This study employs an expert--novice research design to examine how five Latter-day Saint scholars and five Latter-day Saint youths read Scripture. Qualitative analyses of semi-structured interviews and verbal protocols point to six practices participants used: theorizing scriptural possibilities, connecting to Scripture, applying Scripture, managing Scripture-reading uncertainties, using self-contained scriptural resources, and situating Scripture in historical contexts. Use of these practices demonstrates the different ways experts and novices read Scripture and where and how their differences are manifest. Findings build a fuller explanation of the nature of Scripture-reading practice and raise questions for religious education research and practice across Christian traditions.
American Academy of Religion (2020) AAR Religious Literacy Guidelines: What U.S. College Graduates Need to Understand about Religion. Atlanta: Author.
2.
BarlowPL (2013) Mormons and the Bible: The Place of Latter-day Saints in American Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BushmanRL (2005) Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling. New York: Knopf.
4.
ChadwickBATopBLMcClendonRJ (2010) Shield of Faith: The Power of Religion in the Lives of LDS Youth and Young Adults. Provo, UT: Religious Studies Center.
5.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (2013) The Book of Mormon. Salt Lake City: Author.
6.
CopeEM (2020) Compartmentalizing faith: how three first-semester undergraduates manage Evangelical identities in academic writing. Research in the Teaching of English54(4): 367–391.
7.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: Sage.
8.
de GrootAD (1946/1965) Thoughts and Choice in Chess. The Hague: Mouton.
9.
DukeNKPearsonPDStrachanSLBillmanAK (2011) Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In: SamuelsSJFarstrupAE (eds) What Research Has to Say about Reading Instruction. Newark, DE: International Literacy Association, pp. 51–93.
10.
EricssonKASimonHA (1993) Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
GuerraJCFarrM (2002) Writing on the margins: the spiritual and autobiographical discourses of two Mexicanas in Chicago. In: HullGSchultzK (eds) School’s Out!: Bridging Out-of-School Literacies with Classroom Practice. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 96–123.
GuthrieJAWigfieldAHumenickNPerencevichKTaboadaABarbosaP (2006) Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research99(4): 232–245.
14.
HeathSB (1983) Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
IsraelSE (2015) Verbal Protocols in Literacy Research: Nature of Global Reading Development. London: Routledge.
16.
JuzwikMM (2014) American Evangelical biblicism as literate practice: a critical review. Reading Research Quarterly49(3): 335–349.
17.
LarkinJHMcDermottJSimonDSimonH (1980) Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science208: 140–156.
18.
MacGillivrayLArdellALCurwenMS (2011) Libraries, churches, and schools: the literacy lives of mothers and children in a homeless shelter. Urban Education45(2): 221–245.
19.
MooreDL (2007) Overcoming Religious Illiteracy: A Cultural Studies Approach to the Study of Religion in Secondary Education. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
20.
NewellASimonHA (1972) Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
PattonMQ (2015) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
22.
PearceLDDentonML (2011) A Faith of Their Own: Stability and Change in the Religiosity of American’s Adolescents. New York: Oxford.
23.
PeskinJ (1998) Constructing meaning when reading poetry: an expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction16(3): 235–263.
24.
PovedaDCanoAPalomares-ValeraM (2005) Religious genres, entextualization and literacy in Gitano children. Language in Society34: 87–115.
25.
PressleyMAfflerbachPP (1995) Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
PressleyMAllingtonRL (2015) Reading Instruction that Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching. New York: Guilford.
27.
ProtheroS (2007) Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know – and Doesn’t. New York: HarperCollins.
28.
ProtheroSKerbyLR (2015) The irony of religious illiteracy in the USA. In: DinhamAFrancisM (eds) Religious Literacy in Policy and Practice. Great Britain: Policy Press, pp. 55–76.
29.
RackleyED (2014) Scripture-based discourses of Latter-day Saint and Methodist youth. Reading Research Quarterly49(4): 417–435.
30.
RaineyEC (2015) What does it mean to read literary works? The literacy practices, epistemologies, and instructional approaches of literary scholars and high school English language arts teachers. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, USA.
31.
ReyesCC (2009) El libro do recuerdos [book of memories]: a Latina student’s exploration of self and religion in public school. Research in the Teaching of English43(3): 263–285.
32.
ReynoldsTRushLS (2017) Experts and novices reading literature: an analysis of disciplinary literacy in English Language Arts. Literacy Research and Instruction56(3): 199–216.
33.
RouetJ-FFavartMBrittAPerfettiCA (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: effects of disciplinary expertise. Cognition and Instruction15: 85–106.
34.
SaldañaJ (2016) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles: Sage.
35.
SchraagenJM (2006) Task analysis. In: EricssonKACharnessNFeltovichPJHoffmanRR (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–201.
36.
SeidmanI (2013) Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
ShanahanCShanahanTMisischiaC (2011) Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: history, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research43(4): 393–429.
38.
ShreinerTL (2014) Using historical knowledge to reason about contemporary political issues: an expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction32(4): 313–352.
39.
SkerrettA (2020) “Real religion”: the roles of knowledge, dialogue, and sense-making in coming to a faith. In: JuzwikMMStoneJCBurkeKJDavilaD (eds) Legacies of Christian Languaging and Literacies in American Education: Perspectives on English Language Arts Curriculum, Teaching, and Learning. New York: Routledge, pp. 21–36.
40.
SkerrettA (2014) Religious literacies in a secular literacy classroom. Reading Research Quarterly49(2): 233–250.
41.
SmithC (2005) Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers. New York: Oxford.
42.
SmithC (2009) Souls in Transition: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of Emerging Adults. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
WattJFairfieldSL (2008) Religious and sacred literacies. In: SpoklyBHultFM (eds) The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
44.
WiesnerEWeinbergAFulmerEFBarrJ (2020) The role of textual features, background knowledge, and disciplinary expertise in reading a calculus textbook. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education51(2): 204–233.
45.
WineburgSS (1991) Historical problem solving: a study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documents and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology83(1): 73–87.
46.
WongACKSweatAGardnerR (2016) Pedagogy of the spirit: comparing Evangelical and Latter-day Saint youth self-reported in-class spiritual experiences. Religious Education112(5): 569–584.
47.
WrightA (2016) Religious Education and Critical Realism: Knowledge, Reality and Religious Literacy. New York: Routledge.
48.
YinRK (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Method. Los Angeles: Sage.
