This paper examines the life satisfaction of Chinese mainland migrants compared to that of Hong Kong natives, using microdata from the 2011 Hong Kong Panel Study of Social Dynamics (HKPSSD) and aggregated neighborhood data from the 2011 Hong Kong Census. We find that Chinese mainland migrants have significantly lower life satisfaction than Hong Kong natives. As neighborhood socioeconomic status rises, life satisfaction increases, yet the positive effect is smaller for Chinese mainland migrants than for Hong Kong natives. Relative household income in the neighborhood is also positively related to life satisfaction, but the effect is larger for Chinese mainland migrants, suggesting that relative status affects life satisfaction much more for Chinese mainland migrants than for Hong Kong natives.
AldersonASKatz-GerroT (2016) Compared to whom? Inequality, social comparison, and happiness in the United States. Social Forces95(1): 25–54.
2.
AlesinaADi TellaRMacCullochR (2004) Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different?Journal of Public Economics88(9): 2009–2042.
3.
BlanchflowerDGOswaldAJ (2004) Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics88(7–8): 1359–1386.
4.
BlinderAS (1973) Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources8(4): 436–455.
5.
CascianoRMasseyDS (2012) Neighborhood disorder and anxiety symptoms: New evidence from a quasi-experimental study. Health and Place18(2): 180–190.
6.
Census and Statistics Department, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China (2011) Population. Available at: https://www.census2011.gov.hk/en/index.html (accessed 17 April 2020).
7.
ChiuSWKChoiSYPTingKF (2005) Getting ahead in the capitalist paradise: Migration from China and socioeconomic attainment in colonial Hong Kong. International Migration Review39(1): 203–227.
8.
ChouKL (2013) Familial effect on child poverty in Hong Kong immigrant families. Social Indicators Research113(1): 183–195.
9.
ClarkAESenikC (2010) Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. Economic Journal120(544): 573–594.
10.
ClarkAEFrijtersPShieldsMA (2008) Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature46(1): 95–144.
11.
ColemanJS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94(Suppl.): S95–S120.
12.
DienerEEmSLucasRE, et al. (1999) Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin125(2): 276–302.
13.
Diez RouxA (2001) Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. American Journal of Public Health91(11): 1783–1789.
14.
EasterlinRA (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth89: 89–125.
15.
EasterlinRA (1995) Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization27(1): 35–47.
16.
EasterlinRA (2001) Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal111(473): 465–484.
17.
FernandezRMKulikJC (1981) A multilevel model of life satisfaction: Effects of individual characteristics and neighborhood composition. American Sociological Review46(6): 840–850.
18.
Ferrer-i-CarbonellA (2005) Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics89(5–6): 997–1019.
19.
FirebaughGSchroederM (2009) Does your neighbor’s income affect your happiness?American Journal of Sociology115(3): 805–831.
20.
GaryTLStarkSALaveistTA (2007) Neighborhood characteristics and mental health among African Americans and whites living in a racially integrated urban community. Health and Place13(2): 569–575.
21.
HagertyMR (2000) Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78(4): 764–771.
22.
HaoPSliuzasRGeertmanS (2011) The development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen. Habitat International35(2): 214–224.
23.
HillTDRossCEAngelRJ (2005) Neighborhood disorder, psychophysiological distress, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior46(2): 170–186.
24.
HsuC-YChangS-SYipP (2017) Individual-, household- and neighbourhood-level characteristics associated with life satisfaction: A multilevel analysis of a population-based sample from Hong Kong. Urban Studies54(16): 3700–3717.
25.
HughesMThomasME (1998) The continuing significance of race revisited: A study of race, class, and quality of life in America, 1972 to 1996. American Sociological Review63(6): 785–795.
26.
JannB (2008) The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. Stata Journal8(4): 453–479.
27.
JargowskyPA (2009) Immigrants and neighbourhoods of concentrated poverty: Assimilation or stagnation?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies35(7): 1129–1151.
28.
KlingJRLiebmanJBKatzLF (2007) Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica75(1): 83–119.
29.
KniesGNandiAPlattL (2016) Life satisfaction, ethnicity and neighbourhoods: Is there an effect of neighbourhood ethnic composition on life satisfaction?Social Science Research60: 110–124.
30.
KnightJSongLNGunatilakaR (2009) Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China. China Economic Review20(4): 635–649.
31.
LamKCLiuPW (2002) Earnings divergence of immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics20(1): 86–104.
32.
LatkinCACurryAD (2003) Stressful neighborhoods and depression: A prospective study of the impact of neighborhood disorder. Journal of Health and Social Behavior44(1): 34–44.
33.
LeventhalTBrooks-GunnJ (2000) The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin126(2): 309–337.
34.
LeydenKM (2003) Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health93(9): 1546–1551.
35.
LinNYeXEnselXM (1999) Social support and depressed mood: A structural analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior40(4): 344–359.
36.
LiuP-WZhangJChongS-C (2004) Occupational segregation and wage differentials between natives and immigrants: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Development Economics73(1): 395–413.
37.
LiuYHeSWuF, et al. (2010) Urban villages under China’s rapid urbanization: Unregulated assets and transitional neighbourhoods. Habitat International34(2): 135–144.
38.
LoganJRZhangWChunyuMD (2015) Emergent ghettos: Black neighborhoods in New York and Chicago, 1880–1940. American Journal of Sociology120(4): 1055–1094.
39.
LuYWangF (2013) From general discrimination to segmented inequality: Migration and inequality in urban China. Social Science Research42(6): 1443–1456.
40.
LudwigJDuncanGJGennetianLA, et al. (2012) Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults. Science337(6101): 1505–1510.
41.
LuttmerEFP (2005) Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics120(3): 963–1002.
42.
MasseyDSAkreshIR (2006) Immigrant intentions and mobility in a global economy: The attitudes and behavior of recently arrived US immigrants. Social Science Quarterly87(5): 954–971.
43.
MasseyDSDentonNA (1987) Trends in the residential segregation of blacks, Hispanics, and Asians: 1970–1980. American Sociological Review52(6): 802–825.
44.
MengXZhangJ (2001) The two-tier labor market in urban China: Occupational segregation and wage differentials between urban residents and rural migrants in Shanghai. Journal of Comparative Economics29(3): 485–504.
45.
OaxacaR (1973) Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review14(3): 693–709.
46.
PavotWDienerE (1993) Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment5(2): 164–172.
47.
RossCReynoldsJGeisK (2000) The contingent meaning of neighborhood stability for residents’ psychological well-being. American Sociological Review65(4): 581–597.
48.
SafiM (2010) Immigrants’ life satisfaction in Europe: Between assimilation and discrimination. European Sociological Review26(2): 159–176.
49.
SampsonRJRaudenbushW (1999) Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology105(3): 603–651.
50.
SampsonRJRaudenbushSWEarlsF (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science277(5328): 918–924.
51.
SenikC (2004) When information dominates comparison — learning from Russian subjective panel data. Journal of Public Economics88(9–10): 2099–2123.
52.
ThomasMEHughesM (1986) The continuing significance of race: A study of race, class, and quality of life in America, 1972–1985. American Sociological Review51(6): 830–841.
53.
WuX (2016) Hong Kong Panel study of social dynamics (HKPSSD): Research designs and data overview. Chinese Sociological Review48(2): 162–184.
54.
XuDWuX (2017) The rise of the second generation: Aspirations, motivations and academic success of Chinese immigrants’ children in Hong Kong. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies43(7): 1164–1189.
55.
ZhangLZhaoSXBTianJP (2003) Self-help in housing and chengzhongcun in China’s urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27(4): 912–937.
56.
ZhangZ (2014) Contingent transition to triumph: Socioeconomic attainments of Chinese immigrants’ children in Hong Kong. Chinese Sociological Review46(4): 68–88.
57.
ZhangZWuX (2011) Social change, cohort quality and economic adaptation of Chinese immigrants in Hong Kong, 1991–2006. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal20(1): 1–29.
58.
ZhangZYeH (2018) Mode of migration, age at arrival, and occupational attainment of immigrants from mainland China to Hong Kong. Chinese Sociological Review50(1): 83–112.
