Intergenerational transmission of civil servants is a common phenomenon throughout the world, but the formation mechanisms behind the phenomenon are not well documented. Leveraging causal mediation analyses and the Beijing College Students Panel Survey, this paper investigates the phenomenon of intergenerational transmission of civil servants and its formation mechanisms. The results indicate that civil servants’ children are more likely to aspire to follow their parents’ career choices, and are less likely to aspire to become professional technicians, employees, and business managers. Further analyses indicate that the factors influencing civil servants’ children to follow their parents’ career choice are not their family income or parents’ education, but rather their family's political capital; and not student leadership experience, social skills, or career-related preferences and motivations, but rather their status as Communist Party of China members.
AlanSCorekciogluG (2023) Improving workplace climate in large corporations: A clustered randomized intervention. Quarterly Journal of Economics138(1): 151–203.
2.
AsakoYIidaTMatsubayashiT, et al. (2015) Dynastic politicians: Theory and evidence from Japan. Japanese Journal of Political Science16(1): 5–32.
3.
AsankulovaZThomsenS (2024) Studying abroad experience and the wages of females. Higher Education87: 401–431.
BreaughJHammerschmidG (2020) Understanding public servants from a global perspective. In: SullivanHDickinsonHHendersonH (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.1–20.
CameronCTrivediP (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ChenSGeE (2022) The anti-corruption campaign and the inter-generational transmission of working in bureaucracy: evidence from China.
12.
ChenZCaoY (2016) Chinese Private corporate philanthropy: Social responsibility, legitimacy strategy, and the role of political capital. Chinese Sociological Review48(2): 108–136.
13.
ChengXWangJChenK (2022) Does villager social capital hinder poverty targeting? Evidence from poverty-stricken county of western China. China Economic Review71: 101728.
14.
ConstantAZimmermannK (2003) Occupational choice across generations. IZA DP No. 975.
15.
CorakMPirainoP (2011) The intergenerational transmission of employers. Journal of Labor Economics29(1): 37–68.
DavisDBMendozaRUYapJK (2024) Corruption risk and political dynasties: Exploring the links using public procurement data in the Philippines. Economics of Governance25: 81–109.
18.
DehejiaRWahbaS (1999) Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association94(448): 1053–1062.
19.
DenhardtJDenhardtR (2015) The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review75(5): 664–672.
20.
DicksonBRubleeM (2000) Membership has its privileges: The socioeconomic characteristics of communist party members in urban China. Comparative Political Studies33(1): 87–112.
DuQ (2023b) China’s 2024 national civil servant exams begin with candidates, vacancies hitting record high. Global Times, 26 November. Available at: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202311/1302541.shtml (accessed 2 April 2025).
23.
DuS (2024) Planning for a delay? Horizontal stratification in higher education and the intended age at marriage. Higher Education88: 279–295.
24.
EgertonM (1997) Occupational inheritance: the role of cultural capital and gender. Work, Employment and Society11(2): 263–282.
25.
EncarnacionTTademE (2016) Political dynasties in the Philippines: Persistent patterns, perennial problems. South East Asia Research24(3): 328–340.
26.
ErmischJJänttiMSmeedingT (2012) From Parents to Children: The Intergenerational Transmission of Advantage. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
FerrieJ (2005) History lessons: The end of American exceptionalism? Mobility in the United States since 1850. Journal of Economic Perspectives19(3): 199–215.
28.
FinanFOlkenBPandeR (2015) The personnel economics of the state. NBER Working paper No. 21825.
29.
FivaJSmithD (2018) Political dynasties and the incumbency advantage in party-centered environments. American Political Science Review112(3): 706–712.
30.
GalassiGKollDMayrL (2021) The intergenerational correlation of employment: mothers as role models. IZA working paper.
GeysBSmithD (2017) Political dynasties in democracies: Causes, consequences and remaining puzzles. Economic Journal127(605): F446–F454.
33.
GomesMCunhaMSouzaS, et al. (2023) Reproduction of parental occupations, income and poverty in Brazil. Social Indicators Research167: 339–362.
34.
GoodmanD (2014) Class in Contemporary China. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
35.
GuestALandaleNMcCannJ (1989) Intergenerational occupational mobility in the late 19th century United States. Social Forces68(2): 351–378.
36.
HaeckCLalibertéJ-W (2023) Careers and intergenerational income mobility. IZA DP No. 16273.
37.
HanushekE (1992) The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy100(1): 84–117.
38.
HellersteinJMorrillM (2011) Dads and daughters: The changing impact of fathers on women’s occupational choices. Journal of Human Resources46(2): 333–372.
39.
HindRWirthT (1969) The effect of university experience on occupational choice among undergraduates. Sociology of Education42(1): 50–70.
40.
HoutM (2018) Americans’ occupational status reflects the status of both of their parents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(38): 9527–9532.
41.
HuAWuX (2019a) Parental education and college students’ attitudes toward love: Survey evidence from China. Journal of Marriage and Family81: 584–600.
42.
HuAWuX (2019b) Science or liberal arts? Cultural capital and college major choice in China. The British Journal of Sociology70: 190–213.
43.
ImaiK (2011) Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review105: 765–789.
44.
ImaiKKeeleLTingleyD (2010) A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods15: 309–334.
45.
ImaiKKeeleLYamamotoT (2010) Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statistical Science25(1): 51–71.
46.
JacintoAGershensonS (2021) The intergenerational transmission of teaching. American Educational Research Journal58(3): 635–672.
47.
JenseniusF (2018) Kinship in Indian politics. In: HaugevikKNeumannI (eds) Kinship in International Relations. London, UK: Routledge, pp.138–153.
48.
KenawasY (2015) The rise of political dynasties in a democratic society. The Equality Development and Globalization Studies (EDGS) Working Paper No. 30, Northwestern University.
49.
LaiWLiX (2024) China’s anticorruption campaign and civil servant fever. Journal of Law and Economics67(2): 479–516.
50.
LentRBrownSTalleyrandR, et al. (2002) Career choice barriers, supports, and coping strategies: College students’ experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior60: 61–72.
51.
LiA (2023) The marketization of educational resources and individual choice: Examining the heterogeneous treatment effect of private tutoring in middle schools. Chinese Journal of Sociology9(2): 250–282.
LiZFengS (2018) Overseas study experience and students’ attitudes toward China: Evidence from the Beijing college students panel survey. Chinese Sociological Review50(1): 27–52.
54.
LiuX (2006) A power generation explanation of the mechanism of social stratification in contemporary China. Social Sciences in China3(3): 5–22.
55.
LongJFerrieJ (2013) Intergenerational occupational mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850. American Economic Review103(4): 1109–1137.
56.
LuPFanX (2021) Cadre parents and their entrepreneur children? The dual-track intergenerational reproduction of elites in China: 1978–2010. The Journal of Chinese Sociology8: 1–19.
57.
LuX (2002) Research report on social class in contemporary China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
58.
LuYYeungW-JLiuJ, et al. (2019) Health of left-behind children in China: Evidence from mediation analysis. Chinese Journal of Sociology5(4): 431–452.
59.
MendozaRBejaEVenidaV, et al. (2016) Political dynasties and poverty: measurement and evidence of linkages in the Philippines. Oxford Development Studies44(2): 189–201.
60.
MHRSS (2022) Occupational Classification Dictionary of the People‘s Republic of China. Beijing: China Labor and Social Security Publishing House.
61.
MishkinE (2021) Gender and sibling dynamics in the intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurship. Management Science67(10): 5969–6627.
62.
MolCCaarlsKSouto-OteroM (2021) International student mobility and labour market outcomes: An investigation of the role of level of study, type of mobility, and international prestige hierarchies. Higher Education82: 1145–1171.
63.
PerryJWiseL (1990) The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review50(3): 367–373.
64.
RitzABrewerGNeumannO (2016) Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review76(3): 414–426.
65.
RosenbaumPRubinDB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika70(1): 41–55.
66.
RosenbaumPRubinDB (1984) Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association79(387): 516–524.
67.
RossiMNotesA (2017) Self-perpetuation of political power. Economic Journal127(605): F455–F473.
68.
Sánchez-SánchezNPuenteA (2021) Public versus private job satisfaction. Is there a trade-off between wages and stability?Public Organization Review21: 47–67.
69.
SchulzLRollwageaMDolanaR, et al. (2020) Dogmatism manifests in lowered information search under uncertainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(49): 31527–31534.
70.
SchwardmannPTripodiEderWeeleJ (2022) Self-persuasion: Evidence from field experiments at international debating competitions. American Economic Review112(4): 1118–1146.
71.
SewellWShahV (1968) Parents’ education and children’s educational aspirations and achievements. American Sociological Review33(2): 191–209.
72.
ShiL (2022) Changes in intergenerational social mobility in China: An multiple-mechanism approach. Sociological Studies37(5): 156–178+229 (in Chinese).
73.
SongXMasseyCRolfK, et al. (2020) Long-term decline in intergenerational mobility in the United States since the 1850s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(1): 251–258.
74.
SonnertG (2009) Parents who influence their children to become scientists: Effects of gender and parental education. Social Studies of Science39(6): 927–941.
75.
SoonJ-JLeeALimH-E, et al. (2020) Cubicles or corner offices? Effects of academic performance on university graduates’ employment likelihood and salary. Studies in Higher Education45(6): 1233–1248.
76.
TanHGuoCZhouY (2017) Cadre children and cognitive function of parents in China: The value of political connection. Chinese Sociological Review49: 1–25.
77.
TusalemRPe-AguirreJ (2013) The effect of political dynasties on effective democratic governance: Evidence from the Philippines. Asian Politics & Policy5(3): 359–386.
78.
vanCoppenolleB (2017) Political dynasties in the UK house of commons: The null effect of narrow electoral selection. Legislative Studies Quarterly42(3): 449–475.
79.
WalderAHuS (2009) Revolution, reform, and status inheritance: Urban China, 1949–1996. American Journal of Sociology114(5): 1395–1427.
80.
WangGXuRZhangX (2025) The making of “exam ronins”: Young people’s desire for public service jobs in China. Journal of Youth Studies28(1): 1–16.
81.
WhyteM (1975) Inequality and stratification in China. The China Quarterly64: 684–711.
82.
WhyteM (2010) One Country, Two Societies: Rural-Urban Inequality in Contemporary China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83.
WuX (2017) Higher education, elite formation and social stratification in contemporary China: Preliminary findings from the Beijing college students panel survey. Chinese Journal of Sociology3(1): 3–31.
84.
WuX (2019) Inequality and social stratification in postsocialist China. Annual Review of Sociology45: 363–382.
85.
WuYZhouD (2015) Women’s labor force participation in urban China, 1990–2010. Chinese Sociological Review47(47): 314–342.
86.
XieYDongHZhouX, et al. (2022) Trends in social mobility in postrevolution China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119(7): e2117471119.
87.
XueXChengM (2017) Social capital and health in China: Exploring the mediating role of lifestyle. BMC Public Health17(863): 1–11.
88.
YanY (2021) The politics of moral crisis in contemporary China. The China Journal85: 1–25.
89.
ZhangCXieY (2016) Ethnic enclaves revisited: Effects on earnings of migrant workers in China. Chinese Journal of Sociology2(2): 214–234.
90.
ZhangYHannumEWangM (2008) Gender-based employment and income differences in urban China: Considering the contributions of marriage and parenthood. Social Forces86(4): 1529–1560.
91.
ZhangYWangY (2021) Inequality and access to elite universities in China: Reexamining the interacting multiple capitals model. Studies in Higher Education46(9): 1881–1893.
92.
ZhaoJLuM (2009) The contribution of guanxi to income inequality in rural China and a cross-regional comparison: A regression-based decomposition. China Economic Quarterly9(1): 363–390.
93.
ZhouXXieY (2019) Market transition, industrialization, and social mobility trends in postrevolution China. American Journal of Sociology124(6): 1810–1847.
94.
ZhouXXieY (2020) Heterogeneous treatment effects in the presence of self-selection: A propensity score perspective. Sociological Methodology50(1): 350–385.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
