The Humanities Institute of Universidad Panamericana, Guadalajara (Mexico), has carefully crafted its own reading canon by incorporating in to its course design a learning outcomes framework that mirrors its Christian institutional mission. The paper presents an overview of this framework and of its implementation within the University’s Gen Ed reading canon selection. It uses an excerpt of Bartolomé de las Casas’ Apology as a case example of the practice. This text is used within a course of introductory Ethics delivered to 30 different student groups per year. The criteria used in its selection and suggested practices are detailed. Overall, the text shows the value of a learning outcomes approach to text selection in a core-text-based course.
AllanJ (1996) Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education21(1): 93–108. DOI: 10.1080/03075079612331381487.
2.
ANUIES (2018) Visión y Acción 2030 Propuesta de La ANUIES Para Renovar La Educación Superior En México. Ciudad de Mexico: Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Institutos de Educación Superior.
3.
AquinasT (1920) The Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Burns Oates and Washbourne.
4.
ArumRRoksaJCookA (eds) (2016) Improving Quality in American Higher Education. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Association for Core Texts Courses (2016) Bylaws of the Association for Core Texts and Courses a Non Profit Corporation. California: Association for Core Texts Courses. Available at: https://www.coretexts.org/organization/bylaws/ (accessed 01 January 2022).
6.
BateJ (2011) The Public Value of the Humanities. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
7.
BiggsJTangC (2011) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. New York: Open University Press.
8.
Bologna Working Group on Qualifications Frameworks (2005) A Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area. Innovation. Copenhagen: Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.
9.
FIMPES (2017) Manual Para La Aplicación Del Sistema de Acreditación. Ciudad de Mexico: Federación de Instituciones Mexicanas Particulares de Educación Superior.
Fuentes NavarroMTIrigoyenJJMares CárdenasG (eds) (2010) Tendencias En Psicología Y Educación, Red Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología Educativa. Mexico: Sistema Mexicano de Investigación en Psicología.
12.
GallavaraGHreinssonEKajasteM, et al. (2008) Sedigh Zadeh M and European association for quality Assurance in higher education (ENQA). Learning Outcomes: Common Framework Different Approaches to Evaluation Learning Outcomes in the Nordic Countries. Joint Nordic Project, by the Nordic Quality Assurance Network for Higher Education (NOQA). ENQA Occasional Papers 15. Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.
13.
García-HuidobroJPérez LasserreD (2016) Bartolomé de Las Casas y la idealización de las ciudades de los indios. Scripta9(2): 157–186.
14.
GuilloryJ (1991) Canon, syllabus, list: a note on the pedagogic imaginary. Transition52: 36. DOI: 10.2307/2935123.
15.
JewettHBrooksP (2014) Humanities and Public Life. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
16.
Las CasasB (1974) In PooleS (ed) Defense of the Indians. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.
17.
Las CasasB (2003) An account, much abbreviated, of the destruction of the Indies. In KnightFW (ed) An Account, Much Abbreviated, of the Destruction of the Indies. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
MaherA (2004) Learning outcomes in higher education: implications for curriculum design and student learning. The Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism3(2): 46–54. DOI: 10.3794/johlste.32.78.
20.
MaritainJ (1943) The Rights of Man and Natural Law. Anson DC (trans.). New York: Charles Sribner’s Sons.
21.
MeltonR (1996) Learning outcomes for higher education: some key issues. British Journal of Educational Studies44(4): 409–425.
22.
MukherjeeA (2010) ‘What is a classic?’: international literary criticism and the classic question on JSTOR. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America125(4): 1026–1042. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41058302.
23.
NussbaumMC (2016) Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
OtterS (1992) Learning Outcomes in Higher Education. A Development Project Report. London: Department of Employment, Further Education Unit.
25.
PapadimaLDamroschDD’haenT (eds) (2011) The Canonical Debate Today. Paderborn: Brill.
26.
Paricio RoyoJ (2010) Un modelo de guía docente desde los resultados de aprendizaje y su evaluación. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.
27.
Pino-MontoyaJW (2019) Aportes de Bartolomé de Las Casas a La Teoría Actual de Los derechos humanos. Hallazgos17(33): 221–253. DOI: 10.15332/2422409X.5240.
28.
TegliaVM (2012) El nativo Americano En Bartolomé de Las Casas: La Proto-Etnología ‘colegida’de La Polémica. Latinoamércia. Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos54: 217247.
Vidal-MoscosoDManriquez-LópezL (2016) El docente como mediador de la comprensión lectora En universitarios. Revista de la Educación Superior45(177): 95–118.
31.
WigginsGMcTigheJ (2005) Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
