This study sheds light on the paradox of the American Christian Right historically emphasizing “character” in political leadership while reporting greater relative support for leaders like Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. We do this by re-conceptualizing views on the relationship between Christianity and state (Christian nationalism) as reflecting strength of religio-political in-group identification. Research suggests strong in-group identification both heightens demands for ethical purity while blinding individuals to their in-group’s ethical inconsistencies. Examining both sides of this equation, we predict (1) Americans most polarized on Christian nationalism will report the strongest insistence on ethical political leadership and (2) that this applies to Trump voters as well. Analyses of original, representative survey data reveal holding extreme views on Christian nationalism (for or against) is the strongest predictor Americans insist on ethical political leaders. This pattern holds for Americans who voted for Trump or Biden in 2020, or did not vote, though practically speaking, the strongest Christian nationalists are most often Trump voters. Findings suggest strong views for or against Christian nationalism reflect stronger religio-political in-group identification that may cause Americans to demand ethical purity from political leaders, even as strong Christian nationalists show greater relative support for leaders like Donald Trump.
Al-KireRosemary L.PasekMichael H.TsangJo-AnnRowattWade C.2021. “Christian No Nore: Christian Americans are Threatened by Their Impending Minority Status.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology97:104223. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104223.
2.
BakerJoseph O.PerrySamuel L.WhiteheadAndrew L.2020. “Keep America Christian (and White): Christian Nationalism, Fear of Ethnoracial Outsiders, and Intention to Vote for Donald Trump in the 2020 Presidential Election.”Sociology of Religion81(3):272–93. doi:10.1093/socrel/sraa015.
3.
BardonAdrian. 2020. The Truth about Denial: Bias and Self-Deception in Science, Politics, and Religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BennettWilliam J.1998. The Death of Outrage: Bill Clinton and the Assault on American Ideals. New York, NY: Free Press.
BrennerPhilip S.2011. “Exceptional Behavior or Exceptional Identity? Overreporting of Church Attendance in the U.S.”Public Opinion Quarterly75(1):19–41. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfq068.
7.
BroerenZachary D.DjupePaul A.2024. “The Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate of Christian Nationalism: Experimental Evidence about the Implementation of the Rule of Law.”Politics and Religion17(1):40–57. doi:10.1017/S1755048323000305.
DjupePaul A.LewisAndrew R.SokheyAnand E.2023. The Full Armor of God: The Mobilization of Christian Nationalism in American Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
DurkheimEmile. [1912] 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York, NY: Free Press.
17.
EpleyNicholasConverseBenjamin A.DelboscAlexaMonteleoneGeorge A.CacioppoJohn T.2009. “Believers’ Estimates of God’s Beliefs are More Egocentric than Estimates of Other People’s Beliefs.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(51):21533–38. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908374106.
18.
FalwellJerry Sr. 1980. Listen, America!New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
19.
FranzenAaron B.GriebelJenna. 2013. “Understanding a Cultural Identity: The Confluence of Education, Politics, and Religion within the American Concept of Biblical Literalism.”Sociology of Religion74(4):521–543. doi: 10.1093/socrel/srt051.
GorskiPhilip S.PerrySamuel L.2022. The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
GrahamJesseHaidtJonathan. 2010. “Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals into Moral Communities.”Personality and Social Psychology Review14(1):140–50. doi:10.1177/1088868309353415.
24.
GreeneJoshua. 2013. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York, NY: Penguin.
HaidtJonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York, NY: Vintage.
28.
HewstoneMiles. 1990. “The ‘Ultimate Attribution Error'? A Review of the Literature on Intergroup Causal Attribution.”European Journal of Social Psychology20(4):311–335. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420200404.
29.
HildrethJohn Angus D.GinoFrancescaBazermanMax. 2016. “Blind Loyalty? When Group Loyalty Makes Us See Evil or Engage in It.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes132:16–36. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.12.001.
JeffressRobert. 2016. Twilight’s Last Gleaming: How America’s Last Days Can Be Your Best Days. Franklin, TN: Worthy Publishing.
32.
LaHayeTim. 1982. The Battle for the Family. Old Tappan, NJ: Revell.
33.
MargolisMichele F.2022. “Reversing the Causal Arrow: Politics’ Influence on Religious Choices.”Political Psychology43:261–90. doi:10.1111/pops.12829.
34.
McDanielEric L.NooruddinIrfanShortleAllyson F.2022. The Everyday Crusade: Christian Nationalism in American Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
MillsC. Wright. 1940. “Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive.”American Sociological Review5(6):904–13.
MunsonZiad W.2010. The Making of Pro-Life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
O’DonnellS. Jonathan. 2020. “The Deliverance of the Administrative State: Deep State Conspiracism, Charismatic Demonology, and the Post-Truth Politics of American Christian Nationalism.”Religion50(4): 696–719. doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2020.1810817.
PerrySamuel L.2024. Religion for Realists: Why We All Need the Scientific Study of Religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44.
PerrySamuel L.DavisJoshua T.2024. “What Makes Politicians “Religious”? How Identity Congruence Shapes Religious Evaluations.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion63(1):137–59. doi:10.1111/jssr.12895.
45.
PerrySamuel L.GrubbsJoshua B.SchleiferCyrus. 2024. “In Our Own Image: How Americans Rate Jesus on the Ideological Spectrum.”Review of Religious Research66(2):157–176. doi:10.1177/0034673X241239570.
46.
PerrySamuel L.Riccardi-SwartzSarahDavisJoshua T.GrubbsJoshua B.2023. “The Religious Right and Russia: Christian Nationalism and Americans’ Views on Russia and Vladimir Putin Before and After the Ukrainian Invasion.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion62(2):439–50. doi:10.1111/jssr.12838.
47.
PerrySamuel L.WhiteheadAndrew L.GrubbsJoshua B.2022. “The Devil That You Know: Christian Nationalism and Intent to Change One’s Voting Behavior for or Against Trump in 2020.”Politics and Religion15(2):229–46. doi:10.1017/S1755048321000407.
RossLee D.LelkesYphtachRussellAlexandra G.2012. “How Christians Reconcile Their Personal Political Views and the Teachings of Their Faith: Projection as a Means of Dissonance Reduction.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109(10):3616–22. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117557109.
WalkerBrooklynHaider-MarkelDonald P.2024. “Fear and Loathing: How Demographic Change Affects Support for Christian Nationalism.”Public Opinion Quarterly88(2):382–407. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae005.
60.
WhiteheadAndrew L.PerrySamuel L.2020. Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
WhiteheadAndrew L.PerrySamuel L.BakerJoseph O.2018. “Make America Christian Again: Christian Nationalism and Voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election.”Sociology of Religion79(2):147–71. doi:10.1093/socrel/srx070.
62.
WildeMelissaGlassmanLindsay. 2016. “How Complex Religion Can Improve Our Understanding of American Politics.”Annual Review of Sociology42:407–25. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074420.
63.
WilliamsDaniel K.2010. God’s Own Party: The Making of The Christian Right. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
