Oligarchy in the Jokowi government and its influence on the implementation of legislative function in Indonesia

Abstract

The weak implementation of the House of Representatives’, or Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat’s (DPR), function indicates stagnation in Indonesia’s democracy. This fact is due to the party oligarchy’s stronghold in the Jokowi government, which ignores the nature of public representation that should be carried out. The oligarchy controls the government and DPR’s performance in establishing political compromises for every legislative policy with the government to facilitate the affairs of party oligarchs, who are also the members of the Jokowi government coalition. In addition, they engage in cartel politics to secure their respective power and material interests. This article examines the roles of party oligarchs in influencing the implementation of political functions in the DPR. Ironically, the coalition formed by the party oligarchy has helped the Jokowi government and the DPR to secure government policies and the economic and political interests of the oligarchic group.

Keywords

cartel politics democratic decline government coalition legislative oligarchy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agus

(2018) Bertemu empat mata, Luhut minta Prabowo maju Pilpres 2019. [Meeting face to face, Luhut asked Prabowo to run for the 2019 presidential election]. CNN Indonesia, 7 April. Available at: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20180407215504-32-289128/bertemu-empat-mata-luhut-minta-prabowo-maju-pilpres-2019 (accessed 27 May 2020).

Asmara

(2019) Soal polemik revisi UU KPK, ini penjelasan lengkap Jokowi. [Regarding the polemic about the revision of the KPK Law, this is Jokowi’s complete explanation]. CNBC Indonesia, 13 September. Available at: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20190913113348-4-99190/soal-polemik-revisi-uu-kpk-ini-penjelasan-lengkap-jokowi (accessed 25 May 2020).

Aspinall

Barenschot

(2019) Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Barton

(2002) Abdurrahman Wahid: Muslim Democrat, Indonesia President. Sydney: UNSW Press.

CNN Indonesia (2019) Infografis: Daftar anggota DPR 2014–2019 terjerat korupsi. [Infographic: List of 2014–2019 DPR members caught in corruption]. 19 September. Available at: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190919085039-35-431798/infografis-daftar-anggota-dpr-2014-2019-terjerat-korupsi (accessed 27 May 2020).

CNN Indonesia (2020a) Demokrat-PKS tolak bahas omnibus law di tengan wabah corona. [Democrat-PKS refuses to discuss the omnibus law amid the corona outbreak]. 3 April. Available at: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200402155933-32-489672/demokrat-pks-tolak-bahas-omnibus-law-di-tengah-wabah-corona (accessed 13 April 2020).

CNN Indonesia (2020b) RUU Ciptaker ke paripurna, 7 fraksi setuju 2 menolak. [The Ciptaker Bill went to plenary session, 7 factions agreed and 2 rejected]. 3 October. Available at: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20201003233852-32-554072/ruu-ciptaker-ke-paripurna-7-fraksi-setuju-2-menolak (accessed 7 November 2020).

Crouch

(2010) Political Reform in Indonesia: After Soeharto. Singapore: ISEAS.

Dayley

(2020) Southeast Asia in the New International Era. New York: Routledge.

10.

DPR

(2015) Program legislasi nasional. [National legislative program]. Available at: http://www.dpr.go.id/uu/prolegnas-long-list (accessed 27 May 2020).

11.

Farisa

(2020) Catatan PSHTN FHUI atas Perppu 1/2020 dari “absolute power” hingga hilangnya fungsi pengawasan. [PSHTN FHUI notes on Perppu 1/2020 from “absolute power” to loss of supervisory function]. Kompas, 12 May. Available at: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/05/12/13304951/catatan-pshtn-fhui-atas-perppu-1-2020-dari-absolute-power-hingga-hilangnya (accessed 23 May 2020).

12.

Ford

Pepinsky

(2014) Introduction: Beyond oligarchy? In: Ford

Pepinsky

(eds) Beyond Oligarchy: Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program Publication Cornell University Press, pp. 1–11.

13.

Fukuoka

Djani

(2016) Revisiting the rise of Jokowi: The triumph of reformasi or an oligarchic adaptation of post-clientelist initiatives? South East Asia Research 24(2): 204–221.

14.

Habibie

(2004) Detik-Detik yang Menentukan: Jalan Panjang Indonesia Menuju Demokrasi. [Decisive Seconds: Indonesia’s Long Road to Democracy]. Jakarta: THC Mandiri.

15.

Hilmi

(2018) Kasus E-KTP, Setya Novanto divonis 15 tahun penjara. [In the E-KTP case, Setya Novanto was sentenced to 15 years in prison]. Tempo, 24 April. Available at: https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1082710/kasus-e-ktp-setya-novanto-divonis-15-tahun-penjara (accessed 27 May 2020).

16.

Honna

(2003) Military Politics and Democratization in Indonesia. London: Routledge.

17.

Katz

Mair

(2018) Democracy and the Cartelization of Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18.

Kingsbury

(2003) Power Politics and the Indonesia Military. London: Routledge Curzon.

19.

Lindsey

Butt

(2018) Indonesia Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20.

Mandan

(2006) Mendung di Atas Senayan. [Overcast Over Senayan]. Jakarta: Pustaka Indonesia Satu.

21.

Mietzner

(2013) Fighting the hellhounds: Pro-democracy activists and party politics in post-Suharto Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 43(1): 28–50.

22.

Mietzner

(2016) Coercing loyalty: Coalitional presidentialism and party politics in Jokowi’s Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia 38(2): 209–232.

23.

Mietzner

(2017) Jokowi’s presidency between elite consolidation and extra-parliamentary opposition. Asian Survey 57(1): 165–172.

24.

Mietzner

(2019) Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: Electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization 27(6): 1021–1036.

25.

Morgenstern

(2004) Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll-Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Ramage

(1995) Politics in Indonesia: Democracy, Islam and the Ideology of Tolerance. New York: Routledge.

27.

Reuter

(2015) Political parties and power of money in Indonesia and beyond. Trans: Trans-Regional and-National Studies of Southeast Asia 3(2): 267–288.

28.

Rüland

Manea

(2013) The legislature and military reform in Indonesia. In: Rüland

Manea

(eds) The Politics of Military Reform: Experiences from Indonesia and Nigeria. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 123–147.

29.

Saputro

(2020) Prabowo: Gerindra paling keras bela buruh, 80% kepentingan buruh diakomodasi di UU Cipta Kerja. [Prabowo: Gerindra defends workers the hardest, 80% of workers’ interests are accommodated in the Job Creation Law]. Palu Tribun News, 13 October. Available at: https://palu.tribunnews.com/2020/10/13/prabowo-gerindra-paling-keras-bela-buruh-80-kepentingan-buruh-diakomodasi-di-uu-cipta-kerja?page=all (accessed 8 November 2020).

30.

Sari

(2019) DPR sahkan 91 undang-undang selama masa bakti 2014–2019. [The DPR passed 91 laws during the 2014–2019 term]. Kompas, 1 October. Available at: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/10/01/05340051/dpr-sahkan-91-undang-undang-selama-masa-bakti-2014-2019?page=all (accessed 27 May 2020).

31.

Schneier

(2009) Reformasi and the Indonesian ‘war on terror’: State, military and legislative–executive relations in an emerging democracy. The Journal of Legislative Studies 15(2–3): 294–313.

32.

Slater

(2018) Party cartelization, Indonesian-style: Presidential power-sharing and the contingency of democratic opposition. Journal of East Asian Studies 18(1): 23–46.

33.

Slater

(2020) Indonesia’s tenuous democratic success and survival. In: Power

Warburton

(eds) The Democracy in Indonesia: From Stagnation to Regression. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, pp. 45–62.

34.

Soesastro

(2003) Introduction: Indonesia under Megawati. In: Soesastro

Smith

Ling

(eds) Governance in Indonesia: Challenges Facing the Megawati Presidency. Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 1–12.

35.

Sukma

(2009) Indonesian politics in 2009: Defective elections, resilient democracy. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 45(3): 317–336.

36.

Suparman

(2019) Kirim Supres ke DPR, Jokowi dinilai ingkar janji terkait pemberantasan korupsi. [Sending Supres to the DPR, Jokowi is considered to have broken promises related to corruption eradication]. Berita Satu, 12 September. Available at: https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/574742-kirim-surpres-ke-dpr-jokowi-dinilai-ingkar-janji-terkait-pemberantasan-korupsi (accessed 25 May 2020).

37.

Thompson

(2017) The Philippine presidency in Southeast Asian perspective: Imperiled and imperious presidents but not perilous presidentialism. Contemporary Politics 24(3): 325–345.

38.

Tomsa

(2008) Party Politics and Democratization in Indonesia: Golkar in the Post-Suharto Era. London: Routledge.

39.

Tomsa

(2017) Regime resilience and presidential politics in Indonesia. Contemporary Politics 24(3): 266–285.

40.

Ufen

(2006) Political parties in post-Suharto Indonesia: Between politik aliran and “Philippinisation”. Working Paper 37. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.

41.

Winters

(2013) Oligarchy and democracy in Indonesia. Indonesia 96: 11–33.