Contextualized studies of gender have been published, but these studies typically compare men and women in a single context. In this study, we examined men’s expectations for women across two interpersonal contexts, dating and the workplace, with particular attention to the gender-related traits of expressiveness and instrumentality. Data were provided by eighty-seven unmarried, heterosexual young adult males. Significant differences were found for trait preference as a function of context, with young men reporting stronger preference for expressive traits in the romantic context and stronger preference for instrumental traits in the work context. Contextual differences became nonsignificant when egalitarian beliefs were added to the model. Discussion focuses on the importance of context for understanding gender.
Bem, S.L.1974. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology42:155-62.
2.
Bryant, A.N.2003. Changes in attitudes toward women’s roles: Predicting gender-role traditionalism among college students. Sex Roles48:131-42.
3.
Choi, N., and D.R. Fuqua.2003. The structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A summary report of 23 validation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement63:872-87.
4.
Crawford, M., and D. Popp.2003. Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. The Journal of Sex Research40:13-26.
5.
Dailey, D.M., and J. Rosenzweig.1988. Variations in men’s psychological sex role self-perception as a function of work, social and sexual life roles . Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy14:225-40.
6.
Deaux, K., and M. LaFrance.1998. Gender. In The handbook of social psychology, ed. D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey , 788-827. 4th ed. vol. 1, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Deaux, K., and B. Major.1987. Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review94:369-89.
8.
Echabe, A.E., and J.L.G. Castro.1999. The impact of context on gender social identities. European Journal of Social Psychology29:287-304.
9.
Fisher, T.D., and A.S. Walters.2003. Variables in addition to gender that help to explain differences in perceived sexual interest. Psychology of Men and Masculinity4:154-62.
10.
Galambos, N.L., A.C. Petersen, M. Richards, and I.B. Gitelson.1985. The attitudes toward women scale for adolescents (AWSA): A study of reliability and validity. Sex Roles13:343-56.
11.
Jome, L.M., and D.M. Tokar.1998. Dimensions of masculinity and major choice traditionality. Journal of Vocational Behavior52:120-34.
12.
Judd, C.M., D.A. Kenny, and G.H. McClelland .2001. Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods6:115-34.
13.
Mahalik, J.R., B.D. Locke, L.H. Ludlow, M.A. Diemer, R.P.J. Scott, M. Gottfried, and G. Freitas.2003. Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Journal of Men and Masculinity4:3-25.
14.
Mahalik, J.R., E.B. Morray, A. Coonerty-Femiano, L.H. Ludlow, S.M. Slattery, and A.P. Smiler.2005. Development of the conformity to feminine norms inventory. Sex Roles52:417-35.
15.
Mortimer, J.T., M. Vuolo, J. Staff, S. Wakefield, and W. Xie.2008. Tracing the timing of ‘‘career’’ acquisition in a contemporary youth cohort. Work and Occupations35:44-84.
16.
Pleck, J.H.1987. The theory of male sex-role identity: Its rise and fall, 1936 to the present. In The making of masculinities: The new men’s studies, ed., H. Brod, 21-38. Boston : Allen & Unwin.
17.
Regan, P.C., R. Durvasula, L. Howell, O. Ureno, and M. Rea.2004. Gender, ethnicity, and the developmental timing of first sexual and romantic experiences. Social Behavior and Personality32:667-76.
18.
Rosenzweig, J., and D.M. Dailey.1991. Women’s sex roles in their public and private lives. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy17:75-85.
19.
Shaffer, D.R., and R.D. Johnson.1980. Effects of occupational choice and sex-role preferences on the attractiveness of competent men and women. Journal of Personality48:505-19.
20.
Smiler, A.P.2006. Conforming to masculine norms: Evidence for validity among adult men and women. Sex Roles54:767-75.
21.
Smiler, A.P.2008. ‘‘I wanted to get to know her better’’: Adolescent boys’ dating motives, masculinity ideology, and sexual behavior . Journal of Adolescence31:17-32.
22.
Smiler, A.P., and M. Epstein. Forthcoming. Measuring gender: Options and issues. In Handbook of gender research in psychology, ed. J. C. Chrisler and D. R. McCreary.New York: Springer.
23.
Smiler, A.P., G. Kay, and B. Harris.2008. Tightening and loosening masculinity’s (k)nots: Masculinity in the Hearst press during the interwar period. Journal of Men’s Studies16:266-79.
24.
Spence, J.T., and C.E. Buckner.2000. Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify?Psychology of Women Quarterly24:44-62.
25.
Spence, J.T., and R.L. Helmreich.1978. Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
26.
Tolman, D.L., and M.V. Porche.2000. The adolescent femininity ideology scale: Development and validation of a new measure for girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly24:365-76.
27.
Tolman, D.L., R. Spencer, T. Harmon, M. Rosen-Reynoso, and M. Striepe.2004. Getting close, staying cool: Early adolescent boys’ experiences with romantic relationships. In Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood, ed., N. Way, and J. Chu, 235-55. New York: New York University press.
28.
Twenge, J.M.1997a. Attitudes toward women, 1970-1995. Psychology of Women Quarterly21:35-51.
29.
Twenge, J.M.1997b. Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles36:305-25.
30.
United States Census Bureau.2008. Estimated median age at first marriage, by sex: 1890 to the present. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/hh-fam.html. Accessed on March 2, 2009.
31.
Weisbuch, M., D. Beal, and E.C. O’Neal .1999. How masculine ought I be? Men’s masculinity and aggression. Sex Roles40:583-92.
32.
Yoder, J.D., and T.W. McDonald.1997. The generalizability and construct validity of the modern sexism scale: Some cautionary notes. Sex Roles36:655-63.
