voting and party choices. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 99–101.
18.
FranklinM. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge University Press.
19.
GallegoA. (2009). Where else does turnout decline come from? Education, age, generation and period effects in three European countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(1), 23–44.
20.
GoerresA. (2008). The grey vote: Determinants of older voters’ party choice in Britain and West Germany. Electoral Studies, 27(2), 285–304.
21.
HeathA., & YadavY. (1999). The united colours of Congress: Social profile of Congress voters, 1996 and 1998. Economic & Political Weekly, 34(34/35), 2518–2528.
22.
InglehartR. (1989). Cultural change: The impact of economic and sociopolitical change on culture, and the impact of culture on economics, society and politics in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press.
23.
JensonJ. (1976). Party loyalty in Canada: The question of party identification. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 8(4), 543–53.
24.
KailashK. K. (2009). Alliances and lessons of election 2009. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 52–57.
25.
KitscheltH. P. (1988). Left-libertarian parties: Explaining innovation in competitive party systems. World Politics, 40(2), 194–234.
26.
KochanekS. A. (1968). The Congress party of India: The dynamics of a one-party democracy. University of California Press.
27.
KothariR. (1961). Party system-form and substance in Indian politics-V. The Economic Weekly, 13(22), 847–854.
28.
KothariR. (1964). The Congress’ system’ in India. Asian Survey, 4(12), 1161–1173.
29.
KumarS., & RanjanR. (2009). Bihar: Development matters. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 141–144.
30.
MannheimK. (1952). Essays on the sociology of knowledge (1893–1947). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31.
NiemiR. G., & JenningsM. K. (1981). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton University Press.
PalshikarS. (2014). The defeat of the Congress. Economic & Political Weekly, 49(39), 57–63.
34.
PalshikarS. (2015). The BJP and Hindu nationalism: Centrist politics and majoritarian impulses. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 38(4), 719–735.
35.
PalshikarS., & SuriK. C. (2014). India’s 2014 Lok Sabha elections: Critical shifts in the long term, caution in the short term. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 39–49.
36.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone. Simon and Schuster.
37.
ShethD. L. (1971). Profiles of party support in 1967. Economic and Political Weekly, 6(3–5), 275–288.
38.
ShankarR., & SisodiaY. S. (2009). Madhya Pradesh: Overriding the contours of anti-incumbency. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(6), 35–38.
39.
ShastriS. (2009). Leadership at the state level mattered. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 88–91.
40.
ShastriS. (2019). The Modi factor in the 2019 Lok Sabha election: How critical was it to the BJP victory?Studies in Indian Politics, 7(2), 206–218.
41.
ShastriS., & SyalR. (2014). Leadership in context: Impact of leadership in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. Economic & Political Weekly, 49(39), 77–81.
42.
SinhaA. (2007). India’s unlikely democracy: Economic growth and political accommodation. Journal of Democracy, 18(2), 41–54.
43.
SridharanE. (2002). The fragmentation of Indian Party System, 1952–2009: Seven competing explanations. Parties and party politics in India, 483–484. Oxford University Press.
44.
SridharanE. (2004). Electoral coalitions in 2004 general elections: Theory and evidence. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(51), 5418–5425.
45.
StrateJ. M., ParrishC. J., ElderC. D., & FordC. (1989). Life span civic development and voting participation. The American Political Science Review, 83(2), 443–464.
46.
SuriK. C. (2004). Democracy, economic reforms and election results in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(51), 5404–5411.
47.
SuriK. C. (2009). The economy and voting in the 15th Lok Sabha elections. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 64–70.
48.
TharoorS. (2003). Nehru: The invention of India. Arcade publishing.
49.
TilleyJ. (2002). Political generations and partisanship in the U.K., 1964–1997. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 165(1), 121–135.
50.
TitusR. (2015). Yuva India: Consumption and lifestyle choices of a young India. Random House India.
WassH. (2007). The effects of age, generation and period on turnout in Finland 1975–2003. Electoral Studies, 26(3), 648–659.
53.
WeinerM. (1967). Party-building in a new nation: The Indian National Congress. University of Chicago Press.
54.
YadavY. (1996). Reconfiguration in Indian politics: State assembly elections, 1993–95. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(2/3), 95–104.
55.
YadavY. (2004). The elusive mandate of 2004. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(51), 5383–5398.
56.
YadavY., & PalshikarS. (2009). Between fortuna and virtu: Explaining the Congress’ ambiguous victory in 2009. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 33–46.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
