Informed by reading comprehension and comprehension strategies research, this study explores the Scripture-reading practices of four Methodist youths. Several rounds of inductive thematic analyses of Scripture-reading protocols revealed a set of five strategic reading practices youths used to understand Scripture. They drew inferences about the Bible’s possible meanings, made connections between the Bible and other texts, made personal comments, recognized when they were confused, and applied prior knowledge. Identifying and naming these five strategic practices can deepen our understanding of the nature of Methodist youths’ Scripture-reading practices and raise important questions about the relationships among youth, religion, and literacy.
DaveyB (1983) Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading27: 44–47.
5.
DruckmanDBjorkRA (1994) Illusions of comprehension, competence, and remembering. In: DruckmanDBjorkRA (eds) Learning, Remembering, Believing: Enhanced Human Performance, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 57–82.
6.
DukeNKCarlisleJ (2015) The development of comprehension. In: KamilMLPearsonPDMojeEBAfflerbachPP (eds) Handbook of Reading Research, New York: Routledge, pp. 199–228.
7.
DukeNKPearsonPDStrachanSLBillmanAK (2011) Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In: SamuelsSJFarstrupAE (eds) What Research Has to Say about Reading Instruction, Newark, DE: International Literacy Association, pp. 51–93.
8.
EakleJA (2007) Literacy spaces of a Christian faith-based school. Reading Research Quarterly42(2): 472–510.
9.
FieldingLPearsonPD (1994) Reading comprehension: What works?Educational Leadership51(5): 62–67.
10.
GuthrieJ (2004) Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research36(1): 1–29.
11.
GuthrieJAWigfieldAHumenickNPerencevichKTaboadaABarbosaP (2006) Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research99(4): 232–245.
12.
HarveySGoudvisA (2017) Strategies that Work: Teaching Comprehension for Understanding, Engagement, and Building Knowledge, Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
13.
HildenKPressleyM (2011) Verbal reports of reading. In: DukeNKMalletteMH (eds) Literacy Research Methodologies, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 427–440.
14.
KeeneEOZimmermanS (1997) Mosaic of Thought: Teaching Comprehension in a Reader’s Workshop, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15.
KintschWKintschE (2005) Comprehension. In: ParisSGStahlSA (eds) Children’s Reading Comprehension and Assessment, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 71–92.
16.
LeeCDSpratleyA (2010) Reading in the Disciplines: The Challenges of Adolescent Literacy, New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
17.
MaxwellJA (2013) Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
Palinscar AS (2007) Reciprocal Teaching 1982 to 2006: The role of research, theory, and representation in the transformation of instructional research. In 56th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
19.
PearsonPDDoleJA (1987) Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction. Elementary School Journal88: 151–165.
20.
PikeMA (2007) Transactional reading as spiritual investment. Journal of Education and Christian Belief11(2): 83–94.
21.
PressleyM (1976) Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology68: 355–359.
22.
PressleyM (2002) Comprehension strategies instruction. In: BlockCCPressleyM (eds) Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 11–27.
23.
PressleyMAfflerbachPP (1995) Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
PressleyMAllingtonRL (2015) Reading Instruction that Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching, New York: Guilford.
25.
RackleyED (2014) Scripture-based discourses of Latter-day Saint and Methodist youth. Reading Research Quarterly49(4): 417–435.
26.
RackleyED (2015) How young Latter-day Saints read the Scriptures: Five profiles. Religious Educator16(2): 129–147.
27.
RackleyED (2016) Religious youths’ motivations for reading complex, religious texts. Teachers College Record118(11): 1–50.
28.
RackleyED (2017) Scripture reading practices of Methodist youth. Religious Education112(2): 136–148.
29.
RackleyEDKwokM (2016) ‘Long, boring, and tedious’: Youths’ experiences with complex, religious texts. Literacy50(2): 55–61.
30.
RAND Reading Study Group (2002) Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
31.
ReyesCC (2009) El Libro de Recuerdos [Book of Memories]: A Latina student’s exploration of self and religion in public school. Research in the Teaching of English43(3): 263–285.
32.
RobinsonFP (1961) Study skills for superior students in secondary school. The Reading Teacher15(1): 29–37.
33.
RosenblattLM (1938/1968) Literature as Exploration, London: Heinemann.
34.
RosenblattLM (1985) Viewpoints: Transaction versus interaction – A terminological rescue operation. Research in the Teaching of English19(1): 96–107.
35.
RosenblattLM (2013) The transactional theory of reading and writing. In: AlvermannDEUnrauNJRuddellRB (eds) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, Newark: International Reading Association, pp. 923–956.
36.
SarroubLK (2002) In-betweenness: Religion and conflicting visions of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly37(2): 130–148.
37.
SchoenbachRGreenleafCMurphyL (2012) Reading for Understanding: How Reading Apprenticeship Improves Disciplinary Learning in Secondary and College Classrooms, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
SchwanenflugelPJKnappNF (2016) The Psychology of Reading: Theory and Applications, New York: Guilford Press.
39.
SkerrettA (2013) Religious literacies in a secular literacy classroom. Reading Research Quarterly49(2): 233–250.
40.
SkerrettA (2014) “Closer to God”: Following religion across the lifeworlds of an urban youth. Urban Education51(8): 964–990.
41.
SmithCDentonML (2005) Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers, New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
SullivanJ (2007) Understanding and overstanding: Religious reading in historical perspective. Journal of Education and Christian Belief11(2): 25–38.
43.
WattJMFairfieldSL (2010) Religious and sacred literacies. In: SpolkyBHultFM (eds) The Handbook of Educational Linguistics, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 355–366.
44.
WilkinsonIAGSonEH (2015) A dialogic turn in research on learning and teaching to comprehend. In: KamilMLPearsonPDMojeEBAfflerbachPP (eds) Handbook of Reading Research, New York: Routledge, pp. 359–387.
45.
WyattDPressleyMEl-DinaryPBSteinSEvansPBrownR (1993) Comprehension strategies, worth and credibility monitoring, and evaluations: Cold and hot cognition when experts read professional articles that are important to them. Learning and Individual Differences5(1): 49–72.
