This article examines how the marital behaviors of Hui Muslims respond to varying residential concentrations of Hui. Specifically, the marriage patterns indicating responses to local demographic availability of marriageable Hui and adherence to two Islamic norms – universal marriage and endogamy – were explored. Marriage market conditions were measured by local concentrations of Hui and we estimate discrete-time hazard models of marital outcomes using the China 2005 1% inter-census survey. The results show that in places with higher Hui concentrations, Hui tend to have higher marriage rates, to marry earlier, and to marry more endogamously. Conditional on being married, the logged odds of exogamy over endogamy are significantly lower in places with higher Hui concentrations; nevertheless, if exogamy is treated as an alternative to being single, the coefficient of the logged odds of exogamy over being single is significantly negative only for women. This suggests coexistence and competition between the two Islamic norms. Moreover, women have consistently higher marriage rates than men, regardless of Hui concentration. This suggests that women are universally more strictly constrained by the norm of universal marriage than men are. However, men show more variation in marriage rates, suggesting that they are more responsive to changes in Hui concentrations. Men and women are equally restricted by the norm of endogamy.
Abbasi-ShavaziMJMcDonaldP (2008) Family change in Iran: Religion, revolution and the state. In: JayakodyRThorntonAAxinnWG (eds) International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives, New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 177–198.
2.
BarberJS (2004) Community social context and individualistic attitudes toward marriage. Social Psychology Quarterly64: 101–127.
3.
BlauPM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure, New York, NY: Free Press.
4.
BlauPMSchwartzJE (1997) Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
5.
BlauPMBlumTCSchwartzJE (1982) Heterogeneity and intermarriage. American Sociological Review47: 45–62.
6.
ChengSXieY (2013) Structural effect of size on interracial friendship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)110: 7165–7169.
HaiH (2010) An analysis of the causes of Hui’s population dispersion (qian xi hui zu ren kou fen bu guang fan de yuan yin) (in Chinese). Legal System and Society (Fa Zhi Yu She Hui)14: 174–175.
16.
HanY (2010) Historical migration and population change of Hui (li shi shang hui zu ren kou qian yi yu shu liang bian dong) (in Chinese). Social Sciences in Ningxia (Ning Xia She Hui Ke Xue)1: 85–88.
17.
HannumEWangMAdamsJ (2008) Urban–rural disparities in access to primary and secondary education under market reform. In: WhyteMK (ed.) One Country, Two Societies? Rural–Urban Inequality in Contemporary China, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 125–146.
18.
HarrisDROnoH (2005) How many interracial marriages would there be if all groups were of equal size in all places? A new look at national estimates of interracial marriage. Social Science Research34(1): 236–251.
19.
HuY (2012) The social and economic characteristics of the Hui people during the last three decades (jin san shi nian lai hui zu ren kou she hui jing ji te zheng fen xi) (in Chinese). Journal of Hui Muslim Minority Studies (Hui Zu Yan Jiu)4: 61–66.
20.
JayakodyRThorntonAAxinnWG (2008) International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives, New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
JenningsEABarberJS (2013) The influence of neighbors’ family size preference on progression to high parity births in rural Nepal. Studies in Family Planning44: 67–84.
22.
JokelaM (2009) Personality predicts migration within and between US states. Journal of Research in Personality43: 79–83.
23.
KalmijnM (1991) Shifting boundaries: Trends in religious and educational homogamy. American Sociological Review56: 786–800.
24.
KalmijnM (1998) Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology24: 395–421.
25.
KalmijnMVan TubergenF (2010) A comparative perspective on intermarriage: Explaining differences among national-origin groups in the United States. Demography47: 459–479.
26.
KatzJJoinerTEJrKwonP (2002) Membership in a devalued social group and emotional well-being: Developing a model of personal self-esteem, collective self-esteem, and group socialization. Sex Roles47: 419–431.
27.
KennedyRJR (1943) Premarital residential propinquity and ethnic endogamy. American Journal of Sociology48: 580–584.
28.
KhairabadiM (1982) Status of Woman in Islamic Society, Rampur, India: Maktaba Hijab.
29.
LewisSKOppenheimerVK (2000) Educational assortative mating across marriage markets: Non-Hispanic whites in the United States. Demography37: 29–40.
30.
LichterDT (1990) Delayed marriage, marital homogamy, and the mate selection process among white women. Social Science Quarterly74: 802–811.
31.
LichterDTAndersonRNHaywardMD (1995) Marriage markets and marital choice. Journal of Family Issues16: 412–431.
32.
LichterDTLeClereFBMcLaughlinDK (1991) Local marriage markets and the marital behavior of black and white women. American Journal of Sociology96: 843–867.
33.
LichterDTMcLaughlinDKKephartG (1992) Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men?American Sociological Review57: 781–799.
34.
LipmanJN (1997) Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
35.
MaJ (2000) An analysis of features of Hui’s regional distribution – Comparison with several other nationalities (hui zu ren kou fen bu de di yu te zheng jian xi – yu qi ta ji ge shao shu min zu de bi jiao) (in Chinese). Journal of Hui Muslim Minority Studies (Hui Zu Yan Jiu)4: 9–14.
36.
McCraeRRCostaPTJrde LimaMP (1999) Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology35: 466–477.
37.
MackerrasC (1998) Han-Muslim and intra-Muslim social relations in Northwestern China. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics4: 28–46.
38.
MametRJacobsonCKHeatonTB (2005) Ethnic intermarriage in Beijing and Xinjiang, China, 1990. Journal of Comparative Family Studies36: 187–204.
39.
MernissiF (1996) Women’s Rebellion and Islamic Memory, London and New York, NY: Zed Books.
40.
MertonRK (1941) Intermarriage and the social structure: Fact and theory. Psychiatry4: 361–374.
41.
MorganSPStashSSmithHL (2002) Muslim and non-Muslim differences in female autonomy and fertility: Evidence from four Asian countries. Population and Development Review28: 515–537.
42.
QianZ (1997) Breaking the racial barriers: Variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990. Demography34: 263–276.
43.
QianZLichterDT (2007) Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review72: 68–94.
44.
QianZPrestonSH (1993) Changes in American marriage, 1972 to 1987: Availability and forces of attraction by age and education. American Sociological Review58: 482–495.
45.
RaleyRK (1996) A shortage of marriageable men? A note on the role of cohabitation in black–white differences in marriage rates. American Sociological Review61: 973–983.
46.
RosenfeldMJ (2005) A critique of exchange theory in mate selection. American Journal of Sociology110: 1284–1325.
47.
RosenfeldMJ (2008) Racial, educational and religious endogamy in the United States: A comparative historical perspective. Social Forces87: 1–31.
48.
SchoenR (1983) Measuring the tightness of a marriage squeeze. Demography20: 61–78.
49.
SchoenR (1988) Modeling Multigroup Populations, New York, NY: Plenum Press.
50.
SchoenRChengYC (2006) Partner choice and the differential retreat from marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family68: 1–10.
51.
SchoenRKluegelJR (1988) The widening gap in black and white marriage rates: The impact of population composition and differential marriage propensities. American Sociological Review53: 895–907.
52.
SchoenRWooldredgeJ (1989) Marriage choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969–71 and 1979–81. Journal of Marriage and Family51: 465–481.
53.
SchoenRWooldredgeJThomasB (1989) Ethnic and educational effects on marriage choice. Social Science Quarterly70: 617–630.
54.
ThorntonA (2001) The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography38: 449–465.
55.
ThorntonA (2005) Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
ThorntonAAxinnWGXieY (2010) Marriage and Cohabitation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57.
TroyerLYountsCW (1997) Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first- and second-order expectations in determining social influence. American Journal of Sociology103: 692–732.
58.
WuFWanL (2009) The change in population distribution of Hui people from 1982 to 2005 (1982–2005 nian jian hui zu ren kou fen bu bian dong yan jiu) (in Chinese). Northwest Population (Xi Bei Ren Kou)5: 73–76.
59.
WuXTreimanD (2004) The household registration system and social stratification in China, 1955–1996. Demography41: 363–384.
60.
XieYHannumE (1996) Regional variation in earnings inequality in reform-era urban China. The American Journal of Sociology101: 950–992.
61.
XieYRaymoJMGoyetteK (2003) Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography40: 351–367.
62.
ZangX (2005) Hui Muslim – Han Chinese differences in perceptions on endogamy in urban China. Asian Ethnicity6: 51–68.
63.
ZangX (2006) Ethnic differences in neighborly relations in urban China. Asian Ethnicity7: 195–207.
64.
ZangX (2012) Islam, family life, and gender inequality in urban China, London and New York, NY: Routledge.
65.
ZengZXieY (2008) A preference–opportunity–choice framework with applications to intergroup friendship. American Journal of Sociology114: 615–648.
66.
ZhouJ (2001) Exogamy and endogamy during Hui’s formation and development (hui zu xing cheng fa zhan guo cheng zhong de zu ji zu nei tong hun) (in Chinese). Journal of Central University for Nationalities (Zhong Yang Min Zu Da Xue Xue Bao)28: 52–56.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
