Charity in China is deeply rooted in the guanxi tradition and mainly involves strong ties. In the wake of emerging social media, online charity (also known as micro-charity) has become increasingly popular over the past few years. People’s participation in micro-charity is afforded by the ubiquitous connectivity of social media. Their charitable behaviours are steered towards connecting, communicating, and eventually contributing to the formation of a powerful digital environment, which essentially diffuses the awareness of responsibility and commitment. Thus, the affordance of connectivity makes it possible for Chinese people to break from the traditional tightly-bounded close ties towards loosely-bounded networks in micro-charity. In addition, by drawing on some college students’ experiences, this article indicates that connectivity affords people’s active engagement with micro-charity, which in turn fosters their distinct subjectivity pertaining to a social life that is intertwined with new media technology.
Andreoni J, Rao JM and Trachtman H (2011) Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. Working Paper No. w17648, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA. Available at: http://econweb.ucsd.edu/∼jandreon/WorkingPapers/AndreoniRaoTrachtman.pdf (accessed 5 March 2016).
2.
AngelopuloG (2014) Connectivity. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research40(3): 209–222.
3.
BeerD (2009) Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society11(6): 985–1002.
4.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
5.
BianYJHuangXB (2015) The guanxi influence on occupational attainment in urban China. Chinese Journal of Sociology1(3): 307–332.
6.
ChenCCChenY-RXinKR (2004) Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science15(2): 200–209.
7.
ChuS-CKimY (2011) Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising30(1): 47–75.
CouldryNVan DijckJ (2015) Researching social media as if the social mattered. Social Media + Society1(2): 1–7.
10.
CrooksKRSanjayanM (2006) Connectivity Conservation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DuLQianLFengY (2014) Influences of altruistic motivation, shared vision, and perceived accessibility on microcharity behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal42(10): 1639–1650.
12.
FeiX (1992) From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13.
HaythornthwaiteC (2005) Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society8(2): 125–147.
14.
HodkinsonP (2015) Bedrooms and beyond: Youth, identity and privacy on social network sites. New Media & Society19(2): 272–288.
15.
HwangK (1987) Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology92(4): 944–974.
16.
LaceteraNMacisMMeleA (2016) Viral altruism? Charitable giving and social contagion in online networks. Sociological Science3: 202–238.
17.
LinJSiSX (2010) Can guanxi be a problem? Contexts, ties, and some unfavorable consequences of social capital in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management27(3): 561–581.
18.
LiuW (2015) Good people and good deeds: Chinese view on charity (in Chinese). Social Science Front37(8): 188–196.
19.
LiuX (2014) Cha Xu Ge Ju as social capital for the growth of agricultural Enterprises: A case study of Wen’s group. Anthropologist18(1): 93–102.
20.
LuJQiuY (2013) Microblogging and social change in China. Asian Perspective37(3): 305–331.
21.
LuoSLiP (2010) A sociological analysis on the rareness of charity consciousness in the Chinese public (in Chinese). Journal of Beijing Youth Politics College19(1): 48–51.
22.
MorozovE (2012) The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom, New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
23.
NichollsDAAtkinsonKBjorbækmoWSet al.(2016) Connectivity: An emerging concept for physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice32(3): 159–170.
24.
ReyniersDBhallaR (2013) Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving. Judgment and Decision Making8(1): 7–15.
25.
ShierMLHandyF (2012) Understanding online donor behavior: The role of donor characteristics, perceptions of the internet, website and program, and influence from social networks. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing17(3): 219–230.
26.
TanDSnellRS (2002) The third eye: Exploring guanxi and relational morality in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics41(4): 361–384.
27.
TapscottDWilliamsAD (2006) Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything, New York, NY: Portfolio.
28.
TsuiASFarhJ-LL (1997) Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations24(1): 56–79.
29.
TufekciZWilsonC (2012) Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication62(2): 363–379.
30.
UnhelkarB (2009) Handbook of Research in Mobile Business: Technical, Methodological and Social Perspectives, Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
31.
Van DijckJ (2009) Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture, & Society31(1): 41–58.
32.
Van DijckJ (2010) Flickr and the culture of connectivity: Sharing views, experiences, memories. Memory Studies4(4): 401–415.
33.
Van DijckJ (2011) Facebook as a tool for producing sociality and connectivity. Television & New Media13(2): 160–176.
34.
Van DijckJ (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
Van DijckJPoellT (2013) Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication1(1): 2–14.
36.
WellmanB (2001) Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. In: GoosGHartmanisJLeeuwenJ (eds) Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 10–25.
WiepkingPBreezeB (2012) Feeling poor, acting stingy: The effect of money perceptions on charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing17(1): 13–24.
39.
XuL (2005) A Research Study on the Development of Charity in China (in Chinese), Beijing, China: Chinese Society Press.
40.
YanMCHuangXFosterKWet al.(2007) Charity development in China: An overview. Asia Pacific Journal of SocialWork and Development17(1): 79–94.
41.
YangK-S (1993) Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In: ChengLYCheungFMCChenCN (eds) Psychotherapy for the Chinese: Selected Papers from the First International Conference, Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, pp. 19–56.
42.
YangT (2015) The Annual Report on China’s Philanthropy Development (in Chinese), Beijing, China: Social Science Academic Press.
43.
YangY (2009) Guanxilization or categorization: Psychological mechanisms contributing to the formation of the Chinese concept of ‘us.’. Social Sciences in China30(2): 49–67.
44.
ZhengYYuA (2016) Affordances of social media in collective action: The case of Free Lunch for Children in China. Information Systems Journal26(3): 289–313.
