Although the Indian Parliament has witnessed progressive democratization in terms of representation of various sections of society, it has declined as an effective institution of accountability. Unlike in Western democracies, the decline of Indian parliament is not due to strengthening of the executive. Ironically both the executive and the parliament in India have remained weak during the ‘democratic upsurge’ era, while some non-parliamentary institutions have succeeded in asserting their autonomy. We find that existing literature on Indian parliament fails in explaining the paradox of declining parliamentary performance amidst its democratization. In this article, we highlight five such paradoxes. We bring in political parties as the main explanatory variable and argue that the changing character of political parties during the ‘democratic upsurge’ era in India lies at the heart of this debate: the emergence of new players representing sectional interests though increased representation of various sections of society, yet adversarial politics among these parties led to parliament’s decline.
AgrawalArun (2007). The Indian parliament. In KapurDeveshMehtaPratap Bhanu (Eds), Public institution of India (pp. 77–105). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
2.
AroraBalveer. (2003). The Indian parliament and democracy. In MehraAjayKueckGert W. (Eds), The Indian parliament: A comparative perspective (pp. 14–41). New Delhi: Konark Publishers.
3.
BeteilleAndre. (2011, July26>). The institutions of democracy. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(29), 75–84.
4.
BhambriCP. (2008). ‘Democracy in India’. New Delhi: National Book Trust.
5.
ChatterjeeSomnath. (2007). Status of parliamentary democracy in India. Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Lecture, New Delhi, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
6.
ChatterjeeSomnath (2010). Keeping the faith: Memoirs of a Parliamentarian. Harper Collins.
7.
ChhibberPradeep. (2012). Dynastic parties: Organization, finance, and impact. Party Politics, 19(2), 277–295.
8.
ChhibberPradeepOstermannSusan (2013). A democratic balance: Bureaucracy, political parties, and political representation. In NagelJackSmithRogers M. (Eds), Representation: Elections and beyond (forthcoming). Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
9.
ChhibberPradeepVermaRahul. (2013a, January24). No denying the family. The Indian Express.
10.
ChhibberPradeepVermaRahul (2013b, June12). Missing the real malaise of the body politic. The Indian Express.
11.
ChistiSeema. (2008, April24>). On rural development, MPs’ hearts may be full but during debate, Lok Sabha is empty. The Indian Express.
12.
DattaSaugato (2006). Television coverage and political voice: Evidence from Parliamentary Question Hour in India. MIT, Unpublished Manuscript.
13.
Editorial. (2008, February9>). Alarm bell for legislators. The Hindu.
14.
Editorial. (2009, January10>). Decline or death of parliament?Economic and Political Weekly, 44(2), 6.
15.
FlindersMatthew. (2002). Shifting the balance? Parliament, the executive and the British constitution. Political Studies, 50(1), 23–42.
16.
HewittVernon. (1994). The Prime Minister and the parliament. In JamesManor, (Ed.), Nehru to the 90s: The changing office of Prime Minister in India (pp. 48–74). New Delhi: Viking.
17.
Hindustan Times. (2008, July22>). Shame: PM wins, parliament plumbs new depths. The Hindustan Times.
18.
JaffrelotChristopheKumarSanjay (Eds). (2009). Rise of the plebeians? The changing face of Indian legislative assemblies. New Delhi: Routledge.
19.
JaitleyArun. (2012, August28>). Defending the indefensible. The Hindu.
20.
JalanBimal (2007). India’s politics: A view from backbench. New Delhi: Penguin Viking.
21.
JamesManor. (1994). Introduction. In JamesManor, (Ed.), Nehru to the 90s: The changing office of Prime Minister in India (pp.1–19). New Delhi: Viking.
22.
JayalN. G. (2006). Representing India: Ethnic diversity and the governance of public institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
JonesWH Morris. (1957). The Indian parliament. London: Allen and Unwin.
24.
KapurDeveshMehtaPratap Bhanu. (2006). The Indian parliament as an institution of accountability. Democracy, Governance and Human Rights Programme, Paper No. 23. Geneva, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
25.
KapurDeveshMehtaPratap Bhanu. (2007) (Ed.) Public Institution of India: Performance and Design. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
26.
KashyapSubhash. (1989). Our parliament. Delhi: National Book Trust.
27.
KashyapSubhash C. (2004). Executive–legislature interface in the Indian polity. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 10(2), 278–294.
28.
KaushikArunPalRupayan (2012). How representative has the Lok Sabha been?Economic and Political Weekly, 47(19), 74–78.
29.
KhaitanTarunabh. (2013). The real price of parliamentary obstruction. Seminar,642, 37–41.
30.
KornbergAllanMishlerWilliam (1976). Influence in parliament. Canada: Duke University Press.
31.
KumarSanjay. (2004). Increasing fluidity in electoral contests: Is this mere anti incumbency. In VohraRajendraPalshikarSuhas (Eds), Indian democracy: Meaning and practices (pp. 362–379). New Delhi: Sage Publications.
32.
MadhukarC. V. (2008, March18>). Is this why we sent them to parliament?The Indian Express.
33.
MalhotraG. C. (2002). The changing profile of Lok Sabha—a socio-economic study of members (1952–2002). In MalhotraG.C. (Ed.), Fifty years of Indian parliament (pp. 108–132). New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat.
34.
MalhotraInder. (2012, September7>). House in distress. The Indian Express.
35.
MalhotraInder.ManorJames (1994). Introduction. In JamesManor, (Ed.), Nehru to the 90s: The changing office of Prime Minister in India (pp. 1–19). New Delhi: Viking.
36.
MehraAjay K. (2008, February18>). Grammar of anarchy. The Indian Express.
The Indian Express. (2008, July23>). ‘Remains of the day’. The Indian Express.
39.
The Indian Express. (2011, February25>). A battle for parliament. The Indian Express.
40.
The Indian Express. (2013, June20>). A great deal of agreement. The Indian Express.
41.
NarayannJai Prakash (2003). Elections and representational legitimacy. In MehraAjayKueckGert W. (Eds), The Indian parliament: A comparative perspective (pp. 86–136). New Delhi: Konark Publishers.
42.
NortonPhilip (Ed.). (1985). Parliament in the 1980s. United Kingdom: Basil Blackwell Publications.
43.
PalshikarSuhasYadavYogendra. (2009). Principal state level contests and derivative national choices: Electoral trends in 2004–09. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(06), 55–62.
44.
PattersonSamuel. (1989). Understanding the British parliament. Political Studies, 38(4), 449–469.
45.
PrakashSurya A. (2003). Parliamentary questions as instrument of accountability. In MehraAjayKueckGert W. (Eds), The Indian parliament: A comparative perspective (pp. 233–268). New Delhi: Konark Publishers.
46.
Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Vice President’s Secretariat. (2008, Feburary4>). Vice President inaugurates 14th all India whips conference. Available at: http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=35111
47.
Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Vice President’s Secretariat. (2012, May13>). Address of Vice President and Chairman Rajya Sabha Shri M. Hamid Ansari at the Historic Commemoration Function of the 60th Anniversary of the first sitting of Parliament. Available at: http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=83690
48.
RubinoffArthur (1998). The decline of India’s Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(4), 13–33.
49.
RubinoffArthur (1996). India’s new subject based Parliamentary Standing Committees. Asian Survey, 36(7), 723–737.
50.
SamuelJohn, & Jagadananda. (2003). Social Watch India: Citizens report on governance and development. Pune: NCAS.
51.
SethiHarsh (2008). (ed.) State of Democracy in South Asia. A Report by the SDSA Team. (pp. 302). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
52.
ShankarB.L.RodriguesValerian. (2011). The Indian parliament: A democracy at work. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
53.
ShastriSandeep (2003). Parliamentary committees in India and legislative control over administration. In MehraAjayKueckGert W. (Eds), The Indian parliament: A comparative perspective (pp. 206–232). New Delhi: Konark Publishers.
54.
ShastriSandeep (1998). Department Related Standing Committee in Indian Parliament: An assessment. The Indian Journal of Public Administration, 54(2), 184–200.
55.
GuptaShekhar. (2012, September18>). ‘For 15–20 years now, we have been attending the elongated funeral rites of the parliamentary system’. The Indian Express. Available at: http://www.indianexpress.com/story-print/1004159/
56.
ShourieArun (2007). The parliamentary system: What we have made of it what we can make of it. New Delhi: Rupa and Company.
57.
SparyCarole. (2010). Disrupting rituals of debate in the Indian parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(3), 338–351.
58.
SDSA Team. (2008). State of democracy in South Asia: A report. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
59.
Statistical Handbook 2012. (2013). Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, Government of India. New Delhi.
60.
PrakashSurya A. (1995). What ails Indian parliament. New Delhi: Harper and Collins.
61.
The Indian Express (2012, May14>). On 60th anniversary, MPs unite in call to uphold ‘dignity, supremacy’ of House. The Indian Express. Available at: http://www.indianexpress.com/story-print/949009/
62.
UrbinatiN. (2000). Representation as advocacy: A study of democratic deliberation. Political Theory, 28(6), 758–786.
63.
VohraN. (1993). Vohra Committee Report. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi.
64.
WallackJessica (2008). India’s parliament as a representative institution. India Review, 7(2), 91–114.
65.
YadavYogendra (2004). The elusive mandate of 2004. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(51), 5383–5398.
66.
YadavY. (2000). Understanding the second democratic upsurge: Trends of Bahujan participation in electoral politics in the 1990s. In FrankelFrancine R.HasanZoyaBhargavaRajeevAroraBalveer (Eds), Transforming India: Social and political dynamics of democracy (pp. 120–145). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
