Standardization of social measures creates common understanding, supports the accumulation of evidence, and establishes comparability. It also, necessarily, entails loss of information, which is especially costly in comparisons across populations. This essay offers numerous examples of social measures and metrics to illustrate the complex trade-offs between standardization and construct validity.
AlexanderKL (1998) Letter to the editor. Psychology in the Schools35: 402–404.
2.
AlexanderKLEntwisleDRDauberSL (1994) On the Success of Failure: A Reassessment of the Effects of Retention in the Primary Grades, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AlexanderKLEntwisleDRDauberSL (2003) On the Success of Failure: A Reassessment of the Effects of Retention in the Primary Grades, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BalassaB (1964) The purchasing-power parity doctrine: A reappraisal. The Journal of Political Economy72: 584–596.
5.
BardERobertsonDSoraceA (1996) Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language72: 32–68.
6.
BettsJRDanenbergA (2002) School accountability in California: An early evaluation. Brookings Papers on Education Policy 5, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press, pp. 123–180.
7.
BlauPMDuncanOD (1967) The American Occupational Structure, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
8.
BourqueML (2004) A history of the National Assessment Governing Board. In: JonesLVOlkinI (eds) The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation in cooperation with the American Educational Research Association, pp. 201–231.
9.
BrinkleyA (2001) Employment Act of 1946. In: BoyerPS (ed.) The Oxford Companion to United States History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
ChettyRHendrenNKlineP (2014a) Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics129: 1553–1623.
11.
ChettyRHendrenNKlineP (2014b) Is the United States Still a Land of Opportunity? Recent Trends in Intergenerational Mobility. American Economic Review104: 141–147.
12.
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, Division of Policy and Global Affairs and Institute of Medicine (2009) Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
13.
CookTD (1992) Meta-Analysis for Explanation: A Casebook, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
CooperHM (1998) Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15.
CooperHMHedgesLV (1994) The Handbook of Research Synthesis, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
CountsG (1925) The social status of occupations: A problem in vocational guidance. The School Review33: 16–27.
17.
CowanCDHauserRMKominskiRA (2012) Improving the Measurement of Socioeconomic Status for the National Assessment of Educational Progress: A Theoretical Foundation, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
18.
CoxonADaviesPMJonesCL (1978) The Images of Occupational Prestige: A Study in Social Cognition, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
19.
DuncanOD (1961) A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In: ReissAJJr. (ed.) Occupations and Social Status, New York: Free Press, pp. 109–138.
20.
DuncanOD (1984) Notes on Social Measurement: Historical and Critical, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
DuncanOHodgeR (1963) Education and occupational mobility a regression analysis. The American Journal of Sociology68: 629–644.
22.
EnglandPDunnD (1988) Evaluating work and comparable worth. Annual Review of Sociology14: 227–248.
23.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJH (1985) A Model of Core Social Fluidity in Industrial Nations, Mannheim, Germany: Institut fur Sozialwissenschaften, Universitat Mannheim.
24.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJH (1987a) Commonality and variation in social fluidity in industrial nations. Part I: A model for evaluating the ‘JFH Hypothesis’. European Sociological Review3: 54–77.
25.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJH (1987b) Commonality and variation in social fluidity in industrial nations. Part II: The model of core social fluidity applied. European Sociological Review3: 145–166.
26.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJH (1992) The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
27.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJHPortocareroL (1982) Social fluidity in industrial nations: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology33: 1–34.
28.
FeathermanDLHauserRM (1978) Opportunity and Change, New York: Academic Press.
29.
FeathermanDLJonesFLHauserRM (1975) Assumptions of social mobility research in the U.S.: The case of occupational status. Social Science Research4: 329–360.
30.
GanzeboomHBDe GraafPMTreimanDJ (1992) A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research21: 1–56.
31.
GlaserRLinnRLBohrnstedtGW (1993a) Setting Performance Standards for Student Achievement, Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.
32.
GlaserRLinnRLBohrnstedtGW (1993b) The Trial State Assessment: Prospects and Realities, Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.
33.
GreenhouseJBFrommDIyengarS (1990) The making of a meta-analysis: A quantitative review of the aphasia treatment literature. In: WachterKWStrafML (eds) The Future of Meta-Analysis, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 29–46.
34.
Grol-Prokopczyk H, Freese J and Hauser RM (2011) Anchors—A Way? Using Anchoring Vignettes to Assess Group Differences in Self-Rated Health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 52(2): 246--261.
35.
HalabyCN (1993) Reply to Wright. American Sociological Review58: 35–36.
36.
HalabyCNWeakliemDL (1993) Ownership and authority in the earnings function: Alternative specifications. American Sociological Review58: 16–30.
37.
HallerABillsD (1979) Occupational prestige hierarchies: Theory and evidence. Contemporary Sociology8: 721–734.
38.
HallerAHolsingerD (1972) Variations in occupational prestige hierarchies: Brazilian data. American Journal of Sociology77: 941–956.
39.
HallerALewisD (1966) The hypothesis of intersocietal similarity in occupational prestige hierarchies. American Journal of Sociology. 210–216.
40.
HamblinR (1971) Ratio measurement for the social sciences. Social Forces50: 191–206.
41.
HamblinR (1974) Social attitudes: Magnitude measurement and theory. In: BlalockJr. HM (ed.) Measurement in the Social Sciences: Theories and Strategies, Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co, pp. 61–120.
42.
HaugMRSussmanMB (1971) The indiscriminate state of social class measurement. Social Forces49: 549–563.
43.
HauserPM (1964) Labor force. In: FarisREL (ed.) Handbook of Modern Sociology, Chicago: Rand McNally & Co, pp. 160–190.
44.
HauserRM (1982) Occupational status in the 19th and 20th centuries. Historical Methods15: 111–126.
45.
HauserRM (1987) Sharing data: It’s time for ASA Journals to follow the folkways of a Scientific Sociology. American Sociological Review52(6): vi–viii.
46.
HauserRM (2002) Comment on ‘School Accountability in California: An Early Evaluation,' by Julian R. Betts and Anne Danenberg. In: RavitchD (ed.) Brookings Papers on Education Policy 5, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press, pp. 184–197.
47.
HauserRM (2005) In: AlexanderKLEntwistleDRDauberSL (eds.) Book Review: On the Success of Failure, a Reassessment of the Effects of Retention in the Primary School Grades. Alexander KL, Entwistle DR and Dauber SL (eds), 2nd edn, New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
HauserRMFeathermanDL (1977) The Process of Stratification: Trends and Analyses, New York: Academic Press.
49.
HauserRMLoganJA (1992) How not to measure intergenerational occupational persistence. American Journal of Sociology97: 1689–1711.
50.
HauserRMWarrenJR (1997) Socioeconomic indexes for occupations: A review, update, and critique. In: RafteryAE (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1997, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, pp. 177–298.
51.
HauserRMWarrenJRHuangM-H (2000) Occupational status, education, and social mobility in the meritocracy. In: ArrowKBowlesSDurlaufS (eds) Meritocracy and Economic Inequality, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 179–229.
52.
HeckmanJPolachekS (1974) Empirical evidence on the functional form of the earnings-schooling relationship. Journal of the American Statistical Association69: 350–354.
53.
HershbergTKatzMGlascoL (1974) Occupation and ethnicity in five nineteenth century cities: A collaborative inquiry. Historical Methods Newsletter7: 174–216.
54.
HodgeRWSiegelPMRossiPH (1964) Occupational prestige in the United States, 1925–63. American Journal of Sociology70: 286–302.
55.
HollingsheadAB (1957) Two Factor Index of Social Position, New Haven, CT: Yale University.
56.
HollingsheadAB (1971) Commentary on ‘The Indiscriminate State of Social Class Measurement’. Social Forces49: 563–567.
57.
HollingsheadABRedlichFC (1958) Social Class and Mental Illness, New York: Wiley.
58.
HoutMHauserRM (1992) Symmetry and hierarchy in social mobility: A methodological analysis of the CASMIN model of class mobility. European-Sociological-Review8(3): 239–266.
59.
HunterJESchmidtFL (2004) Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
InkelesARossiP (1956) National comparisons of occupational prestige. The American Journal of Sociology61: 329–339.
61.
JencksCSPermanLRainwaterL (1988) What is a good job? A new measure of labor market success. American Journal of Sociology93: 1322–1357.
62.
JonesLVOlkinI (2004) The Nation’s Report Card: Evolution and Perspectives, Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation in cooperation with the American Educational Research Association.
63.
KempS (1991) Magnitude estimation of the utility of public goods. Journal of Applied Psychology76: 533–540.
64.
KingGMurrayCJLSalomonJA (2004) Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of survey research. American Political Science Review98: 191–207.
65.
KirschIS. Educational Testing Service and National Center for Education Statistics (1993) Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey, Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
66.
KirschISKolstadAJ (2001) Technical Report and Data File User’s Manual for the 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey, Washington, DC, Jessup, MD: U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
67.
KlatzkySRHodgeRW (1971) A canonical correlation analysis of occupational mobility. Journal of the American Statistical Association66: 16–22.
68.
KrausVSchildEOHodgeRW (1978) Occupational prestige in the collective conscience. Social Forces56: 900–918.
69.
Krieger N, Williams DR and Moss NE (1997) Measuring social class in U.S. public health research: Concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. In: Fielding JE, Lave LB and Starfield B (eds) Annual Review of Public Health, 1997, Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 341–378.
70.
LairdN (1990) A discussion of the aphasia study. In: WachterKWStrafML (eds) The Future of Meta-Analysis, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 47–52.
71.
LiberatosPLinkBGKelseyJL (1988) The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiological Reviews10: 87–121.
72.
LinnR (2003) Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher32: 3–13.
73.
McEwenB (1998) Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. The New England Journal of Medicine338: 171–179.
74.
McEwenB (2000) Allostasis and allostatic load implications for neuropsychopharmacology. Neuropsychopharmacology22: 108–124.
75.
McEwenBSeemanT (1999) Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress: Elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load. Annals-New York Academy of Sciences896: 30–47.
76.
McEwenBStellarE (1993) Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Archives of Internal Medicine153: 2093.
77.
McEwenBSLasleyEN (2002) The End of Stress as We Know It, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
78.
MiechRAHauserRM (2001) Socioeconomic status (SES) and health at midlife: A comparison of educational attainment with occupation-based indicators. Annals of Epidemiology11: 75–84.
79.
MitnikPBryantVGruskyDB (2015) New Estimates of Intergenerational Mobility Using Administrative Data, Stanford: Stanford Center of Poverty and Inequality.
80.
MostellerFTukeyJW (1977) Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course in Statistics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
81.
NakaoKTreasJ (1994) Updating occupational prestige and socioeconomic scores: How the new measures measure up. In: MarsdenPV (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1994, Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, pp. 1–72.
82.
NamCB (1963) Methodology and Scores of Socioeconomic Status, Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census.
83.
NamCBPowersMG (1983) The Socioeconomic Approach To Status Measurement (With a Guide to Occupational and Socioeconomic Status Scores), Houston: Cap and Gown Press.
84.
NamCBTerrieEW (1982) Measurement of socioeconomic status from United States Census data. In: PowersMG (ed.) Measures of Socioeconomic Status: Current Issues, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 29–42.
85.
NamCBTerrieEW (1988) 1980-Based Nam-Powers Occupational Status Scores, Tallahassee, FL: Center for The Study of Population, Florida State University.
86.
NamCBTerrieEWSchmertmannCP (1994) Comparison of the 1980 Updated Duncan and Nam-Powers Occupational Scores, Tallahassee, FL: Center for the Study of Population Florida State University.
87.
National Research Council (2005) Measuring literacy: Performance levels for adults. Hauser RM, Edley C, Koenig JA, et al. (eds) Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
88.
National Research Council and Committee on National Statistics (1985) Sharing Research Data, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
89.
National Research Council, Committee on Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests and Board on Testing and Assessment (1999a) Uncommon Measures: Equivalence and Linkage among Educational Tests, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
90.
National Research Council, Committee on Embedding Common Test Items in State and District Assessments and Board on Testing and Assessment (1999b) Embedding Questions: The Pursuit of a Common Measure in Uncommon Tests. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
91.
National Research Council, Committee on Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Education Progress and Board on Testing and Assessment (1999c) Grading the Nation’s Report Card: Evaluating NAEP and Transforming the Assessment of Educational Progress, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
92.
National Research Council (1999d) High Stakes: Testing for Tracking, Promotion, and Graduation. Heubert JP and Hauser RM (eds). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
93.
National Research Council, Committee on National Statistics and Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (2000) Improving Access to and Confidentiality of Research Data: Report of a Workshop, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
94.
National Research Council, Committee on Occupational Classification and Analysis (1981) Women, Work, and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value. Treiman DJ and Hartmann HI (eds) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
95.
National Research Council, Panel on Data Access for Research Purposes and Committee on National Statistics (2005) Expanding Access to Research data: reconciling risks and opportunities, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
96.
National Research Council, Panel on Poverty and Family Assistance and Committee on National Statistics (1995) Measuring Poverty: A New Approach, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
97.
OlkinI (1990) History and goals. In: WachterKWStrafML (eds) The Future of Meta-Analysis, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 3–10.
98.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007) PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World, Paris: OECD.
99.
ReardonSF (2011) The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In: DuncanGJMurnaneRJ (eds) Whither Opportunity, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 91–116.
100.
ReardonSF (2013) The widening income achievement gap. Educational Leadership70: 10–16.
101.
ReissAJJr (1961) Occupations and Social Status, New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
102.
RogersRGHummerRANamCB (2000) Living and Dying in the USA: Behavioral, Health, and Social Differentials of Adult Mortality, San Diego: Academic Press.
103.
RogoffK (1996) The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic literature34: 647–668.
104.
RosenthalR (1994) Parametric measures of effect size. In: CooperHMHedgesLV (eds) The Handbook of Research Synthesis, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 231–244.
105.
RytinaS (1989) Life chances and the continuity of rank: An alternative interpretation of mobility magnitudes over the life cycle. American Sociological Review54: 910–928.
106.
RytinaS (1992a) Response to Hauser and Logan and Grusky and Van Rompaey. American Journal of Sociolog97: 1729–1748.
107.
RytinaS (1992b) Scaling the intergenerational continuity of occupation: Is occupational inheritance ascriptive after all?American Journal of Sociology97: 1658–1688.
108.
SalomonJATandonAMurrayCJL (2004) Comparability of self rated health: Cross sectional multi–country survey using anchoring vignettes. BMJ328: 258–263.
109.
SchumpeterJA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York, London: Harper & Brothers.
110.
SewellWHHauserRMSpringerKW (2004) As we age: The Wisconsin longitudinal study, 1957–2001. In: LeichtK (ed.) Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, London: Elsevier, pp. 3–111.
111.
ShepardLASmithMLMarionSF (1996) Failed evidence on grade retention. Psychology in the Schools33: 251–261.
112.
ShepardLASmithMLMarionSF (1998) On the success of failure: A rejoinder to Alexander. Psychology in the School35: 404–407.
113.
SiegelPM (1970) Occupational prestige in the Negro subculture. Sociological Inquiry40: 156–171.
114.
SiegelPM (1971) Prestige in the American Occupational Structure, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
115.
SingerBRyffCD (1999) Hierarchies of life histories and associated health risks. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences896: 96–115.
116.
SmithM (1943) An empirical scale of prestige status of occupations. American Sociological Review8: 185–192.
117.
StevensGFeathermanDL (1981) A revised socioeconomic index of occupational status. Social Science Research10: 364–395.
118.
StevensS (1971) Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological review78: 426–450.
119.
TreimanD (1976) A standard occupational prestige scale for use with historical data. Journal of Interdisciplinary History7: 283–304.
120.
TreimanDJ (1975) Problems of concept and measurement in the comparative study of occupational mobility. Social Science Research4: 183–230.
121.
TreimanDJ (1977) Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective, New York: Academic Press.
122.
United States National Commission on Employment and Unemployment Statistics (1979) Counting the Labor Force, Washington, DC: Supt. of Docs., US Govt Print Off.
123.
WachterKWStrafML (1990) The Future of Meta-Analysis, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
124.
WarrenJRSheridanJTHauserRM (1998) Choosing a measure of occupational standing: How useful are composite measures in analyses of gender inequality in occupational attainment?Sociological Methods and Research27: 3–76.
125.
WrightEO (1993) Typologies, scales, and class analysis: A comment on Halaby and Weakliem. American Sociological Review58: 31–34.
126.
WrightEO (1997) Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
